Therapeutic drug monitoring in psychiatry.

In medicine, there are two main methods of improving the healthcare provided: perfecting (optimizing) the existing ones and seeking new treatment procedures. Despite of tremendous development in the central nervous system research, current treatment of severe mental illnesses, such as schizophrenia and depressive disorder, is suboptimal. Nowadays, optimization of treatment in psychiatry includes therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and pharmacogenomic testing, which examines genetic variation involved in medication metabolism and drug action. The TDM enables to determine drug concentrations in blood and adjust the dose accordingly if clinical effects correlate better with drug blood levels than drug doses. The first international guidelines for TDM in neuropsychopharmacology were published in 2004 and regularly updated. The recent update provides therapeutic reference ranges for a majority of commonly prescribed psychiatric medications and gives example of patients regularly treated in clinical practice profiting from TDM (using antipsychotics and changing their smoking habits). TDM in psychiatry is an underused tool, given its ability to optimize treatment, as well as to improve treatment effectiveness.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for spinal hemangioblastoma - disease control and volume analysis in long-term follow up.

Background: This retrospective analysis evaluated the long-term outcome of spinal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment for hemangioblastomas. Materials and methods: Between 2010 and 2018, 5 patients with 18 Von-Hippel Lindau-related pial-based spinal hemangioblastomas were treated with fractionated SBRT. After precisely registering images of all relevant datasets, we delineated the gross tumor volume, spinal cord (including intramedullary cysts and/or syrinxes), and past radiotherapy regions. A sequential optimization algorithm was used for dose determinations, and patients received 25-26 Gy in five fractions or 24 Gy in three fractions. On-line image guidance, based on spinal bone structures, and two orthogonal radiographs were provided. The actuarial nidus control, surgery-free survival, cyst/syrinx changes, and progression-free survival were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. Results: The median follow-up was 5 years after SBRT. Patients displayed one nidus progression, one need of neurosurgery, and two cyst/syrinx progressions directly connected to symptom worsening. No SBRT-related complications or acute adverse radiation-related events occurred. However, one asymptomatic radiological sign of myelopathy occurred two years after SBRT. All tumors regressed; the one-year equivalent tumor volume reduction was 0.2 mL and the median volume significantly decreased by 28% (p = 0.012). Tumor volume reductions were not correlated with the mean (p = 0.19) or maximum (p = 0.16) dose. Conclusions: SBRT for pial-based spinal hemangioblastomas was an effective, safe, viable alternative to neurosurgery in asymptomatic patients. Escalating doses above the conventional dose-volume limits of spinal cord tolerance showed no additional benefit.