Prostate cancer: localization with three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging--clinicopathologic study.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of combined magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and three-dimensional (3D) proton MR spectroscopic imaging in the detection and localization of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR imaging and 3D MR spectroscopic imaging examinations were performed in 53 patients with biopsy-proved prostate cancer and subsequent radical prostatectomy with step-section histopathologic examination. The prostate was divided into sextants. At MR imaging, the presence or absence of cancer in the peripheral zone of each sextant was assessed independently by two readers (readers 1 and 2) unaware of the findings at 3D MR spectroscopic imaging and histopathologic examination. At 3D MR spectroscopic imaging, cancer was diagnosed as possible if the ratio of choline plus creatine to citrate exceeded 2 SD above population norms or as definite if that ratio exceeded 3 SDs above the norm. RESULTS: On the basis of sextants, sensitivity and specificity, respectively, for MR imaging were 77% and 61% (reader 1) and 81% and 46% (reader 2) with moderate interreader agreement (kappa = 0.43). The 3D MR spectroscopic imaging diagnosis of definite cancer had significantly higher specificity (75%, P < .05) but lower sensitivity (63%, P < .05). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed significantly (P < .001) improved tumor localization for both readers when 3D MR spectroscopic imaging was added to MR imaging. High specificity (up to 91%) was obtained when combined MR imaging and 3D MR spectroscopic imaging indicated cancer, whereas high sensitivity (up to 95%) was obtained when either test alone indicated a positive result. CONCLUSION: The addition of 3D MR spectroscopic imaging to MR imaging provides better detection and localization of prostate cancer in a sextant of the prostate than does use of MR imaging alone.

Localizing prostate cancer in the presence of postbiopsy changes on MR images: role of proton MR spectroscopic imaging.

PURPOSE: To assess whether magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopic imaging with MR imaging can improve prostate cancer localization in postbiopsy hemorrhage cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of 175 patients with prostate cancer were retrospectively reviewed; 42 patients (135 hemorrhagic sites) had spatially correlated biopsy data. Patients underwent both phased-array coil-endorectal coil MR imaging and three-dimensional MR spectroscopic imaging within 180 days after transrectal ultrasound (US)-guided biopsy. High-signal-intensity hemorrhage on T1-weighted images and corresponding high- or low-signal-intensity areas on T2-weighted images and the metabolic ratio (choline + creatine)/citrate were recorded. Cancer was identified as a low-signal-intensity area at T2-weighted MR imaging or a metabolite ratio greater than 3 standard deviations above normal at MR spectroscopic imaging. MR imaging, spectroscopic, and biopsy findings were compared. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients had postbiopsy hemorrhage. On T2-weighted images, a higher (P < .01) percentage of hemorrhagic sites demonstrated low signal intensity (80% [108 of 135 sites]), which is similar to the signal intensity seen with cancer. The addition of MR spectroscopic imaging to MR imaging resulted in a significant increase (P < .01) in the accuracy (52% to 75%) and specificity (26% to 66%) of tumor detection. CONCLUSION: The addition of MR spectroscopic imaging to MR imaging significantly improves the ability to determine the presence of prostate cancer and spatial extent when postbiopsy changes hinder interpretation with MR imaging alone.