RESUMO
Organ transplantation is the primary therapy for organ failure caused by telomere biology disorder (TBD). We describe the first documented case of simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation (SLKTx) for TBD, although the diagnosis of TBD was reached only three months following SLKTx. The patient was born prematurely, displayed growth retardation, and developed chronic kidney and liver diseases. His pre-SLKTx autoimmune, metabolic, and viral assessments were negative, and persistent pancytopenia (bone marrow cellularity 70-80%) was attributed to renal disease-associated bone marrow changes. Following SLKTx, he was discharged with stable graft function on tacrolimus and prednisolone. Although mycophenolate mofetil was discontinued on the second postoperative day, his pancytopenia persisted. Despite extensive evaluations, including drug, immune, nutritional, and viral assessments, all results were negative. A bone marrow biopsy conducted three months post-transplant revealed significant hypocellularity (40-50%). Whole genome sequencing revealed a likely pathogenic variant of the TINF2 gene. The patient was subsequently treated with danazol. At the nine-month follow-up post-SLKTx, he exhibited stable graft function and improved cell counts while maintaining triple-drug immunosuppression. Given the lack of uniform diagnostic criteria for TBD, healthcare providers must be vigilant with patients presenting with multi-organ failure and persistent cytopenias. Effective pre-transplant screening for TBD can lead to timely diagnoses, better management, and improved post-transplant outcomes.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is no robust evidence-based data for ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (ABOiKT) from emerging countries. METHODS: Data from 1759 living donor ABOiKT and 33 157 ABO-compatible kidney transplantations (ABOcKT) performed in India between March 5, 2011, and July 2, 2022, were included in this retrospective, multicenter (n = 25) study. The primary outcomes included management protocols, mortality, graft loss, and biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR). RESULTS: Protocol included rituximab 100 (232 [13.18%]), 200 (877 [49.85%]), and 500 mg (569 [32.34%]); immunoadsorption (IA) (145 [8.24%]), IVIG (663 [37.69%]), and no induction 200 (11.37%). Mortality, graft loss, and BPAR were reported in 167 (9.49%), 136 (7.73%), and 228 (12.96%) patients, respectively, over a median follow-up of 36.3 mo. In cox proportional hazard model, mortality was higher with IA (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.53 [1.62-3.97]; P < 0.001), BPAR (HR: 1.83 [1.25-2.69]; P = 0.0020), and graft loss (HR: 1.66 [1.05-2.64]; P = 0.0310); improved graft survival was associated with IVIG (HR: 0.44 [0.26-0.72]; P = 0.0010); higher BPAR was reported with conventional tube method (HR: 3.22 [1.9-5.46]; P < 0.0001) and IA use (HR: 2 [1.37-2.92]; P < 0.0001), whereas lower BPAR was reported in the prepandemic era (HR: 0.61 [0.43-0.88]; P = 0.008). Primary outcomes were not associated with rituximab dosing or high preconditioning/presurgery anti-A/anti-B titers. Incidence of overall infection 306 (17.39%), cytomegalovirus 66 (3.75%), and BK virus polyoma virus 20 (1.13%) was low. In unmatched univariate analysis, the outcomes between ABOiKT and ABOcKT were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Our largest multicenter study on ABOiKT provides insights into various protocols and management strategies with results comparable to those of ABOcKT.
Assuntos
Transplante de Rim , Humanos , Transplante de Rim/métodos , Rituximab/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapêutico , Incompatibilidade de Grupos Sanguíneos , Sistema ABO de Grupos Sanguíneos , Rejeição de Enxerto/epidemiologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Doadores Vivos , Estudos Multicêntricos como AssuntoRESUMO
Ex vivo normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) has improved organ preservation and viability assessment among heart, liver, and lung transplantation. However, literature regarding the application of NMP in human clinical kidney transplantation remains limited. Numerous kidneys, especially from donors with stage 3 acute kidney injury (AKI), are not utilized concerning the high rate of delayed graft function (DGF) and primary nonfunction. The present study investigated the impact of NMP (135-150 min) on short-term outcomes after kidney transplantation from deceased donors with AKI. Methods: Graft outcomes of NMP kidneys were compared with contralateral kidneys stored in static cold storage (SCS) from the same donor with AKI during December 2019-June 2021. The study's primary aim is to assess the safety and feasibility of NMP in deceased donors with AKI. The primary outcome was DGF. Secondary outcomes were duration of DGF, biopsy-proven rejection, postoperative intrarenal resistive index, postoperative infections, hospital stay duration, primary nonfunction, and kidney function estimated glomerular filtrate rate at discharge, 3 mo, and 1 y. Results: Five pairs of AKI kidneys (NMP versus SCS) were included in the final analysis. The results show no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes between NMP versus SCS kidneys; however, NMP kidneys demonstrated slightly improved estimated glomerular filtrate rate at 3 mo (59.8 ± 5.93 [59] versus 75.20 ± 14.94 [74]) mL/min/1.73 m2 (P < 0.065) and at the last follow-up (12-29 mo) (72.80 ± 10.71 [75]) versus (94 ± 22.67 [82]) mL/min/1.73 m2 (P < 0.059) as compared with SCS kidneys. A higher proportion of NMP kidneys had normal intrarenal resistive index (0.5-0.7) and mild acute tubular injury on protocol biopsy, suggesting NMP is safe and feasible in deceased donors with acute kidney injury. Conclusions: NMPs of AKI donor kidneys are safe and feasible. A larger cohort is required to explore the reconditioning effect of NMP on AKI kidneys.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary mucormycosis has been associated with high mortality (reported up to 100%) in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of renal transplant patients with pulmonary mucormycosis between April 2014 and March 2020, who underwent surgical resection of the affected lung along with liposomal amphotericin therapy. Patients with lower respiratory illness features underwent chest X-ray, high-resolution computed tomography of the chest, and those with suspicious findings underwent analysis of bronchioloalveolar fluid and transbronchial lung biopsy. Patients with histological or microbiological evidence of mucormycosis were started on liposomal Amphotericin B. Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil were stopped at the time of diagnosis. RESULT: Ten patients underwent combined management, while five patients were managed medically. At last follow up, seven out of ten patients (70%) who underwent combined management and two of the five patients (40%) who were managed medically, had a mean survival of 28.86 months (sd = 15.71, median = 25) and 14.17 months (sd = 12.21, median = 18), respectively, post-diagnosis of pulmonary mucormycosis. CONCLUSION: Surgical resection combined with antifungals in the perioperative period and decreased immunosuppression may improve the outcomes in renal transplant patients with pulmonary mucormycosis.
Assuntos
Transplante de Rim , Pneumopatias Fúngicas , Mucormicose , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Pulmão/patologia , Pneumopatias Fúngicas/diagnóstico , Pneumopatias Fúngicas/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumopatias Fúngicas/cirurgia , Mucormicose/diagnóstico , Mucormicose/tratamento farmacológico , Mucormicose/cirurgia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Background: There is an enormous knowledge gap on management strategies, clinical outcomes, and follow-up after kidney transplantation (KT) in recipients that have recovered from coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Methods: We conducted a multi-center, retrospective analysis in 23 Indian transplant centres between June 26, 2020 to December 1, 2021 on KT recipients who recovered after COVID-19 infections. We analyzed clinical and biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (AR) incidence and used cox-proportional modeling to estimate multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for predictors of AR. We also performed competing risk analysis. Additional outcome measures included graft loss, all-cause mortality, waiting time from a positive real-time polymerase test (RT-PCR) to KT, laboratory parameters, and quality of life in follow-up. Findings: Among 372 KT which included 38(10·21%) ABO-incompatible, 12(3·22%) sensitized, 64(17·20%) coexisting donors with COVID-19 history and 20 (5·37%) recipients with residual radiographic abnormalities, the incidence of AR was 34 (9·1%) with 1(0·26%) death censored graft loss, and 4(1·07%) all-cause mortality over a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 241 (106-350) days. In our cox hazard proportional analysis, absence of oxygen requirement during COVID-19 compared to oxygen need [HR = 0·14(0·03-0·59); p-value = 0·0071], and use of thymoglobulin use compared to other induction strategies [HR = 0·17(0·03-0.95); p-value = 0·044] had a lower risk for AR. Degree of Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DR mismatch had the highest risk of AR [HR = 10.2(1·74-65·83); p-value = 0·011]. With competing risk analysis, with death as a competing event, HLA DR mismatch, and oxygen requirement continued to be associated with AR. Age, gender, obesity, inflammatory markers, dialysis vintage, steroid use, sensitization and ABO-incompatibility have not been associated with a higher risk of AR. The median duration between COVID-19 real time polymerase test negativity to transplant was 88(40-145) days (overall), and ranged from 88(40-137), 65(42-120), 110(49-190), and 127(64-161) days in World Health Organization ordinal scale ≤ 3, 4, 5, and 6-7, respectively. There was no difference in quality of life, tacrolimus levels, blood counts, and mean serum creatinine assessed in patients with a past COVID-19 infection independent of severity. Interpretation: Our findings support that the outcomes of KT after COVID-19 recovery are excellent with absence of COVID-19 sequelae during follow-up. Additionally, there does not seem to be a need for changes in the induction/immunosuppression regimen based on the severity of COVID-19. Funding: Sanofi.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Traditionally, fluid administration during kidney transplant surgery is guided by central venous pressure (CVP) despite its limited reliability as a parameter for assessing intravascular fluid volume, particularly in patients with cardiovascular diseases. The recommended goals at graft reperfusion are a mean arterial pressure of 90 mm Hg and a CVP of 12-14 mm Hg. This approach may increase the risk of significant adverse effects due to volume overload. Perioperative fluid therapy guided by dynamic indices of fluid responsiveness has been shown to optimize intravascular volume and prevent complications associated with overzealous administration of fluids in major abdominal surgeries. We hypothesized that pulse pressure variation (PPV)-guided fluid administration would result in better optimization of intravascular fluid volume compared with a CVP-guided strategy during kidney transplant surgery. METHODS: In this single-centre randomized double blinded trial, 77 end-stage renal disease patients, who underwent kidney transplant surgery under general anesthesia with epidural analgesia, were randomized to receive either CVP-guided (n = 35) or PPV-guided (n = 35) fluid therapy using predefined hemodynamic endpoints. The primary outcome was the total volume of intraoperative fluids administered. Secondary outcomes were intraoperative hemodynamic changes, serum lactate levels, serum creatinine, need for dialysis within the first week, creatinine elimination ratio, and incidence of immediate and delayed graft dysfunction. RESULTS: Results were analyzed for 70 patients. Eighty percent of the patients underwent living-related donor allograft kidney transplant. Operative variables related to donor characteristics, duration of surgery, graft cold ischemia time, and blood loss were comparable in both groups. The mean (standard deviation) volume of intravenous fluids administered intraoperatively was 1,346 (337) mL in the PPV-guided group vs 1,901 (379) mL in the CVP-guided group (difference in means, 556 mL; 95% confidence interval, 385 to 727; P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Pulse pressure variation -guided fluid administration significantly decreased the total volume of crystalloids compared with CVP-guided fluid therapy during the intraoperative period in patients who underwent kidney transplant surgery. Nevertheless, our study was underpowered to detect differences in secondary outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ctri.nic.in (CTRI/2018/01/011638); registered 31 January 2018.
RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: Traditionnellement, l'administration liquidienne pendant une chirurgie de transplantation rénale est guidée par la pression veineuse centrale (PVC) et ce, malgré sa fiabilité limitée en tant que paramètre d'évaluation du volume liquidien intravasculaire, en particulier chez les patients atteints de maladies cardiovasculaires. Les objectifs recommandés lors de la reperfusion du greffon sont une tension artérielle moyenne de 90 mmHg et une PVC de 1214 mmHg. Cette approche pourrait augmenter le risque d'effets indésirables importants dus à une surcharge volémique. Il a été démontré que la thérapie liquidienne périopératoire guidée par des indices dynamiques de réponse au remplissage optimisait le volume intravasculaire et prévenait les complications associées à l'administration liquidienne exagérée lors de chirurgie abdominale majeure. Nous avons émis l'hypothèse qu'une administration liquidienne guidée par la variation de pression différentielle (VPD et delta PP) entraînerait une meilleure optimisation du volume liquidien intravasculaire par rapport à une stratégie guidée par la PVC pendant une chirurgie de transplantation rénale. MéTHODE: Dans cette étude randomisée monocentrique à double insu, 77 patients atteints d'insuffisance rénale terminale, qui ont bénéficié d'une greffe rénale sous anesthésie générale avec analgésie péridurale, ont été randomisés à recevoir une administration liquidienne guidée soit par la PVC (n = 35) ou par la VPD (n = 35) en utilisant des critères hémodynamiques prédéfinis. Le critère d'évaluation principal était le volume total de liquides peropératoires administrés. Les critères secondaires comprenaient les variations hémodynamiques peropératoires, les taux sériques de lactate, la créatininémie, le besoin de dialyse au cours de la première semaine, le taux d'élimination de la créatinine et l'incidence de dysfonctionnement immédiat et retardé du greffon. RéSULTATS: Les résultats ont été analysés pour 70 patients. Quatre-vingts pour cent des patients ont subi une allogreffe de rein provenant d'un donneur vivant apparenté. Les variables opératoires liées aux caractéristiques du donneur, la durée de la chirurgie, le temps d'ischémie froide du greffon et les pertes sanguines étaient comparables dans les deux groupes. Le volume moyen (écart type) de liquides intraveineux administrés en peropératoire était de 1346 (337) mL dans le groupe guidé par VPD vs 1901 (379) mL dans le groupe guidé par PVC (différence de moyennes, 556 mL; intervalle de confiance à 95 %, 385 à 727; P = 0,001). Aucune différence intergroupe significative n'a été observée dans les critères d'évaluation secondaires. CONCLUSION: L'administration liquidienne guidée par la variation de pression différentielle a significativement diminué le volume total de cristalloïdes par rapport à la thérapie liquidienne guidée par la PVC pendant la période peropératoire chez les patients ayant bénéficié d'une greffe de rein. Néanmoins, notre étude ne disposait pas de la puissance suffisante pour détecter les différences dans les critères d'évaluation secondaires. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: www.ctri.nic.in (CTRI/2018/01/011638); enregistré le 31 janvier 2018.
Assuntos
Transplante de Rim , Pressão Sanguínea , Pressão Venosa Central , Hidratação/métodos , Humanos , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
Background The importance of optimal acid-base balance during renal transplant surgeries cannot be stressed enough. Optimal preload and electrolyte balance is important in maintaining this. There has been a debate on the choice of perioperative crystalloids in renal transplant surgeries over the past decades. Normal saline (0.9% saline) is more likely to cause hyperchloremic acidosis when compared to balanced salt solutions (BSS) with low chloride content whereas BSS may cause hyperkalemia. We aim to compare the safety and efficacy of normal saline (NS), Ringer's lactate (RL) and Plasmalyte (PL) on acid-base balance and electrolytes during living donor kidney transplantation. Materials and methods Patients were randomized to NS group (n = 60), RL group (n = 60) and Plasmalyte group (n = 60). Arterial blood samples were collected for acid-base analysis after induction of anaesthesia (T0), prior to clamping the iliac vein (T1), 10 minutes after reperfusion of the donated kidney (T2) and at the end of surgery (T3). In addition, serum creatinine and 24-hour urine output were recorded on postoperative days one, two and seven. Results There was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) in the pH at the end of surgery between the three groups with the NS group being more acidotic (pH 7.29 ± 0.06, 95% CI 7.27-7.32), although this was not clinically relevant. This was explainable by the parallel increase in chloride in the NS group. Early postoperative graft functions in terms of serum creatinine, urine output and graft failure requiring dialysis were not significantly different between the groups. Conclusion Balanced salt solutions such as Plasmalyte and Ringer's lactate are associated with better pH and chloride levels compared to normal saline when used intraoperatively in renal transplant patients. This difference, however, does not appear to have any bearing on graft function. Plasmalyte seems to maintain a better acid-base and electrolyte balance, especially during the postreperfusion period.
RESUMO
Abstract Various vascular complications following renal transplantation include renal artery and vein thrombosis, renal artery stenosis, pseudoaneurysm, and iliac artery dissection. Transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) is the most common, while iliac artery dissection is the rarest of these various vascular complications. We describe an elderly male, who had both external iliac artery dissection and TRAS at 2 months following renal transplantation. He underwent successful percutaneous endovascular intervention of both complications. The post-intervention course was uneventful, with improvement in graft renal functions and left lower limb perfusion.
Resumo As diversas complicações vasculares possíveis após um transplante renal incluem trombose da veia e artéria renais, estenose da artéria renal, pseudoaneurisma e dissecção da artéria ilíaca. Entre essas diversas complicações, a estenose da artéria renal transplantada é a mais comum, enquanto a dissecção da artéria ilíaca é a mais rara. Relatamos o caso de um homem idoso que desenvolveu tanto dissecção da artéria ilíaca quanto estenose da artéria renal transplantada 2 meses após transplante renal. As intervenções endovasculares percutâneas foram bem-sucedidas em ambas as complicações. O período pós-intervenção cursou sem complicações, com melhora na função renal do enxerto e na perfusão do membro inferior esquerdo.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Artéria Renal/patologia , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia , Artéria Ilíaca/patologia , Stents , Constrição Patológica , Procedimentos EndovascularesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) is considered the gold standard for live donor nephrectomies owing to lesser pain, shorter hospitalization, and earlier return to normal activities, yet it remains a technically challenging surgery. Repetition of a highly skilled task such as LDN should lead to improved performance reflected in shorter surgery times and a decrease in adverse events. METHODS: The records of over 2524 LDNs from February 2004 to June 2019 were evaluated for duration of surgery (from incision time to clamping of the renal artery) and occurrence of complications. RESULTS: The mean duration of surgery ± SD from incision to clamp time for the first 100 cases at the inception of LDN was 166.13 ± 33.28 minutes whereas it was 124.59 ± 35.91 minutes for the best 100 consecutive cases in 2015 with a decrease of 41 minutes duration of surgery from incision to artery clamping. The adverse events were accessory renal artery injury (n = 10), splenic laceration (n = 2), bowel and mesocolon injuries (n = 12), venous or arterial clip slippage (n = 4), inferior vena cava tear (n = 2) pneumothorax (during stapler application, n = 1), missing gauze counts (n = 1), chylous ascites (n = 1), ureteric thermal injury (n = 2), and renal parenchyma injury (n = 3). CONCLUSIONS: LDN is a technically demanding surgery where surgeon experience appears to affect operative metrics such as operative time. The occurrence of intraoperative complications appears to be acceptably low, although serious complications are a possibility.
Assuntos
Transplante de Rim , Laparoscopia/métodos , Doadores Vivos , Nefrectomia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrectomia/efeitos adversos , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Vascular complications such as renal artery or renal vein thrombosis and laceration and iliac artery dissection are rarely encountered after renal transplantation. Timely management of these vascular complications is important to prevent ischemic injury of a transplanted kidney. We hereby report a case of a 60-year-old male who had acute renal dysfunction due to iatrogenic left external iliac artery dissection after renal transplantation. An endovascular stenting of the dissected iliac artery resulted in a brisk flow across both iliac and transplanted renal arteries. The management issues related to this rare vascular complication is discussed in the article.
Assuntos
Dissecção Aórtica/cirurgia , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Doença Iatrogênica , Aneurisma Ilíaco/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Disfunção Primária do Enxerto/etiologia , Dissecção Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Dissecção Aórtica/etiologia , Dissecção Aórtica/fisiopatologia , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Humanos , Aneurisma Ilíaco/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma Ilíaco/etiologia , Aneurisma Ilíaco/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Disfunção Primária do Enxerto/diagnóstico , Disfunção Primária do Enxerto/fisiopatologia , Stents , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia Doppler em CoresRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chylous ascites (CA) is an extremely rare complication after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). It can increase the hospital stay, morbidity in postoperative period and thus negating the benefits of laparoscopic surgery. Most of the cases were managed conservatively, but surgical intervention may be occasionally required. This report describes the importance of accurate localization of the leaking chyle duct and its repair by endosuturing in a renal donor not responding to conservative treatment. METHODS: A comprehensive review of literature regarding this rare complication after LDN was performed with Pubmed/Medline and Google Scholar using "chyle," "complications," and "laparoscopic donor nephrectomy" as keywords. The demographic profile and management of patients is discussed in detail. The various surgical modalities used to manage these patients are described. RESULTS: Fifty-four cases of chyle leak/ascites have been reported after LDN in literature to date. Around 77% donors with CA could be successfully managed conservatively with dietary measures and total parenteral nutrition. Surgical intervention was required in nearly 23% donors ranging from clip application, use of argon coagulation, endosuturing with application of glue after 36.1 ± 19.07 days of failed conservative treatment. Donors with massive ascites or requiring frequent large-volume paracentesis on conservative treatment are likely to require surgical therapy. The present case was successfully managed with laparoscopic endosuturing and has no recurrence at 6 month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Chylous ascites is a rare complication after donor nephrectomy in experienced centers. Although conservative management remains the first line of treatment, early surgical treatment shall be undertaken in cases of massive ascites.
Assuntos
Ascite Quilosa/etiologia , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Doadores Vivos , Nefrectomia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Ascite Quilosa/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) converted a retroperitoneal (RP) procedure into a transperitoneal (TP) operation with reports of bowel and solid organ injuries leading to mortality in occasional cases. Laparoscopic RP donor nephrectomy can reduce these risks but never became popular because of the muscle cutting approach. Lumbotomy incision can be used to approach retroperitoneum by incising fascial planes, eliminating disadvantages of the RP approach. This report compares the outcomes of the standard multiport TP LDN with translumbar laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy (LESS-DN). METHODS: Between January 2016 and June 2017, 50 voluntary kidney donors out of 267 donors were randomized to undergo LESS-DN vs LDN. Donors with body mass index ≥30 kg/m2, multiple renal arteries, and right-sided nephrectomy were excluded from the study. Postoperative pain, duration of surgery, length of graft vessels and ureter, warm ischemia time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, convalescence period, duration of hospital stay, and recipients' creatinine at discharge were compared among both the groups. Pain assessment was done using visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: The RP group experienced lesser pain (VAS score 0.3 ± 0.3 vs 1.1 ± 0.0, p = 0.000), lesser analgesic requirement (186 ± 51.07 mg vs 254 ± 62.7 mg, p = 0.000), and faster convalescence (7.0 ± 3.0 days vs 10.7 ± 3.3 days, p = 0.00) related to smaller cumulative incision (7.8 ± 0.8 cm vs12.4 ± 2.0 cm, p = 0.00), and had reduced operative time (142 ± 26.2 minutes vs 170.8 ± 34.75 minutes, p = 0.001) and blood loss. Other recorded parameters were similar in both the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The single port RP approach significantly reduced postoperative pain and hastened recovery when compared with the TP approach. Converting to a RP approach presents an opportunity for surgeons to further reduce morbidity associated with the donor nephrectomy.
