Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis ; 18(1): 13-7, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25311766

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: With the increasing use of robotic surgery in the United States, the comparative effectiveness and differences in reimbursement of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (MIRP) and open prostatectomy (ORP) in privately insured patients are unknown. Therefore, we sought to assess the differences in perioperative outcomes and hospital reimbursement in a privately insured patient population who were surgically treated for prostate cancer. METHODS: Using a large private insurance database, we identified 17,610 prostate cancer patients who underwent either MIRP or ORP from 2003 to 2010. The primary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), perioperative complications, 90-day readmissions rates and hospital reimbursement. Multivariable regression analyses were used to evaluate for differences in primary outcomes across surgical approaches. RESULTS: Overall, 8981 (51.0%) and 8629 (49.0%) surgically treated prostate cancer patients underwent MIRP and ORP, respectively. The proportion of patients undergoing MIRP markedly rose from 11.9% in 2003 to 72.5% in 2010 (P<0.001 for trend). Relative to ORP, MIRP was associated with a shorter median LOS (1.0 day vs 3.0 days; P<0.001) and lower adjusted odds ratio of perioperative complications (OR: 0.82; P<0.001). However, the 90-day readmission rates of MIRP and ORP were similar (OR: 0.99; P=0.76). MIRP provided higher adjusted mean hospital reimbursement compared with ORP (US $19,292 vs. US $17,347; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among privately insured patients diagnosed with prostate cancer, robotic surgery rapidly disseminated with over 70% of patients undergoing MIRP by 2009-2010. Although MIRP was associated with shorter LOS and modestly better perioperative outcomes, hospitals received higher reimbursement for MIRP compared with ORP.


Assuntos
Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/economia , Prostatectomia/economia , Neoplasias da Próstata/economia , Adulto , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Perioperatório , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis ; 17(2): 163-9, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24566445

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Given the importance of physician attitudes about different treatments and the quality of life (QOL) in prostate cancer, we performed a national survey of specialists to assess treatment recommendations and perceptions of treatment-related survival and QOL. METHODS: We mailed a self-administered survey instrument to a random sample of 1366 specialists in the U.S. Respondents were asked for treatment recommendations and survival that varied by PSA levels and Gleason scores and estimate QOL outcomes. Pearson's chi-square and multivariable regression models were used to test for differences in each outcome. RESULTS: Response rates were similar for radiation oncologists (52.6%) and urologists (52.3%; P=0.92). Across all risk strata, urologists were more likely to recommend surgery than were radiation oncologists, for conditions ranging from PSA>20 and Gleason score 8-10 (35.2 vs. 0.2%; P<0.001) to PSA 4-10 and Gleason score 7 (87.5 vs. 20.9%; P<0.001). Radiation oncologists were also more likely to recommend radiation therapy relative to urologists (all P<0.001). From low- to high-risk prostate cancer, radiation oncologists and urologists perceived their treatment as being better for improving survival (all P<0.001). Each specialty also viewed their treatment as having less urinary incontinence (all P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Radiation oncologists and urologists both prefer the treatment modalities they offer, perceive them to be more effective and to lead to a better QOL. Patients may be receiving biased information, and a truly informed consent process with shared decision-making may be possible only if they are evaluated by both specialties before deciding upon a treatment course.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Padrões de Prática Médica , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Adulto , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores/métodos , Médicos , Próstata/metabolismo , Próstata/patologia , Próstata/cirurgia , Antígeno Prostático Específico/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Próstata/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Qualidade de Vida , Radioterapia (Especialidade)/métodos , Urologia/métodos
4.
Minerva Urol Nefrol ; 61(2): 71-89, 2009 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19451890

