Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JAMA Surg ; 149(11): 1138-45, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25230047

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Improper mechanical ventilation settings can exacerbate acute lung injury by causing a secondary ventilator-induced lung injury. It is therefore important to establish the mechanism by which the ventilator induces lung injury to develop protective ventilation strategies. It has been postulated that the mechanism of ventilator-induced lung injury is the result of heterogeneous, elevated strain on the pulmonary parenchyma. Acute lung injury has been associated with increases in whole-lung macrostrain, which is correlated with increased pathology. However, the effect of mechanical ventilation on alveolar microstrain remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the mechanical breath profile of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV), consisting of a prolonged pressure-time profile and brief expiratory release phase, reduces microstrain. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In a randomized, nonblinded laboratory animal study, rats were randomized into a controlled mandatory ventilation group (n = 3) and an APRV group (n = 3). Lung injury was induced by polysorbate lavage. A thoracotomy was performed and an in vivo microscope was placed on the lungs to measure alveolar mechanics. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: In the controlled mandatory ventilation group, multiple levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP; 5, 10, 16, 20, and 24 cm H2O) were tested. In the APRV group, decreasing durations of expiratory release (time at low pressure [T(low)]) were tested. The T(low) was set to achieve ratios of termination of peak expiratory flow rate (T-PEFR) to peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) of 10%, 25%, 50%, and 75% (the smaller this ratio is [ie, 10%], the more time the lung is exposed to low pressure during the release phase, which decreases end-expiratory lung volume and potentiates derecruitment). Alveolar perimeters were measured at peak inspiration and end expiration using digital image analysis, and strain was calculated by normalizing the change in alveolar perimeter length to the original length. Macrostrain was measured by volume displacement. RESULTS: Higher PEEP (16-24 cm H2O) and a brief T(low) (APRV T-PEFR to PEFR ratio of 75%) reduced microstrain. Microstrain was minimized with an APRV T-PEFR to PEFR ratio of 75% (mean [SEM], 0.05 [0.03]) and PEEP of 16 cm H2O (mean [SEM], 0.09 [0.08]), but an APRV T-PEFR to PEFR ratio of 75% also promoted alveolar recruitment compared with PEEP of 16 cm H2O (mean [SEM] total inspiratory area, 52.0% [2.9%] vs 29.4% [4.3%], respectively; P < .05). Whole-lung strain was correlated with alveolar microstrain in tested settings (P < .05) except PEEP of 16 cm H2O (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Increased positive-end expiratory pressure and reduced time at low pressure (decreased T(low)) reduced alveolar microstrain. Reduced microstrain and improved alveolar recruitment using an APRV T-PEFR to PEFR ratio of 75% may be the mechanism of lung protection seen in previous clinical and animal studies.


Assuntos
Lesão Pulmonar Aguda/fisiopatologia , Lesão Pulmonar Aguda/terapia , Pressão Positiva Contínua nas Vias Aéreas/métodos , Respiração com Pressão Positiva , Mecânica Respiratória , Lesão Pulmonar Aguda/patologia , Animais , Masculino , Pico do Fluxo Expiratório , Alvéolos Pulmonares/patologia , Alvéolos Pulmonares/fisiopatologia , Distribuição Aleatória , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Estresse Fisiológico
2.
JAMA Surg ; 148(11): 1005-12, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24026214

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Up to 25% of patients with normal lungs develop acute lung injury (ALI) secondary to mechanical ventilation, with 60% to 80% progressing to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Once established, ARDS is treated with mechanical ventilation that can paradoxically elevate mortality. A ventilation strategy that reduces the incidence of ARDS could change the clinical paradigm from treatment to prevention. OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate that (1) mechanical ventilation with tidal volume (VT) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) settings used routinely on surgery patients causes ALI/ARDS in normal rats and (2) preemptive application of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) blocks drivers of lung injury (ie, surfactant deactivation and alveolar edema) and prevents ARDS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS: Rats were anesthetized and tracheostomy was performed at State University of New York Upstate Medical University. Arterial and venous lines, a peritoneal catheter, and a rectal temperature probe were inserted. Animals were randomized into 3 groups and followed up for 6 hours: spontaneous breathing ventilation (SBV, n = 5), continuous mandatory ventilation (CMV, n = 6), and APRV (n = 5). Rats in the CMV group were ventilated with Vt of 10 cc/kg and PEEP of 0.5 cm H2O. Airway pressure release ventilation was set with a P(High) of 15 to 20 cm H2O; P(Low) was set at 0 cm H2O. Time at P(High) (T(High)) was 1.3 to 1.5 seconds and a T(Low) was set to terminate at 75% of the peak expiratory flow rate (0.11-0.14 seconds), creating a minimum 90% cycle time spent at P(High). Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and lungs were harvested for histopathologic analysis at necropsy. RESULTS: Acute lung injury/ARDS developed in the CMV group (mean [SE] PaO2/FiO2 ratio, 242.96 [24.82]) and was prevented with preemptive APRV (mean [SE] PaO2/FIO2 ratio, 478.00 [41.38]; P < .05). Airway pressure release ventilation also significantly reduced histopathologic changes and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid total protein (endothelial permeability) and preserved surfactant proteins A and B concentrations as compared with the CMV group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Continuous mandatory ventilation in normal rats for 6 hours with Vt and PEEP settings similar to those of surgery patients caused ALI. Preemptive application of APRV blocked early drivers of lung injury, preventing ARDS. Our data suggest that APRV applied early could reduce the incidence of ARDS in patients at risk.


Assuntos
Pressão Positiva Contínua nas Vias Aéreas/métodos , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/prevenção & controle , Lesão Pulmonar Induzida por Ventilação Mecânica/prevenção & controle , Animais , Pressão Positiva Contínua nas Vias Aéreas/efeitos adversos , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Masculino , Pico do Fluxo Expiratório/fisiologia , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/etiologia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/patologia , Volume de Ventilação Pulmonar/fisiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Lesão Pulmonar Induzida por Ventilação Mecânica/etiologia , Lesão Pulmonar Induzida por Ventilação Mecânica/patologia
3.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 73(2): 391-400, 2012 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22846945

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Established acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is often refractory to treatment. Clinical trials have demonstrated modest treatment effects, and mortality remains high. Ventilator strategies must be developed to prevent ARDS. HYPOTHESIS: Early ventilatory intervention will block progression to ARDS if the ventilator mode (1) maintains alveolar stability and (2) reduces pulmonary edema formation. METHODS: Yorkshire pigs (38-45 kg) were anesthetized and subjected to a "two-hit" ischemia-reperfusion and peritoneal sepsis. After injury, animals were randomized into two groups: early preventative ventilation (airway pressure release ventilation [APRV]) versus nonpreventative ventilation (NPV) and followed for 48 hours. All animals received anesthesia, antibiotics, and fluid or vasopressor therapy as per the Surviving Sepsis Campaign. Titrated for optimal alveolar stability were the following ventilation parameters: (1) NPV group--tidal volume, 10 mL/kg + positive end-expiratory pressure - 5 cm/H2O volume-cycled mode; (2) APRV group--tidal volume, 10 to 15 mL/kg; high pressure, low pressure, time duration of inspiration (Thigh), and time duration of release phase (Tlow). Physiological data and plasma were collected throughout the 48-hour study period, followed by BAL and necropsy. RESULTS: APRV prevented the development of ARDS (p < 0.001 vs. NPV) by PaO2/FIO2 ratio. Quantitative histological scoring showed that APRV prevented lung tissue injury (p < 0.001 vs. NPV). Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid showed that APRV lowered total protein and interleukin 6 while preserving surfactant proteins A and B (p < 0.05 vs. NPV). APRV significantly lowered lung water (p < 0.001 vs. NPV). Plasma interleukin 6 concentrations were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Early preventative mechanical ventilation with APRV blocked ARDS development, preserved surfactant proteins, and reduced pulmonary inflammation and edema despite systemic inflammation similar to NPV. These data suggest that early preventative ventilation strategies stabilizing alveoli and reducing pulmonary edema can attenuate ARDS after ischemia-reperfusion and sepsis.


Assuntos
Lesão Pulmonar/prevenção & controle , Ventilação Pulmonar , Respiração Artificial/métodos , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/prevenção & controle , Animais , Biópsia por Agulha , Líquido da Lavagem Broncoalveolar , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Feminino , Hemodinâmica/fisiologia , Imuno-Histoquímica , Lesão Pulmonar/mortalidade , Lesão Pulmonar/terapia , Respiração com Pressão Positiva/métodos , Troca Gasosa Pulmonar , Distribuição Aleatória , Mecânica Respiratória , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Suínos , Volume de Ventilação Pulmonar , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA