Treatment patterns of ranibizumab intravitreal injection and dexamethasone intravitreal implant for retinal vein occlusion in the USA.

PurposeRanibizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, and dexamethasone, a corticosteroid, have been shown to be effective in treating macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) (central RVO (CRVO) and branch RVO (BRVO)). Their real-world usage, however, has yet to be compared. We therefore evaluated ophthalmology visits for both drugs using US patient-level data.MethodsThe IMS Health Real-World Data Medical Claims database was used to identify treatment-naive patients receiving ranibizumab intravitreal injections or dexamethasone intravitreal implants between June 2010 and February 2014 who had 12 months of follow-up data. The primary outcome measure was the mean number of all ophthalmology visits for the two drugs in patients with CRVO and BRVO. Secondary outcome measures included a comparison of treatment visits, non-treatment visits, and time intervals between visits.ResultsOverall, 2822 patients received ranibizumab injections (CRVO, 1178; BRVO, 1644) and 365 received dexamethasone implants (CRVO, 191; BRVO, 174). The mean number (SD) of all ophthalmology visits was higher for patients receiving ranibizumab injections than for those receiving dexamethasone implants (CRVO: 7.2 (3.6) vs 6.2 (3.1), P<0.001; BRVO: 7.1 (3.4) vs 6.3 (3.1), P=0.016).ConclusionsPatients with RVO receiving ranibizumab injections had a mean of approximately one more visit to their ophthalmologist in the first 12 months of treatment than those treated with dexamethasone implants. The visit burden is therefore not substantially different and physicians should focus on the clinical benefits of these drugs when evaluating treatment options for RVO.

Atherosclerotic and thrombophilic risk factors in patients with recurrent central retinal vein occlusion.

PURPOSE: Atherosclerotic and thrombophilic risk factors may be causes of central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of the aforesaid risk factors in patients with recurrent CRVOs and patients with a single episode of CRVO. METHODS: Seventeen patients with recurrent CRVO and 30 with a single episode of CRVO were enrolled. The atherosclerotic risk factors investigated were hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and dyslipidemia. Specific laboratory tests for the following thrombophilic markers were performed: homocystinemia (Hcy), lipoprotein (a), factor VIII, factor II G20210A and factor V G1691A polymorphisms, lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, and deficit of vitamins B6, B12, and folic acid. A multivariate analysis, adjusted for age, gender, traditional and thrombophilic risk factors, was performed. Statistical significance was set at p

Nitric oxide proxies and ocular perfusion pressure in primary open angle glaucoma.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the levels of nitric oxide (NO) markers in plasma and aqueous humour of patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and their relation to ocular perfusion pressure. METHODS: Cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) and nitrite (NO(2)(-)) were determined in plasma and aqueous humour of 38 patients with POAG and 46 controls. Blood pressure and IOP were measured to calculate ocular perfusion pressure (PP). RESULTS: cGMP and NO(2)(-) plasma levels were significantly decreased in glaucoma patients compared with controls (p = 0.001 v p = 0.004). In the aqueous humour of subjects with POAG, cGMP and NO(2)(-) concentrations were also lower than in normal eyes (p = 0.0001 v p = 0.001). There was a linear association between cGMP in plasma and aqueous humour in glaucomas and controls (r = 0.514, p = 0.029 and r = 0.558, p = 0.004) and this relation differed in the two groups (p = 0.003). Considering glaucoma patients with controls, a positive correlation was found between cGMP and PP (r = 0.379, p = 0.01) and between NO(2)(-) and PP (r = 0.339, p = 0.040). The cGMP/PP correlation was of borderline statistical significance in controls (p = 0.050), whereas it did not attain statistical significance in POAG, as well as the association between NO(2)(-) and PP when glaucomas and controls were considered separately. CONCLUSIONS: The authors found alterations of NO markers in the plasma and aqueous humour of glaucoma patients. Primary or secondary impaired NO balance could alter ocular perfusion pressure.

Familial AL-amyloidosis in three Italian siblings.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Familial occurrence of immunoglobulin-related (AL) amyloidosis has occasionally been reported. In this work we describe the concomitance of systemic amyloidosis and monoclonal gammopathy (one case of Waldenström's macroglobulinemia and two cases without multiple myeloma or related diseases) in three Italian siblings, two males and one female. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: All of them showed a common pattern of polyneuropathy to different degrees; two presented a sicca syndrome and one also suffered from nephropathy. Two of them showed the same HLA typing with the same light chain type (k), but had different presenting symptoms. Polyneuropathy and a history of peptic disease in two cases was suggestive of type III familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP) occurring in the setting of a familial monoclonal component. However, immunohistochemical studies on different tissue specimens using anti-apolipoprotein A1 and anti-transthyretin antibodies were negative. Further screening of DNA samples for transthyretin (TTR) gene mutations was also negative. Clinical and laboratory investigations ruled out reactive or senile amyloidosis and immunohistochemical studies with anti-light chain antibodies on amyloidotic tissue specimens were positive. As a consequence, this family represents a new case of familial AL-amyloidosis.