Assuntos
Transplante de Rim/métodos , Nefrectomia/métodos , Espaço Retroperitoneal/cirurgia , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Creatinina , Dissecação/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Isquemia Quente/efeitos adversosRESUMO
We report a renal allograft transplant recipient with esophageal tuberculosis (TB) coinfected with herpes simplex virus (HSV) and Candida. The patient presented with oropharyngeal candidiasis and was started on fluconazole. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed whitish patches with mucosal ulcers in the esophagus. Histopathological examination confirmed TB and HSV infection. The patient recovered after antiviral, antifungal, and anti-tubercular therapy with reduction in immunosuppression. In a TB-endemic zone, TB can coexist with opportunistic infections in an immunocompromised host.
Assuntos
Esofagite/complicações , Herpes Simples/complicações , Terapia de Imunossupressão/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Infecções Oportunistas/complicações , Tuberculose Gastrointestinal/complicações , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Antituberculosos/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Candidíase Bucal/tratamento farmacológico , Candidíase Bucal/microbiologia , Transtornos de Deglutição/etiologia , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Mucosa Esofágica/patologia , Esofagite/microbiologia , Esofagite/patologia , Esofagite/virologia , Fluconazol/uso terapêutico , Herpes Simples/patologia , Herpes Simples/virologia , Soluço/etiologia , Humanos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Imuno-Histoquímica , Terapia de Imunossupressão/métodos , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Oportunistas/microbiologia , Infecções Oportunistas/patologia , Infecções Oportunistas/virologia , Simplexvirus/isolamento & purificação , Transplantados , Transplante Homólogo/efeitos adversos , Tuberculose Gastrointestinal/microbiologia , Tuberculose Gastrointestinal/patologia , Vômito/etiologiaRESUMO
Pancreatic transplantation is currently the only effective cure for Type 1 diabetes mellitus. It allows long-term glycemic control without exogenous insulin and amelioration of secondary diabetic complications. In India, pancreas transplant has not yet established with only a single successful transplant reported so far in the literature. We report a 24-year-old Type 1 diabetic patient with renal failure who underwent a simultaneous pancreas kidney transplant. On postoperative day 15, he had leak from the graft duodenal stump for which a tube duodenostomy and proximal diversion enterostomy was done. He had a high output pancreatic fistula following the procedure which was managed conservatively. The tube duodenostomy was removed at three and half months and enterostomy closure with restoration of bowel continuity was done at 6 months. After a follow up of 7 months, patient is doing well with a serum creatinine of 0.8 mg/dl and normal blood sugars, not requiring any exogenous insulin or oral hypoglycemic drugs. Managing patients with graft duodenal complications after pancreas transplant is challenging. Tube duodenostomy is a safe option in management of duodenal leak, although can lead to a persistent pancreatic fistula. A proximal diversion enterostomy allows early oral feeding and avoids the cost as well as the long term complications associated with parenteral nutrition.
Assuntos
Transplante de Rim/métodos , Laparoscopia , Doadores Vivos , Nefrectomia/métodos , Adulto , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Índia , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrectomia/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Repair of vascular defects in the presence of infection remains a challenging task in immunocompromised patients. We report two patients with postrenal transplant Aspergillus mycotic aneurysms of the allograft renal artery involving the external iliac artery which were excised along with the allograft. The defect in the external iliac artery was repaired successfully with interposition of autogenous internal iliac artery graft. Use of an internal iliac artery graft in such settings has been rarely reported in English literature. Autogenous internal iliac artery grafts provide a useful method to bridge the vascular defects created by radical debridement in the presence of fungal infections.