Ten-year experience with sutureless Perceval bioprosthesis: single-centre analysis in 1157 implants.

AIMS: We describe long-term clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in the largest single-centre cohort of patients who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) with sutureless Perceval (CorCym, Italy) bioprosthesis. METHODS: Between March 2011 and March 2021, 1157 patients underwent AVR with Perceval bioprosthesis implantation. Mean age was 77 ±â€Š6 years (range: 46-89 years) and mean EuroSCORE II was 6.7 ±â€Š3.2% (range: 1.7-14.2%). Concomitant procedures were performed in 266 patients (23%). RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was 1.38% (16/1157). Eight hundred and twenty of 891 (92%) isolated AVRs underwent minimally invasive surgery with a ministernotomy ( n  = 196) or right minithoracotomy ( n  = 624) approach. Cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times were 81.1 ±â€Š24.3 and 50.6 ±â€Š11.7 min for isolated AVR and 144.5 ±â€Š34.7 and 96.4 ±â€Š21.6 min for combined procedures. At mean follow-up of 53.08 ±â€Š6.7 months (range: 1-120.5 months), survival was 96.5% and mean transvalvular pressure gradient was 13.7 ±â€Š5.8 mmHg. Left ventricular mass decreased from 152.8 to 116.1 g/m 2 ( P  < 0.001) and moderate paravalvular leakage occurred in three patients without haemolysis not requiring any treatment. Freedom from reoperation was 97.6%. Eight patients required surgical reintervention and 19 patients transcatheter valve-in-valve procedure for structural prosthesis degeneration at a mean of 5.6 years after first operation (range: 2-9 years). CONCLUSION: AVR with a Perceval bioprosthesis is associated with good clinical results and excellent haemodynamic performance in our 10-year experience. Structural degeneration rate of Perceval is comparable with other bioprosthetic aortic valves. Sutureless technology may reduce operative time especially in combined procedures and enable minimally invasive AVR.

Right anterior mini-thoracotomy and sutureless valves: the perfect marriage.

BACKGROUND: A minimally invasive approach (MIA) reduces mortality and morbidity in patients referred for aortic valve replacement (AVR). Sutureless technology facilitates a MIA. We describe our experience with the sutureless Perceval (LivaNova, Italy) aortic bioprosthesis through a right anterior mini-thoracotomy (RAMT) approach. METHODS: Between March 2011 and October 2019, 1,049 patients underwent AVR with Perceval bioprosthesis. Five hundred and three patients (48%) were operated through a RAMT approach in the second intercostal space. Considering only isolated AVR (881), 98% of patients were operated with MIA, and Perceval in RAMT approach was performed in 57% of these patients. Eight patients (1.6%) had previously undergone cardiac surgery. The prosthesis sizes implanted were: S (n=91), M (n=154), L (n=218) and XL (n=40). Concomitant procedures were mitral valve surgery (n=6), tricuspid valve repair (n=1), mitral valve repair and tricuspid valve repair (n=1) and miectomy (n=2). Mean age was 78±4 years (range, 65-89 years), 317 patients were female (63%) and EuroSCORE II was 5.9%±8.4%. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality was 0.8% (4/503). Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamp times were 81.6±30.8 and 50.3±24.5 minutes respectively for stand-alone procedures. In two patients, early moderate paravalvular leakage appeared as a result of incomplete expansion of the sutureless valve due to oversizing of the bioprosthesis, requiring reoperations at two and nine postoperative days with sutured aortic bioprosthesis implantation. Permanent pacemaker implantation within the first thirty days was necessary in 26 (5.2%) patients. At the mean follow-up of 4.6 years (range, 1 month to 8.6 years), survival was 96%, freedom from reoperation was 99.2%, and mean transvalvular pressure gradient was 11.9±4.3 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: AVR with the Perceval bioprosthesis in a RAMT approach is a safe and feasible procedure associated with low mortality and excellent hemodynamic performance. Sutureless technology facilitates a RAMT approach.

Impact of pulmonary hypertension on mortality after operation for isolated aortic valve stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a well-known independent risk factor for mortality and morbidity after cardiac surgery. However, no weight is given to PH in the current guidelines for the management of patients with aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR). The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of preoperative PH on early and five-year survival in patients with severe AS undergoing isolated AVR. METHODS: From January 2005 to July 2010, 422 consecutive patients with severe AS underwent isolated AVR. According to systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP), PH was classified as none (sPAPS<35 mmHg, N=224), mild-moderate (35≤sPAP<50 mmHg, N=159) and severe (sPAP≥50 mmHg, N=39). RESULTS: Overall in-hospital mortality was 2.8%. Unadjusted mortality was 0.9%, 3.8% and 10.2% for patients with normal, mild-moderate and severe PH (p=0.003). In multivariable analysis, severe PH (OR 4.1, 95 CI 1.1-15.3, p=0.04) and New York Heart Association class III-IV (OR 14.9, 95% CI 1.8-117.8, p=0.01) were independent risk factors of in-hospital mortality. Multivariable predictors of five-year survival were extracardiac arteriopathy (HR 2.8, 95%CI 1.6-4.9, p<0.0001), severe PH (HR 2.4, 95%CI 1.2-4.6 p=0.01), NHYA III-IV class (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-4, p=0.003), preoperative serum creatinine (HR 2.2, 95%CI, 1.6-3.1,p<0.0001) and age (HR 1.08, 95%CI 1.03-1.13, p=0.01). Five-year survival was 86%±3% with normal sPAP, 81%±4% with mild-moderate PH and 63±10% with severe PH (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing isolated AVR with severe AS, severe PH is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality and five-year survival.

Root replacement with stentless Freestyle bioprostheses for active endocarditis: a single centre experience.

OBJECTIVES: Few studies have examined the use of stentless Freestyle bioprostheses in patients with active valve endocarditis (VE). The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of stentless Freestyle bioprostheses in patients undergoing full-root replacement. METHODS: From February 2000 to June 2010, 180 patients with VE underwent cardiac surgery at our institution, of which 71 (39.5%) had prosthetic VE. Eighteen patients underwent full-root replacement with Freestyle bioprostheses: 3 patients (16%) had native aortic VE, 14 (78%) had aortic prosthetic VE and 1 (6%) had mitral and aortic prosthetic VE. Mean age was 66.7 ± 10.1, M/F: 6/12, mean logistic EuroSCORE 36.4 ± 21.6. Eight patients (42%) underwent concomitant procedures (two mitral valve replacements, three ascending aorta replacements, one coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), one ventricular septal disease (VSD) repair, one CABG + ascending aorta + VSD repair). RESULTS: Two patients (11%) died in-hospital. At the median follow-up of 24 months (range 1-113 months), no death occurred and freedom from reoperation was 87.5% (2 patients for aortic root pseudo-aneurysm at 1 and 23 months). All patients are in NYHA functional class I and have satisfactory echocardiographic data (EF 54.3 ± 8%, peak and mean trans-prosthetic gradients 12 ± 6.7 mmHg and 7.5 ± 3.6 mmHg) with 100% freedom recurrence of VE. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that root replacement with Freestyle stentless bioprostheses in patient with VE, is associated with low rates of early and mid-term mortality, good haemodynamic performance and low rates of valve-related morbidity as well as low recurrence of infection.