Gastrointestinal complications following on-pump cardiac surgery-A propensity matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal complications following on-pump cardiac surgery are orphan but serious risk factors for postoperative morbidity and mortality. We aimed to assess incidence, perioperative risk factors, treatment modalities and outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A university medical center audit comprised 4883 consecutive patients (median age 69 [interquartile range IQR 60-76] years, 33% female, median logistic EuroScore 5 [IQR 3-11]) undergoing all types of cardiac surgery including surgery on the thoracic aorta; patients undergoing repair of congenital heart disease, implantation of assist devices or cardiac transplantation were excluded. Coronary artery disease was the leading indication for on-pump cardiac surgery (60%), patients undergoing cardiac surgery under urgency or emergency setting were included in analysis. We identified a total of 142 patients with gastrointestinal complications. To identify intra- and postoperative predictors for gastrointestinal complications, we applied a 1:1 propensity score matching procedure based on a logistic regression model. RESULTS: Overall, 30-day mortality for the entire cohort was 5.4%; the incidence of gastrointestinal complications was 2.9% and median time to complication 8 days (IQR 4-12). Acute pancreatitis (n = 41), paralytic ileus (n = 14) and acute cholecystitis (n = 18) were the leading pathologies. Mesenteric ischemia and gastrointestinal bleeding accounted for 16 vs. 18 cases, respectively. While 72 patients (51%) could be managed conservatively, 27 patients required endoscopic/radiological (19%) or surgical intervention (43/142 patients, 30%); overall 30-day mortality was 12.1% (p<0.001). Propensity score matching identified prolonged skin-to-skin times (p = 0.026; Odds Ratio OR 1.003, 95% Confidence Interval CI 1.000-1.007) and extended on-pump periods (p = 0.010; OR 1.006, 95%CI 1.001-1.011) as significant perioperative risk factors. COMMENT: Prolonged skin-to-skin times and extended on-pump periods are important perioperative risk factors regardless of preoperative risk factors.

Statistical primer: methodology and reporting of meta-analyses.

In modern medicine, the results of a comprehensive and methodologically sound meta-analysis bring the most robust, high-quality information to support evidence-based decision-making. With recent developments in newer meta-analytic approaches, iteration of statistical paradigms and software implementations, network and patient-level meta-analyses have recently gained popularity alongside conventional pairwise study-level meta-analyses. However, pitfalls are common in this challenging and rapidly evolving field of statistics. In this regard, guidelines have been introduced to standardize, strengthen and homogenize different aspects of conducting and reporting the results of a meta-analysis. Current recommendations advise a careful selection of the individual studies to be pooled, mainly based on the methodological quality and homogeneity in study designs. Indeed, even if a reasonable degree of variability across study results (namely, heterogeneity) can be accounted for with proper statistics (i.e. random-effect models), no adjustment can be performed in meta-analyses violating the issue of clinical validity and similarity across the included studies. In this context, this statistical primer aims at providing a conceptual framework, complemented by a practical example, for conducting, interpreting and critically evaluating meta-analyses.

Portal vein resection in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: is it worth the risk?

INTRODUCTION: Portal vein resection represents a viable add-on option in standard pancreaticoduodenectomy for locally advanced ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma, but is often underused as it may set patients at additional risk for perioperative and postoperative morbidity and mortality. We aimed to review our long-term experience to determine the additive value of this intervention for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Single, university surgical center audit over a 13-year period; cohort comprised 221 consecutive patients undergoing pancreatic resection; in 47 (21 %) including portal vein resection. Predictors for short- and long-term survival were assessed via multivariate logistic and Cox regression. RESULTS: Baseline and perioperative characteristics were similar between the two groups. However, overall skin-to-skin times, intraoperative transfusion requirements as the need for medical inotropic support were higher in patients undergoing additional portal vein resection (p < 0.0001; p = 0.001 and p = 0.03). Postoperative complication rates were 34 vs. 35 % (p = 0.89), 14 patients (5 % vs. 11 %; p = 0.18) died in-hospital. An American Society of Anesthesiologists Score >2 was the only independent predictor for in-hospital mortality (OR 10.66, 95 % CI 1.24-91.30). Follow-up was complete in 99.5 %, one-year survival was 59 % vs. 70 % and five-year overall survival 15 % vs. 12 % with and without portal vein resection, respectively (Log rank: p = 0.25). For long-term outcome, microvascular invasion (HR 2.03, 95 % CI 1.10-3.76) and preoperative weight loss (HR 2.17, 95 % CI 1.31-3.58) were independent predictors. CONCLUSION: Despite locally advanced disease, patients who underwent portal vein resection had no worse perioperative and overall survival than patients with lower staging and standard pancreaticoduodenectomy only. Therefore, the feasibility of portal vein resection should be evaluated in every potential candidate at risk.

Pancreas Cancer Surgery in Octogenarians - Should We or Should We Not?

BACKGROUND/AIM: In this study we aimed to determine if advanced age represents a risk factor for negative perioperative and long-term outcome in patients undergoing curative surgery ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two-hundred-twenty-one consecutive patients, twelve (6%) patients ≥80 years were included in the study. We assessed perioperative and long-term outcome and independent predictors for in-hospital mortality with Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Advanced age was not a predictor for in-hospital mortality (6.3% in non-octogenarian versus 8.3% in octogenarians; p=0.55) nor for morbidity (31% vs. 32%; p=0.69). An ASA score >II was the only predictor for in-hospital mortality (odds ratio (OR)=10.10, 95%CI=1.28-79.60; Hosmer-Lemeshow: p=0.86). No significant difference was observed in one- and five-year survival rates (68 and 58% vs. 16 and 14%; log-rank p=0.61). CONCLUSION: Advanced age is not a risk factor for negative outcome in curative pancreatic cancer surgery. Therefore, this single curative option should be considered in octogenarians at risk.

Risk Factors for Sternal Wound Infection After Open Heart Operations Vary According to Type of Operation.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated whether risk factors for sternal wound infections vary with the type of surgical procedure in cardiac operations. METHODS: This was a university hospital surveillance study of 3,249 consecutive patients (28% women) from 2006 to 2010 (median age, 69 years [interquartile range, 60 to 76]; median additive European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score, 5 [interquartile range, 3 to 8]) after (1) isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), (2) isolated valve repair or replacement, or (3) combined valve procedures and CABG. All other operations were excluded. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression were conducted to identify independent predictors for development of sternal wound infections. RESULTS: We detected 122 sternal wound infections (3.8%) in 3,249 patients: 74 of 1,857 patients (4.0%) after CABG, 19 of 799 (2.4%) after valve operations, and 29 of 593 (4.9%) after combined procedures. In CABG patients, bilateral internal thoracic artery harvest, procedural duration exceeding 300 minutes, diabetes, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and female sex (model 1) were independent predictors for sternal wound infection. A second model (model 2), using the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation, revealed bilateral internal thoracic artery harvest, diabetes, obesity, and the second and third quartiles of the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation were independent predictors. In valve patients, model 1 showed only revision for bleeding as an independent predictor for sternal infection, and model 2 yielded both revision for bleeding and diabetes. For combined valve and CABG operations, both regression models demonstrated revision for bleeding and duration of operation exceeding 300 minutes were independent predictors for sternal infection. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for sternal wound infections after cardiac operations vary with the type of surgical procedure. In patients undergoing valve operations or combined operations, procedure-related risk factors (revision for bleeding, duration of operation) independently predict infection. In patients undergoing CABG, not only procedure-related risk factors but also bilateral internal thoracic artery harvest and patient characteristics (diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obesity, female sex) are predictive of sternal wound infection. Preventive interventions may be justified according to the type of operation.

Statistical and data reporting guidelines for the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery and the Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery.

As part of the peer review process for the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EJCTS) and the Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery (ICVTS), a statistician reviews any manuscript that includes a statistical analysis. To facilitate authors considering submitting a manuscript and to make it clearer about the expectations of the statistical reviewers, we present up-to-date guidelines for authors on statistical and data reporting specifically in these journals. The number of statistical methods used in the cardiothoracic literature is vast, as are the ways in which data are presented. Therefore, we narrow the scope of these guidelines to cover the most common applications submitted to the EJCTS and ICVTS, focusing in particular on those that the statistical reviewers most frequently comment on.

Aorto-bronchial and aorto-pulmonary fistulation after thoracic endovascular aortic repair: an analysis from the European Registry of Endovascular Aortic Repair Complications.

OBJECTIVES: To learn upon incidence, underlying mechanisms and effectiveness of treatment strategies in patients with central airway and pulmonary parenchymal aorto-bronchial fistulation after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). METHODS: Analysis of an international multicentre registry (European Registry of Endovascular Aortic Repair Complications) between 2001 and 2012 with a total caseload of 4680 TEVAR procedures (14 centres). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients with a median age of 70 years (interquartile range: 60-77) (35% female) were identified. The incidence of either central airway (aorto-bronchial) or pulmonary parenchymal (aorto-pulmonary) fistulation (ABPF) in the entire cohort after TEVAR in the study period was 0.56% (central airway 58%, peripheral parenchymal 42%). Atherosclerotic aneurysm formation was the leading indication for TEVAR in 15 patients (58%). The incidence of primary endoleaks after initial TEVAR was n = 10 (38%), of these 80% were either type I or type III endoleaks. Fourteen patients (54%) developed central left bronchial tree lesions, 11 patients (42%) pulmonary parenchymal lesions and 1 patient (4%) developed a tracheal lesion. The recognized mechanism of ABPF was external compression of the bronchial tree in 13 patients (50%), the majority being due to endoleak formation, further ischaemia due to extensive coverage of bronchial feeding arteries in 3 patients (12%). Inflammation and graft erosion accounted for 4 patients (30%) each. Cumulative survival during the entire study period was 39%. Among deaths, 71% were attributed to ABPF. There was no difference in survival in patients having either central airway or pulmonary parenchymal ABPF (33 vs 45%, log-rank P = 0.55). Survival with a radical surgical approach was significantly better when compared with any other treatment strategy in terms of overall survival (63 vs 32% and 63 vs 21% at 1 and 2 years, respectively), as well as in terms of fistula-related survival (63 vs 43% and 63 vs 43% at 1 and 2 years, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: ABPF is a rare but highly lethal complication after TEVAR. The leading mechanism behind ABPF seems to be a continuing external compression of either the bronchial tree or left upper lobe parenchyma. In this setting, persisting or newly developing endoleak formation seems to play a crucial role. Prognosis does not differ in patients with central airway or pulmonary parenchymal fistulation. Radical bronchial or pulmonary parenchymal repair in combination with stent graft removal and aortic reconstruction seems to be the most durable treatment strategy.

Minimized extracorporeal circulation does not impair cognitive brain function after coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVES: Objective evaluation of the impact of minimized extracorporeal circulation (MECC) on perioperative cognitive brain function in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) by electroencephalogram P300 wave event-related potentials and number connection test (NCT) as metrics of cognitive function. METHODS: Cognitive brain function was assessed in 31 patients in 2013 with a mean age of 65 years [standard deviation (SD) 10] undergoing CABG by the use of MECC with P300 auditory evoked potentials (peak latencies in milliseconds) directly prior to intervention, 7 days after and 3 months later. Number connection test, serving as method of control, was performed simultaneously in all patients. RESULTS: Seven days following CABG, cognitive P300 evoked potentials were comparable with preoperative baseline values [vertex (Cz) 376 (SD 11) ms vs 378 (18) ms, P = 0.39; frontal (Fz) 377 (11) vs 379 (21) ms, P = 0.53]. Cognitive brain function at 3 months was compared with baseline values [(Cz) 376 (11) ms vs 371 (14 ms) P = 0.09; (Fz) 377 (11) ms vs 371 (15) ms, P = 0.04]. Between the first postoperative measurement and 3 months later, significant improvement was observed [(Cz) 378 (18) ms vs 371 (14) ms, P = 0.03; (Fz) 379 (21) vs 371 (15) ms, P = 0.02]. Similar clearly corresponding patterns could be obtained via the number connection test. Results could be confirmed in repeated measures analysis of variance for Cz (P = 0.05) and (Fz) results (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: MECC does not adversely affect cognitive brain function after CABG. Additionally, these patients experience a substantial significant cognitive improvement after 3 months, evidentiary proving that the concept of MECC ensures safety and outcome in terms of brain function.

New insights regarding the incidence, presentation and treatment options of aorto-oesophageal fistulation after thoracic endovascular aortic repair: the European Registry of Endovascular Aortic Repair Complications.

OBJECTIVES: To review the incidence, clinical presentation, definite management and 1-year outcome in patients with aorto-oesophageal fistulation (AOF) following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). METHODS: International multicentre registry (European Registry of Endovascular Aortic Repair Complications) between 2001 and 2011 with a total caseload of 2387 TEVAR procedures (17 centres). RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with a median age of 69 years (IQR 56-75), 25% females and 9 patients (19%) following previous aortic surgery were identified. The incidence of AOF in the entire cohort after TEVAR in the study period was 1.5%. The primary underlying aortic pathology for TEVAR was atherosclerotic aneurysm formation in 53% of patients and the median time to development of AOF was 90 days (IQR 30-150). Leading clinical symptoms were fever of unknown origin in 29 (81%), haematemesis in 19 (53%) and shock in 8 (22%) patients. Diagnosis could be confirmed via computed tomography in 92% of the cases with the leading sign of a new mediastinal mass in 28 (78%) patients. A conservative approach resulted in a 100% 1-year mortality, and 1-year survival for an oesophageal stenting-only approach was 17%. Survival after isolated oesophagectomy was 43%. The highest 1-year survival rate (46%) could be achieved via an aggressive treatment including radical oesophagectomy and aortic replacement [relative risk increase 1.73 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-2.92]. The survival advantage of this aggressive treatment modality could be confirmed in bootstrap analysis (95% CI 1.11-3.33). CONCLUSIONS: The development of AOF is a rare but lethal complication after TEVAR, being associated with the need for emergency TEVAR as well as mediastinal haematoma formation. The only durable and successful approach to cure the disease is radical oesophagectomy and extensive aortic reconstruction. These findings may serve as a decision-making tool for physicians treating these complex patients.

Total surgical aortic arch replacement as a safe strategy to treat complex multisegmental proximal thoracic aortic pathology.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the results after elective open total aortic arch replacement. METHODS: We analysed 39 patients (median age 63 years, median logistic EuroSCORE 18.4) who underwent elective open total arch replacement between 2005 and 2012. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 5.1% (n = 2) and perioperative neurological injury was 12.8% (n = 5). The indication for surgery was degenerative aneurysmal disease in 59% (n = 23) and late aneurysmal formation following previous surgery of type A aortic dissection in 35.9% (n = 14); 5.1% (n = 2) were due to anastomotical aneurysms after prior ascending repair. Fifty-nine percent (n = 23) of the patients had already undergone previous proximal thoracic aortic surgery. In 30.8% (n = 12) of them, a conventional elephant trunk was added to total arch replacement, in 28.2% (n = 11), root replacement was additionally performed. Median hypothermic circulatory arrest time was 42 min (21-54 min). Selective antegrade cerebral perfusion was used in 95% (n = 37) of patients. Median follow-up was 11 months [interquartile range (IQR) 1-20 months]. There was no late death and no need for reoperation during this period. CONCLUSIONS: Open total aortic arch replacement shows very satisfying results. The number of patients undergoing total arch replacement as a redo procedure and as a part of a complex multisegmental aortic pathology is high. Future strategies will have to emphasize neurological protection in extensive simultaneous replacement of the aortic arch and adjacent segments.

Long-term results after proximal thoracic aortic redo surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate early and mid-term results in patients undergoing proximal thoracic aortic redo surgery. METHODS: We analyzed 60 patients (median age 60 years, median logistic EuroSCORE 40) who underwent proximal thoracic aortic redo surgery between January 2005 and April 2012. Outcome and risk factors were analyzed. RESULTS: In hospital mortality was 13%, perioperative neurologic injury was 7%. Fifty percent of patients underwent redo surgery in an urgent or emergency setting. In 65%, partial or total arch replacement with or without conventional or frozen elephant trunk extension was performed. The preoperative logistic EuroSCORE I confirmed to be a reliable predictor of adverse outcome- (ROC 0.786, 95%CI 0.64-0.93) as did the new EuroSCORE II model: ROC 0.882 95%CI 0.78-0.98. Extensive individual logistic EuroSCORE I levels more than 67 showed an OR of 7.01, 95%CI 1.43-34.27. A EuroSCORE II larger than 28 showed an OR of 4.44 (95%CI 1.4-14.06). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified a critical preoperative state (OR 7.96, 95%CI 1.51-38.79) but not advanced age (OR 2.46, 95%CI 0.48-12.66) as the strongest independent predictor of in-hospital mortality. Median follow-up was 23 months (1-52 months). One year and five year actuarial survival rates were 83% and 69% respectively. Freedom from reoperation during follow-up was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a substantial early attrition rate in patients presenting with a critical preoperative state, proximal thoracic aortic redo surgery provides excellent early and mid-term results. Higher EuroSCORE I and II levels and a critical preoperative state but not advanced age are independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. As a consequence, age alone should no longer be regarded as a contraindication for surgical treatment in this particular group of patients.

Midterm results after endovascular treatment of acute, complicated type B aortic dissection: the Talent Thoracic Registry.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and midterm results of endovascular treatment of acute complicated type B dissection. METHODS: From January 1998 to March 2004, 29 patients (7 women and 22 men) with acute complicated aortic type B dissection (mean age, 61 years; range, 22-78), defined as aortic rupture, malperfusion, intractable pain, or uncontrolled hypertension, underwent endovascular stent graft placement with the Medtronic Talent device. Five patients (17%) had undergone previous surgery on the ascending aorta and/or aortic valve. The mean aortic diameter at intervention was 48 ± 13 mm. Follow-up was 100% complete and averaged 53 ± 41 months. RESULTS: The technical feasibility and success with deployment proximal to the entry tear was 100%, requiring partial or total coverage of the left subclavian artery in only 1 patient (3%). Hospital mortality was 17% ± 7% (70% confidence limit) with 6 late deaths. The causes of hospital death included multiorgan failure in 2 patients, aortic rupture in 2, and retrograde dissection in 1 patient. Three patients (10%) who survived the procedure developed neurologic complications (2 strokes and 1 transient ischemic attack). One patient required early conversion to surgery because of retrograde type A dissection. Furthermore, 4 patients developed a type Ia endoleak. A postprocedural increase in the distal aortic diameter was observed in 3 patients. The actuarial survival at 1 and 5 years was 79% and 61%, respectively. Freedom from treatment failure at 1 and 5 years (including reintervention, aortic rupture, device-related complications, aortic-related death, or sudden, unexplained late death) was 82% and 77%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular stent graft placement in acute complicated type B aortic dissection proves to be a promising alternative therapeutic treatment modality in this relatively difficult patient cohort. Refinements, especially in stent design and application, could further improve the prognosis of patients in this life-threatening situation.

Long-term results after operations for active infective endocarditis in native and prosthetic valves.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the midterm results of patients who underwent operations for active infective endocarditis. METHODS: Within a 10-year period, 141 patients with active infective endocarditis received surgical therapy. We assessed outcome, freedom from reinfection, and freedom from reintervention. Prosthetic valve endocarditis was included in this series. RESULTS: Surgical strategies included valve replacement with a tissue valve in 62% of patients and valve repair in 29% of patients. In 29% of patients, reconstruction of the aortomitral continuity, left ventricular outflow tract, or sinus of Valsalva was preferably performed with 1 or more bovine pericardial patches. In-hospital mortality was 11% and postoperative stroke rate was 7%. Multivariate logistic regression revealed multivalve involvement (p=0.052; odds ratio [OR], 5.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-34.57), preoperative neurologic impairment (p=0.006; OR, 9.71; 95% CI, 1.92-49.09), and European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE) in quartiles (p=0.023; OR, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.15-7.17) to be independent predictors for in-hospital death. One-year and 5-year actuarial survival was 77% and 69%, respectively. One-year and 5-year actuarial freedom from reinfection was 100% and 90%, respectively. Freedom from reoperation at 5 years was 100%. Five-year survival was 74% for single-valve endocarditis and 46% for multivalve endocarditis (p<0.001). One-year freedom from reinfection was 100% for both single-valve and multivalve endocarditis; 5-year freedom from reinfection was 95% for single-valve endocarditis versus 67% for multivalve endocarditis (p=0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high early mortality during the first year, surgical intervention for active infective endocarditis provided excellent results with regard to freedom from reinfection and reoperation. A strategy of extensive debridement, reconstruction of destroyed cardiac structures using xenopericardium, followed by valve replacement or repair is highly effective and shows favorable long-term outcomes.

Targeting landing zone 0 by total arch rerouting and TEVAR: midterm results of a transcontinental registry.

BACKGROUND: Landing zone 0, defined as a proximal landing zone in the ascending aorta, remains the last frontier to be taken. Midterm results of total arch rerouting and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) extending into landing zone 0 remain to be determined. METHODS: From 2003 to 2011, 66 patients (mean age, 70 years; 68% men) presenting with pathologic conditions affecting the aortic arch (atherosclerotic aneurysms [n = 48], penetrating ulcers [n = 6], type B dissections [n = 6], type B after type A dissections [n = 5], and anastomotic aneurysm [n = 1]) were treated in 5 participating centers. Of these 66 patients, only 12% would have been deemed suitable for any kind of conventional surgical repair because of multisegmental aortic disease or comorbidities. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 9%. Retrograde type A dissection was observed in 3% of patients. The assisted type I and type III endoleak rate was 0%. Stroke was seen in 5% of patients. Permanent paraplegia was observed in 3% of those studied. Median follow-up was 25 months (8-41 months). There was 1 late type Ib endoleak, which was followed by watchful waiting. Five-year survival was 72%. Five-year aorta-related survival was 96%. No aorta-related reintervention had to be performed in the segments treated. CONCLUSIONS: Midterm results of total arch rerouting and TEVAR extending into landing zone 0 are excellent in regard to aorta-related survival and freedom from aorta-related reintervention. Retrograde type A dissection, potentially related to compliance mismatch between the ascending aorta and the stent-graft, warrants further attention. Extended application of this strategy augments therapeutic options in a group of patients who are not suitable candidates for conventional therapy.

A new mechanism by which an acute type B aortic dissection is primarily complicated, becomes complicated, or remains uncomplicated.

BACKGROUND: This study is to evaluate if different locations of the primary entry tear result in primary complicated, secondary complicated, or uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection. METHODS: Sixty-five patients were analyzed. Patients were stratified according to the location of the primary entry tear. Primary entry tears in axial computed tomographic scans at the upper circumference (180°) of the distal aortic arch were defined as convex (group A) and the remaining as concave (group B). Detailed morphometry was done and the clinical outcome, including need for thoracic endovascular aortic repair, was evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (group A) had the primary entry tear at the convexity and 23 patients (group B) had the primary entry tear at the concavity of the distal aortic arch. There was a significant difference with regard to the incidence of primary complicated type B aortic dissection (group A 21% vs group B 61%, p = 0.003) and with regard to the development of complications in group A (9 days; 9 to 37) versus group B (0 days; 0 to 13, p = 0.03). Cox regression analysis revealed a primary entry tear at the concavity to be the only independent predictor of primary or secondary development of a complicated acute type B aortic dissection (hazard ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 3.2). CONCLUSIONS: A primary entry tear at the concavity of the distal aortic arch is associated with a significant increase of the occurrence of complicated acute type B aortic dissection. Due to low procedural risk and high success rates, closure of the primary entry tear with thoracic endovascular aortic repair is strongly recommended in this newly defined high-risk subgroup of patients.

What makes the difference between the natural course of a remaining type B dissection after type A repair and a primary type B aortic dissection?

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the outcome and need for intervention [surgery or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR)] in patients after surgery for remaining type B dissection after type A repair and primary type B aortic dissection. METHODS: Within a 10-year period, 247 patients with remaining type B after type A, and 112 patients with primary type B aortic dissection were analysed. We assessed the clinical outcome as well as the need for intervention (surgery or TEVAR) within the aortic arch and the thoracoabdominal aorta as well as risk factors. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 23 months (interquartile range 5-52). There was a significant difference with regard to the status of the primary entry tear between patients after surgical repair of an acute type A aortic dissection and primary acute type B aortic dissection (patent vs. non-patent entry 35 vs. 83%, P < 0.001). The overall need for any kind of intervention (surgery or TEVAR) was 19%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed a patent primary entry tear in patients after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection as an independent predictor for intervention (surgery or TEVAR) during follow-up [odds ratio (OR) 6.4; confidence interval (CI) 1.39-29.81, P = 0.017]. Multivariate Cox regression analysis did not reveal a patent primary entry tear in patients after acute type B aortic dissection as an independent predictor for intervention (surgery or TEVAR) during follow-up (OR 0.67; CI 0.27-1.69, P = 0.671). Finally, the thrombosis status of the false lumen was not an independent predictor for intervention (surgery or TEVAR) either in patients after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (OR 3.46; CI 0.79-15.16, P = 0.100) or in patients after acute type B aortic dissection (OR 0.77; CI 0.31-1.93, P = 0.580). CONCLUSIONS: A remaining type B dissection after type A repair and a primary type B aortic dissection represent two distinct pathophysiological entities with regard to late outcome. The need for any kind of intervention in the thoracoabdominal aorta is significantly higher in primary type B aortic dissections. A remaining patent primary entry tear independently predicts the need for intervention (surgery or TEVAR) in patients after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection and, thereby, remains the main target of initial therapy. The thrombosis status of the false lumen seems to be of secondary importance.

Antegrade selective cerebral perfusion and moderate hypothermia in aortic arch surgery: clinical outcomes in elderly patients.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcome in elderly patients (≥ 75 years) undergoing elective aortic arch surgery with the aid of selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (SACP) and moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA). METHODS: A series of 95 patients ≥ 75 years (median age 77 years, median EuroSCORE 28) undergoing elective aortic arch surgery with SACP and moderate HCA were analysed with regard to clinical outcome. Risk factors for serious adverse events (mortality, neurological injury) were determined. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients (66%) underwent ascending aorta and hemiarch replacement, whereas 32 patients (34%) underwent ascending aorta and total arch replacement. Isolated arch replacement was rare. Additionally, 27% of patients underwent aortic valve replacement and 26% underwent root replacement. In-hospital mortality was 7%. Permanent neurological deficits occurred in 5%, transient neurological deficits occurred in 2%. Median SACP time was 24 min. Univariate analysis revealed femoral cannulation site (OR: 3.4; CI: 1.25-9.22, P = 0.016) as well as HCA ≥ 40 min (OR: 4.21; CI: 1.83-12.58, P = 0.001) as predictors of serious adverse events (mortality, neurological injury). CONCLUSIONS: Summarizing, elective aortic arch surgery in elderly patients using SACP and moderate HCA provides excellent results regarding mortality and postoperative neurological outcome. Prolonged HCA time and femoral cannulation were the only predictors of serious adverse events (mortality, neurological injury).

The location of the primary entry tear in acute type B aortic dissection affects early outcome.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of the retrospective study was to relate the site of the primary entry tear in acute type B aortic dissections to the presence or development of complications. METHODS: A consecutive series of 52 patients referred with acute type B aortic dissection was analysed with regard to the location of the primary entry tear (convexity or concavity of the distal aortic arch) using the referral CT scans at the time of diagnosis. These findings were related to the clinical outcome as well as to the need for intervention. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (48%) had the primary entry tear located at the convexity of the distal aortic arch, whereas 27 patients (52%) had the primary entry tear located at the concavity of the distal aortic arch. Twenty per cent of patients with the primary entry tear at the convexity presented with or developed complications, whereas 89% had or developed complications with the primary entry tear at the concavity (P < 0.001). Furthermore, in patients with complicated type B aortic dissection, the distance of the primary entry tear to the left subclavian artery was significantly shorter as in uncomplicated patients (8 vs. 21 mm; P = 0.002). In Cox regression analysis, a primary entry tear at the concavity of the distal aortic arch was identified as an independent predictor of the presence or the development of complicated type B aortic dissection. CONCLUSIONS: A primary entry tear at the concavity of the aortic arch as well as a short distance between the primary entry tear and the left subclavian artery are frequently associated with the presence or the development of complicated acute type B aortic dissection. These findings shall help us to further differentiate acute type B aortic dissections in addition to the common categorization in complicated and uncomplicated. These findings may therefore also have an impact on primary treatment.