A phase II randomized trial of talimogene laherparepvec oncolytic immunotherapy with or without radiotherapy for patients with cutaneous metastases from solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous metastases (CMs) are a manifestation of advanced cancer and can be treated with oncolytic immunotherapy. Laboratory studies suggest radiotherapy (RT) may facilitate response to immunotherapy. We hypothesized that oncolytic immunotherapy with talimogene lapherparepvec (T-VEC, an oncolytic immunotherapy that expresses granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor) and RT would produce response in non-targeted metastases. METHODS: A randomized phase 2 trial of T-VEC+/-RT was conducted. Eligible patients had ≥ 1 CM from a solid tumor amenable to T-VEC and RT and another measurable metastasis. Tumor and overall response was assessed using modified World Health Organization (mWHO) criteria. Adverse events and quality of life (QOL) were characterized using CTCAE v4.0 and Skindex-16, respectively. Correlative analyses of tumor genomics and immune system were performed. RESULTS: 19 patients were randomized to receive T-VEC (n = 9) or T-VEC+RT (n = 10). One patient in each arm demonstrated complete response in the largest non-targeted metastasis. The trial was closed after the first stage of enrollment because of no overall mWHO responses, slow accrual and the COVID19 pandemic. AEs were consistent with prior reports of T-VEC. Skin related QOL was poor before and after treatment. Median progression free survival was 1.2 and 2.5 months in the T-VEC and T-VEC+RT arms; median overall survival was 4.9 and 17.3 months in the T-VEC and T-VEC+RT arms. Analyses of peripheral blood cells and cytokines demonstrated responders exhibited several outlying lymphocyte and cytokine parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Low overall response rate, slow accrual, and the COVID19 pandemic led to closure of this trial. Responses in non-injected and non-irradiated metastases were infrequent.

Efficacy of axitinib in a US cohort of patients with programmed cell death protein 1-resistant mucosal melanoma.

Mucosal melanoma is a rare melanoma subtype, accounting for about 1% of all diagnosed melanomas. It is characterized by an aggressive phenotype with a poor prognosis and a low response rate to approved treatments. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical features, treatments, and outcomes of patients diagnosed with mucosal melanoma treated with axitinib ±â€…anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy at a single US referral center between 2018 and 2021. Radiologic response was assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), v1.1. Twenty-three patients were included in this study. In all, 78% were females with a median age of 62 years. The originating site of mucosal melanoma was the sinonasal (35%), genitourinary (35%), and gastrointestinal (30%) tracts. Sixty-five percent of patients had M1c or M1d disease and 0% had BRAF V600 mutations detected. The majority (96%) had prior treatment inclusive of anti-PD-1, with a median of 2 prior lines, and 78% of patients received a combination of axitinib and PD-1 and the median duration of treatment was 3.2 months. The overall response rate was 13% and the disease control rate was 26%. The median progression-free survival was 3.2 months, and the median overall survival was 8.2 months. Overall, the regimen was well tolerated with 39% of patients requiring dose reduction and 9% requiring treatment cessation. Axitinib with anti-PD-1 therapy has modest clinical activity in heavily pretreated patients with mucosal melanoma outside of Asia, including some with long-term benefits. This data supports the worldwide clinical trials evaluating this combination and the role of incorporating vascular endothelial growth factor-based therapy in the therapeutic paradigm for patients with mucosal melanoma.

Durable complete response in a patient with leptomeningeal melanoma after treatment with dabrafenib, trametinib, and nivolumab.

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of melanoma with a dismal prognosis. We present the case of a young man with stage IV BRAF V600E mutant melanoma with lung, lymph node, and brain metastases initially treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab, who subsequently developed LMD. Upon change to BRAF/MEK targeted therapy with nivolumab, a durable complete response was achieved and remains ongoing, off treatment, 7 years from diagnosis. Management of symptomatic LMD remains a critical unmet clinical challenge, with limited clinical trial data. This exceptional case is instructive, as the first published case of the use of the triplet, and the first durable response with therapy discontinuation, in melanoma LMD. The triple-drug regimen may be considered a viable option in fit patients. This case highlights the potential for long-term disease control and the critical and urgent need to develop clinical trials inclusive of patients with LMD to define the best treatment strategies.

Long-term survival follow-up for tebentafusp in previously treated metastatic uveal melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Tebentafusp, a bispecific (gp100×CD3) ImmTAC, significantly improved overall survival (OS) outcomes for HLA-A*02:01+ adult patients with untreated metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) and showed promising survival in previously treated mUM with 1-year OS of 62% in the primary analysis of study IMCgp100-102. Here we report long-term outcomes from this phase 1/2 study in pretreated mUM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously treated mUM received tebentafusp weekly intravenous at 20 µg dose 1, 30 µg dose 2 and either 54, 64, 68, or 73 µg (phase 1) or 68 µg (phase 2) dose 3+. The primary objective was overall response rate. Secondary objectives included OS and safety. OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods. Association between OS and baseline covariates, on-treatment Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) response, baseline tumor biopsy and circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA) changes were assessed. RESULTS: 146 patients were treated with tebentafusp: 19 in phase 1 and 127 in phase 2. With a median follow-up duration of 48.5 months, the median OS was 17.4 months (95% CI, 13.1 to 22.8), and the 1-year, 2-year, 3-year and 4-year OS rates were 62%, 40%, 23% and 14%, respectively. Improved survival was associated with lower ctDNA baseline levels and greater ctDNA reductions by week 9 on-treatment, with 100% 1-year, 73% 2-year and 45% 3-year OS rates for patients with ctDNA clearance. Baseline gp100 expression was not associated with survival, despite more RECIST responses among patients with higher expression. No new safety signals were reported with long-term dosing. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the longest follow-up of a Tcell receptor bispecific to date and confirms the durable survival benefits achieved with tebentafusp in previously treated mUM with good tolerability long-term. A role for ctDNA reduction as an early indicator of clinical benefit was again suggested for patients treated with tebentafusp.

Early On-Treatment Assessment of T Cells, Cytokines, and Tumor DNA with Adaptively Dosed Nivolumab + Ipilimumab: Final Results from the Phase 2 ADAPT-IT Study.

PURPOSE: The Adaptively Dosed ImmunoTherapy Trial (ADAPT-IT;NCT03122522) investigated adaptive ipilimumab discontinuation in melanoma based on early radiographic assessment. Initial findings indicated similar effectiveness compared with conventional nivolumab-ipilimumab (nivo-ipi). Exploratory biomarker analyses and final clinical results are now reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with unresectable melanoma received two doses of nivo-ipi. Radiographic assessment at Week 6 informed continuation of ipilimumab before nivolumab maintenance. The primary endpoint was overall response rate at Week 12. Plasma was assayed for circulating tumor DNA and 10 cytokines using a multiplex immunoassay. Flow cytometry of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was performed with an 11-color panel. RESULTS: Among the treated patients, expansion of proliferating T-cell populations was observed in responders and nonresponders. Baseline IL6 levels were low in patients achieving an objective radiographic response (median 1.30 vs. 2.86 pg/mL; P = 0.025). High baseline IL6 levels were associated with short progression-free survival [PFS; HR = 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.52; P = 0.041]. At Week 6, patients with response had lower average tumor variant allele fractions than nonresponders (median 0.000 vs. 0.019; P = 0.014). Greater increases in average variant allele fractions from baseline to Week 6 correlated with short PFS (HR = 1.11, 95% CI, 1.01-1.21; P = 0.023). Week 12 overall response rate was 47% (95% CI, 35%-59%) with a median follow-up of 34 months among survivors. Median PFS was 21 months (95% CI, 10-not reached); 76% of responses (95% CI, 64%-91%) persisted at 36 months. CONCLUSIONS: Adaptively dosed nivo-ipi responses are durable and resemble historical data for conventional nivo-ipi. Baseline IL6 and circulating tumor DNA changes during treatment warrant further study as biomarkers of nivo-ipi response.

Clearance of plasma cell free DNA in metastatic uveal melanoma with radiographic response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Purpose: To report a case of metastatic uveal melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibition in which serial circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was assessed throughout treatment. Observations: A 33-year-old man was diagnosed with metastatic uveal melanoma and initially had progression of disease following hepatic embolization and nivolumab/ipilimumab. At the time, plasma ctDNA GNA11 and SF3B1 were measurable and repeat ctDNA showed increased variant allele frequency following further progression of disease on vorinostat. Following additional nivolumab/ipilimumab, radiographic response was noted and repeat ctDNA became undetectable and remained so at 27 months follow up. Conclusions and importance: Clearance of cell free DNA in metastatic uveal melanoma may be associated with radiographic response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

The features and management of acquired resistance to PD1-based therapy in metastatic melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Anti-PD-1 therapy (PD1) either alone or with anti-CTLA-4 (CTLA4), has high initial response rates, however 20% of patients (pts) with complete response (CR) and 30% with partial response (PR) within 12 months of treatment experience subsequent disease progression by 6 years. The nature and optimal management of this acquired resistance (AR) remains unknown. METHODS: Pts from 16 centres who responded to PD1-based therapy and who later progressed were examined. Demographics, disease characteristics and subsequent treatments were evaluated. RESULTS: 299 melanoma pts were identified, median age 64y, 44% BRAFV600m. 172 (58%) received PD1 alone, 114 (38%) PD1/CTLA4 and 13 (4%) PD1 and an investigational drug. 90 (30%) pts had CR, 209 (70%) PR. Median time to AR was 12.6 mo (95% CI, 11.3, 14.2). Most (N = 193, 65%) progressed in a single organ site, and in a solitary lesion (N = 151, 51%). The most frequent sites were lymph nodes (38%) and brain (25%). Management at AR included systemic therapy (ST, 45%), local therapy (LT) +ST (31%), LT alone (21%), or observation (3%). There was no statistical difference in PFS2 or OS based on management, however, PFS2 was numerically superior for pts treated with ST alone who progressed off PD1 therapy than those who progressed on PD1 (2-year PFS2 42% versus 25%, p = 0.249). mOS from AR was 38.0 months (95% CI, 29.5-NR); longer in single-site versus multi-site progression (2-year OS 70% vs 54%, p < 0·001). CONCLUSIONS: Acquired resistance to PD1 therapy in melanoma is largely oligometastatic, and pts may have a favorable survival outcome following salvage treatment.

Phase Ib Trial of Phenformin in Patients with V600-mutated Melanoma Receiving Dabrafenib and Trametinib.

PURPOSE: Preclinical studies show that activation of AMP kinase by phenformin can augment the cytotoxic effect and RAF inhibitors in BRAF V600-mutated melanoma. We conducted a phase Ib dose-escalation trial of phenformin with standard dose dabrafenib/trametinib in patients with metastatic BRAF V600-mutated melanoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We used a 3+3 dose-escalation design which explored phenformin doses between 50 and 200 mg twice daily. Patients also received standard dose dabrafenib/trametinib. We measured phenformin pharmacokinetics and assessed the effect of treatment on circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC). RESULTS: A total of 18 patients were treated at dose levels ranging from 50 to 200 mg twice daily. The planned dose-escalation phase had to be cancelled because of the COVID 19 pandemic. The most common toxicities were nausea/vomiting; there were two cases of reversible lactic acidosis. Responses were seen in 10 of 18 patients overall (56%) and in 2 of 8 patients who had received prior therapy with RAF inhibitor. Pharmacokinetic data confirmed drug bioavailability. MDSCs were measured in 7 patients treated at the highest dose levels and showed MDSC levels declined on study drug in 6 of 7 patients. CONCLUSIONS: We identified the recommended phase II dose of phenformin as 50 mg twice daily when administered with dabrafenib/trametinib, although some patients will require short drug holidays. We observed a decrease in MDSCs, as predicted by preclinical studies, and may enhance immune recognition of melanoma cells. SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first trial using phenformin in combination with RAF/MEK inhibition in patients with BRAF V600-mutated melanoma. This is a novel strategy, based on preclinical data, to increase pAMPK while blocking the MAPK pathway in melanoma. Our data provide justification and a recommended dose for a phase II trial.

Most large structural variants in cancer genomes can be detected without long reads.

Short-read sequencing is the workhorse of cancer genomics yet is thought to miss many structural variants (SVs), particularly large chromosomal alterations. To characterize missing SVs in short-read whole genomes, we analyzed 'loose ends'-local violations of mass balance between adjacent DNA segments. In the landscape of loose ends across 1,330 high-purity cancer whole genomes, most large (>10-kb) clonal SVs were fully resolved by short reads in the 87% of the human genome where copy number could be reliably measured. Some loose ends represent neotelomeres, which we propose as a hallmark of the alternative lengthening of telomeres phenotype. These pan-cancer findings were confirmed by long-molecule profiles of 38 breast cancer and melanoma cases. Our results indicate that aberrant homologous recombination is unlikely to drive the majority of large cancer SVs. Furthermore, analysis of mass balance in short-read whole genome data provides a surprisingly complete picture of cancer chromosomal structure.

Three-Year Overall Survival with Tebentafusp in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Tebentafusp, a T-cell receptor-bispecific molecule that targets glycoprotein 100 and CD3, is approved for adult patients who are positive for HLA-A*02:01 and have unresectable or metastatic uveal melanoma. The primary analysis in the present phase 3 trial supported a long-term survival benefit associated with the drug. METHODS: We report the 3-year efficacy and safety results from our open-label, phase 3 trial in which HLA-A*02:01-positive patients with previously untreated metastatic uveal melanoma were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive tebentafusp (tebentafusp group) or the investigator's choice of therapy with pembrolizumab, ipilimumab, or dacarbazine (control group), with randomization stratified according to the lactate dehydrogenase level. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: At a minimum follow-up of 36 months, median overall survival was 21.6 months in the tebentafusp group and 16.9 months in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.54 to 0.87). The estimated percentage of patients surviving at 3 years was 27% in the tebentafusp group and 18% in the control group. The most common treatment-related adverse events of any grade in the tebentafusp group were rash (83%), pyrexia (76%), pruritus (70%), and hypotension (38%). Most tebentafusp-related adverse events occurred early during treatment, and no new adverse events were observed with long-term administration. The percentage of patients who discontinued treatment because of adverse events continued to be low in both treatment groups (2% in the tebentafusp group and 5% in the control group). No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This 3-year analysis supported a continued long-term benefit of tebentafusp for overall survival among adult HLA-A*02:01-positive patients with previously untreated metastatic uveal melanoma. (Funded by Immunocore; IMCgp100-202 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03070392; EudraCT number, 2015-003153-18.).

Proceedings from the Melanoma Research Foundation Mucosal Melanoma Meeting (December 16, 2022, New York, USA).

Mucosal melanoma remains a rare cancer with high mortality and a paucity of therapeutic options. This is due in significant part to its low incidence leading to limited patient access to expert care and downstream clinical/basic science data for research interrogation. Clinical challenges such as delayed and at times inaccurate diagnoses, and lack of consensus tumor staging have added to the suboptimal outcomes for these patients. Clinical trials, while promising, have been difficult to activate and accrue. While individual institutions and investigators have attempted to seek solutions to such problems, international, national, and local partnership may provide the keys to more efficient and innovative paths forward. Furthermore, a mucosal melanoma coalition would provide a potential network for patients and caregivers to seek expert opinion and advice. The Melanoma Research Foundation Mucosal Melanoma Meeting (December 16, 2022, New York, USA) highlighted the current clinical challenges faced by patients, providers, and scientists, identified current and future clinical trial investigations in this rare disease space, and aimed to increase national and international collaboration among the mucosal melanoma community in an effort to improve patient outcomes. The included proceedings highlight the clinical challenges of mucosal melanoma, global clinical trial experience, basic science advances in mucosal melanoma, and future directions, including the creation of shared rare tumor registries and enhanced collaborations.

Determinants of overall survival in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in the treatment of primary uveal melanoma (UM), patients with metastatic disease continue to exhibit poor survival. METHODS: A retrospective review of metastatic UM patients at Yale (initial cohort) and Memorial Sloan Kettering (validation cohort) was conducted. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine baseline factors that are associated with overall survival, including sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Scale, laboratory measurements, metastasis location, and use of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 therapies. Differences in overall survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: A total of 89 patients with metastatic UM were identified; 71 and 18, in the initial and validation cohorts, respectively. In the initial cohort, median follow-up was 19.8 months (range, 2-127 months) and median overall survival was 21.8 months (95% CI, 16.6-31.3). Female sex, anti-CTLA-4, and anti-PD-1 therapy were associated with better survival outcomes with adjusted death hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.40 (95% CI, 0.20-0.78), 0.44 (0.20-0.97), and 0.42 (0.22-0.84), respectively, whereas development of hepatic metastases and ECOG score ≥1 (per 1 U/L) were associated with worse survival outcomes with HRs of 2.86 (1.28-7.13) and 2.84 (1.29-6.09), respectively. In both the initial and validation cohorts, use of immune checkpoint inhibitors was associated with improved overall survival after adjusting for sex and ECOG score, with death HRs of 0.22 (0.08-0.56) and 0.04 (0.002-0.26), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Development of extrahepatic-only metastases, ECOG of 0, immune checkpoint therapy, and female sex were each associated with more than 2-fold reductions in risk of death. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Metastatic uveal melanoma patients face limited treatment options and poor survival rates. Results from this retrospective analysis indicate that immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 therapies, were associated with improved survival outcomes. Factors such as extrahepatic-only metastases, better baseline performance status, and female sex contributed to a more than 2-fold reduction in death risk. These findings highlight the potential of immunotherapy in treating metastatic uveal melanoma.

Tebentafusp in combination with durvalumab and/or tremelimumab in patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma: a phase 1 study.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have significantly improved outcomes in first line cutaneous melanoma. However, there is a high unmet need for patients who progress on these therapies and combination therapies are being explored to improve outcomes. Tebentafusp is a first-in-class gp100×CD3 ImmTAC bispecific that demonstrated overall survival (OS) benefit (HR 0.51) in metastatic uveal melanoma despite a modest overall response rate of 9%. This phase 1b trial evaluated the safety and initial efficacy of tebentafusp in combination with durvalumab (anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PDL1)) and/or tremelimumab (anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4) in patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma (mCM), the majority of whom progressed on prior checkpoint inhibitors. METHODS: In this open-label, multicenter, phase 1b, dose-escalation trial, HLA-A*02:01-positive patients with mCM received weekly intravenous tebentafusp with increasing monthly doses of durvalumab and/or tremelimumab starting day 15 of each cycle. The primary objective was to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose for each combination. Efficacy analyses were performed in all tebentafusp with durvalumab±tremelimumab treated patients with a sensitivity analysis in those who progressed on prior anti-PD(L)1 therapy. RESULTS: 85 patients were assigned to receive tebentafusp in combination with durvalumab (n=43), tremelimumab (n=13), or durvalumab and tremelimumab (n=29). Patients were heavily pretreated with a median of 3 prior lines of therapy, including 76 (89%) who received prior anti-PD(L)1. Maximum target doses of tebentafusp (68 mcg) alone or in combination with durvalumab (20 mg/kg) and tremelimumab (1 mg/kg) were tolerated; MTD was not formally identified for any arm. Adverse event profile was consistent with each individual therapy and there were no new safety signals nor treatment-related deaths. In the efficacy subset (n=72), the response rate was 14%, tumor shrinkage rate was 41% and 1-year OS rate was 76% (95% CI: 70% to 81%). The 1-year OS for triplet combination (79%; 95% CI: 71% to 86%) was similar to tebentafusp plus durvalumab (74%; 95% CI: 67% to 80%). CONCLUSION: At maximum target doses, the safety of tebentafusp with checkpoint inhibitors was consistent with safety of each individual therapy. Tebentafusp with durvalumab demonstrated promising efficacy in heavily pretreated patients with mCM, including those who progressed on prior anti-PD(L)1. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02535078.

Beyond the 5-year milestone: Long-term survivorship of melanoma patients treated off-trial with anti-PD-1.

Little is known about the long-term outcomes of anti-PD-1 treated patients with melanoma beyond 5 years, especially for patients treated off clinical trials. This retrospective cohort study includes patients with unresectable stage III/IV nonuveal melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 off-trial at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 2014 and 2017 who survived at least 5 years following their first anti-PD-1 dose (N = 139). We characterized overall survival (OS), melanoma-specific survival (MSS) estimates, treatment-free survival rates, and subsequent treatment courses. Median follow-up among 5-plus year survivors (N = 125) was 78.4 months (range 60.0-96.3). OS at year 7 (2 years post 5-year landmark) was 90.1% (95% CI: 83.0%-94.3%). Fourteen deaths occurred, seven due to melanoma. MSS at year 7 (2 years post 5-year landmark) was 95.0% (95% CI: 33.5%-95.2%). In patients who completed anti-PD-1 based therapy and did not require subsequent treatment by 5 years (N = 80), the probability of not requiring additional treatment for an additional 2 years was 95.7% (95% CI: 91.0%-100%). Patients treated with anti-PD-1 regimens off clinical trials who survive at least 5 years from initial anti-PD-1 treatment can be reassured of their excellent long-term prognosis, particularly if they did not require additional melanoma treatment during the first 5 years.

