Associations of periconceptional oral contraceptive use with pregnancy complications and adverse birth outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Periconceptional use of oral contraceptives (OCs) has been reported to increase risks of pregnancy complications and adverse birth outcomes, but risks are suggested to differ depending on the timing of discontinuation, amount of oestrogen and progestin content. METHODS: Prospective cohort study among 6470 pregnancies included in the PRegnancy and Infant DEvelopment (PRIDE) Study in 2012-19. Exposure was defined as any reported use of OCs within 12 months pre-pregnancy or after conception. Outcomes of interest were gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, pre-term birth, low birthweight and small for gestational age (SGA). Multivariable Poisson regression using stabilized inverse probability weighting estimated relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Any periconceptional OC use was associated with increased risks of pre-eclampsia (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.99-1.93), pre-term birth (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.09-1.75) and low birthweight (RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.10-1.92), but not with gestational hypertension (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.91-1.31), gestational diabetes (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.77-1.36) and SGA (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.75-1.21). Associations with pre-eclampsia were strongest for discontinuation 0-3 months pre-pregnancy, for OCs containing ≥30 µg oestrogen and for first- or second-generation OCs. Pre-term birth and low birthweight were more likely to occur when OCs were discontinued 0-3 months pre-pregnancy, when using OCs containing <30 µg oestrogen and when using third-generation OCs. Associations with SGA were observed for OCs containing <30 µg oestrogen and for third- or fourth-generation OCs. CONCLUSIONS: Periconceptional OC use, particularly those containing oestrogen, was associated with increased risks of pre-eclampsia, pre-term birth, low birthweight and SGA.

Proenkephalin A as a marker for glomerular filtration rate in critically ill children: validation against gold standard iohexol GFR measurements.

OBJECTIVES: Accurate determination of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is important. Several endogenous biomarkers exist for estimating GFR, yet, they have limited accuracy, especially in the paediatric population. Proenkephalin A 119-159 (PENK) is a novel and promising GFR marker, but its relation with age in children remains unknown. Also, the value of PENK has never been validated against measured GFR (mGFR) in children when compared to traditional GFR markers including serum creatinine (SCr), SCr-based estimated GFR (eGFR) and cystatin C (cysC). METHODS: Critically ill children and term-born neonates were included in this single-centre, prospective study. Iohexol-based mGFR, SCr, and cysC were determined in each patient. eGFR was calculated using the bedside Schwartz equation, incorporating SCr and height. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the correlation between mGFR and PENK, SCr, cysC and eGFR. RESULTS: For 97 patients (56 children and 41 neonates), mGFR, SCr, cysC and PENK levels were available. PENK levels were higher in young children and decreased to adult PENK reference values around two years of age. PENK levels were highly correlated with mGFR (ρ=-0.88, p<0.001), and similar to mGFR-eGFR correlation (ρ=-0.87, p<0.001). For cysC and SCr the correlation with mGFR was lower (ρ=-0.77 and ρ=-0.46, respectively. Both p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The correlation of PENK with mGFR was as good as SCr-based eGFR-mGFR correlation. To determine the added value of PENK in paediatric clinical care and prior to implementation, PENK reference values are needed and the development and validation of a paediatric PENK-based eGFR equation is necessary.

Glomerular filtration rate in critically ill neonates and children: creatinine-based estimations versus iohexol-based measurements.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) and augmented renal clearance (ARC), both alterations of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), are prevalent in critically ill children and neonates. AKI and ARC prevalence estimates are based on estimation of GFR (eGFR) using serum creatinine (SCr), which is known to be inaccurate. We aimed to test our hypothesis that AKI prevalence will be higher and ARC prevalence will be lower in critically ill children when using iohexol-based measured GFR (mGFR), rather than using eGFR. Additionally, we aimed to investigate the performance of different SCr-based eGFR methods. METHODS: In this single-center prospective study, critically ill term-born neonates and children were included. mGFR was calculated using a plasma disappearance curve after parenteral administration of iohexol. AKI diagnosis was based on the KDIGO criteria, SCr-based eGFR, and creatinine clearance (CrCL). Differences between eGFR and mGFR were determined using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and by calculating bias and accuracy (percentage of eGFR values within 30% of mGFR values). RESULTS: One hundred five children, including 43 neonates, were included. AKI prevalence was higher based on mGFR (48%), than with KDIGO or eGFR (11-40%). ARC prevalence was lower with mGFR (24%) compared to eGFR (38-51%). eGFR equations significantly overestimated mGFR (60-71 versus 41 ml/min/1.73 m2, p < 0.001-0.002). Accuracy was highest with eGFR equations based on age- and sex-dependent equations (up to 59%). CONCLUSION: Iohexol-based AKI prevalence was higher and ARC prevalence lower compared to standard SCr-based eGFR methods. Age- and sex-dependent equations for eGFR (eGFR-Smeets for neonates and eGFR-Pierce for children) best approached measured GFR and should preferably be used to optimize diagnosis of AKI and ARC in this population. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.