Thirty-seven-year Population-based Study of Colorectal Cancer Rates in Renal Transplant Recipients in Ireland.

BACKGROUND: Renal transplantation is associated with an increased risk of neoplasia, including colorectal cancer (CRC). Advances in surgical techniques and immunosuppressive medications have resulted in increased survival rates of both patients and grafts, but the incidence of CRC in the Irish renal transplant population is currently unknown. The aim of this study is to review the incidence of CRC in the Irish renal transplant population and compare it to the general population. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of all renal transplant recipients in Ireland between January 1980 and July 2017 was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-three out of 4230 transplant recipients (men = 20, women = 13) developed CRC subsequent to transplantation and were eligible for inclusion in the series. The mean age at transplantation was 51.5 years, with patients developing CRC on average 10.9 years post-transplantation; 6.1% (n = 2/33) had stage IV disease at diagnosis. The majority of patients (87.8%) had a pathologic T stage of T3/T4 and 45.5% had involvement of locoregional lymph nodes (N1/N2); 42.4% also had a mucinous component at histopathologic assessment. The incidence of CRC was higher in the transplant population compared to the general population. CONCLUSION: This is the first population-based assessment of CRC development in the Irish renal transplant population. Our data suggest that Irish transplant recipients have an increased risk of being diagnosed with a more advanced tumor than the general population, with most being diagnosed almost a decade after transplantation. This highlights the need for increased awareness among patients and clinicians and the potential need for coordinated lifelong surveillance of this patient population to ensure early detection and treatment.

An 18 year population-based study on site of origin and outcome of patients with peritoneal malignancy in Ireland.

Peritoneal malignancy (PM) is predominantly metastatic spread from advanced gastrointestinal or gynaecological cancer. PM is generally considered incurable and therefore has rarely been the focus of novel therapeutic strategies. This study assessed patterns and survival outcomes for patients with PM in Ireland. The National Cancer Registry Ireland database was interrogated to identify patients diagnosed with PM during the period 1994-2012. Patient and tumour characteristics were retrieved and survival outcomes calculated. 5791 patients were diagnosed during the study period. Median age at diagnosis was 68 years; females accounted for 62%. The incidence increased annually from 228 in 1994 to 401 in 2012. Primary PM accounted for 3% of cases. Colorectal (22%), ovarian (16%) and gastric (13%) cancers accounted for the majority of cases of secondary PM. Almost 75% of patients had PM at initial presentation. Almost 40% of patients (n = 2274) underwent surgical intervention, while 44% (n = 2560) had tumour directed chemotherapy. The median survival (MS) in patients with secondary PM was 6.6 months, and did not improve significantly during the study period. Outcomes were best in patients with ovarian cancer (MS 15.9 months) and colorectal cancer (MS 14.3 months) and worst in patients with lung (MS 2.4 months) and pancreas (MS 1.9 months) cancers. This is the first population-based study from Ireland to report the incidence and outcomes for PM. PM is more common than previously reported and survival remains poor. These findings highlight the need for greater clinician awareness and the need to focus on new therapeutic approaches to improve patient outcomes.

A radiological and pathological assessment of ileocolic pedicle length as a predictor of lymph node retrieval following right hemicolectomy for caecal cancer.

BACKGROUND: In colon cancer, the number of harvested lymph nodes is critical for pathological staging. It has been proposed that the more central the mesenteric vascular ligation, the greater the nodal yield. The aim of the current study was to determine the association of radiological and pathological ileocolic pedicle length on nodal harvest following right hemicolectomy for caecal cancer. METHODS: A series of 50 patients undergoing right hemicolectomy for adenocarcinoma underwent specimen evaluation. Preoperative computed tomography images were reconstructed and analysed to determine the direct (vessel origin to caecum) ileocolic pedicle length. RESULTS: The median pathological distance from the tumour to the high vascular tie was 80 mm, and median nodal yield was 16.5 nodes. Radiological pedicle length did not correlate with the pathological distance from the tumour to the high vascular tie or nodal yield; however, the pathological pedicle length did correlate with the total nodal yield (r (2): 0.343, p = 0.015). The median pathologically determined length of colon resected (r (2): 0.153, p = 0.289), ileum resected (r (2): 0.087, p = 0.568) and total specimen length resected (r (2): 0.182, p = 0.205) did not correlate with the total nodal yield. An ileal specimen length ≤25 mm [hazard ratio (HR) 14.8, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.1-194.5, p = 0.040] and a well-differentiated tumour (HR 10.5, 95 % CI 1.1-95.9, p = 0.037) increased the likelihood of retrieving <12 lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these data, pathologic pedicle length is a determining factor in lymph node retrieval. Preoperative radiological calculation of pedicle length does not help predict the number of lymph nodes retrieved.

Length of stay following elective surgery--can we improve efficiency?

Increasing emergency admissions place significant demands on limited hospital resources. We assessed national practices and resources for initiatives to reduce length of stay (LOS) and thereby improve efficiency of resource utilisation. Consultant members of the Irish Association of Coloproctology received a questionnaire seeking information about available initiatives aimed at reducing LOS. 20 out of 32 (62.5%) consultants responded to the questionnaire. Pre-assessment clinics for day surgery were available to 18(90%). Only 13 (65%) had access to pre-assessment clinics for patients requiring longer admissions. 11 (55%) could admit major cases on the day of surgery. Only 9 (45%) surgeons could guarantee immediate re-admission of patients discharged from hospital if needed. There was a divergence of opinion regarding the acceptable average LOS and percentage suitable for day surgery for a variety of common surgical procedures. This study highlights a number of key areas in which certain well-established initiatives could improve efficiency.

Is there a requirement for axillary lymph node dissection following identification of micro-metastasis or isolated tumour cells at sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer?

INTRODUCTION: Recent decades have seen a significant shift towards conservative management of the axilla. Increasingly, immunohistochemical analysis of sentinel nodes leads to the detection of small tumour deposits, the significance of which remains uncertain. The aims of this study are to examine patients whose sentinel lymph nodes are positive for macro-metastasis, micro-metastasis or isolated tumour cells (ITCs) and to determine the rate of further nodal disease after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) between January 2007 and December 2010 in a tertiary referral breast unit was performed. Patients who underwent an axillary lymph node dissection for macro-metastasis, micro-metastasis or ITCs were identified. Demographics, histological data and the rate of further axillary disease were examined. RESULTS: In total, 664 breast cancer patients attended the symptomatic breast unit during the study period, 360 of whom underwent a SLNB. Seventy patients had a SLNB positive for macro-metastasis. All of these patients underwent ALND. A positive SLNB with either micro-metastasis or ITCs was identified in 58 patients. Only 41 of the 58 patients went on to have an ALND, due primarily to variations in surgeons' preferences. Nineteen patients with micro-metastasis underwent an ALND. Four patients had further axillary disease (21%). Twenty-two patients had ITCs identified, of whom only one had further disease (4.5%). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of tumour size, grade, lymphovascular invasion or oestrogen receptor status. CONCLUSION: ALND should be considered in patients with micro-metastasis at SLNB. It should rarely be employed in the setting of SLNB positive for ITCs.

Colonoscopy and computerized tomography scan are not sufficient to localize right-sided colonic lesions accurately.

AIM: Accurate preoperative localization of colonic lesions is critical especially in laparoscopic colectomy where tactile localization is absent particularly in screen-detected tumours. The study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of colonoscopy and double-contrast computerized tomography (CT) scan to localize lesions treated by right hemicolectomy. METHOD: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients treated by right hemicolectomy under the colorectal service between July 2003 and October 2006. Preoperative tumour location determined by CT scan and colonoscopy was compared with the intra-operative and histopathological findings. RESULTS: Out of 101 patients, 73 (73%) were for adenoma or cancer, with a final diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in 59 (58%). Preoperative localization was inaccurate in 29% of lesions using both CT and colonoscopy. In the transverse colon, colonoscopy alone was only 37.5% accurate, increasing to 62.5% when information from the CT scan was added. CONCLUSION: Preoperative localization of right-sided colon cancers using colonoscopy and CT scanning is unreliable in at least 29% of cases. Inaccurate localization of transverse colon tumours risks inadequate lymphadenectomy with an adverse cancer outcome. Preoperative abdominal CT scan improves accuracy but endoscopic tattoo localization should be employed routinely especially in patients undergoing laparoscopic resection.