Finite element modeling of the human cervical spinal cord and its applications: A systematic review.

Background Context: Finite element modeling (FEM) is an established tool to analyze the biomechanics of complex systems. Advances in computational techniques have led to the increasing use of spinal cord FEMs to study cervical spinal cord pathology. There is considerable variability in the creation of cervical spinal cord FEMs and to date there has been no systematic review of the technique. The aim of this study was to review the uses, techniques, limitations, and applications of FEMs of the human cervical spinal cord. Methods: A literature search was performed through PubMed and Scopus using the words finite element analysis, spinal cord, and biomechanics. Studies were selected based on the following inclusion criteria: (1) use of human spinal cord modeling at the cervical level; (2) model the cervical spinal cord with or without the osteoligamentous spine; and (3) the study should describe an application of the spinal cord FEM. Results: Our search resulted in 369 total publications, 49 underwent reviews of the abstract and full text, and 23 were included in the study. Spinal cord FEMs are used to study spinal cord injury and trauma, pathologic processes, and spine surgery. Considerable variation exists in the derivation of spinal cord geometries, mathematical models, and material properties. Less than 50% of the FEMs incorporate the dura mater, cerebrospinal fluid, nerve roots, and denticulate ligaments. Von Mises stress, and strain of the spinal cord are the most common outputs studied. FEM offers the opportunity for dynamic simulation, but this has been used in only four studies. Conclusions: Spinal cord FEM provides unique insight into the stress and strain of the cervical spinal cord in various pathological conditions and allows for the simulation of surgical procedures. Standardization of modeling parameters, anatomical structures and inclusion of patient-specific data are necessary to improve the clinical translation.

Pinless Electromagnetic Neuronavigation During Awake Craniotomies: Technical Pearls, Pitfalls, and Nuances.

BACKGROUND: Awake craniotomies are often performed with rigid pin fixation to support optical neuronavigation. Newer electromagnetic (EM) neuronavigation technology now enables unpinned cranial neurosurgery while maintaining robust intraoperative image guidance. Here, we share technical nuances, operative pearls, and lessons learned from our institutional experience using Curve EM neuronavigation during awake, unpinned craniotomies. METHODS: We describe our process for patient positioning, instrumentation setup, system registration, intraoperative navigation, and surgical adjunct use (e.g., intraoperative neuromonitoring and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging) in detail. At each step, we provide pearls for success and tips for pitfall avoidance based on our experience. RESULTS: Ten patients underwent awake pinless intra-axial tumor resection using Curve EM neuronavigation from May 2021 to August 2022 with a single surgeon. Postoperative transient neurological deficits were seen in 8 of 10 cases (80.0%), as all resections were taken to functional margins. Of the 9 patients with a 3-month follow-up visit at the time of publication, all 9 (100%) had improved or stable preoperative symptoms. No surgical complications, clinically appreciable inaccuracies, intraoperative losses of registration, unexpected postoperative magnetic resonance imaging findings, or errors related to the use of EM neuronavigation occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The technical pearls outlined here will help interested neurosurgeons integrate EM neuronavigation into awake craniotomies. In our experience, using unpinned neuronavigation during awake cases provides many advantages to the patient, surgeon, and entire operative team. It has thus become the standard practice at our institution.

Case report: Two unique cases of co-existing primary brain tumors of glial origin in opposite hemispheres.

Background: Primary CNS tumors are rare. Coexistence of two glial tumors of different histological origins in the same patient is even rarer. Here we describe two unique cases of coexisting distinct glial tumors in opposite hemispheres. Cases: Patient 1 is a 38-year-old male who presented with a seizure in February/2016. MRI showed a left parietal and a right frontal infiltrating nonenhancing lesions. Both lesions were resected revealing an oligodendroglioma WHO grade-2 and an astrocytoma WHO grade-2. Patient 2 is a 34-year-old male who presented with a seizure in November/2021. MRI showed a left frontal and a right mesial temporal lobe infiltrating nonenhancing lesions. Both lesions were resected revealing an oligodendroglioma WHO grade-2 and a diffuse low-grade glioma, MAPK pathway-altered (BRAF V600E-mutant). Patient 1 underwent adjuvant treatment. Both patients are without recurrence to date. Discussion: Two histologically distinct glial tumors may coexist, especially when they are non-contiguous. Pathological confirmation of each lesion is imperative for appropriate management. We highlight the different management of gliomas based on the new CNS WHO 2021 classification compared to its 2016 version, based on NCCN guidelines. Although more molecular markers are being incorporated into glioma classification, their clinical impact of it is yet to be determined.