Integrated Safety Analysis of Ritlecitinib, an Oral JAK3/TEC Family Kinase Inhibitor, for the Treatment of Alopecia Areata from the ALLEGRO Clinical Trial Program.

BACKGROUND: The ALLEGRO phase 2a and 2b/3 studies demonstrated that ritlecitinib, an oral JAK3/TEC family kinase inhibitor, is efficacious at doses of ≥ 30 mg in patients aged ≥ 12 years with alopecia areata (AA). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of ritlecitinib in an integrated analysis of four studies in AA. METHODS: Two cohorts were analyzed: a placebo-controlled and an all-exposure cohort. Proportions and study size-adjusted incidence rates (IRs) of adverse events (AEs) of interest and laboratory abnormalities are reported. RESULTS: In the placebo-controlled cohort (n = 881; median exposure: 169 days), the proportion of ritlecitinib-treated patients with AEs was 70.2-75.4% across doses versus 69.5% in the placebo group; serious AEs occurred in 0-3.2% versus 1.9% for the placebo. A total of 19 patients permanently discontinued due to AEs (5 while receiving the placebo). In the all-exposure cohort (n = 1294), median ritlecitinib exposure was 624 days [2091.7 total patient-years (PY)]. AEs were reported in 1094 patients (84.5%) and serious AEs in 57 (4.4%); 78 (6.0%) permanently discontinued due to AEs. The most common AEs were headache (17.7%; 11.9/100 PY), severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive test (15.5%; 9.8/100 PY), and nasopharyngitis (12.4%; 8.2/100 PY). There were two deaths (breast cancer and acute respiratory failure/cardiorespiratory arrest). Proportions (IRs) were < 0.1% (0.05/100 PY) for opportunistic infections, 1.5% (0.9/100 PY) for herpes zoster, 0.5% (0.3/100 PY) for malignancies (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer), and 0.2% (0.1/100 PY) for major adverse cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: Ritlecitinib is well tolerated with an acceptable safety profile up to 24 months in patients aged ≥ 12 years with AA (video abstract and graphical plain language summary available). TRIAL REGISTRIES: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02974868 (date of registration: 11/29/2016), NCT04517864 (08/18/2020), NCT03732807 (11/07/2018), and NCT04006457 (07/05/2019).

Treatment of moderate-to-severe alopecia areata in patients over the age of 65 with baricitinib.

Baricitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor which is now FDA approved for the treatment of severe alopecia areata (AA) in adults. However, the clinical trials which demonstrated the efficacy of baricitinib in the treatment of severe AA did not include men aged >60 years and women aged >70 years. We retrospectively assessed the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in 14 patients aged ≥65 years with moderate-to-severe AA. After a mean (SD) duration of 18.5 (11.9) months, a 72.0% reduction in the mean SALT score from baseline was observed. Partial or complete eyebrow and eyelash hair was observed in 57.1% and 42.9% of patients respectively. Adverse effects of baricitinib were mild. No cases of venous thromboembolism (VTE), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) or malignancy were reported.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ivarmacitinib (SHR0302) in adult patients with moderate-to-severe alopecia areata.

BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata (AA) is a CD8+ T cell-mediated autoimmune disease characterized by nonscarring hair loss. Ivarmacitinib, which is a selective oral Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, may interrupt certain cytokine signaling implicated in the pathogenesis of AA. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ivarmacitinib in adult patients with AA who have ≥25% scalp hair loss. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive ivarmacitinib 2, 4, or 8 mg once daily or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary end point was the percentage change from baseline in the Severity of Alopecia Tool score at week 24. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients were randomized. At week 24, the least squares mean difference in the percentage change from baseline in the Severity of Alopecia Tool score for ivarmacitinib 2, 4, and 8 mg and placebo groups were -30.51% (90% CI, -45.25, -15.76), -56.11% (90% CI, -70.28, -41.95), -51.01% (90% CI, -65.20, -36.82), and -19.87% (90% CI, -33.99, -5.75), respectively. Two serious adverse events-follicular lymphoma and COVID-19 pneumonia-were reported. LIMITATIONS: A small sample size limits the generalizability of the results. CONCLUSION: Treatment with ivarmacitinib 4 and 8 mg doses in patients with moderate and severe AA for 24 weeks was efficacious and generally tolerated.

Integrated safety analysis of baricitinib in adults with severe alopecia areata from two randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Baricitinib, an oral, selective, reversible Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor, is an approved treatment for adults with severe alopecia areata (AA) in the USA, European Union and Japan. OBJECTIVES: To report safety data for baricitinib in patients with severe AA from two clinical trials including long-term extension periods. METHODS: This analysis includes pooled patient-level safety data from two trials, an adaptive phase II/III trial (BRAVE-AA1) and a phase III trial (BRAVE-AA2) (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03570749 and NCT03899259). Data are reported in three datasets: (i) the placebo-controlled dataset (up to week 36): baricitinib 2 mg and 4 mg vs. placebo; (ii) the extended dataset (up to the data cutoff): patients remaining on continuous treatment with baricitinib 2 mg or 4 mg from baseline; and (iii) the all-baricitinib dataset (all-BARI, up to the data cutoff): all patients receiving any dose of baricitinib at any time during the trials. Safety outcomes include treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), adverse events of special interest and abnormal laboratory changes. Proportions of patients with events and incidence rates (IR) were calculated. RESULTS: Data were collected for 1303 patients who were given baricitinib, reflecting 1868 patient-years of exposure (median 532 days). The most frequently reported TEAEs during the placebo-controlled period (based on the baricitinib 4-mg group) were upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis, headache, acne and elevated blood creatine phosphokinase (CPK). During the placebo-controlled period, the frequency of acne was higher with baricitinib than placebo, and elevated CPK was higher with baricitinib 4 mg than placebo and baricitinib 2 mg. In all-BARI, the IR of serious infections was low (n = 16, IR 0.8). There was one opportunistic infection (IR 0.1), and 34 cases of herpes zoster (IR 1.8). There was one positively adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular event (myocardial infarction) (IR 0.1), one pulmonary embolism (IR 0.1), three malignancies other than nonmelanoma skin cancer (IR 0.2) and one gastrointestinal perforation (IR 0.1). No deaths were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This integrated safety analysis in patients with severe AA is consistent with the overall safety profile of baricitinib. Some differences with atopic dermatitis were noted that may be attributable to the disease characteristics of AA.

Efficacy and safety of oral ritlecitinib for the treatment of active nonsegmental vitiligo: A randomized phase 2b clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Vitiligo is a chronic autoimmune disorder characterized by depigmented patches of the skin. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ritlecitinib, an oral JAK3 (Janus kinase)/TEC (tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocelluar carcinoma) inhibitor, in patients with active nonsegmental vitiligo in a phase 2b trial (NCT03715829). METHODS: Patients were randomized to once-daily oral ritlecitinib ± 4-week loading dose (200/50 mg, 100/50 mg, 30 mg, or 10 mg) or placebo for 24 weeks (dose-ranging period). Patients subsequently received ritlecitinib 200/50 mg daily in a 24-week extension period. The primary efficacy endpoint was percent change from baseline in Facial-Vitiligo Area Scoring Index at week 24. RESULTS: A total of 364 patients were treated in the dose-ranging period. Significant differences from placebo in percent change from baseline in Facial-Vitiligo Area Scoring Index were observed for the ritlecitinib 50 mg groups with (-21.2 vs 2.1; P < .001) or without (-18.5 vs 2.1; P < .001) a loading dose and ritlecitinib 30 mg group (-14.6 vs 2.1; P = .01). Accelerated improvement was observed after treatment with ritlecitinib 200/50 mg in the extension period (n = 187). No dose-dependent trends in treatment-emergent or serious adverse events were observed across the 48-week treatment. LIMITATIONS: Patients with stable vitiligo only were excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Oral ritlecitinib was effective and well tolerated over 48 weeks in patients with active nonsegmental vitiligo.

Safety and Efficacy of Ritlecitinib and Brepocitinib in Alopecia Areata: Results from the Crossover Open-Label Extension of the ALLEGRO Phase 2a Trial.

