Field study of adult male circumcision using the ShangRing in routine clinical settings in Kenya and Zambia.

BACKGROUND: Circumcision devices can facilitate adult voluntary medical male circumcision programs for HIV prevention. The World Health Organization recommends field studies to confirm the safety of devices in local settings. METHODS: We evaluated the safety of the ShangRing device in routine service delivery by measuring adverse event (AE) rates overall and by HIV status. We enrolled men aged 18-54 years and scheduled them for 2 post-circumcision follow-up visits at day 7 for device removal and days 35-42. Men were examined to document AEs and healing and to ascertain client acceptability. Provider preferences were also assessed. RESULTS: We enrolled 1163 men (557 in Kenya and 606 in Zambia); the as-treated analysis population comprised 1149 men, including 84 HIV-positive men. There were no serious AEs and 2 severe AEs: 1 severe wound dehiscence and 1 severe pain, both of which resolved with treatment. There were 18 moderate/severe AEs among 16 men (1.4% of men; 95% confidence interval: 0.8% to 2.3%). The most common AE was wound dehiscence (9 men, 0.8%). Healing was similar between HIV-infected and uninfected men, with 85.7% and 87.3% completely healed at days 35-42. Most men (94.8%) were very satisfied with post-circumcision appearance of the penis, and almost all would recommend a ShangRing procedure. Nineteen of 21 providers preferred the ShangRing over conventional surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The ShangRing has an excellent safety profile with few hemorrhagic and infectious complications. The ShangRing is well accepted by clients and preferred by providers, making it a potential boon to the scale-up of adult voluntary medical male circumcision in African countries.

Randomized controlled trial of the shang ring versus conventional surgical techniques for adult male circumcision: safety and acceptability.

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical profiles of Shang Ring versus conventional circumcisions. DESIGN: Parallel group open-label randomized controlled trial with one-to-one allocations in 2 sites. METHODS: We enrolled HIV-negative men aged 18-54 years in Homa Bay, Kenya, and Lusaka, Zambia and followed them at 2, 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, and 60 days after Shang Ring versus conventional circumcision. We compared the duration of surgery, postoperative pain using a visual analog scale, adverse events rates, time to complete wound healing by clinical assessment, participant acceptability, and provider preferences between circumcision groups. RESULTS: We randomized 200 men to each group; 197 and 201 contributed to the Shang Ring and conventional surgery analyses, respectively. Adverse event rates were similar between groups. Pain scores at most time points were similar, however, the Shang Ring group reported higher scores for worst pain during erections (3.5 ± 1.9 vs. 2.3 ± 1.7; P < 0.001). Significantly more men were satisfied with the cosmetic appearance following Shang Ring male circumcision (MC), 95.7% versus 85.9% (P = 0.02) in Kenya, and 96.8% versus 71.3% (P < 0.01) in Zambia. Although median time to complete wound healing was 43 days in both groups, conventional circumcisions healed on average 5.2 days sooner (P < 0.001). Shang Ring procedures took one-third the time of conventional MC, 7 versus 20 minutes. All circumcision providers preferred the Shang Ring. CONCLUSIONS: Safety profiles of the 2 techniques were similar, all MC providers preferred the Shang Ring technique, and study participants preferred the Shang Ring's cosmetic results. The Shang Ring should be considered for adult MC as programs scale-up.