Comprehensive peripheral blood immunoprofiling reveals five immunotypes with immunotherapy response characteristics in patients with cancer.

The lack of comprehensive diagnostics and consensus analytical models for evaluating the status of a patient's immune system has hindered a wider adoption of immunoprofiling for treatment monitoring and response prediction in cancer patients. To address this unmet need, we developed an immunoprofiling platform that uses multiparameter flow cytometry to characterize immune cell heterogeneity in the peripheral blood of healthy donors and patients with advanced cancers. Using unsupervised clustering, we identified five immunotypes with unique distributions of different cell types and gene expression profiles. An independent analysis of 17,800 open-source transcriptomes with the same approach corroborated these findings. Continuous immunotype-based signature scores were developed to correlate systemic immunity with patient responses to different cancer treatments, including immunotherapy, prognostically and predictively. Our approach and findings illustrate the potential utility of a simple blood test as a flexible tool for stratifying cancer patients into therapy response groups based on systemic immunoprofiling.

Consistent Stool Metagenomic Biomarkers Associated with the Response To Melanoma Immunotherapy.

The human gut microbiome plays an important role in both health and disease. Recent studies have demonstrated a strong influence of the gut microbiome composition on the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. However, available studies have not yet succeeded in finding reliable and consistent metagenomic markers that are associated with the response to immunotherapy. Therefore, the reanalysis of the published data may improve our understanding of the association between the composition of the gut microbiome and the treatment response. In this study, we focused on melanoma-related metagenomic data, which are more abundant than are data from other tumor types. We analyzed the metagenomes of 680 stool samples from 7 studies that were published earlier. The taxonomic and functional biomarkers were selected after comparing the metagenomes of patients showing different treatment responses. The list of selected biomarkers was also validated on additional metagenomic data sets that were dedicated to the influence of fecal microbiota transplantation on the response to melanoma immunotherapy. According to our analysis, the resulting cross-study taxonomic biomarkers included three bacterial species: Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Bifidobacterium adolescentis, and Eubacterium rectale. 101 groups of genes were identified to be functional biomarkers, including those potentially involved in the production of immune-stimulating molecules and metabolites. Moreover, we ranked the microbial species by the number of genes encoding functionally relevant biomarkers that they contained. Thus, we put together a list of potentially the most beneficial bacteria for immunotherapy success. F. prausnitzii, E. rectale, and three species of bifidobacteria stood out as the most beneficial species, even though some useful functions were also present in other bacterial species. IMPORTANCE In this study, we put together a list of potentially the most beneficial bacteria that were associated with a responsiveness to melanoma immunotherapy. Another important result of this study is the list of functional biomarkers of responsiveness to immunotherapy, which are dispersed among different bacterial species. This result possibly explains the existing irregularities between studies regarding the bacterial species that are beneficial to melanoma immunotherapy. Overall, these findings can be utilized to issue recommendations for gut microbiome correction in cancer immunotherapy, and the resulting list of biomarkers might serve as a good stepping stone for the development of a diagnostic test that is aimed at predicting patients' responses to melanoma immunotherapy.