The 24-week, double-blind period of the ALLEGRO phase 2a trial (NCT02974868) evaluated the safety and efficacy of ritlecitinib (Jak3/tyrosine kinase expressed in the hepatocellular carcinoma inhibitor) and brepocitinib (tyrosine kinase 2/Jak1 inhibitor) in patients with alopecia areata; patients could subsequently continue treatment in a 24-week single-blind extension, followed by a crossover open-label extension, described in this article. Patients who did not achieve ≥30% improvement from baseline in Severity of Alopecia Tool score at the end of the single-blind extension entered a 24-week crossover open-label extension: the ritlecitinib group switched to brepocitinib, and the brepocitinib group switched to ritlecitinib. Eighteen patients switched to brepocitinib, and five switched to ritlecitinib. Six treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by five patients; no new safety risks were observed after crossover. An exploratory efficacy evaluation showed that none of the five patients receiving ritlecitinib in the crossover open-label extension achieved ≥30% improvement from baseline in Severity of Alopecia Tool score or improvement in eyebrow/eyelash assessments. Four of 16 patients receiving brepocitinib achieved ≥30% improvement from baseline in Severity of Alopecia Tool score or better; 4 of 15 and 5 of 12 showed improvement in eyebrow and eyelash assessments, respectively. Although the small number of patients precludes firm conclusions regarding efficacy, the data suggest that some patients with alopecia areata and inadequate response to ritlecitinib after ≥24 weeks show benefit after switching to brepocitinib.

Treatment of Alopecia in Children.

Alopecia or hair loss in children is an important and often challenging problem to diagnose and treat. Early diagnosis and treatment is the key because hair loss in children has a significant physical as well as psychological impact on their development. Alopecia in children are mainly non-scarring, but cicatricial alopecia can also be seen. The diagnosis can usually be made by direct examination of the scalp. Potassium hydroxide (KOH) examination of plucked hair and scalp scrapings, woods lamp examination and trichoscopy are useful diagnostic aids. When a cicatricial alopecia is suspected, scalp biopsy is recommended. Disease specific treatment should be initiated early and adequate counselling provided to both the patient and their parents. This review focuses on the treatment options available for various types of alopecia in children and their safety and efficacy data, analyzing the available literature evidences. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(1):49-53. doi:10.36849/JDD.6096.

Ritlecitinib: an investigational drug for the treatment of moderate to severe alopecia areata.

INTRODUCTION: Alopecia areata (AA) is an inflammatory and autoimmune form of hair loss, which can present with one patch of hair loss, but in more extreme cases can lead to total body hair loss. There are limited therapeutic options and no cure, but medication can sometimes induce sustained remission. Disease control cannot be guaranteed; even those who regrow all hair on treatment can experience relapse. There are no FDA approved systemic treatments; therefore, an unmet need for safe, and effective treatments exists. Few treatments have been evaluated by randomized controlled trials. Case reports and series indicate oral Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors as a potential therapy. Ritlecitinib is a novel oral JAK3-selective inhibitor being investigated as an AA treatment. AREAS COVERED: This article introduces ritlecitinib as treatment for AA and considers the mechanism of action, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety [reporting data from a 24-week, phase 2a double-blinded placebo-controlled trial of ritlecitinib in patients with AA who have more than 50% scalp hair loss]. EXPERT OPINION: Ritlecitinib offers a novel mode of action, rapid onset, and the capacity for a superior safety profile over other JAK inhibitors. If approved, ritlecitinib will be widely prescribed by physicians overseeing the more severe AA patients for the foreseeable future. As JAK inhibitors regulate the hair growth cycle and have anti-inflammatory effects, the implementation of ritlecitinib in hair loss disorders other than AA, may prove beneficial.

Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Response to Treatment of Persistent Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia in Breast Cancer Survivors.

IMPORTANCE: Alopecia induced by classic chemotherapy affects up to 65% of patients and is usually reversible. However, there are increasing reports of persistent chemotherapy-induced alopecia (pCIA), especially for patients treated with taxane-containing chemotherapy regimens. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinicopathologic characteristics and response to treatment of patients with pCIA after chemotherapy for breast cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this case series, a retrospective evaluation was performed of patients with a diagnosis of pCIA after chemotherapy for breast cancer in 4 specialist hair clinics from November 1, 2011, to February 29, 2020. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Clinical, trichoscopic, and histopathologic characteristics and treatment outcomes were analyzed. For patients who presented with diffuse alopecia or diffuse rarefaction of hair over the midfrontal scalp with widening of the central part line and preservation of the frontal hairline, the Sinclair scale (grades 1-5, where 1 indicates normal hair density and 5 indicates the most severe stage of hair loss, with little or no hair in the centroparietal region) was used to assess severity. RESULTS: One hundred patients (99 women [99%]; mean age at presentation, 54.0 years [range, 29.0-74.1 years]) were included. Most patients had diffuse nonscarring alopecia (n = 39), female pattern hair loss (n = 55), or male pattern hair loss (n = 6). Six patients developed cicatricial alopecia. Taxane-containing regimens were used for most patients (92 [92%]) and were associated with more severe alopecia than regimens that did not contain taxanes (median Sinclair grade, 4 [IQR, 3-5] vs 2 [IQR, 2-2.5]; P < .001). A total of 76 of 86 patients (88%) had trichoscopic signs indistinguishable from those of androgenetic alopecia. Of 18 patients who had biopsies, 14 had androgenetic alopecia-like features, 2 had cicatricial alopecia, and 2 had features of both. Both topical and oral minoxidil, sometimes combined with antiandrogen therapy, were associated with an improvement in hair density (median Sinclair grade, 4 [IQR, 3-5] before treatment vs 3 [IQR, 2-4] after treatment; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This case series outlines previously unreported features of pCIA in patients with breast cancer, including a trichoscopic description. Cosmetically significant regrowth was achieved for a significant proportion of patients with topical or systemic treatments, suggesting that pCIA may be at least partly reversible.

A review of the treatment of male pattern hair loss

Introduction: Androgenetic alopecia is a common hair loss disorder affecting up to 80% of males by the age of 80. It is characterized by androgen related progressive thinning of hair in a defined pattern. It results in diminished self-esteem, reduced confidence and distress in affected men, irrespective of age or stage of baldness. An effective treatment for hair baldness is needed.Areas covered: In androgenetic alopecia, hair follicles undergo progressive miniaturization. Genetic factors and androgens are key role-players in disease pathogenesis. Herein the authors review the pharmacologic treatment of androgenetic alopecia, which involves 5 alpha reductase inhibitors, minoxidil and prostaglandins. Non-pharmacologic approaches are also explored.Expert opinion: Androgenetic alopecia progresses over time and although the current available medical treatments like finasteride and minoxidil are effective in arresting the progression of the disease, they allow only partial regrowth of hair at its best. Early treatment achieves a more optimal outcome. Non-pharmacologic treatments like PRP can be considered in patients refractory to medical treatment.Abbreviations: MPHL: male pattern hair loss; AGA: androgenetic alopecia; DHT: dihydrotestosterone; 5AR: 5-alpha-reductase; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; PG's: prostaglandins (PG's); PGD2R: prostaglandin D2 receptor; VPA: valproic aid; SR: Serenoa Repens; PRP: platelet-rich plasma; PDGF: platelet derived growth factor; TGF: transforming growth factor; ERK: extracellular signal-regulated kinase; PKB: protein kinase B; LLLT: low-level laser therapy; ROS: reactive oxygen species; RCT: randomized control trial; SFRP1: secreted frizzled related protein 1; DP: dermal papilla; PDE5: phosphodiesterase 5.

Skin checks in primary care.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of skin cancers in Australia continues to rise. Early detection and timely management are required. OBJECTIVE: This article presents a framework for skin examinations in primary care and outlines the various measures available to facilitate early skin cancer detection. Common characteristics of malignant cancers are also discussed. DISCUSSION: Skin cancer awareness campaigns encourage patients to see their general practitioners (GPs) for complete skin examination. GPs are expected to correctly identify benign and malignant skin lesions and understand their high risk patients. A systematic approach to the skin examination combined with knowledge and awareness of diagnostic tools can aid in the early detection of skin malignancies, and prompt escalation as necessary.