Comparison of Trabeculectomy Outcomes Performed by Residents in Training and Ophthalmologists.

PRCIS: Resident-performed trabeculectomies present higher intraocular pressure and lower complete success rate at 1 year. PURPOSE: To compare the 1-year outcomes of ab externo trabeculectomy between residents in training and staff ophthalmologists. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included all consecutive eyes submitted to ab externo trabeculectomy between January 2015 to June 2020. A 1-year complete success rate was considered using all the following criteria: intraocular pressure (IOP)≤21 mm Hg and ≥6mm Hg without ocular hypotensive medications; IOP reduction≥30%; without loss of light perception, phthisis bulbi, and further glaucoma surgery (excluding suture lysis and bleb needling). RESULTS: One hundred and ten eyes from 99 patients were included. Thirty percent (n=33) of the trabeculectomies were performed by residents. There were no significant preoperative differences between groups, apart from age at surgery, which was higher in the residents' group (72.39±6.83 vs. 62.00±15.07 years, P<0.001), and visual field index (Humphrey Field Analyzer), which was lower in the ophthalmologists' group (51.81±34.74% vs. 32.04±33.83%, P=0.013). IOP at 1-, 3-, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery was significantly higher in the resident's group (P<0.05). Resident-performed trabeculectomies achieved a significantly lower complete success rate when compared with the ophthalmologists' group (39.39% vs. 64.94%, P=0.013). The overall rate of the postoperative complications and reintervention did not differ between groups, but the occurrence of a shallow anterior chamber was more frequent in the residents' group (15.15% vs. 4.05%, P=0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Resident-performed trabeculectomies present significantly higher postoperative IOP levels and a lower complete success rate when compared with staff ophthalmologists. It is, therefore, fundamental to adopt strategies to change this gap, improve patient safety, and strengthen resident confidence.

The 2021 Portuguese Society of Ophthalmology joint guidelines with Paediatric Rheumatology on the screening, monitoring and medical treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis.

AIM: To develop the first Ophthalmology joint guidelines with Paediatric Rheumatology with recommendations on the screening, monitoring and medical treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis (JIA-U), endorsed by the Portuguese Society of Ophthalmology (SPO). METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to include publications up to July 14th 2020, with no language restrictions, in order to include all the international position papers/guidelines concerning the medical management of JIA-U and randomised clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of medical treatment in this field. We searched through MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. The Delphi modified technique to generate consensus was used. Preliminary evidence statements were subject to an anonymous agreement assessment and discussion process using an online survey, followed by further discussion and update at a national meeting. A draft of the manuscript with all recommendations was then circulated among all participants and suggestions were incorporated. The final version was again circulated before publication. RESULTS: Twenty-six recommendations were developed focusing on the following topics: general management (3), screening and follow-up of uveitis (4), treatment (17) and health education in JIA-U among patients and families (2). CONCLUSION: These guidelines were designed to support the shared medical management of patients with JIA-U and emphasize the need for a multidisciplinary approach between Ophthalmology and Paediatric Rheumatology regarding the comprehensive care of JIA-U. We acknowledge that updating these recommendations will be warranted in the future, as more evidence becomes available. KEY-WORDS: juvenile idiopathic arthritis, uveitis, biological treatment, conventional immunosuppressive treatment, multidisciplinary management, guidelines, consensus, review, Delphi Technique.

Aflibercept in diabetic macular edema refractory to previous bevacizumab: outcomes and predictors of success.

PURPOSE: To evaluate functional and anatomical outcomes after aflibercept in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) with poor response to bevacizumab. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with DME recalcitrant to bevacizumab who were switched to aflibercept between January and December 2015. All patients had a minimal follow-up of three months before the conversion and underwent at least three injections of bevacizumab. Functional outcome consisted in best corrected visual acuity (VA). Anatomical outcomes were demonstrated through central macular thickness (CMT) measured by optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: Forty-nine eyes of 34 subjects were reviewed. Mean VA improved from 0.55 ± 0.32 logMAR to 0.46 ± 0.33 logMAR (p = 0.038). Mean CMT decreased from 473 ± 146 µm to 349 ± 85 µm (p < 0.001). Twelve eyes (24%) demonstrated absence of macular edema after aflibercept. Previous bevacizumab exposure did not correlate with different outcomes. The variation of VA in response to aflibercept was significantly superior in the group with poorer VA before the switch (mean variation of -0.097 ± 0.21 logMAR) when compared to eyes with VA < 0.4 logMAR (mean variation of +0.019 ± 0.090 logMAR; p = 0.036). The same scenario was verified for anatomical outcomes as eyes with poor vision before the switch (≥0.4 logMAR) achieved superior reduction in CMT in response to aflibercept (mean CMT variation of -157 ± 171 µm versus -49.5 ± 39.9 µm; p < 0.01). Pre-switch CMT was a predictor of CMT reduction after switching (B = -0.945; confidence interval 95% -1.1; -0.76; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Conversion to aflibercept for persistent DME resulted in functional and anatomical improvements and these outcomes were not influenced by previous bevacizumab exposure. Pre-switch CMT was a predictor of anatomical changes after aflibercept.