Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 36(10): 843-51, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24144524

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To report the financial impact of using modern lens and vitreoretinal surgical techniques. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Bottom-up sterilization and consumables costs for new surgical techniques (microincisional coaxial phacoemulsification and transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy) and the corresponding former techniques (phacoemulsification with 3.2-mm incision and 20G vitrectomy) were determined. These costs were compared to each other and to the target costs of the Diagnosis Related Groups for public hospitals (Groupes Homogènes de Séjours [GHS]) concerned, extracted from the analytic accounting data of the French National Cost Study (Étude Nationale des Coûts [ENC]) for 2009 (target=sum of sterilization costs posted under medical logistics, consumables, implantable medical devices, and special pharmaceuticals posted as direct expenses). RESULTS: For outpatient lens surgery with or without vitrectomy (GHS code: 02C05J): the ENC's target cost for 2009 was 339€ out of a total of 1432€. The cost detailed in this study was 4 % higher than the target cost when the procedure was performed using the former technique (3.2mm sutured incision) and 12 % lower when the procedure was performed using the new technique (1.8mm sutureless) after removing now unnecessary consumables and optimization of the technique. For level I retinal detachment surgeries (GHS code: 02C021): the ENC's 2009 target cost was 641€ out of a total of 3091€. The cost specified in this study was 1 % lower than the target cost when the procedure was done using the former technique (20-G vitrectomy) and 16 % less when the procedure was performed using the new technique (transconjunctival vitrectomy) after removal of now unnecessary consumables and optimization of the technique. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to generally accepted ideas, implementing modern techniques in ocular surgery can result in direct cost and sterilization savings when the operator takes advantage of the possibilities these techniques offer in terms of simplification of the procedures to do away with consumables that are no longer necessary.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Microcirurgia/economia , Facoemulsificação/economia , Vitrectomia/economia , Extração de Catarata/efeitos adversos , Extração de Catarata/economia , Extração de Catarata/métodos , Difusão de Inovações , França , Humanos , Invenções/economia , Microcirurgia/efeitos adversos , Microcirurgia/métodos , Facoemulsificação/efeitos adversos , Facoemulsificação/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Descolamento Retiniano/economia , Descolamento Retiniano/cirurgia , Técnicas de Sutura/efeitos adversos , Técnicas de Sutura/economia , Vitrectomia/efeitos adversos , Vitrectomia/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA