Chemotherapeutic potential of lupeol against cancer in pre-clinical model: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Extensive research on Lupeol's potential in cancer prevention highlights its ability to target various cancer-related factors. It regulates proliferative markers, modulates signaling pathways, including PI3K/AKT/mTOR, and influences inflammatory and apoptotic mechanisms. Additionally, Lupeol demonstrates selectivity in killing cancer cells while sparing normal cells, thus minimizing the risk of toxic effects on healthy tissues. HYPOTHESIS: Therefore, we aimed to explore Lupeol's potential roles as a chemotherapeutic agent and as a sensitizer to chemotherapy by reviewing various animal-based studies published on its effects. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a comprehensive search across databases, including PubMed, PMC, Cochrane, EuroPMC, and ctri.gov.in to identify pertinent articles. Our focus was solely on published animal studies examining Lupeol's anti-cancer effects, with reviewers independently assessing bias risk and resolving discrepancies through consensus. RESULT: 20 studies were shortlisted. The results demonstrated that Lupeol brings changes in the tumor volume by [Hedges's g: -6.62; 95 % CI: -8.68, -4.56; τ2: 24.36, I2: 96.50 %; p < 0.05] and tumor weight by [Hedges's g: -3.97; 95 % CI: -5.20, -2.49; τ2: 2.70, I2: 79.27 %; p <0.05]. The high I2, negative Egger's value, and asymmetrical funnel plot show the publication bias among the studies. Further, Lupeol in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents showed better outcomes as compared to them alone [Hedges's g: -6.38; 95 % CI: -11.82, -0.94; τ2: 46.91; I2: 98.68 %; p <0.05]. Lupeol also targets various signaling molecules and pathways to exert an anti-cancer effect. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, Lupeol significantly reduces tumor volume and weight. Combining Lupeol with other chemotherapy agents shows promise for enhancing anti-cancer effects. However, high variability among studies and evidence of publication bias suggest caution in interpreting results.

Apigenin enhances sorafenib anti-tumour efficacy in hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The "one drug-one target" paradigm has various limitations affecting drug efficacy, such as resistance profiles and adverse effects. Combinational therapies help reduce unexpected off-target effects and accelerate therapeutic efficacy. Sorafenib- an FDA-approved drug for liver cancer, has multiple limitations. Therefore, it is recommended to identify an agent that increases its effectiveness and reduces toxicity. In this regard, Apigenin, a plant flavone, would be an excellent option to explore. METHODS: We used in silico, in vitro, and animal models to explore our hypothesis. For the in vitro study, HepG2 and Huh7 cells were exposed to Apigenin (12-96 µM) and Sorafenib (1-10 µM). For the in vivo study, Diethylnitrosamine (DEN) (25 mg/kg) induced tumor-bearing animals were given Apigenin (50 mg/kg) or Sorafenib (10 mg/kg) alone and combined. Apigenin's bioavailability was checked by UPLC. Tumor nodules were studied macroscopically and by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Biochemical analysis, histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and qRT-PCR were done. RESULTS: The results revealed Apigenin's good bioavailability. In silico study showed binding affinity of both chemicals with p53, NANOG, ß-Catenin, c-MYC, and TLR4. We consistently observed a better therapeutic efficacy in combination than alone treatment. Combination treatment showed i) better cytotoxicity, apoptosis induction, and cell cycle arrest of tumor cells, ii) tumor growth reduction, iii) increased expression of p53 and decreased Cd10, Nanog, ß-Catenin, c-Myc, Afp, and Tlr4. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, Apigenin could enhance the therapeutic efficacy of Sorafenib against liver cancer and may be a promising therapeutic approach for treating HCC. However, further research is imperative to gain more in-depth mechanistic insights.

Cancer cell plasticity, stem cell factors, and therapy resistance: how are they linked?

Cellular plasticity can occur naturally in an organism and is considered an adapting mechanism during the developmental stage. However, abnormal cellular plasticity is observed in different diseased conditions, including cancer. Cancer cell plasticity triggers the stimuli of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), abnormal epigenetic changes, expression of stem cell factors and implicated signaling pathways, etc., and helps in the maintenance of CSC phenotype. Conversely, CSC maintains the cancer cell plasticity, EMT, and epigenetic plasticity. EMT contributes to increased cell migration and greater diversity within tumors, while epigenetic changes, stem cell factors (OCT4, NANOG, and SOX2), and various signaling pathways allow cancer cells to maintain various phenotypes, giving rise to intra- and inter-tumoral heterogeneity. The intricate relationships between cancer cell plasticity and stem cell factors help the tumor cells adopt drug-tolerant states, evade senescence, and successfully acquire drug resistance with treatment dismissal. Inhibiting molecules/signaling pathways involved in promoting CSCs, cellular plasticity, EMT, and epigenetic plasticity might be helpful for successful cancer therapy management. This review discussed the role of cellular plasticity, EMT, and stem cell factors in tumor initiation, progression, reprogramming, and therapy resistance. Finally, we discussed how the intervention in this axis will help better manage cancers and improve patient survivability.

Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in cancer progression: unraveling the immunosuppressive module driving therapy resistance.

Cancer cells undergo phenotypic switching (cancer cell plasticity) in response to microenvironmental cues, including exposure to therapy/treatment. Phenotypic plasticity enables the cancer cells to acquire more mesenchymal traits promoting cancer cells' growth, survival, therapy resistance, and disease recurrence. A significant program in cancer cell plasticity is epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), wherein a comprehensive reprogramming of gene expression occurs to facilitate the translational shift from epithelial-to-mesenchymal phenotypes resulting in increased invasiveness and metastasis. In addition, EMT plays a pivotal role in facilitating cancer cells' escape from the body's immune system using several mechanisms, such as the downregulation of major histocompatibility complex-mediated antigen presentation, upregulation of immune checkpoint molecules, and recruitment of immune-suppressive cells. Cancer cells' ability to undergo phenotypic switching and EMT-driven immune escape presents a formidable obstacle in cancer management, highlighting the need to unravel the intricate mechanisms underlying these processes and develop novel therapeutic strategies. This article discusses the role of EMT in promoting immune evasion and therapy resistance. We also discuss the ongoing research on developing therapeutic approaches targeting intrinsic and induced cell plasticity within the immune suppressive microenvironment. We believe this review article will update the current research status and equip researchers, clinicians, and other healthcare professionals with valuable insights enhancing their existing knowledge and shedding light on promising directions for future cancer research. This will facilitate the development of innovative strategies for managing therapy-resistant cancers and improving patient outcomes.

Molecular Insight into Prostate Cancer: Preventive Role of Selective Bioactive Molecules.

Prostate cancer (CaP) is one of the most prevalent male malignancies, accounting for a considerable number of annual mortalities. However, the prompt identification of early-stage CaP often faces delays due to diverse factors, including socioeconomic inequalities. The androgen receptor (AR), in conjunction with various other signaling pathways, exerts a central influence on the genesis, progression, and metastasis of CaP, with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) serving as the primary therapeutic strategy. Therapeutic modalities encompassing surgery, chemotherapy, hormonal intervention, and radiotherapy have been formulated for addressing early and metastatic CaP. Nonetheless, the heterogeneous tumor microenvironment frequently triggers the activation of signaling pathways, culminating in the emergence of chemoresistance, an aspect to which cancer stem cells (CSCs) notably contribute. Phytochemicals emerge as reservoirs of bioactive agents conferring manifold advantages against human morbidity. Several of these phytochemicals demonstrate potential chemoprotective and chemosensitizing properties against CaP, with selectivity exhibited towards malignant cells while sparing their normal counterparts. In this context, the present review aims to elucidate the intricate molecular underpinnings associated with metastatic CaP development and the acquisition of chemoresistance. Moreover, the contributions of phytochemicals to ameliorating CaP initiation, progression, and chemoresistance are also discussed.

Lupeol, an androgen receptor inhibitor, enhances the chemosensitivity of prostate cancer stem cells to antiandrogen enzalutamide-based therapy.

Enzalutamide is an androgen receptor (AR) antagonist commonly used in the treatment of prostate cancer (CaP). However, due to the potential toxicity and development of resistance associated with Enzalutamide-based therapy, there is a need to explore additional compounds that can enhance its therapeutic effectiveness while minimizing toxicity. Lupeol is a pharmacologically active triterpene having anticancer effects. The objective of this study was to explore Lupeol's potential in enhancing the chemosensitivity of chemoresistant CaP cells to Enzalutamide in vitro and in a mouse model. To test our hypothesis, we performed cell viability and luciferase reporter gene assay, flow cytometry, animal studies, and histopathological analysis. Finally, we analyzed the change in selective metabolites in the prostate tissue by LCMS. Results demonstrated that a combination of Lupeol and Enzalutamide could better (i) suppress the Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) and chemoresistant cells (PTEN-CaP8 and PC3) viability and migration, (ii) increase cell cycle arrest, (iii) inhibit the transcriptional activity of AR, c-MYC, c-FLIP, and TCF (iv) inhibit tumor growth in a mouse model (v) protect Enzalutamide-induced adverse effects in prostate glands and gut tissue (vi) decrease levels of testosterone and methionine metabolites. In conclusion, Lupeol enhances the pharmacological efficacy of Enzalutamide and reduces the adverse effects. Thus, Lupeol could be a promising adjuvant for improving Enzalutamide-based treatment outcomes and warrant further research.

Role of epigenetic drugs in sensitizing cancers to anticancer therapies: emerging trends and clinical advancements.

Epigenetic changes play a significant role in cancer progression, maintenance and therapy resistance. Generally, epigenetic modifications are reversible, thereby gaining attention for therapeutic interventions. However, limited efficacy and therapy resistance remain the significant limitations of conventional and epigenetic anticancer therapies. Recently, combination therapies with epigenetic drugs (epi-drugs) and conventional anticancer treatment have gained widespread attention. Here, epi-drugs are administered with anticancer therapies to increase their therapeutic efficacy and sensitize cancer cells resistant to therapies. This review summarizes the mechanism of epi-drugs in reversing resistance to anticancer therapies. Further, the challenges faced during developing combination therapies with epi-drugs are discussed. We believe the clinical benefit of combination therapies could be increased by overcoming the challenges faced during epi-drug development.

Epigenetic changes play a significant role in cancer development and progression. Epigenetic drugs (epi-drugs) target enzymes involved in regulating epigenetic changes to maintain normal cell functioning. Epi-drugs include histone deacetylase inhibitors and DNA methyltransferase inhibitors, among others. These drugs have shown potential as standalone treatments for cancer and have also been found to work well in combination with other therapies (chemotherapy, radiotherapy and immunotherapy), helping to overcome treatment resistance. By targeting the epigenetic alterations that contribute to treatment resistance, epi-drugs have the potential to enhance the effectiveness of these therapies. This review article focuses on how epi-drugs overcome resistance to different cancer treatments. Combining epi-drugs with conventional anticancer therapies could provide better management of cancer. However, more preclinical and clinical research is needed to understand the potential benefits and optimize the use of these combinations fully. Overall, epi-drugs offer a promising avenue for improving cancer treatment outcomes and warrant further investigation.

Anti-cancer activity of guggulsterone by modulating apoptotic markers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Guggulsterone (pregna-4,17-diene-3,16-dione; C21H28O2) is an effective phytosterol isolated from the gum resin of the tree Commiphora wightii (Family Burseraceae) and is responsible for many of the properties of guggul. This plant is widely used as traditional medicine in Ayurveda and Unani system of medicine. It exhibits several pharmacological activities, such as anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antibacterial, anti-septic and anticancer. In this article, the activities of Guggulsterone against cancerous cells were determined and summarized. Methods: Using 7 databases (PubMed, PMC, Google Scholar, Science Direct, Scopus, Cochrane and Ctri.gov), the literature search was conducted since conception until June 2021. Extensive literature search yielded 55,280 studies from all the databases. A total of 40 articles were included in the systematic review and of them, 23 articles were included in the meta-analysis.The cancerous cell lines used in the studies were for pancreatic cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, oesophageal adenocarcinoma, prostrate cancer, colon cancer, breast cancer, gut derived adenocarcinoma, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, bladder cancer, glioblastoma, histiocytic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia and non-small cell lung cancer. The reliability of the selected studies was assessed using ToxRTool. Results: Based on this review, guggulsterone significantly affected pancreatic cancer (MiaPaCa-2, Panc-1, PC-Sw, CD18/HPAF, Capan1, PC-3), hepatocellular carcinoma (Hep3B, HepG2, PLC/PRF/5R), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC4, UM-22b, 1483), cholangiocarcinoma (HuCC-T1, RBE, Sk-ChA-1, Mz-ChA-1) and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (CP-18821, OE19), prostrate cancer (PC-3), colon cancer (HT-29), breast cancer (MCF7/DOX), gut derived adenocarcinoma (Bic-1), gastric cancer (SGC-7901), colorectal cancer (HCT116), bladder cancer (T24, TSGH8301), glioblastoma (A172, U87MG, T98G), histiocytic leukemia (U937), acute myeloid leukemia (HL60, U937) and non-small cell lung cancer (A549, H1975) by inducing apoptotic pathways, inhibiting cell proliferation, and regulating the expression of genes involved in apoptosis. Guggulsterone is known to have therapeutic and preventive effects on various categories of cancers. It can inhibit the progression of tumors and can even reduce their size by inducing apoptosis, exerting anti-angiogenic effects, and modulating various signaling cascades. In vitro studies reveal that Guggulsterone inhibits and suppresses the proliferation of an extensive range of cancer cells by decreasing intrinsic mitochondrial apoptosis, regulating NF-kB/STAT3/ß-Catenin/PI3K/Akt/CHOP pathway, modulating the expression of associated genes/proteins, and inhibiting angiogenesis. Furthermore, Guggulsterone reduces the production of inflammatory markers, such as CDX2 and COX-2. The other mechanism of the Guggulsterone activity is the reversal of P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance. Twenty three studies were selected for meta-analysis following the PRISMA statements. Fixed effect model was used for reporting the odds ratio. The primary endpoint was percentage apoptosis. 11 of 23 studies reported the apoptotic effect at t = 24 h and pooled odds ratio was 3.984 (CI 3.263 to 4.865, p < 0.001). 12 studies used Guggulsterone for t > 24 h and the odds ratio was 11.171 (CI 9.148 to 13.643, 95% CI, p < 0.001). The sub-group analysis based on cancer type, Guggulsterone dose, and treatment effects. Significant alterations in the level of apoptotic markers were reported by Guggulsterone treatment. Conclusion: This study suggested that Guggulsterone has apoptotic effects against various cancer types. Further investigation of its pharmacological activity and mechanism of action should be conducted. In vivo experiments and clinical trials are required to confirm the anticancer activity.

Implication of Lupeol in compensating Sorafenib-induced perturbations of redox homeostasis: A preclinical study in mouse model.

AIMS: Cancer chemotherapeutic drugs can potentially cause several adverse effects that influence a patient's general well-being. Sorafenib, an approved drug used in clinics against multiple cancers whose overall efficacy suffered a serious setback due to various side effects, leading to its frequent discontinuation. Lupeol has recently been considered an important prospective therapeutic agent due to its low toxicity and enhanced biological efficacy. Hence, our study aimed to evaluate whether Lupeol can perturb the Sorafenib-induced toxicity. MAIN METHODS: To test our hypothesis, we studied DNA interaction, level of cytokines, LFT/RFT, oxidant/antioxidant status, and their influences on genetic, cellular, and histopathological changes using both in vitro and in vivo models. KEY FINDINGS: The Sorafenib-treated group showed a marked increase in reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS/RNS), an increase in liver and renal function marker enzymes, serum cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1ß) macromolecular damages (protein, lipid, and DNA), and a decrease in antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, TrxR, GPx, GST). Moreover, Sorafenib-induced oxidative stress caused marked cytoarchitectural damage in the liver and kidney and increased p53 and BAX expression. Interestingly, combining Lupeol with Sorafenib improves all the examined toxic insults caused by Sorafenib. In conclusion, our findings suggest that Lupeol can be used in combination with Sorafenib to reduce ROS/RNS-induced macromolecule damage, which might result in hepato-renal toxicity. SIGNIFICANCE: This study presents the possible protective effect of Lupeol against Sorafenib-induced adverse effects by perturbing redox homeostasis imbalance and apoptosis leading to tissue damage. This study is a fascinating finding that warrants further in-depth preclinical and clinical studies.

MSI2 promotes translation of multiple IRES-containing oncogenes and virus to induce self-renewal of tumor initiating stem-like cells.

RNA-binding protein Musashi 2 (MSI2) is elevated in several cancers and is linked to poor prognosis. Here, we tested if MSI2 promotes MYC and viral mRNA translation to induce self-renewal via an internal ribosome entry sequence (IRES). We performed RIP-seq using anti-MSI2 antibody in tumor-initiating stem-like cells (TICs). MSI2 binds the internal ribosome entry site (IRES)-containing oncogene mRNAs including MYC, JUN and VEGFA as well as HCV IRES to increase their synthesis and promote self-renewal and tumor-initiation at the post-transcriptional level. MSI2 binds a lncRNA to interfere with processing of a miRNA that reduced MYC translation in basal conditions. Deregulation of this integrated MSI2-lncRNA-MYC regulatory loop drives self-renewal and tumorigenesis through increased IRES-dependent translation of MYC mRNA. Overexpression of MSI2 in TICs promoted their self-renewal and tumor-initiation properties. Inhibition of MSI2-RNA binding reduced HCV IRES activity, viral replication and liver hyperplasia in humanized mice predisposed by virus infection and alcohol high-cholesterol high-fat diet. Together MSI2, integrating the MYC oncogenic pathway, can be employed as a therapeutic target in the treatment of HCC patients. A hypothetical model shows that MSI2 binds and activates cap-independent translation of MYC, c-JUN mRNA and HCV through MSI2-binding to Internal Ribosome Entry Sites (IRES) resulting in upregulated MYC, c-JUN and viral protein synthesis and subsequent liver oncogenesis. Inhibitor of the interaction between MYC IRES and MSI2 reduces liver hyperplasia, viral mRNA translation and tumor formation.

AURORA KINASE A and related downstream molecules: A potential network for cancer therapy.

Aurora-A kinase (AURKA) belongs to the serine/threonine kinase family specific to cell division. In normal cells, activation of the AURKA protein is essential for regulating chromosomal segregation and centrosome maturation. The physiological concentration of AURKA accumulation has utmost importance during cell division. AURKA starts accumulating during the S phase of the cell cycle, gets functionally activated during the G2/M phase, attaches to the microtubule, and gets degraded during mitotic exit. Overexpression of AURKA could lead to deregulated cell cycle division, which is intrinsic to numerous cancers. Moreover, dysregulated AURKA affects various downstream molecules that aid in cancer pathogenesis. AURKA phosphorylates its substrates, including oncoproteins, transcriptional factors, tumor suppressor proteins, or other kinases central to various oncogenic signaling pathways critical to cancer. Considering the central role of AURKA in cell proliferation and tumorigenesis, targeting AURKA can be a novel alternative to cancer management. Several AURKA inhibitors have shown promising responses against different cancers either as a single agent or combined with various therapies. This chapter briefly discusses the role of AURKA and its downstream molecules in cancer vis-à-vis the role of AURKA inhibitor in chemoprevention.

Research and Patents Status of Selected Phytochemicals Against Cancer: How Close and How Far?

BACKGROUND: Cancer is a global health issue and economic burden with a continuous increase in incidence and mortality. Over the years, the underlying molecular mechanism of cancers was thoroughly researched, leading to multiple drugs' development. Unfortunately, most drugs have some serious drawbacks, such as therapy resistance and toxicity. Epidemiological studies have shown that a diet rich in fruits and vegetables has cancer prevention properties, which shifted the attention to the potential role of phytochemicals in anti-carcinogenic activity. OBJECTIVE: To review the present status of phytochemicals research and patents in cancer prevention and chemosensitization. METHODS: We explored the relevant published articles and patents to review the phytochemicals showing cancer preventive role in preclinical settings from 1997 onwards. RESULTS: We summarise the role of phytochemicals on anti-carcinogenic, anti-inflammatory, antiproliferative, anti-metastatic, and pro-apoptotic activities in both in vitro and in vivo. Thus, phytochemicals might be an excellent chemosensitizing agent against chemoresistant cells and possibly one of the safest and most effective options for cancer therapy. However, one of the limitations of phytochemicals is their poor bioavailability and rapid excretion. Several analogs have been introduced to increase bioavailability, better biological efficacy, absorption, and retention. In fact, various phytochemicals and their analogs have been patented for their anti-cancerous properties. CONCLUSION: This mini-review discusses various phytochemicals and their anti-cancerous and chemosensitizing roles. Due to their clinical relevance, recent trends in phytochemical extraction and exploration have shown that more and more phytochemicals are being patented.

Antiandrogen enzalutamide induced genetic, cellular, and hepatic damages: amelioration by triterpene Lupeol.

Androgen deprivation therapy is commonly used for the treatment of prostate cancer. Enzalutamide is a next-generation androgen receptor inhibitor, initially approved to treat castration-resistance prostate cancer. Lupeol, a triterpene present in various fruits, vegetables, has anti-oxidant and anti-proliferative activity. The present study aimed to evaluate the Enzalutamide-induced toxicity and its possible amelioration by Lupeol. We performed multiple in vitro and in vivo experiments to conclude our hypothesis. The results revealed that both Enzalutamide and Lupeol interact with DNA through electrostatic interactions. Enzalutamide (5-20 µM) caused cytotoxicity in both normal (PNT2) and cancer cells (LNCaP and 22Rv1). However, Lupeol (10-50 µM) specifically killed the cancer cells while sparing normal cells. The study further revealed that Lupeol could attenuate Enzalutamide-induced cytotoxicity and genotoxicity (chromosomal aberrations and micronucleus formation) to normal cells and potentially induce cytotoxicity to transformed cells. We further observed that Lupeol (40 mg/kg) mediated attenuation of the Enzalutamide (10 mg/kg) induced oxidative and DNA damages. Our study also revealed that Lupeol reverses the Enzalutamide-induced hepatic and renal damages. In conclusion, our study indicates that Lupeol can be used as an adjuvant for reducing the toxic effects and enhancing the effectiveness of Enzalutamide.

Role of lupeol in chemosensitizing therapy-resistant prostate cancer cells by targeting MYC, ß-catenin and c-FLIP: in silico and in vitro studies.

Prostate cancer (CaP) is one of the most frequent malignancies amongst men. Enzalutamide is the second-generation potent androgen receptor (AR) antagonist used against metastatic and non-metastatic CaP. Unfortunately, the development of chemoresistance in cancer cells reduces the effectiveness of Enzalutamide. Lupeol is a pentacyclic triterpene found in different fruits, vegetables, and medicinal plants and possesses anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer properties. Here, we report in silico and in vitro studies of Lupeol and Enzalutamide against the ß-CATENIN, c-FLIPL, and c-MYC, which play a significant role in chemoresistance. We observed that Lupeol significantly inhibits the cell growth of chemoresistant Du145 cells and cancer stem cells (CSCs) either alone or in combination with Enzalutamide. Lupeol and Enzalutamide were also found to dock with ß-CATENIN, c-FLIPL, and c-MYC. The following MD simulation data showed both compounds exerting structural changes in these proteins. Finally, they significantly inhibit the transcriptional activity of all these genes, as observed by luciferase assay. Thus, we infer that Lupeol chemosensitizes the CaP cells for Enzalutamide-resistant CaP cells.

Water soluble transition metal [Ni(II), Cu(II) and Zn(II)] complexes of N-phthaloylglycinate bis(1,2-diaminocyclohexane). DNA binding, pBR322 cleavage and cytotoxicity.

To validate the effect of metal ions in analogous ligand scaffolds on DNA binding and cytotoxic response, we have synthesized a series of water-soluble ionic N-phthaloylglycinate conjugated bis(diaminocyclohexane)M2+ complexes where M = Ni(II), Cu(II) and Zn(II) (1-3). The structural characterization of the complexes (1-3) was achieved by spectroscopic {FT-IR, EPR, UV-vis absorption data, 1H NMR, ESI-MS and elemental analysis} and single crystal X-ray diffraction studies, which revealed different topologies for the late 3d-transition metals. The Ni(II) and Zn(II) complexes exhibited an octahedral geometry with coordinated labile water molecules in the P1̄ space group while the Cu(II) complex revealed a square planar geometry with the P21/c space lattice. In vitro DNA-complexation studies were performed employing various complementary biophysical methods to quantify the intrinsic binding constant Kb and Ksv values and to envisage the binding modes and binding affinity of (1-3) at the therapeutic targets. The corroborative results of these experiments revealed a substantial geometric and electronic effect of (1-3) on DNA binding and the following inferences were observed, (i) high Kb and Ksv values, (ii) remarkable cleavage efficiency via an oxidative pathway, (iii) condensation behavior and (iv) good cytotoxic response to HepG2 and PTEN-caP8 cancer cell lines, with copper(II) complex 2 outperforming the other two complexes as a most promising anticancer drug candidate. Copper(II) complexes have been proven in the literature to be good anticancer drug entities, displaying inhibition of uncontrolled-cell growth by multiple pathways viz., anti-angiogenesis, inducing apoptosis and reactive oxygen species mediated cell death phenomena. Nickel(II) and zinc(II) ionic complexes 1 and 3 have also demonstrated good chemotherapeutic potential in vitro and the bioactive 1,2-diaminocyclohexane fragment in these complexes plays an instrumental role in anticancer activity.

Protective effect of green synthesized Selenium Nanoparticles against Doxorubicin induced multiple adverse effects in Swiss albino mice.

AIMS: Doxorubicin (DOX) is a widely used drug against multiple cancers. However, its clinical Use is often restricted due to multiple adverse effects. Recently, Selenium Nanoparticles (SeNPs) are gaining attention due to their low toxicity and higher biocompatibility, making them attractive nanoparticles (NPs) in medical and pharmaceutical sciences. Therefore, the current study aimed to assess if our biosynthesized SeNP from the endophytic fungus Fusarium oxysporum conjugated with DOX could alleviate the DOX-induced adverse effects. MAIN METHODS: For this purpose, we investigated various genotoxic, biochemical, histopathological, and immunohistochemical parameters and finally analyzed the metabolite profile by LC-MS/MS. KEY FINDINGS: We observed that DOX causes an increase in reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS, RNS), 8-OHdG, and malondialdehyde (MDA), decreases antioxidant defense systems and reduces BCL-2 expression in cardiac tissue. In addition, a significant increase in DNA damage and alteration in the cytoarchitecture of the liver, kidney, and heart tissues was observed by Comet Tail Length and histopathological studies, respectively. Interestingly, the DOX-SeNP conjugate reduced ROS/RNS, 8-OHdG, and MDA levels in the liver, kidney, and heart tissues. It also restored the antioxidant enzymes and cytoarchitectures of the examined tissues, reduced genotoxicity, and increased the BCL-2 levels. Finally, metabolic profiling showed that DOX reduced the number of cardioprotective metabolites, which DOX-SeNP restored. SIGNIFICANCE: Collectively, the present results describe the protective effect of DOX-conjugated SeNP against DOX-induced toxicities. In conclusion, DOX-SeNP conjugate might be better for treating patients receiving DOX alone. However, it warrants further thorough investigation.

Apigenin in cancer prevention and therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of animal models.

BACKGROUND: Apigenin is being increasingly recognized as a cancer chemopreventive agent. We aimed to investigate the anticancer effects of Apigenin in in-vivo studies to know its present research status and how close or how far it is from the clinics. METHODS: Several electronic databases such as PubMed, Springer, Cochrane, and ctri.gov.in were searched to fetch the relevant articles. We focused only on published animal studies that reported the anticancer effects of Apigenin against various cancers. Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias for each analysis, and the conflicting views were resolved later by consensus. RESULTS: A total of 25 studies focused on the anticancer effects of Apigenin on various cancer types, including liver, prostate, pancreatic, lung, nasopharyngeal, skin, colon, colorectal, colitis-associated carcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, leukemia, renal cell carcinoma, Ehrlich ascites carcinoma, and breast cancer were included. Overall, Apigenin reduces tumor volume (SMD=-3.597, 95% CI: -4.502 to -2.691, p < 0.001), tumor-weight (SMD=-2.213, 95% CI: -2.897 to -1.529, p < 0.001), tumor number (SMD=-1.081, 95% CI: -1.599 to -0.563, p < 0.001) and tumor load (SMD=-1.556, 95% CI: -2.336 to -0.776, p < 0.001). Further, it has no significant effect on the animal's body-weight (SMD=-0.345, 95% CI: -0.832 to 0.143, p = 0.165). Apigenin exerts anti-tumor effects mainly by inducing apoptosis/cell-cycle arrest. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that Apigenin has potential anticancer effects against various cancers. However, the poor symmetry of the funnel plot suggested publication bias. Thus, it warrants further research to evaluate the potential of Apigenin alone or as an adjuvant for cancer treatment.

Apigenin alleviates cancer drug Sorafenib induced multiple toxic effects in Swiss albino mice via anti-oxidative stress.

Sorafenib is an FDA-approved chemotherapeutic drug used as standard therapy for advanced-stage cancers. However, Sorafenib-induced multiple adverse effects are a major limitation that directly impacts patients' physical and physiological well-being. Therefore, it is vital to identify agents that can lessen the associated adverse effects and enhance efficacy. Apigenin, a dietary plant flavone, is a bioactive-compound present in fruits and vegetables having anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-cancer properties. Our study aimed to investigate Sorafenib-induced toxic effects at genomic, cellular, and tissue level and the potential protective effects of Apigenin. To achieve our goal, we treated Swiss albino mice with Apigenin (50 mg/kg bw) alone or in combination with Sorafenib (40 mg/kg bw). Next, we performed DNA interaction, genotoxicity, oxidative damages, anti-oxidant activities, liver enzyme levels, and histopathological studies. We demonstrated that Apigenin and Sorafenib bind DNA via electrostatic interaction. Further, Sorafenib induces genetic, oxidative, and tissue damages characterized by an increase in chromosomal aberrations and micronucleus, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), oxidative and DNA damage, lipid peroxidation, and hepato-renal damages, and a decrease in antioxidant-enzymes. Interestingly, the Sorafenib-induced adverse effects were ameliorated by Apigenin. Our findings indicate that Apigenin has protective effects against Sorafenib-induced toxicity and could be combined with Sorafenib to lessen its adverse effects and enhance its efficacy. However, further pre-clinical and clinical studies are required to evaluate Apigenin's effectiveness with Sorafenib.

Specific targeting of cancer stem cells by immunotherapy: A possible stratagem to restrain cancer recurrence and metastasis.

Cancer stem cells (CSCs), the tumor-initiating cells playing a crucial role in cancer progression, recurrence, and metastasis, have the intrinsic property of self-renewal and therapy resistance. The tumorigenic properties of these cells include generation of cellular heterogeneity and immuno-suppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), conferring them the capability to resist a variety of anti-cancer therapeutics. Further, CSCs possess several unique immunological properties that help them escape recognition by the innate and adaptive immune system and shape a TME into a pro-tumorigenic and immunosuppressive landscape. In this context, immunotherapy is considered one of the best therapeutic options for eliminating CSCs to halt cancer recurrence and metastasis. In this review, we discuss the various immunomodulatory properties of CSCs and the interaction of CSCs with the immune system enabling immune evasion. In addition, we also highlight the present research update on immunotherapeutic targeting of CSCs and the possible further scope of research on this topic. We believe that a deeper understanding of CSCs' immunological properties and the crosstalk between CSCs and the immune system can develop better innovative immune-therapeutics and enhance the efficacy of current therapy-resistant cancer treatments.