An Anterior Anastomosis for the Modified Fontan Connection: A Hemodynamic Analysis.

This hemodynamic feasibility study examined total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) designs connecting the extracardiac conduit to the anterior surface of pulmonary arteries (PAs) or superior vena cava (SVC) rather than to the inferior PA surface (traditional TCPC). The study involved twenty-five consecutive Fontan patients meeting inclusion criteria from a single institution. A virtual surgical platform mimicked the completed traditional TCPC and generated three anterior anastomosis designs: Anterior-PA, Middle-SVC, and SVC-Inn (Inn: innominate vein). Hemodynamic performance of anterior anastomosis designs was compared with the traditional TCPC regarding indexed power loss (iPL) and hepatic flow distribution (HFD). Compared to the traditional TCPC, the Anterior-PA design produces a similar iPL. The Middle-SVC design is also similar, though the iPL difference is positively correlated with the anastomosing height. The SVC-Inn design had significantly more iPL. The three anterior anastomosis designs did not have a significant difference in HFD (from traditional TCPC). Pulmonary flow distribution (PFD) has a stronger correlation with HFD from the anterior anastomosis designs than the traditional TCPC. This hemodynamic feasibility study examined anterior anastomosis, extracardiac TCPC designs that may offer surgeons clinical dexterity. The Anterior-PA design may be equivalent to the traditional TCPC. Fontan extracardiac conduit anastomosis just superior to the PAs (Middle-SVC) also preserves hemodynamic performance and avoids direct PA anastomosis. These designs could simplify surgical Fontan completion, and may particularly benefit patients requiring surgical dissection, having atypical PA orientation, or after PA stent angioplasty.

Non-Newtonian Effects on Patient-Specific Modeling of Fontan Hemodynamics.

The Fontan procedure is a common palliative surgery for congenital single ventricle patients. In silico and in vitro patient-specific modeling approaches are widely utilized to investigate potential improvements of Fontan hemodynamics that are related to long-term complications. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding the use of non-Newtonian rheology, warranting a systematic investigation. This study conducted in silico patient-specific modeling for twelve Fontan patients, using a Newtonian and a non-Newtonian model for each patient. Differences were quantified by examining clinically relevant metrics: indexed power loss (iPL), indexed viscous dissipation rate (iVDR), hepatic flow distribution (HFD), and regions of low wall shear stress (AWSS). Four sets of "non-Newtonian importance factors" were calculated to explore their effectiveness in identifying the non-Newtonian effect. No statistical differences were observed in iPL, iVDR, and HFD between the two models at the population-level, but large inter-patient variations exist. Significant differences were detected regarding AWSS, and its correlations with non-Newtonian importance factors were discussed. Additionally, simulations using the non-Newtonian model were computationally faster than those using the Newtonian model. These findings distinguish good importance factors for identifying non-Newtonian rheology and encourage the use of a non-Newtonian model to assess Fontan hemodynamics.

Tricuspid Valve Annular Mechanics: Interactions with and Implications for Transcatheter Devices.

In the interventional treatment of tricuspid valve regurgitation, the majority of prosthetic devices interact with or are implanted to the tricuspid valve annulus. For new transcatheter technologies, there exists a growing body of clinical experience, literature, and professional discourse related to the difficulties in delivering, securing, and sustaining the function of these devices within the dynamic tricuspid annulus. Many of the difficulties arise from circumstances not encountered in open-heart surgery, namely; a non-arrested heart, indirect visualization, and a reliance on non-suture-based methods. These challenges require the application of procedural techniques or system designs to account for tricuspid annular motion, forces, and underlying tissue strength. Improved knowledge in these interactions will support the goals of improving device systems, their procedures, and patient outcomes. This review aims to describe current concepts of tricuspid annular mechanics, key device and procedural implications, and highlight current knowledge gaps for future consideration.