Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Phlebology ; 37(10): 709-720, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36154744

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Aim was to report a prospective two-centre Singaporean experience using Endovenous Microwave Ablation (EMA) to treat symptomatic primary great saphenous vein reflux. We evaluated 1-year safety, efficacy and patient satisfaction. METHODS: 50 patients (63 limbs; 29 females; mean age 58.0 ± 12.1 years) were included. Patients were reviewed at 2-weeks, 3-, 6- and 12-months and underwent Duplex ultrasound assessment. Three quality of life (QoL) questionnaires were completed. RESULTS: The truncal closure rates at 2-weeks, 3-, 6- and 12-months were 63/63 (100%), 59/59 (100%), 58/58 (100%) and 59/60 (98.3%), respectively. There was 100% technical success and no serious adverse events. There were sustained improvement of QoL questionnaire scores from 2 weeks to 12 months. CONCLUSION: EMA is a safe and efficacious venous ablative technology at 12 months and is associated with a high rate of target vein occlusion and sustained QoL improvement.


Assuntos
Varizes , Insuficiência Venosa , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Micro-Ondas/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Sistema de Registros , Veia Safena/diagnóstico por imagem , Veia Safena/cirurgia , Singapura , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Varizes/diagnóstico por imagem , Varizes/cirurgia , Insuficiência Venosa/diagnóstico por imagem , Insuficiência Venosa/cirurgia
2.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord ; 9(2): 335-345.e2, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32387378

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of A Singapore VenaSeal Real-World Post-Market Evaluation Study (ASVS) was to evaluate the performance of cyanoacrylate closure (CAC) for varicose veins in a prospective multiracial Singaporean Asian cohort. We report early clinical and patient satisfaction outcomes at 3 months after intervention. METHODS: There were 100 patients (151 legs; 156 truncal veins) who underwent CAC between April and December 2018. Of the 151 legs, 49 (32.5%) were treated for great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence, 96 (63.6%) for bilateral GSV incompetence, 1 (0.7%) for small saphenous vein (SSV) incompetence, and 5 (3.3%) for combined unilateral GSV and SSV reflux. At baseline, 68 legs (45.0%) had C4 to C6 disease, and 67 legs (44.4%) had concomitant multiple stab avulsions. Patients were reviewed at 2 and 12 weeks by duplex ultrasound to check for venous recanalization (defined as ≥5 cm in length), pain score, revised Venous Clinical Severity Score, EuroQol-5 Dimension questionnaire score, Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire score, 14-item Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIQ-14) for quality of life measures, and patient satisfaction. Time to return to work and normal activities were also recorded. RESULTS: There were 59 female patients, and mean age was 60.1 ± 12.7 years. There was 100% technical success. Patients tolerated the procedure well and reported low periprocedural pain (mean pain score, 2.9 [range, 0-9]). Patient surveys at the 3-month interval showed high satisfaction rates, with 72 of 91 (79.1%) being extremely or very satisfied. By day 10, of 100 patients, 93 (93%) resumed daily activities, whereas 36 (36%) had returned to work. At 2 weeks, GSV and SSV were completely occluded in 150 of 150 (100%) and 6 of 6 (100%) veins, respectively. At 3 months, GSV and SSV occlusion rates were 140 of 141 (99.3%) and 6 of 6 (100%), respectively. Transient superficial phlebitis was reported in 27 of 151 (18 %) legs, which was self-limited. At 3 months, revised Venous Clinical Severity Score improved from 5.00 (range, 1.00-18.00) to 1.00 (0.00-10.00; P < .001); EuroQol-5 Dimension score, from 0.686 (-0.382 to 1.00) to 1.00 (0.12-1.00; P < .001); Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire score, from 17.14 (1.29-61.15) to 4.83 (0.00-57.12; P < .001); and 14-item Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire, from 19.64 (1.79-73.21) to 7.14 (0.00-51.79; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: CAC has a high safety profile and is an effective way to block refluxing truncal veins in Asian patients at early follow-up. Patients are highly satisfied and report low postoperative pain. There is significant continued quality of life improvement at 3 months. Early results are encouraging, but we await further prospective long-term follow-up from the study.


Assuntos
Cianoacrilatos/uso terapêutico , Embolização Terapêutica , Veia Safena , Varizes/terapia , Insuficiência Venosa/terapia , Idoso , Cianoacrilatos/efeitos adversos , Embolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Veia Safena/diagnóstico por imagem , Veia Safena/fisiopatologia , Singapura , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Varizes/diagnóstico por imagem , Varizes/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Venosa/diagnóstico por imagem , Insuficiência Venosa/fisiopatologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA