Biological relapse in multiple myeloma: Outcome and treatment strategies in a Spanish real-world setting.

Recommendations regarding the best time to start treatment in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) after biological relapse/progression (BR) are unclear. This observational, prospective, multicenter registry aimed to evaluate the impact on time to progression (TTP) of treatment initiation at BR versus at symptomatic clinical relapse (ClinR) based on the Spanish routine practice in adult patients with RRMM. Patients had two or less previous treatment lines and at least one previous partial response. Baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes were recorded, and survival was analyzed. Of 225 patients, 110 were treated at BR (TxBR group) and 115 at ClinR (TxClinR group) according to the investigators' criteria. The proportion of patients with higher ECOG, previous noncomplete remission (CR), and second relapse were significantly higher in the TxBR group compared to the TxClinR group. TheTxClinR group showed improved outcomes, including TTP, compared to the TxBR group. Progression-free survival increased in the TxClinR group (56.2 months) compared to the TxBR group (32.5 months) (p = 0.0137), and median overall survival also increased (p = 0.0897). Median TTP was significantly longer in patients relapsing from a CR (50.4 months) and in their first relapse (38.7 months) compared to those relapsing from a non-CR response (32.9 months) and in their second relapse (25.2 months). Physicians seemed to start treatment earlier in RRMM patients with poor prognosis features. Previous responses to anti-MM treatment and the number of prior treatment lines were identified as prognosis factors, whereby relapse from CR and first relapse were associated with a longer time to progression.

A randomized phase II study comparing consolidation with a single dose of 90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan vs. maintenance with rituximab for two years in patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma responding to R-CHOP. Long-term follow-up results.

This is a randomized phase-2 trial aimed to compare consolidation vs. maintenance in untreated patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) responding to induction. 146 patients were enrolled from 25 Spanish institutions (ZAR2007; ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT00662948). Patients in PR or CR/CR[u] after R-CHOP were randomized 1:1 to 90Y-ibritumomab-tiuxetan 0.4 mCi/kg (arm A) vs. rituximab 375 mg/m2 every 8 weeks for 2 years (arm B). After a median follow-up of 10.55 years, 53 patients eventually progressed with a 10-year PFS of 50% vs. 56% for patients in arm A and B, respectively (HR = 1.42; p > 0.1). No significant differences were seen in OS (10-year OS 78% vs. 84.5%; HR = 1.39, p > .1). Patients receiving 90Y-ibritumomab-tiuxetan showed higher incidence of second neoplasms than those in arm B (10-year cumulative incidence 18.5 vs. 2%, respectively; p = .038). In conclusion, in FL patients responding to R-CHOP, no significant differences were found between consolidation and maintenance, although with higher late toxicity for consolidation.

Predictors of return to work after autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma.

Return to work (RTW) is a marker of functional recovery in cancer patients, with quality of life, financial and social implications. We investigated frequency and factors associated with RTW in a cohort of patients younger than 66 years, with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM), uniformly treated with a bortezomib-based induction followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Socio-economic and working status data were collected by a self-administered questionnaire. One hundred and eighty-six patients entered the study. Of whom, 145 (78%) where employed at diagnosis, which was more frequent in younger (median 55 vs. 60 years, p < 0.001), men (59.3% vs. 34.2%, p = 0.004), and with college studies (44.8% vs. 24.4%, p = 0.008). Forty-three (30%) of the 145 patients who had a job at diagnosis, RTW after ASCT in a median of 5 (range 1-27) months. Factors independently associated with RTW were having three or more children (HR 2.87, 95% CI 1.33-6.18), college studies (HR 2.78, 95% CI 1.21-6.41), and a family income >40 × 103€/year (HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.12-4.78). In conclusion, the frequency of RTW herein reported in MM patients seems lower than reported in other malignancies. The risk factors observed may guide the design RTW programs.

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Clinical Stages Maintain Their Prognostic Significance Over the Course of the Disease and Are Surrogates for Response to Therapy.