More than Just Skin-Deep: A Review of Imaging's Role in Guiding CAR T-Cell Therapy for Advanced Melanoma.

Advanced melanoma is one of the deadliest cancers, owing to its invasiveness and its propensity to develop resistance to therapy. Surgery remains the first-line treatment for early-stage tumors but is often not an option for advanced-stage melanoma. Chemotherapy carries a poor prognosis, and despite advances in targeted therapy, the cancer can develop resistance. CAR T-cell therapy has demonstrated great success against hematological cancers, and clinical trials are deploying it against advanced melanoma. Though melanoma remains a challenging disease to treat, radiology will play an increasing role in monitoring both the CAR T-cells and response to therapy. We review the current imaging techniques for advanced melanoma, as well as novel PET tracers and radiomics, in order to guide CAR T-cell therapy and manage potential adverse events.

Undifferentiated and Dedifferentiated Metastatic Melanomas Masquerading as Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Mutational Signature Analysis and Immunotherapy Response.

The distinction between undifferentiated melanoma (UM) or dedifferentiated melanoma (DM) from undifferentiated or unclassifiable sarcoma can be difficult and requires the careful correlation of clinical, pathologic, and genomic findings. In this study, we examined the utility of mutational signatures to identify patients with UM/DM with particular attention as to whether this distinction matters for treatment because the survival of patients with metastatic melanoma has dramatically improved with immunologic therapy, whereas durable responses are less frequent in sarcomas. We identified 19 cases of UM/DM that were initially reported as unclassified or undifferentiated malignant neoplasm or sarcoma and submitted for targeted next-generation sequencing analysis. These cases were confirmed as UM/DM by harboring melanoma driver mutations, UV signature, and high tumor mutation burden. One case of DM showed melanoma in situ. Meanwhile, 18 cases represented metastatic UM/DM. Eleven patients had a prior history of melanoma. Thirteen of 19 (68%) of the tumors were immunohistochemically completely negative for 4 melanocytic markers (S100, SOX10, HMB45, and MELAN-A). All cases harbored a dominant UV signature. Frequent driver mutations involved BRAF (26%), NRAS (32%), and NF1 (42%). In contrast, the control cohort of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (UPS) of deep soft tissue exhibited a dominant aging signature in 46.6% (7/15) without evidence of UV signature. The median tumor mutation burden for DM/UM vs UPS was 31.5 vs 7.0 mutations/Mb (P < .001). A favorable response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy was observed in 66.6% (12/18) of patients with UM/DM. Eight patients exhibited a complete response and were alive with no evidence of disease at the last follow-up (median 45.5 months). Our findings support the usefulness of the UV signature in discriminating DM/UM vs UPS. Furthermore, we present evidence suggesting that patients with DM/UM and UV signatures can benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Decision-Making and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Melanoma Considering Adjuvant Immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant anti-PD1 treatment improves relapse-free survival (RFS) but has not been shown to improve overall survival (OS) in melanoma and is associated with risks of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), some permanent. We identified factors patients consider in deciding whether to undergo adjuvant anti-PD1 treatment and assessed prospective health-related quality of life (HRQoL), treatment satisfaction, and decisional regret. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IIIB-IV cutaneous melanoma and free of disease, were candidates for adjuvant anti-PD1 immunotherapy, and had not yet discussed adjuvant treatment options with their oncologist were eligible. Participants viewed a 4-minute informational video tailored to their disease stage which communicated comprehensive, quantitative information about the risk of relapse both with and without adjuvant treatment, and risks of each irAE before deciding whether or not to opt for adjuvant therapy. We collected data on demographics, HRQoL, and attitudes toward adjuvant treatment over 1 year. RESULTS: 14/34 patients (41%) opted for adjuvant anti-PD1 immunotherapy, 20/34 (59%) opted for observation. Patients choosing adjuvant immunotherapy scored higher on HRQoL social well-being at pre-treatment, were more likely to endorse positive statements about adjuvant immunotherapy, and to perceive that their physician preferred adjuvant therapy. They had lower decisional regret and higher satisfaction, even if they experienced toxicity or recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: When provided with comprehensive quantitative information about risks and benefits of adjuvant anti-PD1 immunotherapy, 20/34 (59%) of patients opted for observation. Patients choosing adjuvant immunotherapy had lower decisional regret and higher satisfaction over time even if they had poorer outcomes in treatment.