RESUMO
Background Palpable nodules in the thyroid are present in 4-7% of the general population. Fine-needle aspiration cytology is a safe and cost-effective method of choice for evaluating thyroid nodules. Aspirated samples can be manually spread directly onto the slide and stained in the conventional smear method. The liquid-cased cytology method has been recently introduced, which is an automated machine-based method, yielding a single slide with a clean background and greater preservation of cells and consuming less time for screening. This study aimed to compare the cytomorphological features and diagnostic accuracy of conventional smears and liquid-based cytology smears. Methodology This prospective study comprised 250 cases of thyroid lesions. Fine-needle aspiration cytology using conventional smears and liquid-based cytology smears was reported per the Bethesda system of reporting thyroid cytopathology. Detailed cytomorphological features were evaluated and compared in both techniques. Results The cellularity of conventional smears was significantly higher for scores 2+ and 3+ than paired liquid-based cytology smears (paired t-test, p < 0.001). The overall diagnostic efficacy of conventional smears and liquid-based cytology smears was equivalent in the majority of cases (n = 171, 68.4%). Conventional smears were better than liquid-cased cytology smears in 34 (13.6%) cases, and liquid-based cytology smears were better than conventional smears in eight (3.2%) cases. Liquid-based cytology smears showed a higher unsatisfactory rate compared to conventional Smears (15.6% vs. 5.2%). The sensitivity and specificity of conventional smears were 84.6% and 94.4%, respectively, compared to 68.7% and 92.4%, respectively, of liquid-based cytology smears. Conclusions Conventional smears are a cost-effective and easy method for diagnosing thyroid nodules. Liquid-based cytology smears can be used in association with conventional smears to enhance the accuracy of the evaluation of malignant thyroid nodules.
RESUMO
Mucoepidermoid carcinoma is the most common malignant salivary gland neoplasm comprising approximately 10% of all tumours of the major salivary gland. Owing to a plethora of morphological variations, it poses a diagnostic challenge on fine-needle aspiration cytology. Oncocytic variant of mucoepidermoid carcinoma is a rare subtype seen in the age group of 20-80 years. It is crucial to make the correct diagnosis on cytology as it has therapeutic implications. Oncocytes can be present in a wide range of salivary gland lesions ranging from non-neoplastic conditions to benign and malignant lesions. We report a case of oncocytic mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the parotid gland in a 12-year-old boy which is the youngest age reported for the same. On cytology, this case was initially diagnosed as Warthin's tumour and was supported by radiology. However, histomorphological findings clinched the diagnosis of an oncocytic variant of mucoepidermoid carcinoma with the aid of immunohistochemistry.