Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Cataract Refract Surg ; 18(2): 162-5, 1992 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1564655

RESUMO

Peribulbar anesthesia was performed in 407 patients and retrobulbar anesthesia in 441 patients in a prospective study comparing the efficacy and complication rate of the two procedures. Eighteen of the peribulbar procedures (4.4%) required reblocks. There were no major complications in this group. Thirty of the retrobulbar procedures (6.8%) required reblocks. This group also had no major complications. The chi-square method of statistical analysis (chi-square = 2.245; P = .134) indicates there was no statistically significant difference between the efficacy of the two local anesthesia methods.


Assuntos
Anestesia Local/métodos , Segmento Anterior do Olho/cirurgia , Anestésicos Locais , Epinefrina , Humanos , Hialuronoglucosaminidase , Injeções , Bloqueio Nervoso , Órbita , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA