Management of splenic trauma: a single institution's 8-year experience.

BACKGROUND: Management of splenic trauma has evolved, with current practice favoring selective angiographic embolization and non-operative treatment over immediate splenectomy. Defining the optimal selection criteria for the appropriate management strategy remains an important question. METHODS: This retrospective registry review was conducted at a Level I trauma center. The patient population consisted of 20,561 patients in the State Trauma Registry from April 2004 to May 2012. Splenectomy, angiography, splenic embolization, nonoperative, and noninterventional (NI) observation were the management strategies under study. Morbidity and mortality were the outcome measures. Morbidity and mortality by management strategy. RESULTS: During the 8-year study period, 926 (4.5%) patients sustained splenic injury. Observational management increased over time despite the similar distribution of splenic injury grade over the study period: grade I/II (50%), grade III (24.2%), and grade IV/V (25.8%). Mortality rates associated with each management strategy were the following: immediate splenectomy (IS; 25%), splenic embolization (SE; 3.9%), and angiography only or observation, that is, NI (6.5%) management. Injury severity score (ISS) was highest in IS (36.1 ± 1.3) compared with SE (29.1 ± 1.0, P = .001) and NI (21.6, P < .001). Splenectomy was required in 5 of the 129 (3.9%) patients managed with SE and 9 of the 677 (1.3%) patients managed by NI. Mortality was significantly lower among those managed by SE (odds ratio .12, 95% confidence interval: .05 to .32) or NI (odds ratio .21, 95% confidence interval: .12 to .35). This survival benefit was explained by the association of IS with systolic blood pressure <90, high ISS, low GCS at presentation, ISS, development of shock, need for transfusion, and multiorgan failure. CONCLUSIONS: In this large 8-year single institution study, we observed an increase in nonoperative management by an increased application of angiography and embolization. An aggressive utilization of SE in patients with appropriate indications will result in low failure rates and improved mortality.

Comparison of the efficacy of the embolic agents acrylamido polyvinyl alcohol microspheres and tris-acryl gelatin microspheres for uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of acrylamido polyvinyl alcohol microspheres (a-PVAM) as an embolic agent for uterine artery embolization (UAE) compared with Tris-acryl gelatin microspheres (TAGM). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Prospective randomized double-blind noninferiority trial. Conducted at two sites both with regional UAE practices. Forty-six women with symptomatic leiomyomas. INTERVENTION: UAE procedure was performed with either of the two embolic agents. Either 700-900-µm a-PVAM or 500-700-µm TAGM was used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in leiomyoma perfusion, overall uterine volume, and dominant leiomyomas volume measured by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months after UAE by a reader blinded to the embolic agent used. Changes in Uterine Fibroid Symptoms and Quality of Life questionnaire scores were measured at 3, 6, and 12 months after UAE. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were randomized and treated under the study protocol (a-PVAM n=22, TAGM n=24). There were no procedure-related complications. Two patients were excluded from analysis (one technical failure of the procedure, one withdrawal from study). Successful (>90%) leiomyoma devascularization was observed in 81% of subjects at 1 week after UAE, 97% at 3 months after UAE, and 95% at 6 months after UAE. No significant differences were observed in 14 of 15 outcome measurements, consistent with noninferiority. TAGM was slightly superior to a-PVAM on one comparison (overall quality of life at 3 months after UAE).

Leiomyoma infarction after uterine artery embolization: a prospective randomized study comparing tris-acryl gelatin microspheres versus polyvinyl alcohol microspheres.

PURPOSE: To determine the degree of leiomyoma infarction after uterine artery embolization (UAE) performed with tris-acryl gelatin microspheres or polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) microspheres. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients determined to be candidates and scheduled for UAE were randomized prospectively to receive tris-acryl gelatin microspheres or PVA microspheres. The manufacturers' recommended technique was used for both products during the UAE procedures (including the recently described refined protocol for PVA microspheres). All patients underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the pelvis with contrast agent enhancement before and after the UAE procedure. On the postprocedural MR study, the degree of tumor infarction was assessed on postcontrast images. These findings were classified as follows: 100% infarction, 90%-99% infarction, 50%-89% infarction, and less than 50% infarction. Treatment failure was defined by enhancement of more than 10% of a patient's entire tumor burden. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients were enrolled in this study. Twenty-seven (mean age, 44.9 years) received PVA microspheres and 26 (mean age, 45.1 years) received tris-acryl gelatin microspheres. There were no significant differences in the preprocedural uterine volume, dominant tumor volume, location of dominant tumor, and presenting symptoms between populations. In the PVA microsphere group, treatment failure was seen in eight patients (29.6%). In the tris-acryl gelatin microsphere group, treatment failure was seen in one patient (3.8%), which was a significant difference between groups (P < or = .025). CONCLUSIONS: There was a significantly greater degree of tumor infarction in patients treated with tris-acryl gelatin microspheres during UAE than in patients who received PVA microspheres administered in accordance with a newly refined protocol. Given the known risk of recurrence in patients with persistent tumor enhancement after UAE, it is concluded that tris-acryl gelatin microspheres should be the preferred agent for UAE at this time.

Uterine artery embolization and infertility.

As the acceptance of uterine artery embolization as a treatment option for uterine fibroids grows among patients and physicians, it appears that new questions are being asked about the patient selection criteria used for this procedure. In particular, patients with infertility issues or concerns about preserving fertility after fibroid treatment are often being evaluated for uterine artery embolization. This article was prepared to summarize the available literature regarding fertility preservation after both myomectomy and uterine artery embolization and to provide the reader with an algorithm for evaluating these patients and making literature-based treatment decisions.

A prospective multicenter comparative study between myomectomy and uterine artery embolization with polyvinyl alcohol microspheres: long-term clinical outcomes in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the safety and effectiveness of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) microspheres in patients undergoing uterine artery embolization (UAE) to treat uterine fibroid tumors and to compare the long-term changes in health-related quality of life (QOL) after UAE with the changes seen after myomectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred forty-six patients with uterine myomas were enrolled into this multicenter study, with 77 patients undergoing UAE with PVA and 69 patients undergoing myomectomy. Six-month follow-up was completed for the myomectomy, whereas 2-year follow-up was completed for the UAE group. Outcomes were assessed with the Uterine Fibroid QOL Questionnaire and based on adverse event incidence, time to return to normal activity, and changes in tumor symptom scores, QOL scores, and menorrhagia bleeding scores. For the UAE cohort, changes in total uterine volume and dominant tumor size on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging were assessed. RESULTS: In the UAE cohort, 88.3% of patients experienced a reduction of tumor-related symptoms (increase >or=5 points from baseline measurement) at 6 months, with 75.4% of patients in the myomectomy group experiencing similar improvement. Median QOL questionnaire scores at 6 months were found to be significantly higher in patients treated with UAE (P = .041), with sustained improvement seen at 12 and 24 months. Both procedures resulted in significant reductions in 6-month menorrhagia bleeding scores, with sustained improvement in the UAE cohort at 12 and 24 months. MR imaging at 6 months revealed significant uterine and tumor volume reductions after UAE (P < .05). At least one adverse event occurred in 42% of patients in the myomectomy group, compared with 26% in the UAE group (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: UAE performed with PVA microspheres was associated with greater sustained improvements in symptom severity and health-related QOL and with fewer complications compared with myomectomy. Six-month MR imaging data demonstrated significant reductions in uterine and tumor volumes, although the degree of tissue infarction after UAE was not assessed with contrast medium-enhanced MR imaging.

Uterine artery embolization versus myomectomy: a multicenter comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is significant quality of life score improvement after uterine artery embolization (UAE) and to compare UAE and myomectomy outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective cohort controlled study. SETTING: Sixteen medical centers in the United States. PATIENT(S): One hundred forty-nine UAE patients and 60 myomectomy patients. Patients were assigned to myomectomy or UAE on the basis of a best treatment decision made by the patient and her physician. All patients were observed for 6 months. The UAE patients also had follow-up examinations at 1 year. INTERVENTION(S): Myomectomy or UAE. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Quality of life score changes, menstrual bleeding score changes, uterine size differences, time off, and adverse events. RESULT(S): Both groups experienced statistically significant improvements in the uterine fibroid quality of life score, menstrual bleeding, uterine volume, and overall postoperative quality of life. The mean hospital stay was 1 day for the UAE patients, compared with 2.5 days for the myomectomy patients. The UAE and myomectomy patients returned to their normal activities in 15 days and 44 days, respectively, and returned to work in 10 days and 37 days, respectively. At least one adverse event occurred in 40.1% of the myomectomy patients, compared with 22.1% in the UAE group. CONCLUSION(S): The uterine fibroid quality of life score was significantly improved in both groups. No significant differences were observed in bleeding improvement, uterine volume reduction, uterine fibroid quality of life score improvement, and overall quality of life score improvement between groups. Patients receiving UAE required fewer days off work, fewer hospital days, and experienced fewer adverse events.

Quality improvement guidelines for uterine artery embolization for symptomatic leiomyomata.

Uterine artery embolization (UAE) is assuming an important role in the treatment of women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomata worldwide. The following guidelines, which have been jointly published with the Society of Interventional Radiology in the Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, are intended to ensure the safe practice of UAE by identifying the elements of appropriate patient selection, anticipated outcomes, and recognition of possible complications and their timely address.

Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic myomata.

Fibroid disease is common and causes significant health problems in women of childbearing age. Over the past several years, uterine artery embolization (UAE) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for symptomatic uterine myomata. Embolotherapy is effective in relieving myoma-related symptoms in 80% to 90% of patients. It requires shorter hospitalizations than traditional surgical therapies for myoma disease and is associated with faster recovery and lower complication risks than surgery. Patient selection, the UAE procedure, and post-UAE management are reviewed.

Results of iliac artery stent placement in patients younger than 50 years of age.

PURPOSE: To determine long-term outcome in patients 50 years of age or younger treated with iliac artery stent placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 412 patients who underwent iliac artery stent placement during a 62-month study period were reviewed retrospectively. Forty-two patients younger than age 50 (mean age = 45 y) at the time of stent placement were included in the study population. Presenting symptoms included claudication (47%), rest pain (17%), ulceration/tissue loss (31%), and blue toe syndrome (5%). Anatomic, hemodynamic, and clinical success rates of the stent placement procedure were assessed. Stent patency rates were calculated by life-table methods. RESULTS: Fifty-nine iliac lesions were treated with stents; 62% of patients underwent treatment of a single lesion whereas 38% had multiple lesions treated. Thirty-one percent were treated after a failed angioplasty procedure and 69% were treated with stent placement primarily. After stent placement, 34 patients (82%) experienced symptomatic relief, although eight of these patients (19%) underwent a planned ipsilateral infrainguinal bypass procedure during the same hospitalization. During follow-up, five patients (12%) required a bypass procedure as a result of stent failure and two patients (5%) required below-knee amputation. Seven patients (17%) required endovascular stent revision, with none requiring additional surgery. At 1, 2, and 3 years, the primary patency rates were 86%, 72%, and 65%, and the secondary patency rates were 90%, 88%, and 88%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Iliac stent placement successfully addresses the presenting symptoms of young patients with peripheral vascular disease and results in patency rates that are similar to those reported in a more general population. With appropriate postprocedural surveillance, restenosis can be addressed in many patients with use of endovascular techniques, limiting the need for surgical revision.

II. Uterine fibroid embolization: technical aspects.

Successful superselective catheterization of the uterine artery requires familiarity with female pelvic arterial anatomy, knowledge of effective catheter and guidewire combinations, and a few tricks. A learning curve can be expected for each of these elements, although it is assumed that the operator will already have experience in basic catheter techniques. Safe transcatheter delivery, understanding of embolization end points, and avoidance of nontarget embolization are essential. Equally important are knowledge of the properties of the embolic agents currently available and their indications for use. Uterine fibroid embolization unavoidably results in radiation exposure to the uterus and ovaries, and adherence to meticulous fluoroscopic technique is crucial to keep the absorbed dose as low as possible.

IV. Uterine fibroid embolization: follow-up.

Patients generally notice some relief of both menorrhagia and mass-effect symptoms during the first few weeks after uterine fibroid embolization (UFE). Shrinkage of the fibroids continues to take place over several months, peaking somewhere between 3 and 6 months, with measurable shrinkage sometimes noted for up to 1 year. The timing of follow-up visits is intended to coincide with the time course of improvement so that diagnostic imaging and intervention can be performed if symptoms worsen or relief does not appear to be on schedule. The amount of shrinkage of fibroids correlates neither with the intensity of immediate postprocedure symptoms or the degree of symptom relief. Affected fibroids undergo hyaline degeneration, a process in which the hard, cellular tumor is replaced by softer, acellular material. A nationwide registry has been constructed for the accumulation of procedural and follow-up data so that success and complication rates can be accurately determined and long-term issues about the durability of UFE and possible side effects can be addressed.

III. Uterine fibroid embolization: pain management.

Conscious sedation and analgesia are integral components of successful uterine fibroid embolization (UFE), both in providing comfort to the anxious patient undergoing an elective procedure and for providing relief of the severe pelvic pain, cramps, and nausea that may result from acute uterine ischemia and the postembolization syndrome that may follow. The agents used are typically those with which interventional radiologists already have extensive experience in the performance of a variety of invasive procedures. Immediate postprocedure care benefits greatly from the use of narcotic delivered via PCA (patient-controlled analgesia) pump. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are also particularly useful for treating the pain and cramping caused by UFE and help reduce the amount of narcotic necessary for pain relief during the recovery period. Detailed instructions for the first week of convalescence are necessary to insure comfort and avoid complications.