RESUMO
Anhydrous ammonia is a commonly used chemicals that are found in fertilizer, refrigeration, and in other occupational environments. Lung damage because of inhalation of ammonia can be devastating, producing debilitating lung disease and can ultimately lead to death. This is the case of a 41-year-old male, previously healthy, Jehovah's Witness, who was working at a poultry plant facility when an explosion occurred exposing him to toxic levels of anhydrous ammonia. Our patient developed end-stage lung disease after sustaining a severe ammonia inhalation injury. Despite aggressive pulmonary rehabilitation, the patient continued to deteriorate, and his only option for a chance at improved quality of life was a double-lung transplant. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a bloodless lung transplantation for inhalational lung injury in the literature. Further study is needed to better understand the effects of ammonia on lung physiology in order to better manage and treat patients who develop acute and chronic lung complications after exposure.
Assuntos
Acidentes de Trabalho , Hidróxido de Amônia/toxicidade , Queimaduras por Inalação/complicações , Lesão Pulmonar/etiologia , Lesão Pulmonar/cirurgia , Adulto , Agricultura , Queimaduras por Inalação/etiologia , Queimaduras por Inalação/fisiopatologia , Progressão da Doença , Explosões , Seguimentos , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Testemunhas de Jeová , Lesão Pulmonar/fisiopatologia , Transplante de Pulmão/métodos , Masculino , Qualidade de Vida , Doenças Raras , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: An evidence-based teamwork system, Team-STEPPS, was implemented in an academic medical center's pediatric and surgical ICUs. METHODS: A multidisciplinary change team of unit- and department-based leaders was formed to champion the initiative; develop a customized action plan for implementation; train frontline staff; and identify process, team outcome, and clinical outcome objectives for the intervention. The evaluation consisted of interviews with key staff, teamwork observations, staff surveys, and clinical outcome data. RESULTS: All PICU, SICU, and respiratory therapy staff received TeamSTEPPS training. Staff reported improved experience of teamwork posttraining and evaluated the implementation as effective. Observed team performance significantly improved for all core areas of competency at 1 month postimplementation and remained significantly improved for most of the core areas of competency at 6 and 12 months postimplementation. Survey data indicated improvements in staff perceptions of teamwork and communication openness in both units. From pre- to posttraining, the average time for placing patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) decreased significantly. The average duration of adult surgery rapid response team events was 33% longer at postimplementation versus pre-implementation. The rate of nosocomial infections at postimplementation was below the upper control limit for seven out of eight months in both the PICU and the SICU. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a customized 2.5-hour version of the TeamSTEPPS training program in two areas--the PICU and SICU--that had demonstrated successful ability to innovate suggests that the training was successful.
Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/normas , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica/normas , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Gestão da Segurança/normas , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Adulto , Criança , Cuidados Críticos/organização & administração , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/normas , Equipe de Respostas Rápidas de Hospitais/organização & administração , Equipe de Respostas Rápidas de Hospitais/normas , Humanos , Capacitação em Serviço/organização & administração , Capacitação em Serviço/normas , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica/organização & administração , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Entrevistas como Assunto , Observação , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/métodos , Gestão da Segurança/organização & administração , Fatores de Tempo , Recursos HumanosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To examine physician practice in, and the costs of, prescribing inhaled bronchodilators to mechanically ventilated patients who do not have obstructive lung disease. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study at 2 medical intensive care units at 2 tertiary-care academic medical centers, over a 6-month period. Included were the patients who required > or = 24 hours of mechanical ventilation but did not have obstructive lung disease. Excluded were patients who had obstructive lung disease and/or who had undergone > 24 hours of mechanical ventilation outside the study intensive care units. RESULTS: Of the 206 patients included, 74 (36%) were prescribed inhaled bronchodilators without clear indication. Sixty-five of those 74 patients received both albuterol and ipratropium bromide, usually within the first 3 days of intubation (58 patients). Patients prescribed bronchodilators were more hypoxemic; their mean P(aO(2))/F(IO(2)) ratio was lower (188 mm Hg versus 238 mm Hg, p = 0.004), and they were more likely to have pneumonia (53% vs 33%, p = 0.007). The mean extra cost for bronchodilators was 449.35 dollars per patient. Between the group that did receive bronchodilators and the group that did not, there was no significant difference in the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia, tracheostomy, or mortality. The incidence of tachyarrhythmias was similar (15% vs 22%, p = 0.25). CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of mechanically ventilated patients without obstructive lung disease received inhaled bronchodilators.