Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure Versus Urine Flow Rate-Guided Hydration in Preventing Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP)-guided and urine flow rate (UFR)-guided hydration. BACKGROUND: Tailored hydration regimens improve the prevention of contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI). METHODS: Between July 15, 2015, and June 6, 2019, patients at high risk for CA-AKI scheduled for coronary and peripheral procedures were randomized to 2 groups: 1) normal saline infusion rate adjusted according to the LVEDP (LVEDP-guided group); and 2) hydration controlled by the RenalGuard System in order to reach UFR ≥300 ml/h (UFR-guided group). The primary endpoint was the composite of CA-AKI (i.e., serum creatinine increase ≥25% or ≥0.5 mg/dl at 48 h) and acute pulmonary edema (PE). Major adverse events (all-cause death, renal failure requiring dialysis, PE, and sustained kidney injury) at 1 month were assessed. RESULTS: The primary endpoint occurred in 20 of 351 (5.7%) patients in the UFR-guided group and in 36 of 351 (10.3%) patients in the LVEDP-guided group (relative risk [RR]: 0.560; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.390 to 0.790; p = 0.036). CA-AKI and PE rates in the UFR-guided group and LVEDP-guided group were 5.7% and 10.0% (RR: 0.570; 95% CI: 0.300 to 0.960; p = 0.048), and, respectively, 0.3% and 2.0% (RR: 0.070; 95% CI: 0.020 to 1.160; p = 0.069). Three patients in the UFR-guided group experienced complications related to the Foley catheter. Hypokalemia rate was 6.2% in the UFR-guided group and 2.3% in the LVEDP-guided group (p = 0.013). The 1-month major adverse events rate was 7.1% in the UFR-guided group and 12.0% in the LVEDP-guided group (p = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that UFR-guided hydration is superior to LVEDP-guided hydration to prevent the composite of CA-AKI and PE.

Time-dependent benefits of pre-treatment with new oral P2Y12 -inhibitors in patients addressed to primary PCI for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this observational study was to determine the benefits of the novel, orally delivered P2Y12 -inhibitors (Is) in terms of angiographic endpoints and in relation to the time of the loading dose (LD) administration. BACKGROUND: The goal of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treatment is timely reperfusion. The P2Y12 -Is prasugrel and ticagrelor have improved the angiographic outcome of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) and patients' prognosis. However, their onset of action is impaired in STEMI and delayed by their oral administration. METHODS: The 328 eligible patients with STEMI consecutively referred for pPCI were divided into three groups depending on the interval of "P2Y12 -I LD administration-to-balloon time": Group 2 included patients that received P2Y12 -I LD at least 60 min prior to pPCI, Group 1 within 60 min prior to pPCI, and Group 0 at the moment of pPCI. Angiographic, clinical, and biochemical parameters were evaluated. Pre- and post-pPCI TIMI flow grade (TFG) and ST resolution (STR) were used as outcome measures to determine efficacy and optimal timing of pretreatment. RESULTS: Pre-pPCI TFG improved with increasing P2Y12 -I LD administration-to-balloon time; pre-PCI TFG 0/1 was 74.5% in Group 0, 65.5% in Group 1 and 54.9% in Group 2 (P < 0.002). Post-pPCI TFG 3 results also differed significantly between the three groups: 85.2% in Group 0, 88.1% in Group 1, 97.6% in Group 2 (P < 0.013). ST resolution rates were also positively associated with longer pretreatment intervals. CONCLUSIONS: This observational study suggests that the angiographic benefit of P2Y12 -I administration is time-dependent: longer pretreatment improves coronary reperfusion in terms of pre- and post-pPCI TFG and STR.