Mucositis-associated bloodstream infections in adult haematology patients with fever during neutropenia: risk factors and the impact of mucositis severity.

PURPOSE: Haematology patients with high-risk neutropenia are prone to mucosal-barrier injury-associated laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infections (MBI-LCBI). We assessed risk factors for MBI-LCBI including candidaemia in neutropenic haematology patients with fever. METHODS: This prospective observational study was performed in six dedicated haematology units in the Netherlands. Eligible haematology patients had neutropenia < 500/mL for ≥ 7 days and had fever. MBI-LCBIs were classified according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) definitions and were followed until the end of neutropenia > 500/mL or discharge. RESULTS: We included 416 patients from December 2014 until August 2019. We observed 63 MBI-LCBIs. Neither clinical mucositis scores nor the blood level of citrulline at fever onset was associated with MBI-LCBI. In the multivariable analysis, MASCC-score (odds ratio [OR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05 to 1.29 per point decrease), intensive chemotherapy (OR 3·81, 95% CI 2.10 to 6.90) and Pichia kudriavzevii (formerly Candida krusei) colonisation (OR 5.40, 95% CI 1.75 to 16.7) were retained as risk factors for MBI-LCBI, while quinolone use seemed protective (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.92). Citrulline level (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.31 per µmol/L decrease), active chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 15.4, 95% CI 1.61 to 14.7) and colonisation with fluconazole-resistant Candida (OR 8.54, 95% CI 1.51 to 48.4) were associated with candidaemia. CONCLUSION: In haematology patients with fever during neutropenia, hypocitrullinaemia at fever onset was associated with candidaemia, but not with bacterial MBI-LCBI. Patients with intensive chemotherapy with a low MASCC-score and colonisation with Pichia kudriavzevii had the highest risk of MBI-LCBI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02149329) at 19-NOV-2014.

Short versus extended treatment with a carbapenem in patients with high-risk fever of unknown origin during neutropenia: a non-inferiority, open-label, multicentre, randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Early antibiotic discontinuation has been advocated in haematology patients with fever of unknown origin during chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, but its safety is unknown. We aimed to assess if short treatment with carbapenems is non-inferior to extended treatment. METHODS: This non-inferiority, open-label, multicentre, randomised trial was done in six hospitals in the Netherlands. Adult patients (≥18 years) who were treated with intensive chemotherapy or haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) for a haematological malignancy, and had fever of unknown origin during high-risk neutropenia (<0·5 × 109/L expected for ≥7 days) were eligible. After onset of fever, patients received either 500 mg intravenous imipenem-cilastatin four times a day or 1000 mg intravenous meropenem three times a day. Between 48 h and 72 h of treatment, participants were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated sequence to receive a short-term (72 h [60-84]; short treatment group) or extended (≥9 days until being afebrile for 5 days or neutrophil recovery; extended treatment group) carbapenem regimen. The composite primary endpoint was treatment failure, defined as recurrent fever or a carbapenem-sensitive infection between day 4 and day 9 and septic shock or respiratory failure or death from day 4 until neutrophil recovery. The study was designed to assess the non-inferiority of the short treatment compared with the extended treatment regimen, with a non-inferiority margin of 10%. The primary outcome was adjudicated by an independent outcome committee, who were masked to treatment allocation, and was analysed in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. The trial is completed and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02149329. FINDINGS: Between Dec 1, 2014, and July 1, 2019, 281 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis: 144 (51%) patients were assigned to the short treatment group and 137 (49%) to the extended treatment group. Median age was 59 years (IQR 52-65); 109 (39%) patients were women and 172 (61%) were men; 205 (73%) patients received HSCT. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 28 (19%) of 144 patients in the short treatment group versus 21 (15%) of 137 patients in the extended treatment group had treatment failure (adjusted risk difference [ARD] 4·0% [90% CI -1·7% to 9·7%]; p=0·25). In the per-protocol analysis (n=225), 24 (23%) of 104 patients in the short treatment group and 19 (16%) of 121 patients in the extended treatment group had treatment failure (ARD 7·3% [0·3% to 14·9%]; p=0·11). The most common grade 3-5 infection-related adverse events were mucositis (23 [20%] of 114 adverse events in the short treatment group vs 28 [29%] of 98 adverse events in the extended treatment group), fever of unknown origin (20 [18%] vs 16 [16%] events), and bacteraemia (15 [13%] vs 13 [13%] events). The number of serious adverse events were higher in the short treatment group (23 [16%] of 144 patients) than in the extended treatment group (14 [10%] of 137 patients), due to an increased rate of readmission (17 [12%] patients in the short treatment group vs ten [7%] in the extended treatment group). Death before 30 days after neutrophil recovery occurred in five (3%) participants in the short treatment group: two due to progressive leukaemia, two due to candidaemia, and one due to Enterococcus faecium bacteraemia and drug-induced pneumonitis. One (1%) patient died in the extended treatment group due to candidaemia. None of the deaths were related to carbapenem-sensitive infections. INTERPRETATION: Early discontinuation of carbapenem treatment in patients with febrile neutropenia of unknown origin does not result in increased treatment failure. Our study supports short treatment if patients are afebrile after 3 days of carbapenem treatment. However, because secondary analyses suggested that serious adverse events and all-cause mortality occurred more often in patients who are persistantly febrile the short treatment group, we recommend vigilance for non-susceptible pathogens and early resumption of empirical therapy in patients who are deteriorating. FUNDING: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development and Fonds NutsOhra.

Antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 variants induced by four different SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in health care workers in the Netherlands: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Emerging and future SARS-CoV-2 variants may jeopardize the effectiveness of vaccination campaigns. Therefore, it is important to know how the different vaccines perform against diverse SARS-CoV-2 variants. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In a prospective cohort of 165 SARS-CoV-2 naive health care workers in the Netherlands, vaccinated with either one of four vaccines (BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, AZD1222 or Ad26.COV2.S), we performed a head-to-head comparison of the ability of sera to recognize and neutralize SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs; Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta and Omicron). Repeated serum sampling was performed 5 times during a year (from January 2021 till January 2022), including before and after booster vaccination with BNT162b2. Four weeks after completing the initial vaccination series, SARS-CoV-2 wild-type neutralizing antibody titers were highest in recipients of mRNA-1273, followed by recipients of BNT162b2 (geometric mean titers (GMT) of 358 [95% CI 231-556] and 214 [95% CI 153-299], respectively; p<0.05), and substantially lower in those vaccinated with the adenovirus vector-based vaccines AZD1222 and Ad26.COV2.S (GMT of 18 [95% CI 11-30] and 14 [95% CI 8-25] IU/ml, respectively; p<0.001). VOCs neutralization was reduced in all vaccine groups, with the greatest reduction in neutralization GMT observed against the Omicron variant (fold change 0.03 [95% CI 0.02-0.04], p<0.001). The booster BNT162b2 vaccination increased neutralizing antibody titers for all groups with substantial improvement against the VOCs including the Omicron variant. We used linear regression and linear mixed model analysis. All results were adjusted for possible confounding of age and sex. Study limitations include the lack of cellular immunity data. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study shows that the mRNA vaccines appear superior to adenovirus vector-based vaccines in inducing neutralizing antibodies against VOCs four weeks after initial vaccination and after booster vaccination, which implies the use of mRNA vaccines for both initial and booster vaccination.

[Congenital anomalies in Amsterdam: results of the 'Amsterdam-Born Children and their Development' study]. / Congenitale afwijkingen in Amsterdam: resultaten 'Amsterdam born children and their development'-studie.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of congenital anomalies in children born in Amsterdam and to analyse potential differences between groups based on risk factors such as ethnicity and maternal age. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2004, mothers filled in questionnaires on their newborn children on behalf of the Amsterdam-Born Children and their Development study (ABCD study). Data from 5,276 liveborn children in this cohort were used to calculate the prevalence rates of congenital anomalies in Amsterdam. These were compared with expected prevalence rates based on Eurocat data for the Northern region of the Netherlands during the years 2000-2005. Prevalence rates were compared between subgroups which had been divided according to risk factors: maternal ethnic origin, maternal age, parity, gender of child, inter-pregnancy interval, years of maternal education, smoking, alcohol use, and periconceptional folate use. RESULTS: The total prevalence of major congenital anomalies among liveborn children in the ABCD cohort was as expected based on the figures from the Eurocat registration. Digestive anomalies were reported significantly less frequently (n = 1) than expected (n = 10). Mothers of Surinam descent more frequently reported a child with a musculoskeletal anomaly. Older mothers were more likely to report congenital anomalies. No significant trends regarding other risk factors were observed. CONCLUSIONS: No significant trends regarding ethnicity and congenital anomalies were detected. The interpretation of the other results was hampered by methodological differences between the ABCD study and Eurocat. Nationwide registration with active case detection of congenital anomalies is therefore recommended.