RESUMO

Transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) is the second most common urologic malignancy, and 70% of patients present with superficial, or non-muscle invasive disease (NMIBC). Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), currently the most effective intravesical agent at preventing disease recurrence, is the only therapy shown to inhibit disease progression. Unfortunately, approximately 20% of patients discontinue BCG due to local and systemic toxicity and more than 30% show evidence of recurrence; this has led to increased interest in alternate chemotherapeutic agents. Induction intravesical chemotherapy has shown comparable efficacy to BCG in select patients and the immediate perioperative instillation of chemotherapeutic agents has become standard of care. Clinical trial evidence demonstrating the efficacy of BCG plus interferon 2B, gemcitabine and anthracyclines (doxorubicin, epirubicin, valrubicin) in patients refractory or intolerant to BCG is accumulating. Phase I trials investigating alternative agents such as apaziquone, taxanes (docetaxel, paclitaxel), and suramin are reporting promising data. Current efforts are also being directed towards optimizing the administration of existing chemotherapeutic regimens, including the use of novel modalities including hyperthermia, photodynamic therapy, magnetically targeted carriers, and liposomes. Despite recent enthusiasm for new intravesical agents, radical cystectomy remains the treatment of choice for patients with NMIBC who have failed intravesical therapy and select patients with naive T1 tumors and aggressive features. Our aim in this report is to provide a comprehensive review of contemporary intravesical therapy options for NMIBC with an emphasis on emerging agents and novel treatment modalities.


Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Vacina BCG/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/terapia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/terapia , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Administração Intravesical , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Vacina BCG/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/patologia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Fase I como Assunto , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Fotoquimioterapia/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia
5.
Minerva Urol Nefrol ; 61(1): 27-40, 2009 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19002101

RESUMO

In anatomical and functional studies of the human and animal urethra, the middle urethral contained rhabdosphincter is critical for maintaining continence. Transplanted stem cells may have the ability to undergo self renewal and multipotent differentiation, leading to sphincter regeneration. In addition, such cells may release, or be engineered to release, neurotrophins with subsequent paracrine recruitment of endogenous host cells to concomitantly promote a regenerative response of nerve-integrated muscle. Cell-based therapies are most often associated with the use of autologous multipotent stem cells, such as the bone marrow stromal cells. However, harvesting bone marrow stromal stem cells is difficult, painful, and may yield low numbers of stem cells upon processing. In contrast, alternative autologous adult stem cells such as muscle derived stem cells (MDSCs) and adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) can be easily obtained in large quantities and with minimal discomfort. This chapter aims to discuss the neurophysiology of stress urinary incontinence (highlighting the importance of the middle urethra); current injectable cell sources for endoscopic treatment; and the potential of MDSCs for the delivery of neurotrophic factors.


Assuntos
Células-Tronco Adultas/transplante , Regeneração , Transplante de Células-Tronco/métodos , Uretra/cirurgia , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/cirurgia , Adipócitos/transplante , Adulto , Animais , Humanos , Mioblastos Esqueléticos/transplante , Resultado do Tratamento , Uretra/patologia , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/patologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos
6.
ScientificWorldJournal ; 7: 727-41, 2007 Jan 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17619755

RESUMO

The spectrum of laparoscopic surgery in children has undergone a dramatic evolution. Initially used as a diagnostic modality for many pediatric urologists, complex as well as reconstructive procedures are now being performed laparoscopically. Laparoscopic orchiopexy and nephrectomy are well established and are being performed at many centers. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, adrenalectomy, and dismembered pyeloplasty series have reported shortened hospital stays and operative times that are comparable to that of open techniques or are decreasing with experience. The initial experiences with laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation and laparoscopic-assisted bladder reconstructive surgery have been described, reporting encouraging results with regards to feasibility, hospital stay, and cosmetic outcome. This report will provide a directed review of the literature to establish the current indications for laparoscopy in pediatric urologic surgery.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia/tendências , Pediatria/tendências , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/tendências , Doenças Urológicas/patologia , Doenças Urológicas/cirurgia , Urologia/tendências , Previsões , Humanos , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências
7.
Can J Urol ; 13(6): 3351-2, 2006 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17187701

RESUMO

Currently, the prosthesis of choice for patients undergoing penile prosthesis surgery is a three piece inflatable device, as this provides optimal inflation and deflation when compared to a one or two piece prosthesis. However, prior pelvic surgery or radiation therapy can obliterate the retropubic space and make placement of the reservoir required for a three piece prosthesis difficult. We report a novel location for reservoir placement in a man who had undergone multiple pelvic surgeries after suffering a severe pelvic crush injury.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil/cirurgia , Implante Peniano/métodos , Estruturas Criadas Cirurgicamente , Parede Abdominal/cirurgia , Adulto , Disfunção Erétil/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Obesidade Mórbida , Pelve/lesões , Tela Subcutânea/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA