Comparing Healthcare Needs in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants With NEC and Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation.

BACKGROUND: Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) affect 6-8% of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. SIP has lower mortality than NEC, but with similar short-term morbidity in length of stay, growth failure, and supplemental oxygen requirements. Comparative long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes have not been clarified. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected from 59 North American neonatal units, regarding ELBW infants (401-1000 g or 22-27 weeks gestational age) born between 2011 and 2018 and evaluated again at 16-26 months corrected age. Outcomes were collected from infants with laparotomy-confirmed NEC, laparotomy-confirmed SIP, and those without NEC or SIP. The primary outcome was severe neurodevelopmental disability. Secondary outcomes were weight <10th percentile, medical readmission, post-discharge surgery and medical support at home. Adjusted risk ratios (ARR) were calculated. RESULTS: Of 13,673 ELBW infants, 6391 (47%) were followed including 93 of 232 (40%) with NEC and 100 of 235 (42%) with SIP. There were no statistically significant differences in adjusted risk of any outcomes when directly comparing NEC to SIP (ARR 2.35; 95% CI 0.89, 6.26). However, infants with NEC had greater risk of severe neurodevelopmental disability (ARR 1.43; 1.09-1.86), rehospitalization (ARR 1.46; 1.17-1.82), and post-discharge surgery (ARR 1.82; 1.48-2.23) compared to infants without NEC or SIP. Infants with SIP only had greater risk of post-discharge surgery (ARR 1.64; 1.34-2.00) compared to infants without NEC or SIP. CONCLUSIONS: ELBW infants with NEC had significantly increased risk of severe neurodevelopmental disability and post-discharge healthcare needs, consistent with prior literature. We now know infants with SIP also have increased healthcare needs. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Predictors of Mortality in Very Low Birth Weight Neonates With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exists regarding the mortality of very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). This study aims to quantify and determine predictors of mortality in VLBW neonates with CDH. METHODS: This analysis of 829 U.S. NICUs included VLBW [birth weight ≤1500g] neonates, born 2011-2021 with and without CDH. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. A generalized estimating equation regression model determined the adjusted risk ratio (ARR) of mortality. RESULTS: Of 426,140 VLBW neonates, 535 had CDH. In neonates with CDH, 48.4% had an additional congenital anomaly vs 5.5% without. In-hospital mortality for neonates with CDH was 70.4% vs 12.6% without. Of those with CDH, 73.3% died by day of life 3. Of VLBW neonates with CDH, 38% were repaired. A subgroup analysis was performed on 60% of VLBW neonates who underwent delivery room intubation or mechanical ventilation, as an indicator of active treatment. Mortality in this group was 62.7% for neonates with CDH vs 16.4% without. Higher Apgars at 1 min and repair of CDH were associated with lower mortality (ARR 0.91; 95%CI 0.87,0.96 and ARR 0.28; 0.21,0.39). The presence of additional congenital anomalies was associated with higher mortality (ARR 1.14; 1.01,1.30). CONCLUSION: These benchmark data reveal that VLBW neonates with CDH have an extremely high mortality. Almost half of the cohort have an additional congenital anomaly which significantly increases the risk of death. This study may be utilized by providers and families to better understand the guarded prognosis of VLBW neonates with CDH. TYPE OF STUDY: Level II. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Towards a harmonized bronchopulmonary dysplasia definition: a study protocol for an international Delphi procedure.

INTRODUCTION: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) remains the most common complication of preterm birth with lifelong consequences. Multiple BPD definitions are currently used in daily practice. Uniformity in defining BPD is important for clinical care, research and benchmarking. The aim of this Delphi procedure is to determine what clinicians and researchers consider the key features for defining BPD. With the results of this study, we hope to advance the process of reaching consensus on the diagnosis of BPD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A Delphi procedure will be used to establish why, when and how clinicians propose BPD should be diagnosed. This semi-anonymous iterative technique ensures an objective approach towards gaining these insights. An international multidisciplinary panel of clinicians and researchers working with preterm infants and/or patients diagnosed with BPD will participate. Steering committee members will recruit potential participants in their own region or network following eligibility guidelines to complete a first round survey online. This round will collect demographic information and opinions on key features of BPD definitions. Subsequent rounds will provide participants with the results from the previous round, for final acceptance or rejection of key features. Statements will be rated using a 5-point Likert scale. After completing the Delphi procedure, an (online) consensus meeting will be organised to discuss the results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: For this study, ethical approval a waiver has been provided. However, all participants will be asked to provide consent for the use of personal data. After the Delphi procedure is completed, it will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated at international conferences.

Two-Year Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy in Preterm Infants: Follow-Up of the OPTIMIST-A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The long-term effects of surfactant administration via a thin catheter (minimally invasive surfactant therapy [MIST]) in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome remain to be definitively clarified. Objective: To examine the effect of MIST on death or neurodevelopmental disability (NDD) at 2 years' corrected age. Design, Setting, and Participants: Follow-up study of a randomized clinical trial with blinding of clinicians and outcome assessors conducted in 33 tertiary-level neonatal intensive care units in 11 countries. The trial included 486 infants with a gestational age of 25 to 28 weeks supported with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Collection of follow-up data at 2 years' corrected age was completed on December 9, 2022. Interventions: Infants assigned to MIST (n = 242) received exogenous surfactant (200 mg/kg poractant alfa) via a thin catheter; those assigned to the control group (n = 244) received sham treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: The key secondary outcome of death or moderate to severe NDD was assessed at 2 years' corrected age. Other secondary outcomes included components of this composite outcome, as well as hospitalizations for respiratory illness and parent-reported wheezing or breathing difficulty in the first 2 years. Results: Among the 486 infants randomized, 453 had follow-up data available (median gestation, 27.3 weeks; 228 females [50.3%]); data on the key secondary outcome were available in 434 infants. Death or NDD occurred in 78 infants (36.3%) in the MIST group and 79 (36.1%) in the control group (risk difference, 0% [95% CI, -7.6% to 7.7%]; relative risk [RR], 1.0 [95% CI, 0.81-1.24]); components of this outcome did not differ significantly between groups. Secondary respiratory outcomes favored the MIST group. Hospitalization with respiratory illness occurred in 49 infants (25.1%) in the MIST group vs 78 (38.2%) in the control group (RR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.54-0.81]) and parent-reported wheezing or breathing difficulty in 73 (40.6%) vs 104 (53.6%), respectively (RR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.63-0.90]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this follow-up study of a randomized clinical trial of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome supported with CPAP, MIST compared with sham treatment did not reduce the incidence of death or NDD by 2 years of age. However, infants who received MIST had lower rates of adverse respiratory outcomes during their first 2 years of life. Trial Registration: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12611000916943.

Practices and Outcomes from a Prospective, Multicenter Registry for Preterm Newborns with Pulmonary Hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To describe current treatment practices of preterm infants with early hypoxemic respiratory failure (HRF) and pulmonary hypertension (PH) and their association with patient outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: We developed a prospective, observational, multicenter clinical registry of preterm newborns <34 weeks' gestation with HRF and PH, based on either clinical or echocardiographic evidence during the first 72 hours of life, from 28 neonatal intensive care units in the US from 2017 through 2022. The primary end point was mortality among those who did or did not receive PH-targeted treatment, and the secondary end points included comparisons of major morbidities. Variables were compared using t tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, Fisher exact tests, and χ² tests. RESULTS: We analyzed the results of 224 preterm infants enrolled in the registry. Of which, 84% (188/224) received PH-targeted treatment, most commonly inhaled nitric oxide (iNO). Early mortality in this cohort was high, as 33% (71/224) of this sample died in the first month of life, and 77% of survivors (105/137) developed bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Infants who received PH-targeted treatment had higher oxygenation indices at the time of enrollment (28.16 [IQR: 13.94, 42.5] vs 15.46 [IQR: 11.94, 26.15]; P = .0064). Patient outcomes did not differ between those who did or did not receive PH-targeted therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Early-onset HRF with PH in preterm infants is associated with a high early mortality and a high risk of developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia. iNO is commonly used to treat early-onset PH in preterm infants with HRF. In comparison with untreated infants with lower oxygenation indices, iNO treatment in severe PH may prevent poorer outcomes.

Current outcomes of infants with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula: A multicenter analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to quantify mortality rates and hospital lengths of stay (LOS) in neonates with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF), and to characterize the effects of birth weight (BW) and associated congenital anomalies upon these. METHODS: Data regarding patients with EA/TEF were prospectively collected (2013-2019) at 298 North American centers. The primary outcome was mortality and secondary outcome was LOS.  Risk factors affecting mortality and LOS were assessed. RESULTS: EA/TEF was diagnosed in 3290 infants with a median BW of 2476 g (IQR 1897,2970). In-hospital mortality was 12.7%. Mortality was inversely correlated with BW. After adjustment, the risk of mortality decreased by approximately 11% with every 100 g increase in BW. A significant congenital anomaly other than EA/TEF was diagnosed in 37.9% of patients. Risk of mortality increased in patients with associated congenital anomalies, most notably in those with a severe cardiac anomaly. Lower BW was associated with an increased mean LOS among survivors. Similar to mortality risk, additional anomalies were associated with prolonged LOS. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates an in-hospital mortality of over 10%. Both increased mortality and prolonged LOS are highly associated with lower birth weight and the presence of concomitant congenital anomalies.

Morbidity associated with laparotomy-confirmed spontaneous intestinal perforation: A prospective multicenter analysis.

BACKGROUND: Differences in morbidities between spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) are unknown. METHODS: Prospectively collected multicenter data regarding very low birth weight (VLBW) infants 2015-2019 were analyzed. Diagnosis of SIP or NEC was laparotomy-confirmed in all patients. Multivariable regression modeling was used to assess adjusted length of stay (LOS; primary outcome) and adjusted risk ratios (ARR) for weight <10th percentile at discharge, and supplemental oxygen requirement at discharge. RESULTS: Of 201,300 VLBW infants at 790 hospitals, 1523 had SIP and 2601 had NEC. Adjusted LOS was similar for SIP and NEC (92 vs 88 days, p = 0.08561), but significantly higher than seen without SIP or NEC (68 days, p<0.0001). The risk of growth morbidity at discharge was similar between SIP and NEC (74.2% vs 75.3%; ARR:1.00;0.94,1.06), but higher than infants without SIP or NEC (47.7%; ARR:0.50;0.47,0.53). Infants with NEC were less likely to require supplemental oxygen at discharge than infants with SIP (24.4% vs 34.9%; ARR:0.80; 0.71,0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Although mortality is known to be lower in VLBW infants with SIP than NEC, this study highlights the similarly high morbidity experienced by both groups of infants. These benchmark data can help align counseling of families with expected outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II. TYPE OF STUDY: Prognosis study (Cohort Study).

Effect of Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy vs Sham Treatment on Death or Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome: The OPTIMIST-A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The benefits of surfactant administration via a thin catheter (minimally invasive surfactant therapy [MIST]) in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome are uncertain. Objective: To examine the effect of selective application of MIST at a low fraction of inspired oxygen threshold on survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized clinical trial including 485 preterm infants with a gestational age of 25 to 28 weeks who were supported with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and required a fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.30 or greater within 6 hours of birth. The trial was conducted at 33 tertiary-level neonatal intensive care units around the world, with blinding of the clinicians and outcome assessors. Enrollment took place between December 16, 2011, and March 26, 2020; follow-up was completed on December 2, 2020. Interventions: Infants were randomized to the MIST group (n = 241) and received exogenous surfactant (200 mg/kg of poractant alfa) via a thin catheter or to the control group (n = 244) and received a sham (control) treatment; CPAP was continued thereafter in both groups unless specified intubation criteria were met. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the composite of death or physiological BPD assessed at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age. The components of the primary outcome (death prior to 36 weeks' postmenstrual age and BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age) also were considered separately. Results: Among the 485 infants randomized (median gestational age, 27.3 weeks; 241 [49.7%] female), all completed follow-up. Death or BPD occurred in 105 infants (43.6%) in the MIST group and 121 (49.6%) in the control group (risk difference [RD], -6.3% [95% CI, -14.2% to 1.6%]; relative risk [RR], 0.87 [95% CI, 0.74 to 1.03]; P = .10). Incidence of death before 36 weeks' postmenstrual age did not differ significantly between groups (24 [10.0%] in MIST vs 19 [7.8%] in control; RD, 2.1% [95% CI, -3.6% to 7.8%]; RR, 1.27 [95% CI, 0.63 to 2.57]; P = .51), but incidence of BPD in survivors to 36 weeks' postmenstrual age was lower in the MIST group (81/217 [37.3%] vs 102/225 [45.3%] in the control group; RD, -7.8% [95% CI, -14.9% to -0.7%]; RR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.70 to 0.98]; P = .03). Serious adverse events occurred in 10.3% of infants in the MIST group and 11.1% in the control group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome supported with CPAP, minimally invasive surfactant therapy compared with sham (control) treatment did not significantly reduce the incidence of the composite outcome of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age. However, given the statistical uncertainty reflected in the 95% CI, a clinically important effect cannot be excluded. Trial Registration: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12611000916943.

Severity of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Among Very Preterm Infants in the United States.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network recently proposed new, severity-based diagnostic criteria for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). This study provides the first benchmark epidemiological data applying this definition. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of infants born from 22 to 29 weeks' gestation in 2018 at 715 US hospitals in the Vermont Oxford Network. Rates of BPD, major neonatal morbidities, and common respiratory therapies, stratified by BPD severity, were determined. RESULTS: Among 24 896 infants, 2574 (10.3%) died before 36 weeks' postmenstrual age (PMA), 12 198 (49.0%) did not develop BPD, 9192 (36.9%) developed grade 1 or 2 BPD, and 932 (3.7%) developed grade 3 BPD. Rates of mortality before 36 weeks' PMA and grade 3 BPD decreased from 52.7% and 9.9%, respectively, among infants born at 22 weeks' gestation to 17.3% and 0.8% among infants born at 29 weeks' gestation. Grade 1 or 2 BPD peaked in incidence (51.8%) among infants born at 25 weeks' gestation. The frequency of severe intraventricular hemorrhage or cystic periventricular leukomalacia increased from 4.8% among survivors without BPD to 23.4% among survivors with grade 3 BPD. Similar ranges were observed for late onset sepsis (4.8%-31.4%), surgically treated necrotizing enterocolitis (1.4%-17.1%), severe retinopathy of prematurity (1.2%-23.0%), and home oxygen therapy (2.0%-67.5%). CONCLUSIONS: More than one-half of very preterm infants born in the United States died before 36 weeks' PMA or developed BPD. Greater BPD severity was associated with more frequent development of major neonatal morbidities, in-hospital mortality, and use of supplemental respiratory support at discharge.

Benefits and obstacles to cell therapy in neonates: The INCuBAToR (Innovative Neonatal Cellular Therapy for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: Accelerating Translation of Research).

Cell-based therapies hold promise to substantially curb complications from extreme preterm birth, the main cause of death in children below the age of 5 years. Exciting preclinical studies in experimental neonatal lung injury have provided the impetus for the initiation of early phase clinical trials in extreme preterm infants at risk of developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Clinical translation of promising therapies, however, is slow and often fails. In the adult population, results of clinical trials so far have not matched the enticing preclinical data. The neonatal field has experienced many hard-earned lessons with the implementation of oxygen therapy or postnatal steroids. Here we briefly summarize the preclinical data that have permitted the initiation of early phase clinical trials of cell-based therapies in extreme preterm infants and describe the INCuBAToR concept (Innovative Neonatal Cellular Therapy for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: Accelerating Translation of Research), an evidence-based approach to mitigate the risk of translating advanced therapies into this vulnerable patient population. The INCuBAToR addresses several of the shortcomings at the preclinical and the clinical stage that usually contribute to the failure of clinical translation through (a) systematic reviews of preclinical and clinical studies, (b) integrated knowledge transfer through engaging important stakeholders early on, (c) early economic evaluation to determine if a novel therapy is viable, and (d) retrospective and prospective studies to define and test ideal eligibility criteria to optimize clinical trial design. The INCuBAToR concept can be applied to any novel therapy in order to enhance the likelihood of success of clinical translation in a timely, transparent, rigorous, and evidence-based fashion.

The future of Cochrane Neonatal.

Cochrane Neonatal was first established in 1993, as one of the original review groups of the Cochrane Collaboration. In fact, the origins of Cochrane Neonatal precede the establishment of the collaboration. In the 1980's, the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit at Oxford, led by Dr. Iain Chalmers, established the "Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials" (ODPT), a register of virtually all randomized controlled trials in perinatal medicine to provide a resource for reviews of the safety and efficacy of interventions used in perinatal care and to foster cooperative and coordinated research efforts in the perinatal field [1]. An effort that was clearly ahead of its time, ODPT comprised four main elements: a register of published reports of trials; a register of unpublished trials; a register of ongoing and planned trials; and data derived from pooled overviews (meta-analyses) of trials. This core effort grew into the creation of the seminal books, "Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth" as well as "Effective Care of the Newborn Infant" [2,3]. As these efforts in perinatal medicine grew, Iain Chalmers thought well beyond perinatal medicine into the creation of a worldwide collaboration that became Cochrane [4]. The mission of the Cochrane Collaboration is to promote evidence-informed health decision-making by producing high-quality, relevant, accessible systematic reviews and other synthesized research evidence (www.cochrane.org). Cochrane Neonatal has continued to be one of the most productive review groups, publishing between 25 tpo to 40 new or updated systematic reviews each year. The impact factor has been steadily increasing over four years and now rivals most of the elite journals in pediatric medicine. Cochrane Neonatal has been a worldwide effort. Currently, there are 404 reviews involving 1206 authors from 52 countries. What has Cochrane done for babies? Reviews from Cochrane Neonatal have informed guidelines and recommendations worldwide. From January 2018 through June 2020, 77 international guidelines cited 221 Cochrane Neonatal reviews. These recommendations have included recommendations of the use of postnatal steroids, inhaled nitric oxide, feeding guidelines for preterm infants and other core aspects of neonatal practice. In addition, Cochrane Reviews has been the impetus for important research, including the large-scale trial of prophylactic indomethacin therapy, a variety of trials of postnatal steroids, trials of emollient ointment and probiotic trials [6]. While justifiably proud of these accomplishments, one needs to examine the future contribution of Cochrane Neonatal to the neonatal community. The future of Cochrane Neonatal is inexorably linked to the future of neonatal research. Obviously, there is no synthesis of trials data if, as a community, we fail to provide the core substrate for that research. As we look at the current trials' environment, fewer randomized controlled trial related to neonates are being published in recent years. A simple search of PubMed, limiting the search to "neonates" and "randomized controlled trials" shows that in the year 2000, 321 randomized controlled trials were published. These peaked five years ago, in 2015, with close to 900 trials being published. However, in 2018, only 791 studies are identified. Does this decrease represent a meaningful change in the neonatal research environment? Quite possibly. There are shifting missions of clinical neonatology at academic medical institutions, at least in the United States, with a focus on business aspects as well as other important competing clinical activities. Quality improvement has taken over as one of the major activities at both private and academic neonatal practices. Clearly, this is a needed improvement. All units at levels need to be dedicated to improving the outcomes of the sick and fragile population we care for. However, this need not be at the expense of formal clinical trials. It is understandable that this approach would be taken. Newer interventions frequently relate to complex systems of care and not the simple single interventions. Even trials that might traditionally have been done as randomized controlled trials, such as the introduction of a new mode of ventilation, are in reality complex challenges to the ability of institutions to create systems to adapt to these new technologies. Cost of doing trials has always been a barrier. The challenging regulatory and ethical environment contributes to these problems as well [7]. Despite these barriers, how does the research agenda of the neonatal community move forward in the 21st Century? We need to reassess how we create and disseminate our research findings. Innovative trial designs will allow us to address complex issues that we may not have tackled with conventional trials. Adaptive designs may allow us to look at potentially life-saving therapies in a way that feel more efficient and more ethical [8]. Clarifying issues such as the use of inhaled nitric oxide in preterm infants would be greatly served if we even knew whether or not there are hypoxemic preterm infant who would benefit from this therapy [9]. Current trials do not suggest so, yet current practice tells us that a significant number of these babies will receive inhaled nitric oxide [10-13]. Adaptive design, such as those done with trials of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), would allow us to quickly assess whether, in fact, these therapies are life-saving and allow us to consider whether or not further trials are needed [14,15]. Our understanding that many interventions involve entire systems approaches does not relegate us only to doing quality improvement work. Cluster designs may allow us to test more complex interventions that have usually been under the purview of quality improvement [16-18]. Cluster trials are well suited for such investigations and can be done with the least interruption to ongoing care. Ultimately, quality improvement is the application of the best evidence available (evidence-based medicine is "what to do" and evidence-based practice is "how to do"). [19,20]. Nascent efforts, such as the statement on "embedding necessary research into culture and health" (the ENRICH statement) call for the conduct of large, efficient pragmatic trials to evaluate neonatal outcomes, as in part called for in the ALPHA Collaboration [21,22]. This statement envisions an international system to identify important research questions by consulting regularly with all stakeholders, including patients, public health professionals, researchers, providers, policy makers, regulators, funders of industry. The ENRICH statement envisions a pathway to enable individuals, educational institutions, hospitals and health-care facilities to confirm their status as research-friendly by integrating an understanding of trials, other research and critical thinking and to teaching learning and culture, as well as an engagement with funders, professional organizations and regulatory bodies and other stake holders to raise awareness of the value of efficient international research to reduce barriers to large international pragmatic trials and other collaborative studies. In the future, if trials are to be done on this scale or trials are prospectively designed to be analyzed together, core outcome measures must be identified and standardized. That clinical trials supply estimates of outcomes that are relevant to patients and their families is critical. In addition, current neonatal research evaluates many different outcomes using multiple measures. A given measure can have multiple widely used definitions. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (or chronic lung disease just to add to the confusion) quickly comes to mind [23,24]. The use of multiple definitions when attempting to measure the same outcome prevents synthesis of trial results and meta-analysis and hinders efforts to refine our estimates of effects. Towards that end, Webbe and colleagues have set out to develop a core outcome set for neonatal research [25]. Key stakeholders in the neonatal community reviewed multiple outcomes reported in neonatal trials and qualitative studies. Based on consensus, key outcome measures were identified, including survival, sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, brain injury on imaging, retinopathy or prematurity, gross motor ability, general cognitive ability, quality of life, adverse events, visual impairment or blindness, hearing impairment or deafness, chronic lung disease/bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Trials registration has to be a continued focus of the neonatal community. Trials registration allows for systematic reviewers to understand whether or not reporting bias has occurred [26]. It also allows for transparent incorporation of these core outcome measures. Ultimately, trials registration should include public reporting of all of these core outcomes and, in the future, access to data on an individual level such that more sophisticated individual patient data meta-analysis could occur. Lastly, there is no reason to see clinical trials and quality improvement as separate or exclusive activities. In fact, in the first NICQ Collaborative, conducted by Vermont Oxford Network, participation in a trial of postnatal steroids was considered part of the quality improvement best practices as opposed to simply choosing an as-of-yet unproven approach to use of this potent drug [27]. What role will Cochrane Neonatal play as we move forward in the 21st Century? As the neonatal community moves forward with its' research agenda, Cochrane Neonatal must not only follow but also lead with innovative approaches to synthesizing research findings. Cochrane Neonatal must continue to work closely with guideline developers. The relationship between systematic review production and guideline development is clearly outlined in reports from the Institute of Medicine [28,29]. Both are essential to guideline development; the systematic review group culling the evidence for the benefits and harms of a given intervention and the guideline group addressing the contextual issues of cost, feasibility, implementation and the values and preferences of individuals and societies. Most national and international guidelines groups now routinely use systematic reviews as the evidence basis for their guidelines and recommendations. Examples of the partnership between Cochrane Neonatal and international guideline development can be seen in our support of the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on the use of vitamin A or the soon to be published recommendations from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) on cord management in preterm and term infants [30]. In the future, we need to collaborate early in the guideline development process so that the reviews are fit for purpose and meet the needs of the guideline developers and the end users. Towards this end, all Cochrane Neonatal reviews now contain GRADE assessments of the key clinical findings reported in the systematic review [31]. Addition of these assessments addresses the critical issue of our confidence in the findings. We are most confident in evidence provided by randomized controlled trials but this assessment can be can be downgraded if the studies that reported on the outcome in question had a high risk of bias, indirectness, inconsistency of results, or imprecision, or where there is evidence of reporting bias. Information provided by GRADE assessments is seen as critical in the process of moving from the evidence to formal recommendations [32]. We need to explore complex reviews, such as network (NMA) or multiple treatment comparison (MCT) meta-analyses, to address issues not formally addressed in clinical trials [33]. In conditions where there are multiple effective interventions, it is rare for all possible interventions to have been tested against each other [34]. A solution could be provided by network meta-analysis, which allows for comparing all treatments with each other, even if randomized controlled trials are not available for some treatment comparisons [34]. Network meta-analysis uses both direct (head-to-head) randomized clinical trial (RCT) evidence as well as indirect evidence from RCTs to compare the relative effectiveness of all included interventions [35]. However, Mills and colleagues note that the methodological quality of MTCs may be difficult for clinicians to interpret because the number of interventions evaluated may be large and the methodological approaches may be complex [35]. Cochrane Neonatal must take a role in both the creation of such analyses and the education of the neonatal community regarding the pitfalls of such an approach. The availability of individual patient data will make more sophisticated analyses more available to the community. Although the current crop of individual patient data meta-analyses (including the reviews of elective high frequency ventilation, inhaled nitric oxide and oxygen targets) have not differed substantially from the findings of the trials level reviews (suggesting that, in fact, sick neonates are more alike that unalike), there still will be a large role for individual patient data meta-analysis, at least to end the unfound conclusions that these therapies are effective in various subgroups (be it issues of sex, disease severity, or clinical setting) [36-39]. Future trials should take a lesson from the NeOProM Collaborative [37,39]. Given the difficulty in generating significant sample size and creating funding in any single environment, trials with similar protocols should be conducted in a variety of healthcare settings with an eye towards both study level and individual patient level meta-analysis at the conclusion of those trials, allowing for broader contribution to the trials data, more rapid accrual of sample size, and more precise results. We need to educate the neonatal community regarding the use and abuse of diagnostic tests. Diagnostic tests are a critical component of healthcare but also contribute greatly to the cost of medical care worldwide. These costs include the cost of the tests themselves and the costs of misdiagnosis and treatment of individuals who will not benefit from those treatments. Clinicians may have a limited understanding of diagnostic test accuracy, the ability of a diagnostic test to distinguish between patients with and without the disease or target condition [41,42]. Efforts such as Choosing Wisely have tried to identify these deficiencies [40]. As Cochrane has increased the general literacy of both the medical and general population regarding the interpretation of the results of interventions on various diseases, so should Cochrane move forward and improve the understanding of diagnostic testing. We need to become more efficient at creating and maintaining our reviews. The time spent to produce systematic reviews is far too great. In average, it takes between 2½ to 6½ years to produce a systematic review, requiring intense time input for highly trained and expensive experts. Innovations in the ways in which we produce systematic reviews can make the review process more efficient by outsourcing some of the tasks or crowdsourcing to machine learning. We need to let the crowd and machine learning innovations help us sort the massive amounts of information needed to conduct systematic reviews. It can also allow for "live" updating of critical reviews where the research landscape is quickly changing [43]. Lastly, Cochrane Neonatal must focus more on users of the reviews and not necessarily authors of the reviews. Current Cochrane programming speaks of Cochrane training with an eye towards developing the skills of individuals who will conduct systematic reviews. While this is clearly needed and laudable, the fact of the matter is that most of the community will be "users" of the reviews. Individuals who need to understand how to use and interpret the findings of systematic reviews. These review users include clinicians, guideline developers, policy makers and families. Incorporation of GRADE guidelines has been a huge step in adding transparency to the level of uncertainty we have in our findings. From a family's perspective, we need to overcome the environment of mistrust or misunderstanding of scientific evidence and how we convey what we know, and our uncertainty about what we know, to parents and families.

