Comparison of the clinical outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty vs. kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic Kümmell's disease:a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) are widely used in the treatment of Kümmell's disease. The purpose of this article is to investigate the clinical efficacy of PVP and PKP for Kümmell's disease. METHODS: The clinical data that 56 cases of Kümmell's disease treated with either PVP (28 cases) or PKP (28 cases) from December 2015 to December 2017 were prospectively analyzed. Gender, age, course of disease, injury segment, bone mineral density (BMD), visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), imaging measurement indexes before surgery between the two groups showed no significant difference (all P > 0.05). The bone cement leakage rate, bone cement injection amount, operation time, VAS, ODI, the rate of vertebral compression, correction rate of kyphosis and refracture rate of adjacent vertebra in 2 years were compared between the two groups to calculate clinical efficacy. RESULTS: The two groups were followed up for 24-48 months. There was no significant difference in the follow-up time, amount of bone cement injected, incidence of bone cement leakage and refracture rate of adjacent vertebrae between the two groups (all P > 0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss and fluoroscopy times of the PVP group were significantly lower than those of the PKP group (all P = 0.000). VAS score and ODI of the two groups were significantly lower at 1 day, 1 year and 2 years after surgery than before surgery (all P < 0.05), but there was not statistically significant difference between the two groups at each time point after surgery (all P > 0.05). The rate of vertebral compression and kyphosis correction in the two groups were significantly corrected (P < 0.05, respectively) and decreased significantly with time (all P < 0.05), But there was not significant difference between the two groups at any time point (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both PVP and PKP can achieve similar effects in the treatment of Kümmell's disease. Because the cost, operation time, blood loss, radiation exposure and surgical procedure of PVP are less than those of PKP, PVP has more clinical priority value.

Dynamic compression locking system versus multiple cannulated compression screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Femoral neck fractures are one of the problems in clinical treatment. The prognosis is uncertain. Currently, No internal fixation method is superior to other internal fixation methods in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. Therefore, the internal fixation system needs to be further explored. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of femoral neck dynamic compression locking system (DCLS) and multiple cannulated compression screws(MCCS) in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. METHODS: A prospective analysis of 54 cases of femoral neck fractures treated with either a DCLS (n = 28) or MCCS (n = 26) was conducted between December 2015 and November 2017 in authors' hospitals. The perioperative and postoperative parameters of the two groups were recorded and evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were followed up for 24-47 months. The etiology was caused by a fall. There was no significant difference in follow-up time, operation time, incision length, surgical blood loss, the incidence of perioperative and postoperative healing complications, and mobility in the two groups (all P > 0.05). The Harris score, fracture healing time, femoral neck shortening, partial weight-bearing time and complete weight-bearing time were significantly better in the DCLS group than in the MCCS group (all P < 0.05). The fracture healing rate in the DCLS group was higher than that in the MCCS group. CONCLUSIONS: The DCLS and MCCS might be equally effective in terms of operation time, incision length, surgical blood loss, the incidence of perioperative and postoperative healing complications, and mobility in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. However, the DCLS is superior to the MCCS in Harris score, fracture healing time, femoral neck shortening, weight-bearing time and fracture healing rate. So, DCLS deserves further study.

The clinical application of a novel method of internal fixation for femoral neck fractures-dynamic locking compression system.

BACKGROUND: Femoral neck fractures are the commonly encountered injury in orthopedic practice and result in significant morbidity and mortality. Currently, how to treat femoral neck fractures safely and effectively is still a challenge. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of dynamic compression locking system for femoral neck fractures. METHODS: This is a retrospective study conducted from May 2015 to October 2016. The study included 36 patients suffering from femoral neck fractures who underwent closed reduction and were fixed using dynamic compression locking system. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon. The study was conducted by telephone and on-site follow-up. The Garden classification and anatomical site classification were categorized for all patients. We assessed radiographic outcomes of union, femoral neck shortening, screw back-out, and femoral head avascular necrosis. We also evaluated functional outcome using the Harris hip score. Other outcomes included the length of surgery, duration of hospital stay, injury to surgery time, intraoperative hemorrhage, time to clinical bone union, and other fracture complications. RESULTS: All patients were followed up 12 to 29 months with an average of 21.58 ± 5.41 months. All cases were caused by falls including 17 males and 19 females with an average age of 65.33 ± 9.30 years old ranging from 53 to 82 years old. Among them, injury to surgery time ranged between 1 and 4 days with an average of 2.58 ± 1.05 days. Duration of hospital stay was 8 to 21 days with an average of 15.33 ± 3.71 days. Intraoperative hemorrhage was 40 to 80 ml with an average of 61.67 ± 12.31 ml. Operation time was from 35 to 80 min with average of 50.25 ± 11.77 min. According to Garden classification, 9 cases (25%) were type II and 27 cases (75%) were type III. According to the anatomical site classification, 8 cases (22.2%) were subcapital femoral neck fractures, 19 cases (52.8%) trans-cervical, and 9 cases (25%) basi-cervical. At present, the follow-up has not found the fracture complications of femoral head avascular necrosis, fracture nonunion, and re-fracture. All patients achieved solid bone union. The mean time of clinical bone union was 3 to 4 months. Among all patients, there were only 3 cases of femoral neck shortening < 5 mm and 1 case of screw back-out = 4 mm. For Harris scoring, average Harris scale at the end of the follow-up was 93.42 ± 3.95 ranging from 85 to 98. There were 32 cases of excellent function scores on the Harris scale and 4 cases of good function scores on the Harris scale. Therefore, the excellent and good rate of Harris hip scores was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Femoral neck dynamic compression locking system for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients can provide effective stability and reduce complications and revision rates.