RESUMO
The present treatise chronicles one decade of experience pertaining to clinical PRRT services in a large-volume tertiary cancer care centre in India delivering over 4,000 therapies, an exemplar of successful PRRT programme employing indigenous 177Lutetium production and resources. For the purpose of systematic discussion, we have sub-divided the communication into 3 specific parts: (a) Radiopharmaceutical aspects that describes 177Lutetium production through 'Direct' Neutron Activation Route and the subsequent radiolabeling procedures, (b) The specific clinical nuances and finer learning points (apart from the routine standard procedure) based upon clinical experience and how it has undergone practice evolution in our setting and (c) Dosimetry results with this indigenous product and radiation safety/health physics aspects involved in PRRT services. Initiated in 2010 at our centre, the PRRT programme is a perfect example of affordable quality health care delivery, with indigenous production of the radionuclide (177Lu) in the reactor and subsequent radiolabeling of the radiopharmaceutical ([177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE) at the hospital radiopharmacy unit of the centre, which enabled catering to the needs of a large number of patients of progressive, metastatic and advanced Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NENs) and related malignancies.
RESUMO
UNLABELLED: This prospective study compared 177Lu-ethylene diamine tetramethylene phosphonate (EDTMP) with 153Sm-EDTMP for painful skeletal metastases. METHODS: Half of the 32 patients were treated with 177Lu-EDTMP and half with 153Sm-EDTMP, at 37 MBq/kg of body weight. Analgesic, pain, and quality-of-life scores (EORTC, Karnofsky, ECOG) and bone proliferation marker were used to examine efficacy. Hematologic toxicity was evaluated using NCI-CTCAE and compared between groups at baseline and each month till 3 mo after therapy. Pain relief was categorized as complete, partial, minimal, or none. RESULTS: Pain relief with 177Lu-EDTMP was 80%: 50% complete, 41.67% partial, and 8.33% minimal. Pain relief with 153Sm-EDTMP was 75%: 33.33% complete, 58.33% partial, and 8.33% minimal. The difference was not significant (P=1.000). Quality of life at 3 mo after therapy improved significantly in both groups as per ECOG score (P=0.014 and 0.005 for 177Lu-EDTMP and 153Sm-EDTMP, respectively), Karnofsky index (P=0.007 and 0.023 for 177Lu-EDTMP and 153Sm-EDTMP, respectively), and EORTC score (P=0.004 and <0.001 for 177Lu-EDTMP and 153Sm-EDTMP, respectively). Bone proliferation marker in responders of both groups dropped significantly (P=0.008 for 177Lu-EDTMP and P=0.019 for 153Sm-EDTMP), parallel to clinical response. For 177Lu-EDTMP, anemia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia were nonserious (grade I/II) in 46.67%, 46.67%, and 20%, respectively, and serious (grade III/IV) in 20%, 6.67%, and 0%, respectively. For 153Sm-EDTMP, anemia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia were nonserious (grade I/II) in 62.5%, 31.25%, and 18.75%, respectively, and serious (grade III/IV) in 18.75%, 0%, and 6.25%, respectively. One patient treated with 153Sm-EDTMP had grade IV thrombocytopenia but required no blood transfusion. Differences between groups were not significant for either nonserious or serious toxicity. For 177Lu-EDTMP, 3 of 12 responders experienced the flare phenomenon on the third day after therapy and one on the fifth day, showing no response to therapy. For 153Sm-EDTMP, 2 of 12 responders experienced the flare phenomenon, both on the third day after therapy. CONCLUSION: 177Lu-EDTMP has pain response efficacy similar to that of 153Sm-EDTMP and is a feasible and safe alternative, especially in centers with no nearby access to 153Sm-EDTMP.