Use of the oral beta blocker bisoprolol to reduce the rate of exacerbation in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a randomised controlled trial (BICS).

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with significant morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. Beta blockers are well-established drugs widely used to treat cardiovascular conditions. Observational studies consistently report that beta blocker use in people with COPD is associated with a reduced risk of COPD exacerbations. The bisoprolol in COPD study (BICS) investigates whether adding bisoprolol to routine COPD treatment has clinical and cost-effective benefits. A sub-study will risk stratify participants for heart failure to investigate whether any beneficial effect of bisoprolol is restricted to those with unrecognised heart disease. METHODS: BICS is a pragmatic randomised parallel group double-blind placebo-controlled trial conducted in UK primary and secondary care sites. The major inclusion criteria are an established predominant respiratory diagnosis of COPD (post-bronchodilator FEV1 < 80% predicted, FEV1/FVC < 0.7), a self-reported history of ≥ 2 exacerbations requiring treatment with antibiotics and/or oral corticosteroids in a 12-month period since March 2019, age ≥ 40 years and a smoking history ≥ 10 pack years. A computerised randomisation system will allocate 1574 participants with equal probability to intervention or control groups, stratified by centre and recruitment in primary/secondary care. The intervention is bisoprolol (1.25 mg tablets) or identical placebo. The dose of bisoprolol/placebo is titrated up to a maximum of 4 tablets a day (5 mg bisoprolol) over 4-7 weeks depending on tolerance to up-dosing of bisoprolol/placebo-these titration assessments are completed by telephone or video call. Participants complete the remainder of the 52-week treatment period on the final titrated dose (1, 2, 3, 4 tablets) and during that time are followed up at 26 and 52 weeks by telephone or video call. The primary outcome is the total number of participant reported COPD exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids and/or antibiotics during the 52-week treatment period. A sub-study will risk stratify participants for heart failure by echocardiography and measurement of blood biomarkers. DISCUSSION: The demonstration that bisoprolol reduces the incidence of exacerbations would be relevant not only to patients and clinicians but also to healthcare providers, in the UK and globally. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current controlled trials ISRCTN10497306 . Registered on 16 August 2018.

Tunable Surface Repellency Maintains Stemness and Redox Capacity of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) hold great promise for regenerative medicine due to their multipotent differentiation capacity and immunomodulatory capabilities. Substantial research has elucidated mechanisms by which extracellular cues regulate hMSC fate decisions, but considerably less work has addressed how material properties can be leveraged to maintain undifferentiated stem cells. Here, we show that synthetic culture substrates designed to exhibit moderate cell-repellency promote high stemness and low oxidative stress-two indicators of naïve, healthy stem cells-in commercial and patient-derived hMSCs. Furthermore, the material-mediated effect on cell behavior can be tuned by altering the molar percentage (mol %) and/or chain length of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), the repellant block linked to hydrophobic poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) in the copolymer backbone. Nano- and angstrom-scale characterization of the cell-material interface reveals that PEG interrupts the adhesive PCL domains in a chain-length-dependent manner; this prevents hMSCs from forming mature focal adhesions and subsequently promotes cell-cell adhesions that require connexin-43. This study is the first to demonstrate that intrinsic properties of synthetic materials can be tuned to regulate the stemness and redox capacity of hMSCs and provides new insight for designing highly scalable, programmable culture platforms for clinical translation.

Effects of intranasal salmeterol and fluticasone given alone and in combination in persistent allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: ß(2)-Agonists have previously been shown to be effective inhibitors of mediator release from airway mucosal mast cells. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of intranasal salmeterol and fluticasone propionate alone and in combination on the response to nasal adenosine monophosphate (AMP) challenge to assess mast cell activation. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with persistent allergic rhinitis completed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-way crossover trial. They received once daily treatment with placebo, salmeterol, 50 µg, fluticasone propionate, 500 µg, or fluticasone propionate and salmeterol combination, 500/50 µg, delivered via an antistatic spacer with nasal adapter for 1 week each, with trough measurements being made 12 hours after the first and last dose. The primary outcome was the maximum percentage decrease in peak nasal inspiratory flow after nasal AMP challenge. RESULTS: For the primary outcome there was significant protection after single and long-term dosing with fluticasone alone and fluticasone-salmeterol combination, whereas salmeterol alone only afforded protection after the first dose. Fluticasone-salmeterol combination and fluticasone but not salmeterol conferred significant chronic dosing effects on secondary outcomes of nasal symptoms and disease-specific quality of life. There was no potentiation of the response to fluticasone by salmeterol on any outcomes when given in combination. CONCLUSION: Chronic dosing with fluticasone but not salmeterol confers anti-inflammatory activity against nasal AMP challenge, but there was no potentiation of fluticasone when given in combination with salmeterol. Thus, salmeterol may not be an effective treatment for use in allergic rhinitis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01388595.

The impact of tiotropium on mortality and exacerbations when added to inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting ß-agonist therapy in COPD.

BACKGROUND: Tiotropium has been shown to improve lung function, quality of life, and exacerbations and reduce mortality when compared with placebo in COPD. It remains unclear whether benefits are seen when tiotropium is used in conjunction with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) plus long-acting ß-agonists (LABAs). METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using a National Health Service database of patients with COPD in Tayside, Scotland, between 2001 and 2010 that is linked with databases regarding hospital admissions, pharmacy prescriptions, and death registries. The impact of the addition of tiotropium (Tio) to ICS + LABA therapy on all-cause mortality, hospital admissions for respiratory disease, and emergency oral corticosteroid bursts was evaluated. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated by Cox regression after inclusion of the following covariates: cardiovascular and respiratory disease, diabetes, smoking, age, sex, and deprivation index. RESULTS: A total of 1,857 patients were given ICS + LABA + Tio, and 996 were given ICS + LABA. Mean follow-up was 4.65 years. The adjusted HR for all-cause mortality for ICS + LABA + Tio vs ICS + LABA was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.57-0.75; P < .001). Adjusted HRs for hospital admissions and oral corticosteroid bursts were 0.85 (95% CI, 0.73-0.99; P = .04) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.63-0.80; P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that the addition of tiotropium to ICSs and LABA therapy may confer benefits in reducing all-cause mortality, hospital admissions, and oral corticosteroid bursts in patients with COPD. Triple therapy is widely used in the real-life management of COPD, with only limited scientific support. The study supports the use of triple therapy in COPD and provides a platform for randomized controlled trials specifically addressing this topic.

Proof of concept study to evaluate step-down therapy with inhaled corticosteroid alone or additive therapy on surrogate inflammatory markers in asthma.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: Much of the focus of inflammatory surrogates and airway challenges in asthma has been directed towards success of therapy and diagnosis. Few have considered them in the context of guiding dose reduction once sufficient control has been achieved. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: Adenosine monophosphate (AMP) as an indirect bronchial airway challenge, together with non invasive inflammatory surrogate measures were not found to be clinically useful when guiding therapy in a group of asthmatic patients through step 3-4 in British Thoracic Society asthma guidelines. However, they may still play a role in predicting failure of individual step-down. AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the usefulness of inflammatory surrogates in determining step-down therapy in asthma. METHODS: AMP challenge, serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) and pulmonary function tests were recorded. Subjects were divided into two groups following high dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS): Group A fixed dose ICS vs. Group B ICS alone and in combination with add on therapies. RESULTS: No differences were seen in inflammatory measures between fixed dose ICS and reduced dose ICS alone or with combination therapies. CONCLUSIONS: AMP challenge conferred no additional benefit in guiding step-down therapy. The role of inflammatory surrogates may still play a role in predicting failed step-down on an individual basis.