Evaluation of the rapid Idylla IDH1-2 mutation assay in FFPE glioma samples.

IDH1 and IDH2 mutational status is a critical biomarker with diagnostic, prognostic, and treatment implications in glioma. Although IDH1 p.R132H-specific immunohistochemistry is available, it is unable to identify other mutations in IDH1/2. Next-generation sequencing can accurately determine IDH1/2 mutational status but suffers from long turnaround time when urgent treatment planning and initiation is medically necessary. The Idylla assay can detect IDH1/2 mutational status from unstained formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) slides in as little as a few hours. In a clinical validation, we demonstrate clinical accuracy of 97% compared to next-generation sequencing. Sensitivity studies demonstrated a limit of detection of 2.5-5% variant allele frequency, even at DNA inputs below the manufacturer's recommended threshold. Overall, the assay is an effective and accurate method for rapid determination of IDH1/2 mutational status.

Diagnostic interobserver agreement for thyroid fine-needle aspirates: Effects of reviewer experience and molecular diagnostics.

OBJECTIVES: Few cytologically indeterminate thyroid fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) harbor BRAF V600E. Here, we assess interobserver agreement for The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) category III (atypia of undetermined significance [AUS]) FNAs harboring BRAF V600E and contrast their features with those harboring non-BRAF V600E alterations, with attention to cytopathology experience. METHODS: Seven reviewers evaluated 5 AUS thyroid FNAs harboring BRAF V600E. To blind reviewers, cases were intermixed with 19 FNAs falling within other TBSRTC categories and in which genetic alterations other than BRAF V600E had been identified (24 FNAs total). Interobserver agreement against both "index" and most popular ("mode") diagnoses was calculated. Four additional BRAF V600E cases were independently reviewed. RESULTS: Reviewers included 3 trainees and 3 American Board of Pathology (board)-certified cytopathologists. Board-certified cytopathologists, whose experience ranged from 2 to more than 15 subspecialty practice years, had known AUS rates. BRAF V600E was identified in 5 of 260 (2%) AUS FNAs. Interobserver agreement was higher among cytopathologists with more experience. Mode diagnosis differed from index diagnosis in 6 of 11 cases harboring RAS-like alterations; mode diagnosis was AUS in 4 of 5 BRAF V600E FNAs. CONCLUSIONS: Atypia of undetermined significance of thyroid FNAs harboring BRAF V600E is uncommon yet relatively reproducible, particularly among pathologists with experience. It is advisable to sequence BRAF across V600 in such cases.

Practical Considerations for Oncogenic Fusion Detection and Reporting in Solid Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Chromosomal rearrangements that result in oncogenic fusions can hold tremendous clinical significance in solid tumors, often with diagnostic or treatment implications. CONTENT: Traditionally, low-throughput methods such as fluorescence in situ hybridization were used to identify fusions in the clinical laboratory. With the rise of next-generation sequencing techniques and the broad adoption of comprehensive genomic profiling, the practice of screening for fusions as part of an oncologic workup has evolved. RNA sequencing methods are increasingly used, as these comprehensive high-throughput assays have many advantages over traditional techniques. Several RNA sequencing platforms are available, each with benefits and drawbacks. Regardless of the approach, systematic evaluation of the RNA sequencing results and the fusions identified by the assay should be performed. Assessment of fusion events relies upon evaluation of quality evidence, structural evidence, and functional evidence to ensure accurate fusion reporting and interpretation. SUMMARY: Given the clinical significance of gene fusions in oncology, understanding the variety of assays available for fusion detection, their benefits and drawbacks, and how they are used in the identification and interpretation of gene fusions is important for the modern precision oncology practice.

Use of the Afirma Xpression Atlas for cytologically indeterminate, Afirma Genomic Sequencing Classifier suspicious thyroid nodules: Clinicopathologic analysis with postoperative molecular testing.

OBJECTIVES: Afirma has recently introduced its Xpression Atlas (XA) as an adjunct to its Genomic Sequencing Classifier (GSC) for risk stratification of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules. We evaluated the performance of Afirma XA and associated pathologic findings for Afirma GSC suspicious nodules. METHODS: Intradepartmental records of thyroid fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) from January 2021 to December 2022 were identified and reviewed for patient and nodule characteristics, FNA findings, molecular test results, and final surgical pathology, if available. RESULTS: Material for Afirma GSC testing was collected in 624 thyroid FNAs, and 148 (24%) were classified as cytologically indeterminate. Afirma GSC testing was successful in 132 (89%) of those cases, of which 35 (27%) were Afirma GSC suspicious. Afirma XA testing was positive in 11 cases (11/35 [31%]). Eight (73%) patients underwent surgery that revealed 7 patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma and 1 patient with noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) (risk of malignancy: 100% [8/8]). Among the 24 patients with negative Afirma XA results, 19 (79%) underwent surgery, revealing 5 patients with malignancy and 3 patients with NIFTP (risk of malignancy: 42% [8/19]). Overall, the risk of malignancy for Afirma GSC suspicious nodules was 59% (16/27). CONCLUSIONS: Afirma XA improved risk stratification of thyroid disease with a high risk of malignancy in Afirma GSC suspicious nodules. A negative Afirma XA result, however, should not be used as a rule-out test.

A Rare PDGFRA Exon 15 Germline Mutation Identified in a Patient With Phenotypic Manifestations Concerning for GIST-Plus Syndrome: A Case Report and Review of Literature.

Molecular alterations in PDGFRA are well-described as drivers of sporadic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and inflammatory fibroid polyps (IFPs). However, a small number of families with germline PDGFRA mutations in exons 12, 14, and 18 have been reported, forming the basis of an autosomal dominant inherited disorder with incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity, now referred to as PDGFRA-mutant syndrome or GIST-plus syndrome. Phenotypic manifestations of this rare syndrome include multiple gastrointestinal GISTS, IFPs, fibrous tumors, and other variable features. Herein, we report the case of a 58-year-old female who presented with a gastric GIST and numerous small intestinal IFPs, found to harbor a previously undescribed germline PDGFRA exon 15 p.G680R mutation. Somatic tumor testing was performed on the GIST, a duodenal IFP, and an ileal IFP utilizing a targeted next-generation sequencing panel, revealing additional and distinct secondary PDGFRA exon 12 somatic mutations in each of the 3 tumors. Our findings raise important considerations regarding mechanisms of tumor development in patients with underlying germline PDGFRA alterations and highlight the potential utility of expanding currently available germline and somatic testing panels to include exons outside the typical hotspot regions.

Towards a single-assay approach: a combined DNA/RNA sequencing panel eliminates diagnostic redundancy and detects clinically-relevant fusions in neuropathology.

Since the introduction of integrated histological and molecular diagnoses by the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Nervous System, an increasing number of molecular markers have been found to have prognostic significance in infiltrating gliomas, many of which have now become incorporated as diagnostic criteria in the 2021 WHO Classification. This has increased the applicability of targeted-next generation sequencing in the diagnostic work-up of neuropathology specimens and in addition, raises the question of whether targeted sequencing can, in practice, reliably replace older, more traditional diagnostic methods such as immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in-situ hybridization. Here, we demonstrate that the Oncomine Cancer Gene Mutation Panel v2 assay targeted-next generation sequencing panel for solid tumors is not only superior to IHC in detecting mutation in IDH1/2 and TP53 but can also predict 1p/19q co-deletion with high sensitivity and specificity relative to fluorescence in-situ hybridization by looking at average copy number of genes sequenced on 1p, 1q, 19p, and 19q. Along with detecting the same molecular data obtained from older methods, targeted-next generation sequencing with an RNA sequencing component provides additional information regarding the presence of RNA based alterations that have diagnostic significance and possible therapeutic implications. From this work, we advocate for expanded use of targeted-next generation sequencing over more traditional methods for the detection of important molecular alterations as a part of the standard diagnostic work up for CNS neoplasms.

Bioinformatically Expanded Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis Optimizes Identification of Therapeutically Relevant MET Copy Number Alterations in >50,000 Tumors.

PURPOSE: Clinical relevance thresholds and laboratory methods are poorly defined for MET amplification, a targetable biomarker across malignancies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The utility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in assessing MET copy number alterations was determined in >50,000 solid tumors. Using fluorescence in situ hybridization as reference, we validated and optimized NGS analysis. RESULTS: Incorporating read-depth and focality analyses achieved 91% concordance, 97% sensitivity, and 89% specificity. Tumor heterogeneity, neoplastic cell proportions, and genomic focality affected MET amplification assessment. NGS methodology showed superiority in capturing overall amplification status in heterogeneous tumors and defining amplification focality among other genomic alterations. MET copy gains and amplifications were found in 408 samples across 23 malignancies. Total MET copy number inversely correlated with amplified segment size. High-level/focal amplification was enriched in certain genomic subgroups and associated with targeted therapy response. CONCLUSIONS: Leveraging our integrated bioinformatic approach, targeted therapy benefit was observed across diverse MET amplification contexts.

Combining molecular testing and the Bethesda category III:VI ratio for thyroid fine-needle aspirates: A quality-assurance metric for evaluating diagnostic performance in a cytopathology laboratory.

BACKGROUND: Molecular testing (MT) of thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA)-derived genetic material is commonly used to assess malignancy risk for indeterminate cases. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBS) provides limited guidance for the appropriate use of category III (atypia of undetermined significance [AUS]). The authors combined MT with cytomorphology to monitor AUS diagnoses in a cytopathology laboratory. METHODS: Neoplasia-associated genetic alterations (NGAs) were determined by MT of preoperative FNA biopsies or resected malignancies and were categorized as BRAF V600E mutations, RAS-like mutations (HRAS, NRAS, or KRAS mutations or non-V600E BRAF mutations), or other mutations. RESULTS: Among 7382 thyroid FNA biopsies, the AUS rate was 9.3% overall and ranged from 4.3% to 24.2% among 6 cytopathologists (CPs) who evaluated >150 cases. The ratio of specimens falling into TBS category III to specimens falling into category VI (malignant) (the III:VI ratio) was 2.4 overall (range, 1.1-8.1), and the ratio of specimens falling into TBS categories III and IV (follicular neoplasm or suspicious for follicular neoplasm) combined (III+IV) to specimens falling into category VI (the [III+IV]:VI ratio) was 2.9 overall (range, 1.4-9.5). MT was performed on 588 cases from 560 patients (79% women) with a median age of 56 years (range, 8-89 years). BRAF V600E mutation was the most common (76% of cases) in TBS category VI and was rare (3%) in category III. RAS-like mutations were most common in TBS categories III (13%), IV (25%), and V (suspicious for malignancy) (17.5%). The NGA rate in AUS cases fell between 5% and 20% for 5 of 6 CPs and did not correlate with the III:VI ratio or the (III+IV):VI ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of correlation between the NGA rate and easily calculable diagnostic ratios enables the calibration of diagnostic thresholds, even for CPs who have normal metrics. Specifically, calculation of the NGA rate and the III:VI ratio may allow individual CPs to determine whether they are overcalling or undercalling cases that other CPs might otherwise recategorize.

Comparison of RNA-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Assays for the Detection of NTRK Gene Fusions.

Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration approved several targeted therapies directed against oncogenic fusions. One of the most effective such targeted therapies is Vitrakvi (larotrectinib), highly specific oral tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with any solid tumor harboring a fusion involving one of the neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK) genes. Although several diagnostic approaches can be used to detect these NTRK fusions, RNA-based next-generation sequencing remains one of the most sensitive methods, as it can directly detect the transcribed end product of gene fusion at the mRNA level. In this study, performance characteristics of three RNA-based next-generation sequencing assays with distinct mechanisms and chemistries were investigated: anchored multiplex PCR, amplicon-based multiplex PCR, and hybrid capture-based enrichment method. Analytical sensitivity analysis shows that the amplicon-based multiplex PCR method has the lowest limit of detection. However, both hybrid-capture and anchored multiplex PCR methods can detect NTRK fusions with uncommon or novel fusion partners, which is challenging for the amplicon-based multiplex method. As for clinical sensitivity, all three methods were highly concordant in detecting NTRK fusions in patient samples. Additionally, they all presented equivalent high-level performance in specificity, suggesting that all three platforms can detect NTRK fusions in clinical samples with similar performance characteristics.

Clinical Experience of Cerebrospinal Fluid-Based Liquid Biopsy Demonstrates Superiority of Cell-Free DNA over Cell Pellet Genomic DNA for Molecular Profiling.

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) offers unique opportunities for genomic profiling of tumors involving the central nervous system but remains uncommonly used in clinical practice. We describe our clinical experience using cfDNA from CSF for routine molecular testing using Memorial Sloan Kettering Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (targeting 468 cancer-related genes). In all, 148 cfDNA samples were assessed, comparing results of cfDNA versus genomic DNA (gDNA; gDNA from cell pellets) derived from the same CSF sample and the primary tumor. Of these, 71.6% (106/148) were successfully sequenced. Somatic alterations (mutations and fusions) were observed in 70.8% (75/106) of the samples; 97.3% (73/75) comprised variants confirming central nervous system involvement by a previously diagnosed tumor, 14.7% (11/75) had additional variants consistent with a therapy-related resistance mechanism, and 2.7% (2/75) had variants that independently diagnosed a new primary. Among samples with paired cfDNA and gDNA sequencing results, cfDNA was more frequently positive for at least one mutation [43.6% (55/126) versus 19.8% (25/126)] and harbored 1.6× more mutations (6.94 versus 4.65; P = 0.005), with higher mean variant allele fractions (41.1% versus 13.0%; P < 0.0001). Among mutation-positive cfDNAs, the corresponding gDNA was frequently negative (44.6%; 25/55) or failed sequencing (17.8%; 9/55). Routine molecular profiling of cfDNA is superior to gDNA from CSF, facilitating the capture of mutations at high variant allele frequency, even in the context of a negative cytology.

Molecular Diagnostics of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma encompasses a diverse group of B-cell and T-cell neoplasms. Current classification is based on clinical information, histologic assessment, immunophenotypic characteristics, and molecular alterations. A wide range of genetic alterations, including large chromosomal structural rearrangements, aneuploidies, point mutations, and copy number alterations, have been reported across all types of lymphomas. Many of these are now incorporated into the World Health Organization-defined criteria for the diagnostic evaluation of patients with lymphoid proliferations and, therefore, their accurate identification is paramount for diagnosis, subclassification, and selection of treatment. In addition to their value in the diagnostic setting, many alterations that are not routinely evaluated in standard clinical practice may still define specific disease entities as they have important implications in risk stratification, as well as roles in emerging alternate therapies and disease monitoring. Because of the complexity and range of alterations, their accurate and sensitive assessment requires a careful selection of technology. Here, we discuss the most commonly used molecular techniques in current clinical practice and highlight some of the benefits and pitfalls based on the type of alteration.

Apocrine Variant of Pleomorphic Lobular Carcinoma In Situ: Further Clinical, Histopathologic, Immunohistochemical, and Molecular Characterization of an Emerging Entity.

To date, the apocrine variant of lobular carcinoma in situ (AP-LCIS) has been cursorily described as a subtype of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). We retrospectively reviewed 34 cases of AP-LCIS (including 23 associated with invasive lobular carcinoma) to fully characterize it. AP-LCIS typically presented with screen-detected calcifications in older women (mean age: 65 y) and was characterized by distended terminal duct lobular units with relatively large "pleomorphic" cells, central necrosis, and calcifications. AP-LCIS cells exhibited abundant eosinophilic occasionally granular cytoplasm, hyperchromatic nuclei, and prominent nucleoli. Synchronous classic and/or florid LCIS was identified in 24/34 (70%) AP-LCIS, and in 9/11 (82%) pure AP-LCIS. Most (68%) cases of AP-LCIS were estrogen receptor-positive (50% strongly), 35% were progesterone receptor-positive, 26% were human epidermal growth factor 2-positive, 18% demonstrated high-proliferation rate (Ki67: >15%), and 90% were androgen receptor-positive. Aurora kinase A, immunoreactive in 38% of AP-LCIS cases, was not significantly associated with recurrence, development of invasion, or nodal positivity (P>0.05). Compared with conventional (nonapocrine) pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ (P-LCIS), aurora kinase A was expressed in a significantly greater proportion of P-LCIS (100%). AP-LCIS and P-LCIS did not otherwise differ in clinicopathologic features. Next-generation sequencing utilizing the Oncomine Comprehensive Panel v2, performed on 27 AP-LCIS cases, showed no specific molecular findings. In a mean follow-up of 57 months, 2 (of 11, 18%) pure AP-LCIS cases recurred (2 both in situ and invasive) and none metastasized or proved fatal. AP-LCIS should be regarded as another high-grade LCIS similar to P-LCIS in many respects, and pending additional studies should be managed similarly.

NTRK fusion detection across multiple assays and 33,997 cases: diagnostic implications and pitfalls.

With the FDA approval of larotrectinib, NTRK fusion assessment has recently become a standard part of management for patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancers. Unlike somatic mutation assessment, the detection of NTRK fusions is not straightforward, and various assays exist at the DNA, RNA, and protein level. Here, we investigate the performance of immunohistochemistry and DNA-based next-generation sequencing to indirectly or directly detect NTRK fusions relative to an RNA-based next-generation sequencing approach in the largest cohort of NTRK fusion positive solid tumors to date. A retrospective analysis of 38,095 samples from 33,997 patients sequenced by a targeted DNA-based next-generation sequencing panel (MSK-IMPACT), 2189 of which were also examined by an RNA-based sequencing assay (MSK-Fusion), identified 87 patients with oncogenic NTRK1-3 fusions. All available institutional NTRK fusion positive cases were assessed by pan-Trk immunohistochemistry along with a cohort of control cases negative for NTRK fusions by next-generation sequencing. DNA-based sequencing showed an overall sensitivity and specificity of 81.1% and 99.9%, respectively, for the detection of NTRK fusions when compared to RNA-based sequencing. False negatives occurred when fusions involved breakpoints not covered by the assay. Immunohistochemistry showed overall sensitivity of 87.9% and specificity of 81.1%, with high sensitivity for NTRK1 (96%) and NTRK2 (100%) fusions and lower sensitivity for NTRK3 fusions (79%). Specificity was 100% for carcinomas of the colon, lung, thyroid, pancreas, and biliary tract. Decreased specificity was seen in breast and salivary gland carcinomas (82% and 52%, respectively), and positive staining was often seen in tumors with neural differentiation. Both sensitivity and specificity were poor in sarcomas. Selection of the appropriate assay for NTRK fusion detection therefore depends on tumor type and genes involved, as well as consideration of other factors such as available material, accessibility of various clinical assays, and whether comprehensive genomic testing is needed concurrently.

TRK Fusions Are Enriched in Cancers with Uncommon Histologies and the Absence of Canonical Driver Mutations.

PURPOSE: TRK inhibitors achieve marked tumor-agnostic efficacy in TRK fusion-positive cancers and consequently are now an established standard of care. Little is known, however, about the demographics, outcomes, response to alternative standard therapies, or genomic characteristics of TRK fusion-positive cancers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Utilizing a center-wide screening program involving more than 26,000 prospectively sequenced patients, genomic and clinical data from all cases with TRK fusions were extracted. An integrated analysis was performed of genomic, therapeutic, and phenomic outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 76 cases with confirmed TRK fusions (0.28% overall prevalence) involving 48 unique rearrangements and 17 cancer types. The presence of a TRK fusion was associated with depletion of concurrent oncogenic drivers (P < 0.001) and lower tumor mutation burden (P < 0.001), with the exception of colorectal cancer where TRK fusions cooccur with microsatellite instability (MSI-H). Longitudinal profiling in a subset of patients indicated that TRK fusions were present in all sampled timepoints in 82% (14/17) of cases. Progression-free survival on first-line therapy, excluding TRK inhibitors, administered for advanced disease was 9.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.8-13.2]. The best overall response rate achieved with chemotherapy containing-regimens across all lines of therapy was 63% (95% CI, 41-81). Among 12 patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors, a patient with MSI-H colorectal cancer had the only observed response. CONCLUSIONS: TRK fusion-positive cancers can respond to alternative standards of care, although efficacy of immunotherapy in the absence of other predictive biomarkers (MSI-H) appears limited. TRK fusions are present in tumors with simple genomes lacking in concurrent drivers that may partially explain the tumor-agnostic efficacy of TRK inhibitors.

Detection of NTRK Fusions: Merits and Limitations of Current Diagnostic Platforms.

Oncogenic fusions involving NTRK1, NTRK2, and NTRK3 with various partners are diagnostic of infantile fibrosarcoma and secretory carcinoma yet also occur in lower frequencies across many types of malignancies. Recently, targeted small molecular inhibitor therapy has been shown to induce a durable response in a high percentage of patients with NTRK fusion-positive cancers, which has made the detection of NTRK fusions critical. Several techniques for NTRK fusion diagnosis exist, including pan-Trk IHC, FISH, reverse transcription PCR, DNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS), and RNA-based NGS. Each of these assays has unique features, advantages, and limitations, and familiarity with these assays is critical to appropriately screen for NTRK fusions. Here, we review the details of each existing methodology.

Her2/neu Status Determination in Breast Cancer: A Single Institutional Experience Using a Dual-Testing Approach With Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization.

OBJECTIVES: According to current guidelines, either immunohistochemistry (IHC) or in situ hybridization (ISH) can be used to determine human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2/neu) status in breast carcinoma. While the guidelines explicitly delineate result interpretation, there is no consensus on the most appropriate testing algorithm. METHODS: The Her2/neu statuses of 369 consecutive cases of invasive breast cancer (from 351 patients) were assessed in a dual-testing algorithm that uses both IHC and fluorescence ISH (FISH). FISH was performed using dual-color HER2/ chromosome enumeration probe 17 ( CEP17 ) probes, and if equivocal results were obtained, reflex testing using HER2/lissencephaly gene 1 ( LIS1 ) probes was used. Results from both modalities were scored and reported using American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists 2013 criteria. RESULTS: Sixty-one (16.5%) of the 369 tumors were found to be Her2/neu positive by at least one modality. The overall concordance between IHC and FISH results was 97.6%. Six of the 369 tumors were reclassified as Her2/neu positive after a negative IHC result. FISH was also able to identify significantly more Her2/neu-positive cases than IHC. CONCLUSIONS: The commonly used reflex strategy based on IHC results may deny potentially beneficial targeted therapy for a small cohort of patients, which should be considered as testing guidelines are formulated and the cost-benefit analyses of various testing algorithms are assessed.

Challenges in the Diagnosis of Urothelial Carcinoma Variants: Can Emerging Molecular Data Complement Pathology Review?

Urothelial carcinoma can exhibit a wide variety of histopathologic phenotypes or variant morphologies, classifications of which have recently been revised in the 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. Many of these variants not only present diagnostic challenges, but also have clinical implications that affect patient prognosis and treatment strategies. This review will discuss these variant morphologies and their relationship to current understanding of the underlying biology of urothelial carcinoma and molecular classification paradigms.

Glomuvenous Malformation: A Rare Periorbital Lesion of the Thermoregulatory Apparatus.

Glomuvenous malformations (GVMs), previously referred to as glomus tumors or glomangiomas, are benign, mesenchymal venous malformations arising from glomus bodies. Glomus bodies are modified smooth muscle neuromyoarterial structures involved in temperature regulation via blood shunting. These classically occur in the digits but can occur in other locations. The authors present a case of a periorbital GVM presented following blunt trauma to the area.

The Emerging Molecular Landscape of Urothelial Carcinoma.

Although there have been many recent discoveries in the molecular alterations associated with urothelial carcinoma, current understanding of this disease lags behind many other malignancies. Historically, a two-pathway model had been applied to distinguish low- and high-grade urothelial carcinoma, although significant overlap and increasing complexity of molecular alterations has been recently described. In many cases, mutations in HRAS and FGFR3 that affect the MAPK and PI3K pathways seem to be associated with noninvasive low-grade papillary tumors, whereas mutations in TP53 and RB that affect the G1-S transition of the cell cycle are associated with high-grade in situ and invasive carcinoma. However, recent large-scale analyses have identified overlap in these pathways relative to morphology, and in addition, many other variants in a wide variety of oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes have been identified. New technologies including next-generation sequencing have enabled more detailed analysis of urothelial carcinoma, and several groups have proposed molecular classification systems based on these data, although consensus is elusive. This article reviews the current understanding of alterations affecting oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes associated with urothelial carcinoma, and their application in the context of morphology and classification schema.