Trends in incidence and outcomes of necrotizing enterocolitis over the last 12 years: A multicenter cohort analysis.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe changes in the incidence and mortality of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and associated surgical management strategies for very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected on VLBW infants (≤1500 g or < 29 weeks) born 2006 to 2017 and admitted to 820 U.S. centers. NEC was defined by the presence of at least one clinical and one radiographic finding. Trends analyses were performed to assess changes in incidence and mortality over time. RESULTS: Of 473,895 VLBW infants, 36,130 (7.6%) were diagnosed with NEC, of which 21,051 (58.3%) had medical NEC and 15,079 (41.7%) had surgical NEC. Medical NEC decreased from 5.3% to 3.0% (p < 0.0001). Surgical NEC decreased from 3.4% to 3.1% (p = 0.06). Medical NEC mortality decreased from 20.7% to 16.8% (p = 0.003), while surgical NEC mortality decreased from 36.6% to 31.6% (p < 0.0001). In the surgical cohort, the use of primary peritoneal drainage (PPD) versus initial laparotomy rose from 23.2% to 46.8%. CONCLUSION: The incidence and mortality of both medical and surgical NEC have decreased over time. Changes in surgical management during this time period included the increased utilization of primary peritoneal drainage. TYPE OF STUDY: Prognosis study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Outcomes for Ectopia Cordis.

