Transoral removal of submandibular hilar lithiasis: results on the salivary duct system, glandular parenchyma, and quality-of-life recovery.

OBJECTIVE(S): To confirm that hilar transoral submandibular sialolitectomy (TOSL) is the first treatment option for submandibular hilar lithiasis (SHL) in terms of glandular parenchyma recovery, salivary system restoration, and patient quality of life (QoL) improvement. METHODS: Depending on whether the stone was easily palpable, TOSL was carried out with or without sialendoscopy. For the first time in the literature, Magnetic Resonance Sialography (MR-Si) was performed before and after TOSL, to evaluate stone characteristics, glandular parenchyma status, hilum dilation and main duct recanalization. Radiological data was examined independently by two radiologists. COSQ, a recently validated and specific questionnaire, was used to assess associated QoL. RESULTS: Between 2017 and 2022, 29 TOSL patients were examined. With a high interobserver correlation, MR-Si was confirmed as a very useful radiological test in the pre- and post-surgical evaluation of SHL. The salivary main duct was completely recanalized in all cases. The presence of lithiasis was found in 4 patients (13.8%). After surgery, the majority of patients (79.31%) had hilum dilation. There was a statistically significant improvement in parenchyma status, but no significant progression to glandular atrophy. After surgery, COSQ mean values always improved (22.5 to 4.5). CONCLUSIONS: TOSL is the ideal surgical technique for the management of SHL, resulting in improved parenchymal inflammatory changes, recanalization of Wharton's duct, and enhancement patients' QoL. As a result, before removing the submandibular gland, TOSL should be considered as the first treatment option for SHL.

Epidemiologic, radiologic, and sialendoscopic aspects in chronic obstructive sialadenitis.

PURPOSE: Chronic obstructive sialadenitis (COS) is a recurring inflammation of the salivary gland. To date, there are no known predisposing factors for COS. Given the advances seen in radiology and sialendoscopy, we must update our knowledge of COS, analyzing factors that can favor its development. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed 333 patients who underwent sialendoscopy between 2012 and 2021. Epidemiologic, radiologic, and sialendoscopy-related factors were correlated. Suspected diagnosis was established based on the clinical and radiologic data. The final diagnosis was determined on the basis of sialendoscopic findings. RESULTS: The most common etiology of COS was stricture (40.8%). Lack of papilla distensibility (LPD) was also described as an etiology. COS was related to patient gender and age. Submandibular gland involvement was significantly more associated with lithiasis and LPD, while COS of the parotid gland was most frequently caused by stricture. Radioiodine sialadenitis and Sjögren's syndrome were significantly associated with stricture. MR sialography (MR-Si) showed the best overall sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSION: In our series, stricture was the most common cause of COS. We describe LPD as a frequent cause of COS in this series; ours is the first study to report this finding. There was a significant association between the salivary gland involved, patient sex and age, and the cause of COS. MR-Si showed the greatest diagnostic yield.