Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38838257

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The overall and race-specific associations between racialized economic segregation and all-cause mortality in non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black patients with small-cell lung cancer. METHODS: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to identify men and women diagnosed with SCLC from January 2007 to December 2015 (n=38,393). An Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE) was computed to measure county-level racialized economic segregation and categorized into quartile 1 (most privileged: highest concentration of high-income NHW residents) through quartile 4 (least privileged: highest concentration of low-income NHB residents). Multilevel logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for extensive-stage diagnosis and non-adherence to guideline-recommended treatment. Hazard ratios (HRs) for lung cancer-specific and overall mortality were computed using multilevel Cox regression. RESULTS: Patients in the least privileged counties had higher risks of non-adherence to guideline-recommended treatment (OR=1.23, 95% CI 1.08-1.40; Ptrend <0.01), lung cancer-specific (HR=1.08, 95% CI 1.04-1.12; Ptrend <0.01) and all-cause mortalities (HR=1.13, 95% CI 1.09-1.17; Ptrend <0.0001) compared with patients in the most privileged counties. Adjustment for treatment did not significantly reduce the association with mortality. These associations were comparable between NHB and NHW patients. Segregation was not significantly associated with extensive-stage diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that living in the neighborhoods with higher proportions of low-income households and Black residents had adverse impacts on stage-appropriate treatment and survival of SCLC. IMPACT: This highlights the need for improving access to quality lung cancer care in the less privileged neighborhoods.

2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e249548, 2024 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717774

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Diabetes is associated with poorer prognosis of patients with breast cancer. The association between diabetes and adjuvant therapies for breast cancer remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively examine the associations of preexisting diabetes with radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and endocrine therapy in low-income women with breast cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This population-based cohort study included women younger than 65 years diagnosed with nonmetastatic breast cancer from 2007 through 2015, followed up through 2016, continuously enrolled in Medicaid, and identified from the linked Missouri Cancer Registry and Medicaid claims data set. Data were analyzed from January 2022 to October 2023. EXPOSURE: Preexisting diabetes. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of utilization (yes/no), timely initiation (≤90 days postsurgery), and completion of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, as well as adherence (medication possession ratio ≥80%) and persistence (<90-consecutive day gap) of endocrine therapy in the first year of treatment for women with diabetes compared with women without diabetes. Analyses were adjusted for sociodemographic and tumor factors. RESULTS: Among 3704 women undergoing definitive surgery, the mean (SD) age was 51.4 (8.6) years, 1038 (28.1%) were non-Hispanic Black, 2598 (70.1%) were non-Hispanic White, 765 (20.7%) had a diabetes history, 2369 (64.0%) received radiotherapy, 2237 (60.4%) had chemotherapy, and 2505 (67.6%) took endocrine therapy. Compared with women without diabetes, women with diabetes were less likely to utilize radiotherapy (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.53-0.86), receive chemotherapy (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48-0.93), complete chemotherapy (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.50-0.99), and be adherent to endocrine therapy (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56-0.91). There were no significant associations of diabetes with utilization (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.71-1.28) and persistence (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.88-1.36) of endocrine therapy, timely initiation of radiotherapy (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.86-1.38) and chemotherapy (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.77-1.55), or completion of radiotherapy (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.91-1.71). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study, preexisting diabetes was associated with subpar adjuvant therapies for breast cancer among low-income women. Improving diabetes management during cancer treatment is particularly important for low-income women with breast cancer who may have been disproportionately affected by diabetes and are likely to experience disparities in cancer treatment and outcomes.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Diabetes Mellitus , Pobreza , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Adulto , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Missouri/epidemiologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 115(10): 1204-1212, 2023 Oct 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37697664

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Research indicates that Black cancer patients have higher rates of COVID-19 hospitalization than their White counterparts. However, the extent to which chronic diseases contribute to racial disparities remains uncertain. We aimed to quantify the effect of chronic diseases on racial disparity in COVID-19-associated hospitalization among cancer patients. METHODS: We linked Louisiana Tumor Registry's data with statewide COVID-19 data and hospital in-patient discharge data to identify patients diagnosed with cancer in 2015-2019 who tested positive for COVID-19 in 2020 and those with COVID-19-associated hospitalization. Multivariable logistic regression and mediation methods based on linear structural equations were employed to assess the effects of the number of chronic diseases (0, 1-2, ≥3) and individual chronic diseases. RESULTS: Of 6381 cancer patients who tested positive for COVID-19, 31.6% were non-Hispanic Black cancer patients. Compared with non-Hispanic White cancer patients, non-Hispanic Black cancer patients had a higher prevalence of chronic diseases (79.5% vs 66.0%) and higher COVID-19-associated hospitalization (27.2% vs 17.2%). The odds of COVID-19-associated hospitalization were 80% higher for non-Hispanic Black cancer patients than non-Hispanic White cancer patients (odds ratio = 1.80, 95% confidence interval = 1.59 to 2.04). After adjusting for age, sex, insurance, poverty, obesity, and cancer type, number of chronic diseases explained 37.8% of the racial disparity in COVID-19-associated hospitalization, and hypertension, diabetes, and chronic renal disease were the top 3 chronic diseases explaining 9.6%, 8.9%, and 7.3% of the racial disparity, respectively. CONCLUSION: Chronic diseases played a substantial role in the racial disparity in COVID-19-associated hospitalization among cancer patients, especially hypertension, diabetes, and renal disease. Understanding and addressing the root causes are crucial for targeted interventions, policies, and health-care strategies to reduce racial disparity.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano , COVID-19 , Doença Crônica , Hospitalização , Neoplasias , Brancos , Humanos , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Doença Crônica/etnologia , Doença Crônica/terapia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/etnologia , COVID-19/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hipertensão/complicações , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/etnologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Fatores Raciais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Brancos/estatística & dados numéricos
4.
Cancer Med ; 12(6): 6842-6852, 2023 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36495041

