High tibial osteotomy alone does not decrease medial meniscus extrusion in the setting of medial meniscus posterior root tear: A cadaveric study.

PURPOSE: This study investigated whether inducing valgus alignment and shifting the load laterally through high tibial osteotomy (HTO) alone decreases the extent of medial meniscus extrusion (MME) in the setting of medial meniscus posterior root tear(MMPRT) using ultrasound evaluation. METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen human cadaveric knee specimens were tested using a six-degree-of-freedom robotic testing system and ultrasound. Each specimen was tested in five conditions: (1) intact, (2) MMPRT, (3) medial meniscus repair (MMR), (4) combined medial open-wedge HTO + MMR, and (5) HTO + MMPRT. Measurements were obtained over the medial collateral ligament (MCL, central image) and posterior to the MCL (posterior image) with a 250 N axial load at 0°, 30°, and 90° of knee flexion. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-factor repeated-measures ANOVA. RESULTS: MME was significantly greater in HTO + MMPRT(0°: 2.44 ± 0.41mm, 30°: 2.47 ± 0.37mm, 90°: 2.41 ± 0.28mm) than HTO + MMR in central images (mean difference +0.83 mm, p < .001). No significant difference was found between HTO + MMPRT and MMPRT in MME . MMR had significantly less MME than MMPRT (mean difference -0.58mm, p < .001, posterior image at 0°and central image at 90°, p=.002). HTO + MMR showed significantly less MME than MMR alone at 30° and 90° knee flexion in central image (30°: -0.38 ± 0.05mm, 90°: -0.45 ± 0.06mm, p < .001) and 90° knee flexion in posterior image (-0.38 ± 0.08mm, p = .004). CONCLUSION: HTO alone did not decrease MME in the setting of MMPRT, while MMR alone decrease MME after MMPRT. Additionally, HTO + MMR decreases MME aftrer MMPRT compared to MMR alone, although the clinical significance was uncertain. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings of this study provide clinicians with valuable insights for improving MME. HTO alone does not decrease MME in cases of MMPRT.

Satisfactory outcomes after one-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using rectangular tunnel technique.

PURPOSE: One-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with the anatomic rectangular tunnel (RT) technique using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) grafts results in anatomically precise tunnel placement and secure graft fixation. This study evaluated knee joint laxity and clinical outcomes in terms of femoral tunnel overlap. It was hypothesised that there would be no significant differences in knee joint laxity or clinical outcomes regardless of femoral tunnel overlap. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2021, a single surgeon conducted 196 one-stage revision ACLRs with the RT technique using BTB grafts. Patients were divided based on the presence of femoral tunnel overlap. Knee joint laxity was evaluated using the Lachman test, pivot shift test, and side-to-side difference measured with a KT-1000 arthrometer. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Lysholm score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Knee Examination Form 2000. Knee joint laxity and clinical outcomes were compared between groups after a median follow-up of 2.5 years (range 2.0-8.0). RESULTS: The study included 30 and 73 patients in the overlap and non-overlap groups, respectively. No significant differences were observed in the results of the Lachman test, pivot shift test, or KT-1000 arthrometer as well as in the Lysholm, KOOS, or IKDC scores between the two groups. Based on the IKDC scores, all patients were graded as normal or nearly normal. CONCLUSION: One-stage revision ACLR with the RT technique using BTB grafts improved knee joint laxity and had favourable clinical outcomes regardless of femoral tunnel overlap. To achieve optimal results in one-stage revision ACLR, it is crucial to create a tunnel within the anatomical attachment area and ensure proper graft fixation and tensioning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Patient-reported outcome measures after mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty were better than medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy in early elderly patients with severe osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Many countries are faced with aging populations. However, few studies have directly compared the clinical outcomes of medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) and mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MB-UKA) in early elderly patients. Thus, we aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes after OWHTO and MB-UKA in early elderly patients with similar demographics and osteoarthritis (OA) severity. METHODS: Three hundred and fifteen OWHTO and 142 MB-UKA were performed for medial compartment OA by a single surgeon between August 2009 and April 2020. Among them, patients aged 65-74 years with more than two years of follow-up were enrolled. The patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including visual analog scale (VAS) score and Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure (JKOM) score, were compared between both procedures preoperatively and at the last follow-up. The PROMs were compared between the groups by Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) OA grades. RESULTS: Seventy-three OWHTO and 37 MB-UKA patients were enrolled. No significant differences were found in the distribution of age, gender, follow-up period, body mass index, and Tegner activity scale between the two procedures. The postoperative PROMs in patients with K-L grade 4 were better after MB-UKA than OWHTO at the mean follow-up of 5 years. No significant difference was found in PROMs in patients with K-L grades 2 and 3. CONCLUSION: ThePROMs after MB-UKA were superior to that after OWHTO in early elderly patients with severe OA. In particular, pain relief was better after MB-UKA than OWHTO with severe OA. Meanwhile, no significant difference in PROMs was found with moderate OA patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IVprospective cohort study.

Bioabsorbable interference screws can be used with less tunnel widening in anatomic rectangular tunnel anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a bone-patellar-tendon-bone graft.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate postoperative tunnel widening after rectangular tunnel bone-patellar-tendon-bone graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using newer-generation bioabsorbable interference screws. METHODS: Forty-six patients who had undergone primary rectangular tunnel bone-patellar-tendon-bone graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using MILAGRO bioabsorbable interference screws (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN, USA) for femoral fixation and for whom computed tomography was performed at two weeks and one year postoperatively were included in this prospective study. To assess the tunnel widening, the cross-sectional area of the femoral tunnel aperture (compared between two weeks and one year postoperatively) was assessed using computed tomography. Cyst formation, postoperative screw breakage, screw migration, and graft migration were also evaluated using computed tomography one year postoperatively. RESULTS: Mean tunnel widening was 1.9%, and the cross-sectional area of the femoral tunnel aperture was not significantly different between two weeks and one year postoperatively. Postoperative cyst formation, screw breakage, screw migration, and graft migration were not observed in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: After rectangular tunnel bone-patellar-tendon-bone graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bioabsorbable interference screws for femoral fixation, tunnel widening was not observed via computed tomography analysis at two weeks and one year postoperatively.

Varus kinematics at knee flexion affect clinical outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Intraoperative navigation-based kinematics evaluation.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of navigation-based varus or axial rotational alignment through knee flexion on patient reported outcomes or the maximum flexion angle of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from 46 knees that underwent UKA for medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. An image-free knee navigation system was used in all cases, and intraoperative varus and axial rotational alignment at every knee flexion angle were recorded before and after implantation. All patients completed the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at final follow-up. By varus or valgus at 0° knee flexion, the knees were subdivided into two groups (varus at 0° group, varus above the median value; neutral at 0° group, varus equal to or below the median value). By varus or valgus at 90° knee flexion, patients were similarly subdivided into two groups (varus at 90° group; neutral at 90° group). The maximum knee flexion angle was measured 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: There were no differences in the KOOS between the neutral at 0° group and the varus at 0° group. However, the KOOS activity score (79 ± 17 vs 69 ± 16, p = 0.02) and the KOOS total score (72 ± 17 vs 65 ± 15, p = 0.03) of the neutral at 90° group were better than those of the varus at 90° group. The alignment and the maximum knee flexion angle 3 months after surgery were not correlated. CONCLUSION: Varus at 0° knee flexion and axial rotational alignment did not affect the clinical outcomes of UKA. Patient reported outcomes was better for the neutral knees with less varus at 90° knee flexion than for varus knees.