Clinical treatment patterns, molecular characteristics and survival outcomes of ROS1-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer: A large multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring ROS1 rearrangements is a molecular subset that exhibits favorable responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment than chemotherapy. This study investigated real-world treatment patterns and survival outcomes among patients with ROS1-rearranged advanced NSCLC. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with ROS1-rearranged advanced NSCLC treated in four different hospitals in China from August 2018 to March 2022. The study analyzed gene fusion distribution, resistance patterns, and survival outcomes. RESULTS: ROS1 rearrangement occurs in 1.8 % (550/31,225) of our study cohort. CD74 was the most common ROS1 fusion partner, accounting for 45.8 %. Crizotinib was used in 73.9 % of patients in the first-line treatment, and an increased use of chemotherapy, ceritinib, and lorlatinib was seen in the second-line setting. Lung (43.2 %) and brain (27.6 %) were the most common sites of progression in first-line setting, while brain progression (39.2 %) was the most common site of progression in second-line. Median overall survival was 46 months (95 % confidence intervals: 39.6-52.4). First-line crizotinib use yielded significantly superior survival outcomes over chemotherapy in terms of progression-free (18.5 vs. 6.0; p < 0.001) and overall survival (49.8 vs. 37; p = 0.024). The choice of treatment in the latter line also had survival implications, wherein survival outcomes were better when first-line crizotinib was followed by sequential TKI therapy than first-line chemotherapy followed by TKI therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provided insights into the real-world treatment, drug resistance patterns, and survival outcomes among patients with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC. This information serves as a valuable reference for guiding the treatment of this molecular subset of NSCLC.

Clinical evidence for efficacy of pembrolizumab in MSI-H and TMB-H advanced solid tumor: results from three cancer centers in China.

BACKGROUND: Pembrolizumab has been indicated in the treatment of solid tumors with high frequency microsatellite instability (MSI-H) or high tumor mutational burden (TMB-H); however, real-world data on the effectiveness of pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy in this molecular subset remain limited. Our retrospective study evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in treating advanced solid tumors with either MSI-H or TMB-H. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed data from 116 patients with MSI-H or TMB-H advanced solid cancers who received pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy regardless of treatment setting. We analyzed objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: The top three cancer types were colorectal (48.6% MSI-H, 6.5% TMB-H), lung (15.4% MSI-H, 84.4% TMB-H), and gastric (15.4% MSI-H, 5.1% TMB-H). The ORR with pembrolizumab was 52.6%, including complete response (CR) observed in 8.6% (n = 10) of cases and partial responses (PR) in 43.9% (n = 51). Of the 93 patients who received first-line pembrolizumab, 52 patients achieved objective response (10 CR, 42 PR), with a median PFS of 14.0 months (95% confidence intervals [CI] 6.6-21.4). Of the 23 who received subsequent-line pembrolizumab, the ORR was 39.1%, disease control rate was 91.3%, and median PFS was 5.7 months (95% CI 3.9-7.5). Treatment-related adverse events were observed in 32 patients (27.6%), with no reported treatment-related fatal adverse events. CONCLUSION: Our study provides real-world evidence on the clinical effectiveness of pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with MSI-H and TMB-H advanced solid cancers.

First-in-human phase I study of BEBT-109 in previously treated EGFR exon 20 insertion-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: BEBT-109 is an oral pan-mutant-selective inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) that demonstrated promising antitumor potency in preclinical models. METHODS: This first-in-human study was a single-arm, open-label, two-stage study. Phase Ia dose-escalation study evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of BEBT-109 in 11 patients with EGFR T790M-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). Phase Ib dose-expansion study evaluated the safety and efficacy of BEBT-109 in 18 patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion (ex20ins)-mutated treatment-refractory aNSCLC. The primary outcomes were adverse events and antitumor activity. Clinical trial registration number CTR20192575. FINDINGS: The phase Ia study demonstrated no dose-limiting toxicity, no observation of the maximum tolerated dose, and no new safety signals with BEBT-109 in the dose range of 20-180 mg/d, suggesting that BEBT-109 had an acceptable safety profile among patients with EGFR T790M-mutated aNSCLC. Plasma pharmacokinetics of BEBT-109 showed a dose-proportional increase in the area under the curve and maximal concentration, with no significant drug accumulation. The dose-expansion study demonstrated that BEBT-109 treatment was tolerable across the three dose levels. The three most common treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea (100%; 22.2% ≥Grade 3), rash (66.7%; 5.6% ≥Grade 3), and anemia (61.1%; 0% ≥Grade 3). The objective response rate was 44.4% (8 of 18). Median progression-free survival was 8.0 months (95% confidence intervals, 1.33-14.67). CONCLUSION: Preliminary findings showed that BEBT-109 had an acceptable safety profile and favorable antitumor activity in patients with refractory EGFR ex20ins-mutated aNSCLC. FUNDING: National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Dynamic cytokines signature predicts survival outcome from severe Immune-related hepatitis with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs), particularly immune-related hepatitis (IRH) is a potentially serious complication of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. This retrospective cohort study investigated potential prognostic and predictive biomarkers for IRH. METHOD: This study included 37 patients with advanced lung cancer who received ICIs and were divided into two groups: ≥Grade 3 (G3)-IRH group (n = 17) and without irAE (no-irAE) group (n = 20). Blood samples collected at three different time points and pre-treatment tumor biopsy samples were analyzed using multi-omics assays. RESULTS: The IL-1B RNA expression was significantly increased (limma, fold = 1.94) in the ≥ G3-IRH group than the no-irAE group. Compared with no-irAE group, ≥G3-IRH group had higher monocyte and eosinophil infiltration and lower macrophage infiltration, particularly macrophage M2. Transcriptomics analyses of pre-treatment tumor samples revealed significant upregulation of various inflammation-related genes in the ≥ G3-IRH group (False discovery rate < 0.05). Moreover, various proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines were significantly lower in the plasma of the ≥ G3-IRH group than in the no-irAE group. Subgroup analyses of the ≥ G3-IRH group revealed that plasma IL-1A was significantly higher among those whose IRH resolved than those who had IRH-related death. Patients who died had a greater increase in immune score and Euclidean distance from the baseline to the seventh day of IRH onset, with a dramatic increase in Euclidean distance after immunosuppression, suggesting overstimulated immune status. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated the association between IL-1B overexpression and IRH susceptibility. Immune score and Euclidean distance of inflammatory cytokines may provide predictive value on the survival outcome from ≥ G3 IRH.

Clinical activity of pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy in advanced pulmonary large-cell and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)-based combination strategies have improved the survival outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancers; however, data regarding their efficacy remains limited for uncommon histological types, including large-cell carcinoma (LCC) and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a total of 60 patients with advanced LCC and LCNEC - 37 treatment-naïve and 23 pre-treated - who received pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy. Treatment and survival outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 37 treatment-naïve patients who received first-line pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy, the 27 patients with LCC had an overall response rate (ORR) of 44.4% (12/27) and a disease control rate (DCR) of 88.9% (24/27); whereas 10 patients with LCNEC had an ORR of 70% (7/10) and DCR of 90% (9/10). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 7.0 months (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 2.2-11.8) and median overall survival (mOS) was 24.0 months (95%CI: 0.0-50.1) for first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy of LCC (n = 27), whereas mPFS was 5.5 months (95%CI: 2.3-8.7) and mOS was 13.0 months (95%CI: 11.0-15.0) for first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy of LCNEC (n = 10). Of the 23 pre-treated patients who received subsequent-line pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy, mPFS was 2.0 months (95% CI: 0.6-3.4) and mOS was 4.5 months (95% CI: 0.0-9.0) for LCC and mPFS was 3.8 months (95% CI: 0.0-7.6) and mOS was not reached for LCNEC. CONCLUSION: Our study provides real-world clinical evidence of the anti-tumor activity of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced LCC and LCNEC, indicating that this regimen could serve as a treatment option, particularly as first-line therapy, for improving the survival outcomes of patients with these rare histological subtypes of lung cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05023837(ESPORTA, 27/08/2021).

