Differentiation of lymphocytic-plasmacytic enteropathy and small cell lymphoma in cats using histology-guided mass spectrometry.

BACKGROUND: Differentiation of lymphocytic-plasmacytic enteropathy (LPE) from small cell lymphoma (SCL) in cats can be challenging. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVE: Histology-guided mass spectrometry (HGMS) is a suitable method for the differentiation of LPE from SCL in cats. ANIMALS: Forty-one cats with LPE and 52 cats with SCL. METHODS: This is a retrospective clinicopathologic study. Duodenal tissue samples of 17 cats with LPE and 22 cats with SCL were subjected to HGMS, and the acquired data were used to develop a linear discriminate analysis (LDA) machine learning algorithm. The algorithm was subsequently validated using a separate set of 24 cats with LPE and 30 cats with SCL. Cases were classified as LPE or SCL based on a consensus by an expert panel consisting of 5-7 board-certified veterinary specialists. Histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and clonality testing were available for all cats. The panel consensus classification served as a reference for the calculation of test performance parameters. RESULTS: Relative sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of HGMS were 86.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 74.5%-98.8%), 91.7% (95% CI: 80.6%-100%), and 88.9% (95% CI: 80.5%-97.3%), respectively. Comparatively, the clonality testing had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 85.7% (95% CI: 72.8%-98.7%), 33.3% (95% CI: 14.5%-52.2%), and 61.5% (95% CI: 48.3%-74.8%) relative to the panel decision. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Histology-guided mass spectrometry was a reliable technique for the differentiation of LPE from SCL in duodenal formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples of cats and might have advantages over tests currently considered state of the art.

Histopathology-guided mass spectrometry differentiates benign nevi from malignant melanoma.

PURPOSE: Distinguishing benign nevi from malignant melanoma using current histopathological criteria may be very challenging and is one the most difficult areas in dermatopathology. The goal of this study was to identify proteomic differences, which would more reliably differentiate between benign and malignant melanocytic lesions. METHODS: We performed histolpathology - guided mass spectrometry (HGMS) profiling analysis on formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissue samples to identify differences at the proteomic level between different types of benign nevi and melanomas. A total of 756 cases, of which 357 cases of melanoma and 399 benign nevi, were included in the study. The specimens originated from both biopsies (376 samples) and tissue microarray (TMA) cores (380 samples). After obtaining mass spectra from each sample, classification models were built using a training set of biopsy specimens from 111 nevi and 100 melanomas. The classification algorithm developed on the training data set was validated on an independent set of 288 nevi and 257 melanomas from both biopsies and TMA cores. RESULTS: In the melanoma cohort, 239/257 (93%) cases classified correctly in the validation set, 3/257 (1.2%) classified incorrectly, and 15/257 (5.8%) classified as indeterminate. In the cohort of nevi, 282/288 (98%) cases classified correctly, 1/288 (0.3%) classified incorrectly, and 5/288 (1.7%) were indeterminate. HGMS showed a sensitivity of 98.76% and specificity of 99.65% in determining benign vs malignant. CONCLUSION: HGMS proteomic analysis is an objective and reliable test with minimal tissue requirements, which can be a helpful ancillary test in the diagnosis of challenging melanocytic lesions.