The effect of teriparatide compared with risedronate on reduction of back pain in postmenopausal women with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

UNLABELLED: The effect of teriparatide and risedronate on back pain was tested, and there was no difference in the proportion of patients experiencing a reduction in back pain between groups after 6 or 18 months. Patients receiving teriparatide had greater increases in bone mineral density and had fewer vertebral fractures. INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to understand the effect of teriparatide in reducing back pain in patients with prevalent back pain and vertebral fracture compared to risedronate. METHODS: In an 18-month randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial, we investigated the effects of teriparatide (20 µg/day) vs. risedronate (35 mg/week) in postmenopausal women with back pain likely due to vertebral fracture. The primary objective was to compare the proportion of subjects reporting ≥30% reduction in worst back pain severity from baseline to 6 months as assessed by a numeric rating scale in each treatment group. Pre-specified secondary and exploratory outcomes included assessments of average and worst back pain at additional time points, disability and quality of life, bone mineral density, incidence of fractures, and safety. RESULTS: At 6 months, 59% of teriparatide and 57% of risedronate patients reported ≥30% reduction in worst back pain and there were no differences between groups in the proportion of patients experiencing reduction in worst or average back pain at any time point, disability, or quality of life. There was a greater increase from baseline in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine (p = 0.001) and femoral neck (p = 0.02) with teriparatide compared to risedronate and a lower incidence of vertebral fractures at 18 months (4% teriparatide and 9% risedronate; p = 0.01). Vertebral fractures were less severe (p = 0.04) in the teriparatide group. There was no difference in the overall incidence of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were no differences in back pain-related endpoints, patients receiving teriparatide had greater skeletal benefit than those receiving risedronate.

Sustained efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene in preventing fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results of a 5-year, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

UNLABELLED: In this 2-year extension of a 3-year study, bazedoxifene showed sustained efficacy in preventing new vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and in preventing non-vertebral fractures in higher-risk women. Bazedoxifene significantly increased bone mineral density and reduced bone turnover versus placebo and was generally safe and well tolerated. INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis over 5 years. METHODS: A total of 4,216 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were enrolled in this 2-year extension of a 3-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. In the core study (N = 7,492), subjects received bazedoxifene 20 or 40 mg/day, raloxifene 60 mg/day, or placebo. The raloxifene arm was discontinued after 3 years; subjects receiving bazedoxifene 40 mg were transitioned to bazedoxifene 20 mg after 4 years. Five-year findings are reported for bazedoxifene 20 and 40/20 mg and placebo. Endpoints included incidence of new vertebral fractures (primary) and non-vertebral fractures, and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers. RESULTS: At 5 years, the incidence of new vertebral fractures in the intent-to-treat population was significantly lower with bazedoxifene 20 mg (4.5%) and 40/20 mg (3.9%) versus placebo (6.8%; P < 0.05), with relative risk reductions of 35% and 40%, respectively. Non-vertebral fracture incidence was similar among groups. In a subgroup of higher-risk women (n = 1,324; femoral neck T-score ≤-3.0 and/or ≥ 1 moderate or severe or ≥ 2 mild vertebral fracture[s]), bazedoxifene 20 mg reduced non-vertebral fracture risk versus placebo (37%; P = 0.06); combined data for bazedoxifene 20 and 40/20 mg reached statistical significance (34% reduction; P < 0.05). Bazedoxifene significantly increased BMD and reduced bone turnover versus placebo (P < 0.05) and was generally safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support a sustained anti-fracture effect of bazedoxifene on new vertebral fractures in postmenopausal osteoporotic women and on non-vertebral fractures in the higher-risk subgroup of women.

Risk of fracture in women treated with monthly oral ibandronate or weekly bisphosphonates: the eValuation of IBandronate Efficacy (VIBE) database fracture study.

The eValuation of IBandronate Efficacy (VIBE) head-to-head database fracture study compared fracture rates between patients treated with monthly ibandronate and weekly oral bisphosphonates (BPs). This large study included women >/=45 years old, newly prescribed monthly oral ibandronate or weekly oral alendronate or risedronate, and without malignancy or Paget's disease of bone. The primary analysis included patients who were adherent to treatment during the first 90 days after the index date. The risks of hip, nonvertebral, vertebral and any clinical fracture were compared using Cox proportional hazards models and adjusted for potential confounding factors. A secondary, "intent-to-treat" analysis included all patients who received at least one BP prescription. Sensitivity analyses based on the primary analysis compared patients receiving ibandronate with patients receiving weekly alendronate or risedronate separately, and explored the effect of excluding patients with potential confounding factors from the analysis. Further sensitivity analyses varied the requirement for adherence during the first 90 days after the index date. The primary analysis population included 7345 monthly ibandronate and 56,837 weekly BP patients. Fracture rates after the 12-month observational period were <2% and fracture risk was not significantly different between patients receiving monthly ibandronate or weekly BPs for hip, nonvertebral or any clinical fracture (adjusted relative risk: hip=1.06, p=0.84; nonvertebral=0.88, p=0.255; any clinical fracture=0.82, p=0.052). Ibandronate patients had a significantly lower risk of vertebral fracture than weekly BP patients (adjusted relative risk 0.36, 95% confidence interval 0.18-0.75, p=0.006). In the secondary, "intent-to-treat" analysis, relative risks of fracture were not significantly different between treatment groups for any fracture type. The results of the sensitivity analyses were generally consistent with the primary analysis. This retrospective cohort study found that patients treated with oral monthly ibandronate or weekly BPs (alendronate and risedronate) had similar, low risks of hip fracture, nonvertebral fracture and any clinical fracture. Ibandronate patients had a significantly lower relative risk of vertebral fracture than weekly BP patients; the clinical implications of these findings require further exploration and validation.

Monthly ibandronate suppresses serum CTX-I within 3 days and maintains a monthly fluctuating pattern of suppression.

UNLABELLED: Bone turnover markers such as serum C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I) can be used to assess drug efficacy in osteoporosis. This study evaluated the pattern of CTX-I suppression in postmenopausal osteoporotic women receiving ibandronate. Ibandronate decreased serum CTX-I levels within 3 days of therapy initiation. Over 6 months, the levels remained suppressed below baseline. INTRODUCTION: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the rapidity of onset and pattern of suppression of the bone resorption marker serum CTX-I in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) who received once-monthly oral ibandronate. METHODS: Women diagnosed with PMO received once-monthly oral ibandronate (150 mg) or placebo for 6 months. Serum CTX-I was measured at baseline and after study dose administration on day 3 (month 1 only) and days 7, 14, 21, and 28 (months 1-6). Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase was measured on days 7 and 28 (months 1-6). RESULTS: This study enrolled 67 women: 49 received ibandronate, 17 received placebo, and one took no study drug. At day 3, median reduction in serum CTX-I from baseline was 70.2% with ibandronate and 6.0% with placebo (difference, -64.2%; 95% confidence interval, -80.3% to -46.2%; p < 0.0001). In women receiving ibandronate, serum CTX-I levels remained consistently below baseline, exhibiting a regular monthly fluctuating pattern of suppression over 6 months. Ibandronate was well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Monthly ibandronate decreased serum CTX-I within 3 days. Over 6 months, in women receiving once-monthly ibandronate, serum CTX-I remained suppressed below baseline. A monthly fluctuation, related to time from last dose, was observed.

Comparison of sulfasalazine and placebo in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. A Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether sulfasalazine (SSZ) at a dosage of 2,000 mg/day is effective for the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) resistant to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug therapy. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-one patients with PsA were recruited from 15 clinics, randomized (double-blind) to SSZ or placebo treatment, and followed up for 36 weeks. Treatment response was based on joint pain/ tenderness and swelling scores and physician and patient global assessments. RESULTS: Longitudinal analysis revealed a trend favoring SSZ treatment (P = 0.13). At the end of treatment, response rates were 57.8% for SSZ compared with 44.6% for placebo (P = 0.05). The Westergren erythrocyte sedimentation rate declined more in the PsA patients taking SSZ than in those taking placebo (P < 0.0001). Adverse reactions were fewer than expected and were mainly due to nonspecific gastrointestinal complaints, including dyspepsia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. CONCLUSION: SSZ at a dosage of 2,000 mg/day is well tolerated and may be more effective than placebo in the treatment of patients with PsA.

Identification of conserved amino acids in the human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor alpha subunit critical for function. Evidence for formation of a heterodimeric receptor complex prior to ligand binding.

A superfamily of growth factor and cytokine receptors has recently been identified, which is characterized by four spatially conserved cysteine residues, a tryptophan-serine motif (WSXWS) in the extracellular domain, and a proline-rich cytoplasmic domain. The high affinity human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) receptor (hGM-CSFR) consists of two subunits, alpha (hGM-CSFR alpha) and beta (hGM-CSFR beta), both of which are members of the receptor superfamily. In this study, we prepared mutations in conserved amino acids of the receptor subunit necessary for GM-CSF binding (hGM-CSFR alpha) and analyzed mutant receptors for low affinity binding, internalization, and high affinity binding when complexed with the beta subunit. Mutations in the cytoplasmic domain did not affect GM-CSF binding or receptor internalization. Mutation of a single conserved serine residue within the WSXWS motif diminishes cell surface receptor expression but not ligand binding. Mutation of either the second or third conserved cysteine residue of hGM-CSFR alpha resulted in complete loss of low affinity binding; however, co-expression of the cysteine 2 mutant with hGM-CSFR beta yielded a high affinity receptor complex. Since neither the cysteine 2 mutant nor the beta subunit can bind ligand alone, this result suggests that hGM-CSFR alpha and hGM-CSFR beta exist in a preformed heterodimeric protein complex on the plasma membrane.

The importance of aspects of treatment for fibromyalgia (fibrositis). Differences between patient and physician views.

Thirty-five individuals with fibromyalgia (fibrositis), 22 of their physicians, and 49 rheumatologists on an Arthritis Foundation referral list rated the importance of 24 aspects of fibromyalgia treatment. These encompassed symptom control, psychosocial factors, information, and physical therapy. Respondents with fibromyalgia rated their satisfaction with the way each aspect of treatment had been managed by their physician, and each completed a health status questionnaire. Fibromyalgia patients viewed 8 of the 24 aspects of treatment as significantly more important than did their own physician, and 18 of the 24 as significantly more important than did area rheumatologists. Satisfaction with the way treatment had been managed was generally low. Some evidence suggested that patients' health status was affected positively by the extent to which their physician viewed certain aspects of treatment as important. The results are expected to be useful in the design of fibromyalgia education programs for both lay and health professional audiences.

Thrombocytopenia and intravenous heroin use.

Five young male heroin users presented with a syndrome resembling acute immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Although a viral, autoimmune, or toxic origin cannot be conclusively excluded at present, data are most consistent with the hypothesis that the thrombocytopenia was due to a drug-related immunologic mechanism that resulted in peripheral platelet destruction. Epidemiologic considerations suggest the common agent involved in their illnesses was present in the heroin they used. Although glucocorticoid therapy was followed by clinical recovery in four of the five patients (one was lost to follow-up), it is not certain that this represented a causal relation.

A musculoskeletal syndrome in intravenous heroin users: association with brown heroin.

During a recent 5-month period, 16 intravenous heroin users were hospitalized with a previously unrecognized complication of drug abuse. The characteristic symptoms were similar in all patients and included fever, paraspinal myalgias, and periarthritis. There was no evidence of bacterial infection, hepatitis, or drug abstinence as the cause of these musculoskeletal symptoms. Continued heroin use was associated with progressive musculoskeletal symptoms, while discontinuation of heroin use resulted in complete recovery. Antibiotics did not affect the outcome, and the syndrome was self-limited in all hospitalized patients. The pathogenesis of this syndrome is unknown but may be related to the heroin, which was described as brown by the patients, or an adulterant.

Mitogen induced cellular cytotoxicity (MICC) in multiple myeloma.

Mitogen induced cellular cytotoxicity (MICC) was noted to be markedly increased in patients with multiple myeloma as compared to normal controls and to patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Enhanced MICC was present at various effector-to-target cell ratios and at several mitogen concentrations. Removal of adherent, phagocytic cells by carbonyl iron, glass wool, or rayon columns abolished the MICC response from the peripheral blood of both multiple myeloma patients and normal controls. Thus, the effector cell mediating MICC may be monocytic in origin and closely resembles the suppressor cell for immunoglobulin synthesis described in patients with multiple myeloma. Our data suggest that the MICC assay with chicken red blood cells as targets may provide a convenient method for identifying pathologic conditions where this cytotoxic effector cell population plays an active role.