Intracranial activity of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used as first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring no actionable mutations; however, data on their efficacy among patients presenting with intracranial lesions are limited. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of ICIs combined with chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients with measurable brain metastasis at initial diagnosis. METHODS: Our study retrospectively analyzed clinical data of a total of 211 patients diagnosed with driver gene mutation-negative advanced NSCLC with measurable, asymptomatic brain metastasis at baseline from Hunan Cancer Hospital between January 1, 2019 and September 30, 2021. The patients were stratified into two groups according to the first-line treatment regimen received: ICI combined with chemotherapy ( n = 102) or chemotherapy ( n = 109). Systemic and intracranial objective response rates (ORRs) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. Adverse events were also compared between the groups. RESULTS: Compared with the chemotherapy-based regimen, the ICI-containing regimen was associated with a significantly higher intracranial (44.1% [45/102] vs . 28.4% [31/109], χ2 = 5.620, P = 0.013) and systemic (49.0% [50/102] vs . 33.9% [37/109], χ2 = 4.942, P = 0.019) ORRs and longer intracranial (11.0 months vs . 7.0 months, P <0.001) and systemic (9.0 months vs . 5.0 months, P <0.001) PFS. Multivariable analysis consistently revealed an independent association between receiving ICI plus platinum-based chemotherapy as a first-line regimen and prolonged intracranial PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37-0.73, P <0.001) and systemic PFS (HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.35-0.66, P <0.001). No unexpected serious adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSION: Our study provides real-world clinical evidence that ICI combined with chemotherapy is a promising first-line treatment option for driver gene mutation-negative advanced NSCLC patients who present with brain metastasis at initial diagnosis. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ , OMESIA, NCT05129202.

Validation of E1L3N antibody for PD-L1 detection and prediction of pembrolizumab response in non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) 22C3 assay is one of the approved companion diagnostic assays for receiving anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy. Our study evaluated the performance of E1L3N and 22C3 antibodies in estimating PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Our retrospective study included 46 patients diagnosed with unresectable EGFR/ALK/ROS1-negative NSCLC who received first-line pembrolizumab therapy between 2018 and 2021. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry of baseline tissue biopsy samples was performed using PDL1-E1L3N and PDL1-22C3 antibodies. The concordance between the PD-L1 assays and the treatment outcomes was assessed. RESULTS: Using a tumor proportion score (TPS) cutoff of ≥1%, 67.4% of patients are evaluated to be positive using PDL1-E1L3N and 73.9% using PDL1-22C3. Using a TPS of ≥50% as the cutoff, 26.1% of patients are positive using PDL1-E1L3N and 30.4% using PDL1-22C3. The PDL1-22C3 and PDL1-E1L3N assays are highly concordant and reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.925 (p < 0.0001). Patients with PDL1-E1L3N TPS > 50% have a significantly higher objective response rate than patients with PDL1-E1L3N TPS < 1% (p = 0.047), with a similar trend observed for PDL1-22C3 (p = 0.051). Consistent with PDL1-22C3, patients with higher PDL1-E1L3N expression (≥50%, 1-49%) have longer progression-free survival than those with PDL1-E1L3N TPS < 1%. CONCLUSION: Our study provides clinical evidence on the concordance of PD-L1 TPS scores between clones E1L3N and 22C3. Moreover, the treatment responses to pembrolizumab are also comparable between the PDL1-E1L3N and PDL1-22C3. These findings indicate that E1L3N is a reliable and cost-effective assay and may serve as an alternative to 22C3.

To determine which patients might be suitable to receive immunotherapy, a type of cancer treatment that triggers the immune system to target the patient's tumor, a PD-L1 test is sometimes used. This test looks at the levels of PD-L1, which indicate whether immunotherapy might work in the patient. One of the tests commonly used can be expensive and a reliable and cost-effective alternative is needed. Here, we compare the results of PD-L1 testing with that test with an alternative that is more cost-effective. We show that the two tests are highly concordant, and also demonstrate that the results using the alternative test are able to predict response to immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Our findings provide evidence that the alternative, more cost-effective test might be useful and reliable in the clinic.

Sintilimab plus docetaxel as second-line therapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer without targetable mutations: a phase II efficacy and biomarker study.

BACKGROUND: Single-agent immunotherapy is currently the recommended second-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without targetable mutations; however, the objective response rate (ORR) remains low. This phase II study evaluated the efficacy of the combination therapy of sintilimab plus docetaxel and explored potential biomarkers for efficacy prediction. METHODS: Thirty patients with NSCLC without targetable mutations whose disease progressed from first-line platinum-based chemotherapy from October 2019 to December 2020 were enrolled in this single-arm, single-center, phase II trial. Sintilimab (200 mg) and docetaxel (75 mg/m2) were administered every 3 weeks until progression. The primary endpoint was ORR. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Biomarker analyses of blood and tissue samples were also performed. RESULTS: Among 30 patients, 11 patients had partial response, resulting in an ORR of 36.7%. The median PFS was 5.0 months (95%CI: 3.9-6.1) and OS was 13.4 months (95%CI: 5.6-21.2). The most common immune-related adverse event of any grade was hepatitis, observed in 23.3% (7/30) of patients. Treatment-emergent adverse events were manageable. Patients detected with high PD-L1 expression in circulating tumor cells (cutoff value ≥32.5% based on the median CTC-PD-L1 expression) achieved significantly higher ORR (60% versus 13.3%, p = 0.021) and significantly longer median PFS (6.0 versus 3.5 months, p = 0.011) and median OS (15.8 versus 9.0 months, p = 0.038) than those with low CTC-PD-L1 level. Patients detected with PD-L1 < 1% and CD8 ≥ 1% expression from their baseline tissue samples had significantly higher ORR (83.3% versus 12.5%, p = 0.026) but similar PFS (p = 0.62) and OS (p = 0.15). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of sintilimab plus docetaxel as a second-line treatment of NSCLC without targetable mutations after progression from first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the Clinical trials registry with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03798743 (SUCCESS).

Investigation on the survival implications of PD-L1 expression status in ALK- rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line crizotinib.

BACKGROUND: Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression has been associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) of crizotinib-treated patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the association between PD-L1 expression and overall survival (OS) in ALK-rearranged NSCLC remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the survival implication of baseline PD-L1 expression status in crizotinib-treated patients with ALK-rearranged advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Between October 1, 2015, and October 31, 2021, we retrospectively analyzed the baseline PD-L1 expression levels using immunohistochemistry 22C3 assay of tissue samples from 128 patients with ALK-rearranged advanced lung adenocarcinoma who were treated with first-line crizotinib. RESULTS: Of the 128 baseline tumor specimens analyzed, a majority (76.6%, n = 98) had low PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score (TPS) < 50%), wherein 58.6% (n = 75) had < 1% and 18.0% (n = 23) had 1%-49%, and the remaining 23.4% (n = 30) had high PD-L1 expression level (TPS ≥ 50%). High baseline PD-L1 expression was not associated with any clinical characteristic examined. Patients with high baseline PD-L1 (n = 30) expression level had significantly shorter median PFS (6 vs 11 months, p = 0.011) and OS (17 vs 53 months, p = 0.023) on crizotinib treatment than those with low PD-L1 level (n = 98). CONCLUSIONS: A subset of patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC having high baseline PD-L1 expression level (TPS of ≥ 50%) had poorer survival outcomes despite crizotinib therapy. Our study raises the need to investigate alternative treatment strategies to improve survival outcomes of this patient subset.

A novel ROS1 G2032 K missense mutation mediates lorlatinib resistance in a patient with ROS1-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma but responds to nab-paclitaxel plus pembrolizumab.

INTRODUCTION: ROS1-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has demonstrated promising response to lorlatinib; however, no targeted therapy is available after failure of lorlatinib and information on acquired resistance mechanisms mediating lorlatinib resistance among ROS1-rearranged NSCLC patients is limited. We report a ROS1-rearranged NSCLC patient who responded to immunochemotherapy after acquisition of ROS1 G2032K-mediated lorlatinib resistance. METHODS: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on supraclavicular lymph nodes (SLN) and blood samples obtained from the 53-year old male patient with advanced CD74-ROS1-rearranged NSCLC. In vitro experiments with patient-derived SLN tumor cells and in silico homology modeling were performed to investigate mechanisms of G2032K-mediated inhibitor resistance. RESULTS: NGS analysis revealed the detection of an acquired ROS1 G2032 K after failure from lorlatinib. Homology modeling revealed the conformational change in the inhibitor binding site induced by the ROS1 G2032 K that disrupted lorlatinib binding. In vitro experiments using patient-derived cells bearing concurrent CD74-ROS1-rearrangement and ROS1 G2032 K demonstrated half-maximal inhibitory concentration IC50 of 730.2 nM for lorlatinib, 812.1 nM for entrectinib, and 1546 nM for crizotinib, indicating resistance to these inhibitors. With PD-L1 expression of TPS 30 %, nab-paclitaxel plus pembrolizumab was administered as fifth-line treatment and achieved partial response, with sustained response ongoing for 7 months as of January 31, 2020. CONCLUSION: ROS1 G2032 K is a novel mutation that mediates resistance to lorlatinib. With the lack of targeted therapeutic options after lorlatinib resistance, checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy may be considered as a treatment option in patients with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC.