Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Open Orthop J ; 11: 309-315, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28567160

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Hip fractures are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. A new patient pathway was introduced in our institution to facilitate rapid preoperative assessment, acute physician involvement and early surgery for patients with hip fractures. We sought to assess its impact on patient care and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective audit of 161 patients admitted with a proximal femoral fracture in the six months before (92 patients) and after (69 patients) implementation of the pathway. Data included: time to orthogeriatric assessment (TtG); time to surgery (TtS); length of hospital stay (LOS); return to original accommodation; inpatient mortality rate. RESULTS: In the six months after introduction of the pathway, there was an increase in patients who received pre-operative medical assessment (85% after vs. 19% before, p=0.0001). Average TtG decreased (19 vs. 91 hours, p=0.0001), as did LOS (19.5 vs. 24.8 days, p=0.029) and mortality (4 vs. 14%, p=0.0336). There was an increase in patients returning to their original place of accommodation (80% vs. 57%, p=0.0069). There was a reduction in mean TtS (31 vs. 37 hours, p=0.0663), although this was not statistically significant. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Rapid medical optimisation and prompt surgery significantly improve outcomes in patients with hip fractures. By involving an acute medical team in patient care from the point of admission, we have significantly improved our inpatient mortality and increased the proportion of patients returning to their preoperative place of accommodation, thereby maintaining patient independence and reducing the financial and logistical burden on social care.

2.
J Long Term Eff Med Implants ; 24(2-3): 163-71, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25272215

RESUMO

Slipped upper femoral epiphysis is a disabling condition with an annual incidence of 2-13 per 100,000. In situ surgical fixation is the preferred initial treatment for both stable and unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) cases. The main aim is to avoid further slippage and complications such as osteonecrosis and chondrolysis. The choice of medical implants in managing this condition has changed along the years from large nail-like devices to cannulated screws. The biomechanical properties of different fixation techniques have been studied. All implants have been associated with complications that can occur intraoperatively as well as in the early and late postoperative periods. This report examines a number of different implants used and identifies complications and ways on how to avoid such complications. It also looks at the complications directly related to medical implants in the management of SCFE. We looked at published literature in peer-reviewed journals describing the use of the different medical implants and the documented complications. We also examined literature that suggests ways on how to avoid and manage these complications. A review of the current literature is presented in this text.


Assuntos
Dispositivos de Fixação Ortopédica/efeitos adversos , Escorregamento das Epífises Proximais do Fêmur/cirurgia , Doenças das Cartilagens/etiologia , Doenças das Cartilagens/prevenção & controle , Fraturas do Fêmur/etiologia , Fraturas do Fêmur/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Fixadores Internos/efeitos adversos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/prevenção & controle , Osteólise/etiologia , Osteólise/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA