Intense symptoms of pain are associated with poor sleep, fibromyalgia, depression and sleep apnea in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. A register-based study.

OBJECTIVES: To study whether poor sleep and comorbidities are associated with high symptom levels of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) pain, patient global assessment and fatigue in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), in a nation-wide cross-sectional setting. METHODS: Clinical data were extracted from The Finnish Rheumatology Quality Register between 1.2021 and 9.2022. Self-reported sleep was categorized as "good" (little/no difficulties) or "poor" (great difficulties/can't) sleep. Data concerning comorbidities were collected from national registers. Descriptive statistics were used. Regression analyses were applied to analyze independent associations of sleep status, comorbidities and disease activity with pain in RA and PsA, adjusting for age and sex. RESULTS: Among 13,512 patients with RA, 6052 [mean (SD) age 62 (13), 71% female] had sleep status reported; in PsA 1861/3636 [age 55 (13), 48% female]. In RA, 5072 (84%) reported good and 980 (16%) poor sleep; the corresponding numbers in PsA were 1460 (78%) and 401 (22%). Median values for objective disease activity were low and similar in patients with poor sleep and good sleep in both diseases. Among patients with no swollen joints, the median values for PROs were approximately three times higher for patients with poor sleep vs. good sleep in both diagnoses (P<0.001). In regression analyses, "poor" sleep was independently associated with higher symptoms in pain [B (95%CI) 20 (18,22) in RA and 23 (19, 26) in PsA], followed by comorbid fibromyalgia, as well as depression in RA and sleep apnea in PsA. CONCLUSION: "Poor" sleep quality and comorbidities are independently associated with pain. Patient's sleep status is important to know especially in patients with severe symptoms without objective disease activity.

Similar levels of disease activity and remission rates in patients with psoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis-results from the Finnish quality register.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the current disease activity and remission rates, and their regional variation in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Finland. METHODS: Data of patients' most recent visit in 1/2020-9/2021 were extracted from the Finnish Rheumatology Quality Register. Measures for disease activity and remission included joint counts, DAS28, cDAPSA, CDAI, the Boolean definition, and physician assessment. Regression analyses were applied, adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: Data of 3598 patients with PsA (51% female, mean age 54 years) and 13,913 patients with RA (72% female, 74% ACPA-positive, mean age 62 years) were included. The median (IQR) DAS28 was 1.9 (1.4, 2.6) in PsA and 2.0 (1.6, 2.7) in RA (p = 0.94); for cDAPSA, the median (IQR) values were 7.7 (3.1, 14) in PsA and 7.7 (3.3, 14) in RA (p < 0.001). In all regions in both diseases, the median DAS28 was ≤ 2.6 and the median cDAPSA < 13. Remission rates included DAS28 < 2.6 in 73% in PsA and 69% in RA (p = 0.17) and Boolean remission in 17% in PsA and 15% in RA (p < 0.001). By other definitions of remission, the rates ranged between 30% and 46%. Methotrexate was currently used by 49% in PsA and 57% in RA (p < 0.001). Self-administered bDMARDs were currently used by 37% in PsA and 21% in RA (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The overall disease activity was low and similar in patients with PsA and RA across the country. Remission rates varied between 15 and 73%, depending on the definition but were similar in PsA and RA. Key Points • The disease activity and clinical picture was similar between patients with PsA and RA, in a cross-sectional setting in 1.2020-9.2021. • A significant majority of patients with PsA had low disease activity or were in remission according to cDAPSA. Majority of patients with RA were in remission according to DAS28. • Patients with PsA and RA used methotrexate similarly. The utilization of bDMARDs was more prevalent in patients with PsA.

Commonalities and differences in set-up and data collection across European spondyloarthritis registries - results from the EuroSpA collaboration.

BACKGROUND: In European axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) clinical registries, we aimed to investigate commonalities and differences in (1) set-up, clinical data collection; (2) data availability and completeness; and (3) wording, recall period, and scale used for selected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: Data was obtained as part of the EuroSpA Research Collaboration Network and consisted of (1) an online survey and follow-up interview, (2) upload of real-world data, and (3) selected PROMs included in the online survey. RESULTS: Fifteen registries participated, contributing 33,948 patients (axSpA: 21,330 (63%), PsA: 12,618 (37%)). The reported coverage of eligible patients ranged from 0.5 to 100%. Information on age, sex, biological/targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment, disease duration, and C-reactive protein was available in all registries with data completeness between 85% and 100%. All PROMs (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity and Functional Indices, Health Assessment Questionnaire, and patient global, pain and fatigue assessments) were more complete after 2015 (68-86%) compared to prior (50-79%). Patient global, pain and fatigue assessments showed heterogeneity between registries in terms of wording, recall periods, and scale. CONCLUSION: Important heterogeneity in registry design and data collection across fifteen European axSpA and PsA registries was observed. Several core measures were widely available, and an increase in data completeness of PROMs in recent years was identified. This study might serve as a basis for examining how differences in data collection across registries may impact the results of collaborative research in the future.

Disease burden measured by patient-reported outcomes: does psoriatic arthritis feel worse than rheumatoid arthritis? A cross-sectional nationwide study.

OBJECTIVES: To study the subjective disease burden of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) cross-sectionally. METHODS: Data of 3598 patients with PsA and 13913 with RA were extracted from the database. Measures included the VAS-values of pain, fatigue and patient global assessment (PGA), HAQ, and disease activity at the most recent visit/remote contact in the period 1.2020 to 9.2021. Values were compared between patients with PsA and RA overall, and by sex and age (<50, 50-59, 60-69 and ≥70 years). Regression analyses were applied. RESULTS: The overall median (IQR)-values for pain were 29 (10, 56) for PsA and 26 (10, 51) for RA, 29 (9, 60) and 28 (8, 54) for fatigue, 28 (10, 52) and 29 (11, 51) for PGA, 0.4 (0, 0.9) and 0.5 (0, 1.0) for HAQ (p<0.001 for all comparisons; adjusted for sex and age). The median (IQR)-values for pain, fatigue, PGA and HAQ were higher for PsA vs. RA in most age groups for males and females. All PROs were higher in older patients with both diagnoses. The median values for DAS28, doctor global assessment, ESR and CRP were 1.9 vs. 2.0, 8 vs. 8, 7 vs. 8 and 2 vs. 3 in PsA and RA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, both PsA and RA groups showed moderate disease control by patients' perspective, but the burden of disease was higher especially in women with PsA compared to RA. Disease activity was similar and low in both diseases.

Decreased burden of revision hip replacements despite substantial rise in prevalence: a register-based analysis in Finland.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: While the incidence of THR operations has been established, little is known about the prevalence or the ratio of the annual number of revision THRs to the total number of THRs in the general population. By combining data from nationwide registers, we calculated the annual prevalence of THRs and the revision burden caused by THR survivors in Finland. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All primary THRs performed between 1980 and 2020 were identified from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register (FAR). Patient deaths were extracted from the Finnish Digital and Population Data Services Agency and THR revisions and removals from the FAR and the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register. We analyzed annual THR prevalence by dividing the number of THRs by the population aged 40 or older and the revision burden factor (RBF) by dividing the annual number of revisions by the total number of primary and revision THRs in the population. The proportions of bilateral implants and patients with THRs performed more than 10 years earlier (older THRs) were identified. RESULTS: THR prevalence in Finland increased rapidly, reaching 3.6% in 2020. Between 2010 and 2020, the number of THRs increased by 50% and the prevalence of THRs by 38%. In 2020, the proportion of bilateral THRs had risen to 29% and the proportion of patients with older THRs to 36%. The RBF decreased between 1996 and 2020 from 3.1% to 1.3% (age- and sex-adjusted proportion ratio PR 0.42 [95% CI 0.39-0.45]). INTERPRETATION: Despite the decrease in the RBF, the rapidly increasing prevalence of THRs potentially increases the number of revisits and revisions and thus poses a challenge for healthcare in the future.

Short interruptions of TNF-inhibitor treatment can be associated with treatment failure in patients with immune-mediated diseases.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of immune-mediated diseases has increased in the past decades and despite the use of biological treatments all patients do not achieve remission. The aim of this study was to characterise the reasons for short interruptions during treatment with two commonly used TNF-inhibitors infliximab and adalimumab and to analyse the possible effects of the interruptions on immunisation and switching the treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This case-control study was based on retrospective analyses of patient records and a questionnaire survey to clinicians. A total of 370 patients (194 immunised cases and 172 non-immunised controls, 4 excluded) were enrolled from eight hospitals around Finland. Eleven different diagnoses were represented, and the largest patient groups were those with inflammatory bowel or rheumatic diseases. RESULTS: Treatment interruptions were associated with immunisation in patients using infliximab (p < .001) or adalimumab (p < .000001). Patients with treatment interruptions were more likely to have been treated with more than one biological agent compared to those without treatment interruptions. This was particularly prominent among patients with a rheumatic disease (p < .00001). The most frequent reason for a treatment interruption among the cases was an infection, whereas among the control patients it was remission. The median length of one interruption was one month (interquartile range 1-3 months). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the interruptions of the treatment with TNF-inhibitors expose patients to immunisation and increase the need for drug switching. These findings stress the importance of careful judgement of the need for a short interruption in the biological treatment in clinical work, especially during non-severe infections.

Rapid rise in prevalence of knee replacements and decrease in revision burden over past 3 decades in Finland: a register-based analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The prevalence of knee joint replacements (KJR) has been less investigated in situations where the increase in incidence is known. This study investigated the annual and population-based prevalence of KJR and the relationship between the prevalence of KJRs and the incidence of revision surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All KJRs performed between 1980 and 2020 were identified from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register (FAR). KJR revisions and removals were extracted from the FAR and hospital discharge registers and patient deaths from Finnish Digital and Population Data Services Agency. We analyzed the annual prevalence by dividing the number of KJR survivors by the population aged 40 or older. The revision burden factor (RBF) was determined by dividing the annual number of revisions by the number of primary and revision KJRs in the population. Proportions of bilateral implants and patients with older KJRs performed 10 or more years earlier were identified. RESULTS: KJR prevalence in Finland increased by 298% between 2000 and 2020, reaching 4.0% in 2020. The proportion of patients with bilateral KJRs and those with older KJRs had increased to 37% and 34%, respectively, by 2020. The annual RBF decreased statistically significantly from 1.9% to 0.7% between 1996 and 2020 (proportion ratio, PR 0.37 [95% CI 0.33-0.42]) and was higher among males (PR 1.23 [CI 1.20-1.26]). INTERPRETATION: Although the recent rapid increase in KJRs is abating and the RBF is diminishing, it is important to take the continuing increase in the prevalence of KJRs into account when assessing hospitals' future resources.

The impact of a csDMARD in combination with a TNF inhibitor on drug retention and clinical remission in axial spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Many axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) patients receive a conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) in combination with a TNF inhibitor (TNFi). However, the value of this co-therapy remains unclear. The objectives were to describe the characteristics of axSpA patients initiating a first TNFi as monotherapy compared with co-therapy with csDMARD, to compare one-year TNFi retention and remission rates, and to explore the impact of peripheral arthritis. METHODS: Data was collected from 13 European registries. One-year outcomes included TNFi retention and hazard ratios (HR) for discontinuation with 95% CIs. Logistic regression was performed with adjusted odds ratios (OR) of achieving remission (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)-CRP < 1.3 and/or BASDAI < 2) and stratified by treatment. Inter-registry heterogeneity was assessed using random-effect meta-analyses, combined results were presented when heterogeneity was not significant. Peripheral arthritis was defined as ≥1 swollen joint at baseline (=TNFi start). RESULTS: Amongst 24 171 axSpA patients, 32% received csDMARD co-therapy (range across countries: 13.5% to 71.2%). The co-therapy group had more baseline peripheral arthritis and higher CRP than the monotherapy group. One-year TNFi-retention rates (95% CI): 79% (78, 79%) for TNFi monotherapy vs 82% (81, 83%) with co-therapy (P < 0.001). Remission was obtained in 20% on monotherapy and 22% on co-therapy (P < 0.001); adjusted OR of 1.16 (1.07, 1.25). Remission rates at 12 months were similar in patients with/without peripheral arthritis. CONCLUSION: This large European study of axial SpA patients showed similar one-year treatment outcomes for TNFi monotherapy and csDMARD co-therapy, although considerable heterogeneity across countries limited the identification of certain subgroups (e.g. peripheral arthritis) that may benefit from co-therapy.

Somatic STAT3 mutations in Felty syndrome: an implication for a common pathogenesis with large granular lymphocyte leukemia.

Felty syndrome is a rare disease defined by neutropenia, splenomegaly, and rheumatoid arthritis. Sometimes the differential diagnosis between Felty syndrome and large granular lymphocyte leukemia is problematic. Recently, somatic STAT3 and STAT5B mutations were discovered in 30-40% of patients with large granular lymphocyte leukemia. Herein, we aimed to study whether these mutations can also be detected in Felty syndrome, which would imply the existence of a common pathogenic mechanism between these two disease entities. We collected samples and clinical information from 14 Felty syndrome patients who were monitored at the rheumatology outpatient clinic for Felty syndrome. Somatic STAT3 mutations were discovered in 43% (6/14) of Felty syndrome patients with deep amplicon sequencing targeting all STAT3 exons. Mutations were located in the SH2 domain of STAT3, which is a known mutational hotspot. No STAT5B mutations were found. In blood smears, overrepresentation of large granular lymphocytes was observed, and in the majority of cases the CD8+ T-cell receptor repertoire was skewed when analyzed by flow cytometry. In bone marrow biopsies, an increased amount of phospho-STAT3 positive cells was discovered. Plasma cytokine profiling showed that ten of the 92 assayed cytokines were elevated both in Felty syndrome and large granular lymphocyte leukemia, and three of these cytokines were also increased in patients with uncomplicated rheumatoid arthritis. In conclusion, somatic STAT3 mutations and STAT3 activation are as frequent in Felty syndrome as they are in large granular lymphocyte leukemia. Considering that the symptoms and treatment modalities are also similar, a unified reclassification of these two syndromes is warranted.

EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2013 update.

In this article, the 2010 European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (sDMARDs and bDMARDs, respectively) have been updated. The 2013 update has been developed by an international task force, which based its decisions mostly on evidence from three systematic literature reviews (one each on sDMARDs, including glucocorticoids, bDMARDs and safety aspects of DMARD therapy); treatment strategies were also covered by the searches. The evidence presented was discussed and summarised by the experts in the course of a consensus finding and voting process. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendations were derived and levels of agreement (strengths of recommendations) were determined. Fourteen recommendations were developed (instead of 15 in 2010). Some of the 2010 recommendations were deleted, and others were amended or split. The recommendations cover general aspects, such as attainment of remission or low disease activity using a treat-to-target approach, and the need for shared decision-making between rheumatologists and patients. The more specific items relate to starting DMARD therapy using a conventional sDMARD (csDMARD) strategy in combination with glucocorticoids, followed by the addition of a bDMARD or another csDMARD strategy (after stratification by presence or absence of adverse risk factors) if the treatment target is not reached within 6 months (or improvement not seen at 3 months). Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, biosimilars), abatacept, tocilizumab and, under certain circumstances, rituximab are essentially considered to have similar efficacy and safety. If the first bDMARD strategy fails, any other bDMARD may be used. The recommendations also address tofacitinib as a targeted sDMARD (tsDMARD), which is recommended, where licensed, after use of at least one bDMARD. Biosimilars are also addressed. These recommendations are intended to inform rheumatologists, patients, national rheumatology societies and other stakeholders about EULAR's most recent consensus on the management of RA with sDMARDs, glucocorticoids and bDMARDs. They are based on evidence and expert opinion and intended to improve outcome in patients with RA.