Presence of risk factors for thyroid cancer does not improve the performance of ultrasound screening for thyroid nodules in patients with obesity.

PURPOSE: It has been suggested, on a theoretical basis, that ultrasound screening of thyroid nodules in obese patients with additional risk factors (family history, chronic autoimmune thyroiditis or high thyrotropin) might be cost-effective for the early detection and treatment of thyroid cancer. The present study evaluates if this approach can be validated in a real clinical setting. METHODS: Patients with obesity who attended hospital-based clinics were evaluated for risk factors of thyroid cancer and ultrasound screened for thyroid nodularity. Detected nodules were evaluated according to current guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 429 patients were evaluated (70.2% women, mean age 49.1 ± 11.0, mean body mass index 42.6 ± 5.8 kg/m2 ). Risk factors were present in 129 (30.1%) patients. Thyroid nodules with indication for fine-needle aspiration biopsy were detected in 69 (16.1%). We did not find differences in the risk of harbouring thyroid nodules according to the presence of risk factors (no risk factors 16.6%, risk factors 14.1%, P = .64). No single risk factor conferred an increased risk for thyroid nodules During the screening procedure, four cases of thyroid cancer were detected, none of them with the evaluated risk factors. CONCLUSION: The presence of known risk factors for thyroid cancer does not improve the performance of a US screening strategy aimed at the detection of thyroid nodules in obese patients. According to current guidelines, screening for thyroid nodules in obese patients is not recommended regardless of the presence of thyroid cancer risk factors.

[Healthcare impact of introduction of thyroid ultrasound in a thyroid nodule pathology unit]. / Impacto asistencial tras la introducción de la ecografía tiroidea en una unidad monográfica de atención al nódulo tiroideo.

INTRODUCTION: Worldwide incidence of thyroid cancer has increased in recent decades. OBJECTIVE: To provide evidence of the diagnostic and care efficiency of a monographic thyroid nodule clinic integrating clinical examination, ultrasound examination, and cytology with on site evaluation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients attending the monographic thyroid nodule clinic from January 2004 to June 2010. Two periods may be distinguished based on availability of ultrasound equipment at the time of the visit: a first period (P1: 01/2004-09/2007) where no ultrasound equipment was available at the clinic and FNA by palpation was performed, and a second period (P2: 10/2007-06/2010) where this equipment was available and ultrasound-guided FNA was performed. RESULTS: A total of 1036 patients [P1: 537 (52%), P2: 499 (48%)] were seen and enrolled. Diagnostic efficiency (P1 vs P2): 143 vs 181 patients were seen annually, p<0.001; FNA number/nodule: 1.68 vs 1.17, p<0.001; percent FNAs with inadequate material: 26% vs 5.3%, p<0.001; mean (SD) nodule size: 23.6 (12.4) vs 21.7 (11.7) mm, p 0.040; proportion of nodules examined less than 10mm in size: 9.9% vs 13.7%, p 0.030. Care efficiency: mean time (range) from the first visit to surgery indication: 332 (0-2177) vs 108 (0-596) days, p<0.001; proportion of patients referred for surgery due to suspect cytology/other reasons: 1.06 vs 2.21, p<0.001; and operated benign neoplasm/pathology: 0.47 vs 0.93, p=0.002. CONCLUSION: A monographic thyroid nodule clinic integrating clinical examination, ultrasound, and cytology evaluated on site increases diagnostic and care efficiency in patients with thyroid nodules.

Serum free triiodothyronine (T3) to free thyroxine (T4) ratio in treated central hypothyroidism compared with primary hypothyroidism and euthyroidism.

UNLABELLED: The standard treatment of hypothyroidism (central and primary) consists of thyroxine (T4) administration alone. However, the normal thyroid gland produces a small proportion of triiodothyronine (T3) directly into the circulation. AIM: We aimed to study the free T3 to free T4 ratio in treated central hypothyroidism compared with euthyroidism and treated primary hypothyroidism. METHODS: Eighty-three subjects were included in this cross-sectional study: 36 with central hypothyroidism, 20 with primary hypothyroidism and 27 healthy controls. A clinical history and a physical examination, including height and weight measurement, were performed and body mass index (BMI) was calculated. Fasting blood was drawn to measure T3, T4, free T3, free T4 and TSH. RESULTS: The free T3 to free T4 ratio was lower in treated central hypothyroidism than in euthyroidism but was similar to treated primary hypothyroidism. Free T4 was higher in treated central and primary hypothyroidism than in euthyroidism. Age, sex and BMI did not affect the free T3 to free T4 ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Treated patients with central hypothyroidism had a lower free T3 to free T4 ratio, similar free T3 levels and higher free T4 concentrations than euthyroid controls, whereas all these parameters were similar in central and primary hypothyroid patients treated with T4. The question of whether these findings translate into adequate tissue concentrations of free thyroid hormones in all tissues remains to be answered. Further studies should aim to determine whether clinical outcomes could be improved by a treatment achieving more physiological plasma concentrations.