OBJECTIVES: To utilize a large multicenter neonatal cohort to describe survival and clinical outcomes of very low birth weight (VLBW) or preterm infants with ectopia cordis. STUDY DESIGN: Data were prospectively collected on 2 211 262 infants (born 2000-2017) from 845 US centers. Both VLBW (401-1500 g or 22-29 weeks of gestation) and non-VLBW (>1500 g and >29 weeks) infants had diagnoses or anatomic descriptors consistent with ectopia cordis and/or pentalogy of Cantrell. The primary outcome was neonatal survival, defined as hospital discharge or initial length of stay of ≥12 months. RESULTS: In total, 180 infants had ectopia cordis, 135 (76%) with findings of pentalogy of Cantrell. VLBW infants comprised 52% of the population. VLBW mortality was 96% with 79% dying within 12 hours, compared with 59% and 36%, respectively, for non-VLBW. One-third of VLBW infants received life support compared with 65% of non-VLBW. Surgery was reported for 34% of VLBW and 68% of non-VLBW infants. Congenital heart disease was reported in 8% of VLBW and 36% of non-VLBW, with conotruncal abnormalities most common. Survival exceeded 50% for infants >2500 g and >37 weeks of gestation. CONCLUSIONS: Survival of VLBW infants with ectopia cordis was poor and substantially worse compared with non-VLBW, with notable discrepancies in resuscitative efforts and surgical interventions. Although gestational age and weight strongly influence current survival, more detailed information regarding the severity of cardiac and noncardiac abnormalities is required to fully determine prognosis and inform counseling.

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

In the absence of effective interventions to prevent preterm births, improved survival of infants who are born at the biological limits of viability has relied on advances in perinatal care over the past 50 years. Except for extremely preterm infants with suboptimal perinatal care or major antenatal events that cause severe respiratory failure at birth, most extremely preterm infants now survive, but they often develop chronic lung dysfunction termed bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD; also known as chronic lung disease). Despite major efforts to minimize injurious but often life-saving postnatal interventions (such as oxygen, mechanical ventilation and corticosteroids), BPD remains the most frequent complication of extreme preterm birth. BPD is now recognized as the result of an aberrant reparative response to both antenatal injury and repetitive postnatal injury to the developing lungs. Consequently, lung development is markedly impaired, which leads to persistent airway and pulmonary vascular disease that can affect adult lung function. Greater insights into the pathobiology of BPD will provide a better understanding of disease mechanisms and lung repair and regeneration, which will enable the discovery of novel therapeutic targets. In parallel, clinical and translational studies that improve the classification of disease phenotypes and enable early identification of at-risk preterm infants should improve trial design and individualized care to enhance outcomes in preterm infants.

Evidence-Based Practice: Improving the Quality of Perinatal Care.

BACKGROUND: For clinical research findings to improve the quality of care and outcomes for newborn infants and their families, they need to be implemented in policy and adopted in practice. METHODS: We describe the principles of effective dissemination and implementation of research findings and highlight examples of collaborative quality improvement strategies to ensure that guidelines, protocols, policies and practices reflect research-informed evidence. RESULTS: Passive dissemination of research findings is generally ineffective in driving change. Implementation strategies that use multi-faceted approaches acting on different barriers to change are better at driving improvements in the quality of care practices. These initiatives are increasingly embedded within regional, national and international networks of neonatal care centres that collaborate in conducting research, implementing its findings and auditing its uptake. Examples of successful network-based collaborative quality improvement programmes include efforts to increase use of evidence-based strategies to prevent hospital-acquired bloodstream infections, optimise surfactant replacement for preterm infants, reduce the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, improve antibiotic stewardship and promote the use of human milk to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very-low-birth-weight infants. CONCLUSIONS: Effective dissemination and implementation are essential for research evidence to improve quality of care and outcomes for newborn infants and their families. Multifaceted initiatives within network-based collaborative quality improvement programmes facilitate continuous audit and benchmarking cycles to ensure equity of access to evidence-based care practices.

Novel Surfactant Administration Techniques: Will They Change Outcome?

Traditionally, surfactant has been administered to preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome via an endotracheal tube and in conjunction with mechanical ventilation. However, negative consequences of mechanical ventilation such as pneumothorax and bronchopulmonary dysplasia are well known. In order to provide the benefits of surfactant administration without the negative effects of mechanical ventilation, several methods of less invasive surfactant administration have been developed. These methods include InSurE (intubate, surfactant, extubate), pharyngeal administration, laryngeal mask administration, aerosolized surfactant administration, and thin catheter administration (TCA). Of these, TCA has been studied most extensively and holds the most promise as a less invasive and effective mode of surfactant administration to preterm infants. Further studies will aid in determining which patients would benefit most from less invasive surfactant administration.

Impact of disease-specific volume and hospital transfer on outcomes in gastroschisis.

BACKGROUND: Gastroschisis, a surgical condition requiring complex interdisciplinary care, may benefit from treatment at higher volume centers. Recent studies on surgical volume and outcomes have conflicting findings. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on newborns ≥1500 g with gastroschisis born 2009-2015, admitted to 159 US centers, and separated into terciles based on number of annual gastroschisis repairs. Infants transferred after gastroschisis repair were excluded. RESULTS: There were 4663 infants included: 307 from 53 low, 1201 from 55 medium, and 3155 from 51 high volume centers. Infants at high volume centers had higher rates of intestinal atresia (P = 0.04) and outborn status (P < 0.0001). Outborn infants (N = 1134) had higher rates of gastrostomy/jejunostomy placement (P < 0.001). Mortality was universally low (2.0% low, 2.4% medium, and 1.7% high; 2.0% outborn and 1.9% inborn). On multivariate analysis, mortality, sepsis rates, and length of stay did not differ by center volume. Outborn status was associated with longer length of stay (P = 0.001), not mortality or sepsis. CONCLUSION: Infant characteristics and management vary based on gastroschisis surgical volume and transfer status. Center volume and early transfers were not associated with mortality. Further investigation to identify subsets of gastroschisis infants who would benefit from care at higher volume centers is warranted. TYPE OF STUDY: Prognosis study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Growth morbidity in extremely low birth weight survivors of necrotizing enterocolitis at discharge and two-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine postnatal growth outcomes and predictors of growth failure at 18-24months corrected age among extremely low birth weight (ELBW) survivors of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) compared to survivors without NEC. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on ELBW (22-27weeks gestation or 401-1000g birth weight) infants born 2000-2013 at 46 centers participating in the Vermont Oxford Network follow-up project. Severe growth failure was defined as <3rd percentile weight-for-age. RESULTS: There were 9171 evaluated infants without NEC, 416 with medical NEC, and 462 with surgical NEC. Rates of severe growth failure at discharge were higher among infants with medical NEC (56%) and surgical NEC (61%), compared to those without NEC (36%). At 18-24months follow-up, rates of severe growth failure decreased and were similar between without NEC (24%), medical NEC (24%), and surgical NEC (28%). On multivariable analysis, small for gestational age, chronic lung disease, severe intraventricular hemorrhage or cystic periventricular leukomalacia, severe growth failure at discharge, and postdischarge tube feeding predicted <3rd percentile weight-for-age at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: ELBW survivors of NEC have higher rates of severe growth failure at discharge. While NEC is not associated with severe growth failure at follow-up, one quarter of ELBW infants have severe growth failure at 18-24months. TYPE OF STUDY: Prognosis study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Morbidity and mortality among "big" babies who develop necrotizing enterocolitis: A prospective multicenter cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is classically a disease of prematurity, with less reported regarding morbidity and mortality of this disease among other infants. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected from 2009 to 2015 at 252 Vermont Oxford Network member centers on neonates with birth weight>2500g admitted to a participating NICU within 28days of birth. RESULTS: Of 1629 neonates with NEC, gestational age was 37 (36, 39) weeks, and 45% had major congenital anomalies, most commonly gastrointestinal defects (20%), congenital heart defects (18%), and chromosomal anomalies (7%). For the 23% of infants who had surgery for NEC, mortality and length of stay were 23% and 63 (36, 94) days versus 8% and 34 (22, 61) days in medical NEC. Independent predictors of mortality were congenital heart defects (p<0.0001), chromosomal abnormalities (p<0.05), other congenital malformations (p<0.001), surgical NEC (p<0.0001), and sepsis (p<0.05). All of these in addition to gastrointestinal defects were independent predictors of increased length of stay. Nutritional morbidity at discharge included 6% receiving no enteral feeds and 27% who were <10th percentile weight-for-age. CONCLUSIONS: Major congenital anomalies are present in nearly half of >2500g birth weight infants diagnosed with necrotizing enterocolitis. Morbidity and mortality increase with sepsis, surgical disease, and congenital anomalies. TYPE OF STUDY: Prognosis Study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.