BACKGROUND: To determine whether in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the clinical stage maintains prognostic significance over time and can be considered as a surrogate for the response to therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data from 229 CLL patients were retrospectively evaluated. The main aims of the study were to describe the changes in clinical stage during the course of CLL as a result of the response to treatment and to determine the time to next therapy (TTNT) and overall survival (OS) according to those changes, in particular, among the heterogeneous International Workshop on CLL (IWCLL) partial response (PR) category. RESULTS: Among the patients in the IWCLL PR category, differences were found in TTNT and OS according to the clinical stage at the response evaluation. With a median follow-up period of 91 months (range, 2-390 months), patients with a PR- Binet A at the response evaluation had significantly longer TTNT and OS compared with those with PR-Binet B/C (median TTNT, 26 vs. 11 months; P = .00; median OS, 63 vs. 43 months; P = .047). CONCLUSION: The results of the present study have shown that for patients with CLL, the Binet clinical stages are good outcome predictors throughout the disease course and also suggest that changes in Binet clinical stage could be useful as response surrogates and to divide the IWCLL PR category into different prognostic subgroups.

Clinical features and survival of 338 multiple myeloma patients treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or conventional chemotherapy.

Therapeutic approaches against multiple myeloma (MM) have largely changed during the past decade. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and licensing of immunomodulators and proteasome inhibitors have resulted in better response and increased overall survival rates compared to previous conventional therapies. To assess the impact that these new strategies have had on outcome of patients with symptomatic MM in Spain, we conducted an epidemiological retrospective analysis of 338 newly diagnosed patients with stage II-III MM who started first-line treatment over a 2-yr period (2003-2005) by collecting data from their medical records. Most patients had been diagnosed with secretory MM (94.4%), 41.7% stage II and 58.3% stage III. The presence of bone lesions (72.2%), as well as anemia (79.8%) and elevated beta2-microglobulin levels (62.3%), was a common finding; in contrast, hypercalcemia and elevated serum creatinine were less frequent (25% each). First-line treatment had consisted of either conventional chemotherapy (62%) or induction treatment plus autologous HSCT (38%), as per standard clinical practice. HSCT not only resulted in greater objective response rates (93% vs. 50%), but also contributed to a significant increase in 3-yr survival (85% vs. 49.7%; 95% CI, range 77-91 vs. 41-58; P < 0.001). Overall, 55% of patients presented treatment-related adverse events, mainly hematological. Toxicity rates were higher among patients treated with alkylating-based regimens and in those undergoing transplantation. In conclusion, data analysis shows an adequate balance between increased response rates and safety that supports the use of up-front high-dose HSCT therapy in younger patients. Most importantly, this study provides further confirmation that the introduction of HSCT has significantly prolonged survival of patients with MM.

High-dose therapy intensification compared with continued standard chemotherapy in multiple myeloma patients responding to the initial chemotherapy: long-term results from a prospective randomized trial from the Spanish cooperative group PETHEMA.

The aim of the present randomized trial was to compare high-dose therapy (HDT) with continued conventional chemotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who responded to the initial treatment. From May 1994 to October 1999, 216 patients (122 men/94 women; stage II or III; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] score less than 3) entered the study. Initial chemotherapy consisted of 4 cycles of alternating vincristine, BCNU, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, prednisone/vincristine, BCNU, Adriamycin, dexamethasone (VBMCP/VBAD). Responding patients were randomly assigned to receive 8 additional cycles of VBMCP/VBAD, intensification with melphalan 200 mg/m2, or melphalan 140 mg/m2 plus 12 Gy fractionated total body irradiation (TBI). One-hundred sixty-four patients were randomly assigned, 83 to continued chemotherapy and 81 to HDT. The complete remission (CR) rate was significantly higher with HDT (30% vs 11%; P = .002). However, progression-free survival (PFS) was not significantly different between HDT and conventional therapy (median, 42 vs 33 months; P = not significant [NS]), and overall survival (OS) was similar in both groups (median, 61 vs 66 months). Finally, survival after relapse was identical in the 2 arms (15.9 vs 16.4 months). In conclusion, these results show that HDT intensification, when given to myeloma patients who have responded to the initial chemotherapy, significantly increases the CR rate but has no significant impact on PFS or OS.