Brachytherapy and non-cancer mortality in patients with oral cavity and oropharynx SCCs.

BACKGROUND: Oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell cancers (OC-OPSCC) display high cancer-specific mortality and increased non-cancer mortality. We examined cause of death in patients treated for OC-OPSCC with brachytherapy, chemotherapy, external beam radiation, surgery, or combination of modalities. We hypothesized that brachytherapy does not increase non-cancer mortality comparably with external beam radiation. METHODS: A database was constructed from institutional tumor registry and electronic medical record data from all patients with first OC-OPSCC diagnosis at our institution between 2000 and 2010, excluding patients with a second primary cancer at diagnosis. The primary outcome was association between treatment modality and non-cancer mortality. RESULTS: Of 693 eligible patients, 460 were deceased; 84 from primary malignancy and 96 from a non-primary cancer cause, including 24 with a second primary cancer. 193 patients received brachytherapy. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed on treatment regimen, stratified by AJCC stage, race, and sex. Age, smoking history, and alcohol had HRs for death of 1.05 (p < 0.005), 1.37 (p = 0.106), and 2.24 (p < 0.005), respectively, while brachytherapy had a 0.53 HR (p < 0.005) for death. Non-smoking OPC patients had an 88% 5-year OS, suggesting these were largely HPV-driven cancers. In smoking OPC patients, 5-year OS was 61%. Non-cancer mortality HR of 0.36 for brachytherapy-treated patients. CONCLUSION: We report non-cancer mortality from a cohort of curatively treated OC-OPSCC and show a significant correlation between brachytherapy and non-cancer survival, independent of remission status. The impact of brachytherapy in OPC was strongest in smokers.

Postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy with mitomycin in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results from three prospective randomized trials.

UNLABELLED: Recent prospective randomized trials have shown concurrent chemoradiotherapy improves locoregional control in postoperative patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck using cisplatin-based regimes. This report presents data pooled from three randomized trials employing mitomycin, selecting those patients treated postoperatively, to evaluate the long-term benefit of mitomycin in the postoperative setting and to compare these results with those of two other recently published randomized trials. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1980 and 1999, a total of 331 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck from the three prospective trials were enrolled. Of the 205 postoperative patients in these trials, 103 were randomized to receive mitomycin and radiation, while 102 received radiation alone or radiation with porfiromycin in the third trial. Patients were treated with standard daily radiotherapy to a total median dose of 60 Gy over 47 days. Patients who were randomized to mitomycin C received 15 mg/m2 of the drug on days 5 and 47 (or last day). RESULTS: The 5-year rate of locoregional control was higher in the mitomycin arms. There was no statistically significant difference in the rates of overall survival or distant metastasis. Patients had a lower percentage of high-risk factors in both arms of the study, compared with patients in the large prospective trials, including positive margins, two or more positive lymph nodes, or oropharynx primary tumors. The gains in locoregional control realized with mitomycin were similar to the improvements in the recently published randomized trials using platinum. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm significant gains in locoregional control using concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the postoperative setting for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The lack of consensus over a benefit in the rates of overall survival and distant metastasis emphasizes the need for further prospective trials in the postoperative management of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy with mitomycin C compared with porfiromycin in squamous cell cancer of the head and neck: final results of a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Previous randomized trials have shown a benefit with concurrent use of the hypoxic cell cytotoxin mitomycin C (MC) and radiation (RT) in the management of squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN). We conducted a randomized trial comparing MC with porfiromycin (POR) in combination with RT in the management of SCCHN. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1992 and 1999, 128 patients with SCCHN were enrolled in this prospective randomized trial. Patients were stratified by management intent, and balanced with respect to stage and site of disease. They were randomized to receive MC (15 mg/M(2)) or POR (40 mg/M(2)) on Days 5 and 47 (or last day) of RT. Of 121 evaluable patients, 61 were randomized to MC and 60 to POR. Patients were treated with standard daily RT to a total median dose of 64 Gy over 47 days. Patients were well balanced with respect to management intent, stage, site, age, sex, hemoglobin levels, tumor grade, radiation dose, and days on treatment. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two arms with respect to acute hematologic or nonhematologic toxicities. As of January 2003 with a median follow-up of 6.3 years, there have been 19 local relapses (4 MC vs. 15 POR), 21 regional relapses (7 MC vs. 14 POR), 24 distant metastases (11 MC vs. 13 POR), and 66 deaths (33 MC vs. 33 POR). MC was superior to POR with respect to 5-year local relapse-free survival (91.6% vs. 72.7%, p = 0.01), local-regional relapse-free survival (82% vs. 65.3%, p = 0.05), and disease-free survival (72.8% vs. 52.9%, p = 0.026). There were no significant differences between the two arms with respect to overall survival (49.2% vs. 54.4%) or distant metastasis-free rate (79.9% vs. 75.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite promising preclinical data, and an acceptable toxicity profile, POR was inferior to MC as an adjunct to RT in the management of SCCHN. This randomized trial emphasizes the need for randomized studies to evaluate new agents in the management of SCCHN.

Microsurgical free flap reconstruction outcomes in head and neck cancer patients after surgical extirpation and intraoperative brachytherapy.

OBJECTIVES: The management of recurrent or persistent head and neck cancer poses a challenging problem. Salvage surgery for these individuals consists of ablative surgery, interstitial brachytherapy, and microsurgical free flap reconstruction. This study reviews complications after such reconstruction. METHODS: We reviewed 139 consecutive head and neck cancer patients undergoing free flap reconstruction from January 1994 to May 2002. These included 66 patients with recurrent head and neck cancer undergoing intraoperative brachytherapy (IOBT) and free flap reconstruction and 73 undergoing free flap reconstructions only. A total of 142 reconstructions were performed, with three patients in IOBT group receiving two free flap reconstructions per patient, giving us a total of 69 reconstructions in the IOBT group versus 73 in the non-IOBT group. Nine patients were excluded from the IOBT group because of nonsynchronous use of brachytherapy and reconstruction, and 10 patients were excluded from the other group because they had prior radiotherapy or surgical treatment, leaving us with a total of 123 reconstructions, 60 in the IOBT group and 63 in the non-IOBT group. The IOBT group patients received iodine Vicryl seed implants, palladium seed implants, or both, to deliver an average dose of 79.3 +/- 31.8 Gy (mean +/- 1SD) to the surgical bed. RESULTS: All patients were followed for evidence of local wound complications. The IOBT group showed multiple complications in 23 (38.33%) of 60 reconstructions, the most common being wound dehiscence in 11. This, when compared with the non-IOBT group complications (15.87%), was found to be statistically significant (chi test, P <.01). CONCLUSION: IOBT increases the rate of complications in patients undergoing microvascular free tissue transfer. This, however, should not deter or alter the aggressiveness of cancer therapy used for managing recurrent head and neck cancer.

Prognostic significance of cyclooxygenase-2 in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To determine the relative prognostic significance of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 expression in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study included 82 patients with SCC referred to the Department of Therapeutic Radiology at Yale-New Haven Hospital (Connecticut) between 1980 and 1999 who were treated with primary external beam radiotherapy or gross total surgical resection and postoperative radiotherapy. A microarray of archival tumor tissue was constructed and stained with monoclonal antibodies directed against COX-2 and scored for intensity by a pathologist blinded to the clinical outcomes of the patients. COX-2 immunoreactivity and clinicopathological data were analyzed with respect to survival endpoints using bivariate and multivariate techniques. RESULTS: Frequency of COX-2 overexpression was 45%. In multivariate analysis, COX-2 positivity predicted poor 3-year survival (P = 0.02; odds ratio = 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.84). Increasing age was significantly associated with increased 3-year survival (P = 0.03; odds ratio = 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.004-1.09). Positive COX-2 status trended toward predicting decreased 3-year disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: COX-2 was the most important predictor of poor survival in this patient cohort. In patients with oropharyngeal SCC treated with external-beam radiation therapy, overexpression of COX-2 may affect clinical outcome, and COX-2 may therefore prove valuable both as a prognostic factor and as a therapeutic target.