Non-clinical studies of progesterone.

Progesterone is a steroid hormone that is essential for the regulation of reproductive function. Progesterone has been approved for several indications including the treatment of anovulatory menstrual cycles, assisted reproductive technology, contraception during lactation and, when combined with estrogen, for the prevention of endometrial hyperplasia in postmenopausal hormonal therapy. In addition to its role in reproduction, progesterone regulates a number of biologically distinct processes in other tissues, particularly in the nervous system. This physiological hormone is poorly absorbed when administered in a crystalline form and is not active when given orally, unless in micronized form, or from different non-oral delivery systems that allow a more constant delivery rate. A limited number of preclinical studies have been conducted to document the toxicity, carcinogenicity and overall animal safety of progesterone delivered from different formulations, and these rather old studies showed no safety concern. More recently, it has been shown in animal experiments that progesterone, its metabolite allopregnanolone and structurally related progestins have positive effects on neuroregeneration and repair of brain damage, as well as myelin repair. These recent preclinical findings have the potential to accelerate therapeutic translation for multiple unmet neurological needs.

Continuous dosing of a novel contraceptive vaginal ring releasing Nestorone® and estradiol: pharmacokinetics from a dose-finding study.

BACKGROUND: As part of a program to develop a novel estradiol-releasing contraceptive vaginal ring (CVR), we evaluated the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of CVRs releasing segesterone acetate (Nestorone® (NES)) combined with one of three different estradiol (E2) doses. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, double-blind, randomized, multi-centered study to evaluate a 90-day CVR releasing NES [200mcg/day] plus E2, either 10mcg/day, 20mcg/day, or 40mcg/day in healthy reproductive-age women with regular cycles. Participants provided blood samples twice weekly for NES and E2 levels during the first 60 days (ring 1) and the last 30 days (ring 2) of use. A subset underwent formal PK assessments at ring initiation, ring exchange (limited PK), and study completion. RESULTS: The main study enrolled 197 women; 22 participated in the PK substudy. Baseline characteristics between the main and PK participants were comparable, with an average BMI of 25.8 kg/m2 (SD 4.3). In the PK substudy, all three rings showed similar NES PK: mean area under the curve (AUC(0-72)) 34,181 pg*day/mL; concentration maximum (Cmax) 918 pg/mL; time to maximum concentration (Tmax) 3.5 h. For E2, the Cmax occurred at 2 h, and was significantly higher with the 20 mcg/day ring (mean 390 pg/mL); 10 mcg/day, 189 pg/mL, p=.003; 40 mcg/day, 189 pg/mL, p<.001), and declined rapidly to≤50 pg/mL for all doses by 24 h. For all subjects, the median E2 levels remained under 35 pg/mL during treatment. CONCLUSION: PK parameters of NES were not affected when paired with different doses of E2, but E2 levels from all three doses were lower than anticipated and no dose response was observed. IMPLICATIONS: While these novel estradiol-releasing combination contraceptive vaginal rings provided sustained release of contraceptive levels of Nestorone over 90 days, the E2 levels achieved were not consistent with bone protection, and a dose-response was not observed.

Neurosteroidogenesis and progesterone anti-inflammatory/neuroprotective effects.

Progesterone shows anti-inflammatory and promyelinating effects in mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a commonly used model for multiple sclerosis (MS). Because neurosteroids have been implicated as protective factors for MS and EAE, we analysed the expression of neurosteroidogenic enzymes in the compromised spinal cord of EAE mice. EAE was induced in female C57Bl6 mice, which were then killed on day 16 after induction. Progesterone was given by pellet implantation 1 week before EAE induction. Untreated EAE mice showed decreased mRNAs for the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (Star), voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC), cholesterol side-chain cleavage (P450scc), 5α-reductase, 3α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3α-HSOR) and aromatase, whereas changes of 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3ß-HSD) were not significant. mRNA translocator protein (18 kDa) (TSPO) was elevated, concomitantly with a reactive microgliosis. EAE mice also showed abnormal mitochondrial ultrastructure in axons and neuronal bodies, as well as reduced expression of fission and fusion protein mRNAs. Progesterone pretreatment before EAE induction increased Star, VDAC, P450scc, 5α-reductase type I, 3α-HSOR and aromatase mRNAs and did not modify 3ß-HSD. TSPO mRNA was decreased, possibly as a result of reversal of microgliosis. Progesterone pretreatment also improved mitochondrial ultrastructure and increased fission/fusion protein mRNAs. These mitochondrial effects may be part of the progesterone recovery of neurosteroidogenesis. The enzymes 3ß-HSD, 3α-HSOR and 5α-reductase are also responsible for the formation of androgens. Because MS patients and EAE rodents show changes of central androgen levels, it is likely that, together with progestins and oestrogens, neuroandrogens afford neuroprotection for EAE and MS. The data reviewed suggest that enhanced synthesis of neurosteroids contributes in an auto/paracrine manner to reinforce the neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of exogenous progesterone given to EAE mice.

Impact on hepatic estrogen-sensitive proteins by a 1-year contraceptive vaginal ring delivering Nestorone® and ethinyl estradiol.

OBJECTIVES: Estrogen-sensitive hepatic proteins were assessed in women using a contraceptive vaginal ring (CVR) delivering 150mcg Nestorone® (NES) and 15mcg ethinyl estradiol (EE). STUDY DESIGN: A substudy of the Contraceptive Clinical Trials Network of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development enrolled 129 participants, with assessments of factor VIII, fibrinogen, protein S (PS) and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG). Thirty-six participants had used combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) in the cycle preceding first CVR use (recent users) and 70 had no history of recent use (nonusers). RESULTS: Mean values at baseline were within the normal range for all four proteins but were higher for factor VIII, fibrinogen and SHBG and significantly lower for PS in recent compared to nonusers. During NES/EE CVR use, factor VIII, fibrinogen and PS were within the normal range; however, SHBG levels were increased by nearly 100% at Cycle 13. The change from baseline to final evaluation was statistically significant for all proteins in nonusers. The change in recent users was significant for factor VIII at Cycle 6 and for SHBG at Cycles 6 and 13, but not for PS or fibrinogen. CONCLUSION: NES/EE CVR for up to 13cycles was associated with changes from baseline in plasma levels of factor VIII, fibrinogen and PS that were within the normal range, with SHBG levels above the normal range by Cycle 6. Nonusers of CHC before CVR showed wider changes in values versus recent users whose baseline values were increased by previous EE exposure. IMPLICATIONS: Recent use of CHCs demonstrated significant changes in all four measured hepatic proteins at baseline compared to nonusers. Use of the NES/EE CVR further changed these hepatic protein markers, but values remained within the normal range. Prebaseline exposure to estrogen can obscure interpretation of hepatic proteins changes associated with a second CHC.

Revisiting the roles of progesterone and allopregnanolone in the nervous system: resurgence of the progesterone receptors.

Progesterone is commonly considered as a female reproductive hormone and is well-known for its role in pregnancy. It is less well appreciated that progesterone and its metabolite allopregnanolone are also male hormones, as they are produced in both sexes by the adrenal glands. In addition, they are synthesized within the nervous system. Progesterone and allopregnanolone are associated with adaptation to stress, and increased production of progesterone within the brain may be part of the response of neural cells to injury. Progesterone receptors (PR) are widely distributed throughout the brain, but their study has been mainly limited to the hypothalamus and reproductive functions, and the extra-hypothalamic receptors have been neglected. This lack of information about brain functions of PR is unexpected, as the protective and trophic effects of progesterone are much investigated, and as the therapeutic potential of progesterone as a neuroprotective and promyelinating agent is currently being assessed in clinical trials. The little attention devoted to the brain functions of PR may relate to the widely accepted assumption that non-reproductive actions of progesterone may be mainly mediated by allopregnanolone, which does not bind to PR, but acts as a potent positive modulator of γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A) receptors. The aim of this review is to critically discuss effects of progesterone on the nervous system via PR, and of allopregnanolone via its modulation of GABA(A) receptors, with main focus on the brain.

Progesterone and related progestins: potential new health benefits.

Progesterone is a steroid hormone that is essential for the regulation of reproductive function. The main physiological roles of this hormone have been widely described. Progesterone and progestins have been approved for a number of indications including the treatment of irregular and anovulatory menstrual cycles and, when combined with estrogen, for contraception, and the prevention of endometrial hyperplasia in postmenopausal hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) regimens. Lack of understanding between the differences in categories of the progestins as well as with the physiological hormone has resulted in considerable controversy surrounding the use of progestins for HRT regimens. Newer evidence suggests that there are distinct differences between the molecules and there is no progestin class effect, with regard to benefits or side-effects. In addition to its role in reproduction, progesterone regulates a number of biologically distinct processes in other tissues, particularly in the nervous system and the vessels. Recently, it has been shown in animal experiments that progesterone and the progestin Nestorone(®) have positive effects on neuroregeneration and repair of brain damage, as well as myelin repair. The potential benefits of natural progesterone and its related derivatives warrant further investigation. It is hoped that a better understanding of the mechanism of action of progesterone and selected progestins will help in defining better therapies for men and women.

Endometrial effect of progesterone delivered by vaginal rings in estrogen-treated postmenopausal women.

AIM: The type of estrogen and progestin as well as their doses, route and regimens of administration may each affect the benefit-risk profile of postmenopausal hormone therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the endometrial effect of progesterone released continuously from a vaginal ring, combined with transdermal estradiol in postmenopausal women. METHOD: Forty-four postmenopausal women participated in a randomized, double-blind, dose-finding study evaluating two hormonal treatments, combining 50 microg/day of estradiol delivered by transdermal patches and either 0.5-g or 1-g progesterone vaginal rings (PVR) given for 12 weeks. The effect on the endometrium was assessed by histology and the detection of the proliferative marker Ki-67. We also measured the serum concentration of estradiol and progesterone, the tissue concentration of progesterone and the immunolocalization of estradiol and progesterone receptors in the endometrium. RESULTS: Endometrial thickness was increased after both treatments, although endometrial histology appeared atrophic in most biopsies. A circulating dose-response of serum progesterone levels was observed from the first to the 12th week of PVR use. In the high-progesterone-dose group, the scarce presence of Ki-67 and hormone receptors reflected the predominant action of progesterone in endometrial glands and stroma, in parallel with a lower tissue concentration of progesterone in this group. CONCLUSION: The PVR appears to be a promising method of administering natural progesterone to postmenopausal women treated with estrogen. Estradiol levels corrected the menopausal symptoms, as expected, and the presence of atrophic endometrium in the majority of women indicated that both doses of progesterone oppose the stimulatory estradiol effects, although the percentage of proliferative tissue was not negligible in both groups.

Pharmacology and clinical applications of selective estrogen receptor modulators.

Compounds that can be described as selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) have expanded dramatically over the past two decades. The ability of SERMs to act as estrogens in certain tissues while remaining inert or acting as an anti-estrogen in other tissues has opened up opportunities for treating specific estrogen-modulated diseases without accepting the risk of systemic estrogen activity. SERM development has resulted in significant therapeutic advances for breast cancer, osteoporosis and potentially other diseases associated with the menopause. After the publication of the Women's Health Initiative, interest in compound selectivity that reduces menopausal symptoms while protecting bone, breast, uterus and the heart has increased. Future SERMs may also have a therapeutic profile that can be tailored to specific patient populations, including men. This review paper summarizes the characteristics of different SERMs from various pharmacological categories and the feasibility and scope of their use for a large range of disease/health conditions.

New hormonal therapies and regimens in the postmenopause: routes of administration and timing of initiation.

Since the publication of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study followed by the results of the Million Women Study (MWS), the role of hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women has been further challenged. The risks attributed to hormone therapy have been overestimated and the data has been wrongly extrapolated to the whole class of therapies. The trends in postmenopausal hormonal therapy seem now to favor the non-oral delivery routes for both the estrogen and the progestin for women with an intact uterus, based on the assumption that a lesser stimulation of the liver proteins and a neutral metabolic profile would be more favorable in terms of cardiovascular and venous risk. The combination of non-oral administration of estradiol and local delivery of progesterone or a progestin such as levonorgestrel by means of gels, sprays, vaginal rings or intrauterine systems would represent new methods of replacement therapy for the menopausal woman, improving compliance and minimizing the risks of hormone replacement. Several of these systems are either available or in development. Long-term studies on the risk/benefit of various non-oral formulations are certainly warranted.

Pharmacology of different progestogens: the special case of drospirenone.

The pharmacological properties of progestins used in contraception and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) vary, depending upon the molecules from which they are derived. Very small structural changes may induce considerable differences in effects. It is unclear if the currently available progestins are able to bind specifically to the progesterone receptors, PR-A or PR-B. The clinical relevance of more specific binding to one or the other isoforms of the progesterone receptor is still unknown. The development of new generations of progestins, with improved receptor-selectivity profiles, has been a great challenge. Steroidal and non-steroidal progesterone agonists have also been synthesized, although these molecules are at a very early stage of development. Several new progestins have been synthesized in the past decade, including dienogest, drospirenone, Nestorone, nomegestrol acetate and trimegestone. Drospirenone differs from the classic progestins in its derivation from spirolactone. The major effect of drospirenone is antimineralocorticoid activity. By that property, drospirenone causes decreased salt and water retention, and thus lowering of blood pressure. The affinity of drospirenone for the mineralocorticoid receptor is about five times that of aldosterone, the naturally occurring mineralocorticoid. In addition, drospirenone has no androgenic effect, but does exhibit partial antiandrogenic activity; its antiandrogenic potency is about 30% of that of cyproterone acetate, the progestin with the most potent antiandrogenic activity. This property, shared by several new progestins, may counteract the negative effect of androgens on hair growth, lipid changes, insulin and, possibly, body composition in postmenopausal women. Drospirenone has a long terminal half-life (about 32 hours), and its bioavailability is about 76%. Drospirenone, which has pharmacodynamic properties very similar to those of progesterone, has been developed as a combined oral contraceptive (30 microg ethinylestradiol/3 mg drospirenone; Yasmin, Schering AG, Berlin, Germany). Drospirenone is also available in combination with estradiol as an HRT preparation (1 mg 17beta-estradiol/2 mg drospirenone; Angeliq, Schering AG).

Alternatives for optimal hormone replacement therapy.

To satisfy the needs of women with a wide variety of different medical histories and preferences, a wide choice of various forms of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is desirable. The potential long-term benefits of HRT, in terms of osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease and dementia, require good compliance, which in turn requires an HRT formulation that is highly acceptable. An absence of weight gain and lack of androgenic effects are of great importance, as are predictable bleeding and positive effects on postmenopausal symptoms and quality of life. HRT should be tailored to each woman's needs by the choice of appropriate estrogens and particularly a progestogen with a suitable pharmacological profile. An ideal progestogen should be targeted at preventing endometrial hyperplasia without opposing the effects of estrogen on the vessels. Several new progestogens have been synthesized in recent years. Dienogest, the progestogenic component of a new hormone replacement therapy with estradiol valerate, has many desirable features, including antiandrogenic properties; in this respect, it is unique amongst progestogens derived from testosterone. Tailored HRT should treat symptoms, minimize risk factors, meet personal preferences and lifestyle needs, and not be contraindicated for concomitant diseases. During the next decade, optimal HRT must match a number of trends, including an aging population, and is likely to be influenced by the outcome of major trials such as the Women's Health Initiative trial whose negative results will impact the prescriptions, the advent of new compounds--particularly the selective estrogen receptor modulators and progestogen receptor modulators--and the introduction of new methods of delivery, including vaginal rings and medicated intrauterine systems.

Approval of mifepristone (RU 486) in Europe.

The discovery of mifepristone (ex-RU486) was the achievement of a large research programme on steroidal compounds with antihormone properties conducted at Roussel Uclaf in partnership with the INSERM unit of Pr. E. E. Baulieu. Mifepristone exhibited a strong affinity to the progesterone and the glucocorticoid receptors. Consequently, it exerted competitive antagonism to these hormones both in in vitro and animal experiments. The identification of the antiprogesterone activity led to propose mifepristone use for the termination of early human pregnancy. Mifepristone at the dose of 600 mg initially used alone, was then used with a subsequent low dose of prostaglandins that led to a success rate of 95% as a medical method for early termination of pregnancy. In parallel, other indications were extended to the cervical dilatation prior to surgical termination of pregnancy in the first trimester, in the therapeutic termination of pregnancy for medical reasons beyond the first trimester, and for labour induction in case of fetal death in utero. The efficacy and safety of that treatment have been confirmed on the basis of more than 10 years of use with close adherence to the approved recommendations. Besides the political and philosophical hurdles that delayed clinical research with this molecule, other potential indications either in gynecological or cancer areas should be further developed.

[Anti-progesterones]. / Les antiprogestérones.

THERAPEUTIC APPLICATIONS: Antiprogestins are a promising class of therapeutic agents in the field of reproductive health. Mifepristone (exRU486) remains the leading compound of this class and is the only one presently used in clinical practice. Beyond the main action of antiprogestins on human pregnancy, these compounds may prove useful in the treatment of uterine leiomyomas and endometriosis, and for contraception. IN CANCEROLOGY: Rare tumors such as meningiomas or leiomyoarcomas expressing progesterone receptors may be successfully treated with these antihormones. MAIN INDICATIONS: The main characteristics of the different antiprogestins discovered so far are addressed and the key results from the large clinical studies conducted with mifepristone are described here for indications where the product is approved for clinical use: medical termination of pregnancy during the first trimester, cervical dilatation prior to surgical termination of pregnancy, preparation for prostaglandin action in the therapeutic termination of pregnancy beyond the first trimester, labor induction in case of foetal death in utero.

Percutaneous progesterone use and risk of breast cancer: results from a French cohort study of premenopausal women with benign breast disease.

Percutaneous progesterone topically applied on the breast has been proposed and widely used in the relief of mastalgia and benign breast disease by numerous gynecologists and general practitioners. However, its chronic use has never been evaluated in relation to breast cancer risk. The association between percutaneous progesterone use and the risk of breast cancer was evaluated in a cohort study of 1150 premenopausal French women with benign breast disease diagnosed in two breast clinics between 1976 and 1979. The follow-up accumulated 12,462 person-years. Percutaneous progesterone had been prescribed to 58% of the women. There was no association between breast cancer risk and the use of percutaneous progesterone (RR = 0.8; 95% confidence interval 0.4-1.6). Although the combined treatment of oral progestogens with percutaneous progesterone significantly decreased the risk of breast cancer (RR = 0.5; 95% confidence interval 0.2-0.9) as compared with nonusers, there was no significant difference in the risk of breast cancer in percutaneous progesterone users versus nonusers among oral progestogen users. Taken together, these results suggest at least an absence of deleterious effects caused by percutaneous progesterone use in women with benign breast disease.

Progestins in the menopause.

While the benefits of progestin use in hormone replacement therapy (HRT) are well recognised as far as endometrial protection is concerned, their risks and drawbacks have generated controversial articles. The data related to the progestin effect on breast tissue has been interpreted differently from country to country. However it has been admitted that, according to the type of progestin used, the dose and duration of its application, a predominant antiproliferative effect is observed in the human breast cells. As far as breast cancer risk is concerned, most epidemiological studies do not suggest any difference between the estrogens given alone or combined to progestins in HRT. When the cardiovascular risk factors are considered, some molecules with a higher androgenic potency than others, attenuate the beneficial effects of estrogens on the lipid profile and the vasomotion as well. On the other hand, other progestins devoid of androgenic properties do not exert these deleterious effects. The epidemiological data does not suggest any negative effect of the progestins administered together with estrogens on cardiovascular morbidity or mortality. However, recent results suggest that in women with established coronary heart disease (CHD), HRT may not protect against further heart attacks, when the progestin selected possesses androgenic properties. Complying with the classic contra indications of HRT and selecting molecules devoid of estrogenic, androgenic, or glucocorticoid effect should allow a larger use of the progestins without any major drawback.

Progestins and cancer.

The role of progestins in breast tissue is less well defined than in the endometrium. Although in vitro studies have shown that progestins induce a similar decrease in both estrogen and progesterone receptors and an increase in 17beta-estradiol dehydrogenase in the breast as in the endometrium, epidemiologic studies have suggested that progestins prevent endometrial cancer, but do not reverse the estrogen-related increase in breast cancer risk in long-term hormone-replacement therapy (HRT). Other studies have also suggested a protective effect for progestins on breast tissue. The dual effect of progesterone and progestins on the cell cycle has been demonstrated, suggesting that according to the duration of administration, the same steroid can induce cells to enter the multiplication phase or to enter a resting state. Progestins exert different effects according to the steroid from which they are derived, e.g. pregnanes derived from progesterone, estranes or gonanes derived from testosterone. Some estrane derivatives are able to stimulate breast cell multiplication in vitro through an estrogen receptor-mediated pathway. Most pregnanes do not exert such an effect. Also, some pregnane derivatives stimulate apoptosis, leading to cell death. However, it is well established that high doses of progestins have been successfully used in the treatment of advanced breast cancer as second-line endocrine therapy. Finally, striking differences have been observed in progestin use in Europe and in the USA. In France, where the rate of progestin use per head is higher than in the USA, the rate of breast cancer has not increased as sharply as observed in North America. Although cancer genesis is multifactorial, it may be concluded that progestins do protect endometrial tissue against the proliferative action of estrogen and if they do not protect breast tissue, at least they do not stimulate its proliferation. Also, they are useful agents as a second-line therapy for breast cancer, when used at high doses.

Progestins and breast cancer.

In the last years there has been an extraordinary development in the synthesis of new progestins. These compounds are classified, in agreement with their structure, in various groups which include progesterone, retroprogesterones, 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterones, 19-norprogesterones, 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone derivatives, androstane and estrane derivatives. The action of progestins is a function of many factors: its structure, affinity to the progesterone receptor or to other steroid receptors, the target tissue considered, the biological response, the experimental conditions, dose, and metabolic transformation. The information on the action of progestins in breast cancer patients is very limited. Positive response with the progestins: medroxyprogesterone acetate and megestrol acetate was obtained in post-menopausal patients with advanced breast cancer. However, extensive information on the effect of progestins was obtained in in vitro studies using hormone-dependent and hormone-independent human mammary cancer cell lines. It was demonstrated that in the hormone-dependent breast cancer cells, various progestins (nomegestrol acetate, tibolone, medrogestone, promegestone) are potent sulfatase inhibitory agents. The progestins can also involve the inhibition of mRNA of this enzyme. In another series of studies it was also demonstrated that various progestins are very active in inhibiting the 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase for the conversion of estrone to estradiol. More recently it was observed that the progestins promegestone or medrogestone stimulate the sulfotransferase for the formation of estrogen sulfates. Consequently, the blockage in the formation of estradiol via sulfatase, or the stimulatory effect on sulfotransferase activity, by progestins can open interesting and new possibilities in clinical applications in breast cancer.

[Topical hormonal treatment and urogenital atrophy]. / Traitement hormonal local de l'atrophie urogénitale.

Hypoestrogenemia-derived urogenital symptoms after menopause manifest after some years of hormonal deficit and appear commonly in elderly, untreated women. In the urogenital tract low postmenopausal estrogen levels lead to vaginal irritation and dryness and to dyspareunia, often accompanied by other symptoms like uriesthesis, incontinence or recurrent infections. Every systemic estrogen treatment is accepted as efficient for the correction of urogenital symptoms, often even at doses lower than those necessary for the correction of vasomotor symptoms. Diverse local treatments have been proposed: estriol, promestriene and low-dose estrone or estradiol. Promestriene applied locally stimulates differentiation and maturation of vaginal mucosa and compensates local hypoestrogenic effects without marked hormonal effects outside the vagina. Vaginal application of estrone, on the other hand, has rather been proposed for systemic hormone substitution and elevated levels of estrone and estradiol observed in the plasma render this method in-appropriate in cases where strictly local effects are desired. Recently, very low doses of estradiol in a range of 7.5 micrograms/day have been proposed for the treatment of urogenital atrophy by means of a prolonged release regimen. Among the described preparations, those with strictly local (devoid of systemic) effects should be restricted to patients with contraindications for systemic substitution therapy. Local estrogen therapies are recommended for the treatment of complaints due to vulvar and vaginal atrophy. They have also been proposed by certain authors for the acceleration of the cervico-vaginal and vulvar cicatrisation after surgical interventions or postpartum. The presence of miction disorders in elderly postmenopausal women is also a point in favour of local treatment.