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Breast-conserving surgery plus radiation (BCT) yields equivalent or better survival than mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) women. However, nationwide mastectomy trends increased in recent decades, attracting studies on underlying causes. Prior research identified that long distance to the radiation treatment facility (RTF) was associated with mastectomy. Still, it is unclear whether such association applies to young and old ESBC women comparably. We sought to delineate such impacts by age. METHODS: Women diagnosed with stages 0-II breast cancer in 2013-2017 receiving either BCT or mastectomy were identified from the Louisiana Tumor Registry. We assessed the association of surgery (mastectomy vs. BCT) with the distance to the nearest or nearest accessible RTFs using multivariable logistic regression adjusting the socio-demographic and tumor characteristics. The nearest accessible RTF was determined based on patients' health insurance. For Medicaid, uninsured, and unknown insurance patients, the nearest accessible RTF is the nearest RTF owned by the government. The interaction effect of age and distance was evaluated as well. RESULTS: Of 11,604 patients, 46.7% received mastectomy. Compared with distance ≤5 miles to the nearest RTF, those with distance ≥40 miles or 15-40 miles had higher odds of mastectomy (adjusted (adj) OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.07-1.82; adj OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.02-1.34). To the nearest accessible RTF, the adj ORs were 1.25 (95% CI = 1.03-1.51) and 1.19 (95% CI = 1.04-1.35), respectively. Age-stratified analysis showed the significant association (p < 0.05) only presented among women aged ≥65, but not those aged <65 years. CONCLUSION: Distance to the nearest or nearest accessible RTF influences the surgery choice, especially among women in Louisiana ≥65 years with ESBC. Further understanding of factors leading to the decision for mastectomy in this age group is needed.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mastectomia , Mastectomia Segmentar , Seguro Saúde , Modelos Logísticos
5.
Front Epidemiol ; 3: 1108452, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38455937

RESUMO

Background: Precancerous cervical lesion (PCL) is common in working-age and minority women. In Louisiana, 98% of PCL cases were diagnosed at age 18-65 with over 90% of them being human papillomavirus (HPV)-related. PCL women represent those who may be immunocompromised from the precancerous condition and thus more vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2. Most studies evaluating racial disparities for COVID-19 infection have only used data prior to vaccine availability. This study assessed disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status (SES) in COVID-19 infections among working-age PCL women for pre- and post-COVID-19 vaccine availability. Methods: Louisiana women aged 18-65 with PCL diagnosed in 2009-2021 were linked with the Louisiana statewide COVID-19 database to identify those with positive COVID-19 test. Race/ethnicity was categorized as non-Hispanic white (NHW), non-Hispanic black (NHB), Hispanic, and others. The census tract SES quintiles were created based on American Community Survey estimates. Logistic regression was employed to assess the racial/ethnic and SES differences in COVID-19 infections. Results: Of 14,669 eligible PCL women, 30% were tested COVID-19 positive. NHB had the highest percentage of COVID-19 infection (34.6%), followed by NHW (27.7%). The infection percentage was inversely proportional to SES, with 32.9% for women having the lowest SES and 26.8% for those with the highest SES. NHB women and those with lower SES had higher COVID-19 infection than their counterparts with an aOR of 1.37 (95% CI 1.25-1.49) and 1.21 (95% CI 1.07-1.37), respectively. In the pre-vaccine period, NHB and Hispanic women had higher odds of infection than NHW women. However, after the vaccine was implemented, the significant racial/ethnic and SES differences in COVID-19 infections still existed in PCL women residing in non-Greater New Orleans area. Conclusions: There are substantial variations in racial/ethnic and SES disparities in COVID-19 infections among working-age women with PCL, even after vaccine implementation. It is imperative to provide public health interventions and resources to reduce this unequal burden for this vulnerable population.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA