Using registries to identify adverse events in rheumatic diseases.

The proven effectiveness of biologics and other immunomodulatory products in inflammatory rheumatic diseases has resulted in their widespread use as well as reports of potential short- and long-term complications such as infection and malignancy. These complications are especially worrisome in children who often have serial exposures to multiple immunomodulatory products. Post-marketing surveillance of immunomodulatory products in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus is currently based on product-specific registries and passive surveillance, which may not accurately reflect the safety risks for children owing to low numbers, poor long-term retention, and inadequate comparators. In collaboration with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), patient and family advocacy groups, biopharmaceutical industry representatives and other stakeholders, the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) and the Duke Clinical Research Institute (DCRI) have developed a novel pharmacosurveillance model (CARRA Consolidated Safety Registry [CoRe]) based on a multicenter longitudinal pediatric rheumatic diseases registry with over 8000 participants. The existing CARRA infrastructure provides access to much larger numbers of subjects than is feasible in single-product registries. Enrollment regardless of medication exposure allows more accurate detection and evaluation of safety signals. Flexibility built into the model allows the addition of specific data elements and safety outcomes, and designation of appropriate disease comparator groups relevant to each product, fulfilling post-marketing requirements and commitments. The proposed model can be applied to other pediatric and adult diseases, potentially transforming the paradigm of pharmacosurveillance in response to the growing public mandate for rigorous post-marketing safety monitoring.

Guillain-Barré and Miller Fisher syndromes occurring with tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonist therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Diverse neurologic syndromes have been described in association with tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) antagonist therapy for inflammatory arthritides and Crohn's disease. The objective of this study was to review the occurrence and clinical features of Guillain-Barré syndrome and its variant, the Miller Fisher syndrome, during TNFalpha antagonist therapy. METHODS: The postmarketing database of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was searched, following our experience with a patient with rheumatoid arthritis in whom the Miller Fisher syndrome variant of the Guillain-Barré syndrome developed while he was receiving infliximab therapy. RESULTS: Our index patient had a neurologic illness defined initially by ataxia and dysarthria, which fluctuated in relation to each subsequent infliximab infusion and, after 6 months, culminated in areflexic flaccid quadriplegia. In addition, 15 patients in whom Guillain-Barré syndrome developed following TNFalpha antagonist therapy were identified from the FDA database. Guillain-Barré syndrome developed following infliximab therapy in 9 patients, following etanercept therapy in 5 patients, and following adalimumab therapy in 1 patient. Among the 13 patients for whom followup data were available, 1 patient experienced no resolution, 9 patients had partial resolution, and 3 patients had complete resolution of Guillain-Barré syndrome following therapy. CONCLUSION: An association of Guillain-Barré syndrome with TNFalpha antagonist therapy is supported by the worsening of neurologic symptoms that occurred in our index patient following each infusion of infliximab, and by the temporal association of this syndrome with TNFalpha antagonist therapy in 15 other patients. An acute or subacute demyelinating polyneuropathy should be considered a potential adverse effect of TNFalpha antagonist therapy.

Leukocytoclastic vasculitis associated with tumor necrosis factor-alpha blocking agents.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical features of leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV) associated with the use of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) blockers. METHODS: The Adverse Events Reporting System (AERS) of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was queried for reports of patients who developed LCV during or after starting etanercept or infliximab from date of approval of each agent through September 6, 2002. RESULTS: Thirty-five cases of LCV were identified, 20 following etanercept administration and 15 following infliximab administration. Seventeen of the 35 (48.5%) were biopsy-proven cases and the others had skin lesions that were clinically typical for LCV. Twenty-two of 35 (62.8%) patients had complete or marked improvement of skin lesions upon stopping the TNF-alpha blocker. Three patients who had received etanercept had continuing lesions despite discontinuation of the drug; one of these patients improved when switched to infliximab. One patient who received infliximab was reported to have continuing lesions despite discontinuation of the drug and treatment with prednisone and antihistamines. Six patients experienced a positive rechallenge (recurrence of LCV on restarting therapy with a TNF-alpha blocker) and 3 patients a negative rechallenge phenomenon. LCV lesions improved in patients despite continuing use of concomitant medications reportedly associated with LCV. CONCLUSION: Therapy with TNF-alpha blocking agents may be associated with the development of LCV. Skin lesions improved on discontinuation of anti-TNF-alpha therapy in most patients. Other causes of LCV should be excluded, and evaluation for systemic involvement with appropriate investigations is recommended.

Tuberculosis following the use of etanercept, a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor.

Infliximab, a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist, is associated with tuberculosis (TB), but it is unknown whether this phenomenon is true of all TNF antagonists. We reviewed 25 cases of TB due to another TNF antagonist, etanercept, that were reported to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between November 1998 and March 2002. Such cases are sometimes incomplete and are subject to underreporting. Fifteen patients received other immunosuppressive medications. The median interval between the receipt of the first dose of etanercept and the diagnosis of TB was 11.5 months. Thirteen patients had extrapulmonary TB at the time of diagnosis. Diagnosis was made on the basis of culture results for 12 patients, biopsy findings for 9, and sputum staining for 4. There were 2 deaths, 1 of which was directly attributed to TB. The estimated number of TB cases reported to the FDA for each person-year of treatment with etanercept (i.e., the "reporting rate") among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was ~10 cases/100,000 patient-years of exposure. Clinicians considering etanercept for patients with RA should be alert to the possibility of the occurrence of TB, sometimes with an unusual extrapulmonary presentation. It is unclear whether etanercept therapy increases the risk of TB beyond the elevated TB rates already documented for patients with RA.

Infectious complications of biologic treatments of rheumatoid arthritis.

Agents that block the action of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and recombinant interleukin-1 have been shown to be effective biologic treatment modalities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Given the immunosuppressive effects of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1 blockers, infections have emerged as possible complications of using these agents, an observation foreshadowed in prelicensure animal studies. At this time, hundreds of thousands of patients have received these drugs, and a wide variety of infectious complications has been reported, among which reactivation tuberculosis is most notable. Case reports alone, however, do not necessarily reflect a causal association between a therapeutic product and an adverse event. The authors review the infectious complications of the use of these agents as reported in the medical literature from November 2001 through October 2002.

Life-threatening histoplasmosis complicating immunotherapy with tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonists infliximab and etanercept.

OBJECTIVE: Two tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) antagonists were recently licensed in the US. Infliximab was licensed in 1998 for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD), and since 1999, it has been licensed in combination with methotrexate for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Etanercept was licensed in 1998 for treatment of RA and, more recently, for juvenile RA and psoriatic arthritis. Because of potential immunosuppression related to use of anti-TNFalpha agents, we sought to identify postlicensure cases of opportunistic infection, including histoplasmosis, in patients treated with these products. METHODS: The US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) passive surveillance database for monitoring postlicensure adverse events was reviewed to identify all reports received through July 2001 of histoplasmosis in patients treated with either infliximab or etanercept. RESULTS: Ten cases of Histoplasma capsulatum (HC) infection were reported: 9 associated with infliximab and 1 associated with etanercept. In patients treated with infliximab, manifestations of histoplasmosis occurred within 1 week to 6 months after the first dose and typically included fever, malaise, cough, dyspnea, and interstitial pneumonitis. Of the 10 patients with histoplasmosis, 9 required treatment in an intensive care unit, and 1 died. All patients had received concomitant immunosuppressive medications in addition to infliximab or etanercept, and all resided in HC-endemic regions. CONCLUSION: Postlicensure surveillance suggests that acute life-threatening histoplasmosis may complicate immunotherapy with TNFalpha antagonists, particularly infliximab. Histoplasmosis should be considered early in the evaluation of patients who reside in HC-endemic areas in whom infectious complications develop during treatment with infliximab or etanercept.