HNRNPL Restrains miR-155 Targeting of BUB1 to Stabilize Aberrant Karyotypes of Transformed Cells in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Aneuploidy and overexpression of hsa-miR-155-5p (miR-155) characterize most solid and hematological malignancies. We recently demonstrated that miR-155 sustains aneuploidy at early stages of in vitro cellular transformation. During in vitro transformation of normal human fibroblast, upregulation of miR-155 downregulates spindle checkpoint proteins as the mitotic checkpoint serine/threonine kinase budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 (BUB1), the centromere protein F (CENPF) and the zw10 kinetochore protein (ZW10), compromising the chromosome alignment at the metaphase plate and leading to aneuploidy in daughter cells. Here we show that the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein L (HNRNPL) binds to the polymorphic marker D2S1888 at the 3'UTR of BUB1 gene, impairs the miR-155 targeting, and restores BUB1 expression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. This mechanism occurs at advanced passages of cell transformation and allows the expansion of more favorable clones. Our findings have revealed, at least in part, the molecular mechanisms behind the chromosomal stabilization of cell lines and the concept that, to survive, tumor cells cannot continuously change their genetic heritage but need to stabilize the most suitable karyotype.

Hsa-miR-155-5p drives aneuploidy at early stages of cellular transformation.

Hsa-miR-155-5p (miR-155) is overexpressed in most solid and hematological malignancies. It promotes loss of genomic integrity in cancer cells by targeting genes involved in microsatellite instability and DNA repair; however, the link between miR-155 and aneuploidy has been scarcely investigated. Here we describe a novel mechanism by which miR-155 causes chromosomal instability. Using osteosarcoma cells (U2OS) and normal human dermal fibroblast (HDF), two well-established models for the study of chromosome congression, we demonstrate that miR-155 targets the spindle checkpoint proteins BUB1, CENP-F, and ZW10, thus compromising chromosome alignment at the metaphase plate. In U2OS cells, exogenous miR-155 expression reduced the recruitment of BUB1, CENP-F, and ZW10 to the kinetochores which resulted in defective chromosome congression. In contrast, during in vitro transformation of HDF by enforced expression of SV40 Large T antigen and human telomerase (HDFLT/hTERT), inhibition of miR-155 reduced chromosome congression errors and aneuploidy at early passages. Using live-cell imaging we observed that miR-155 delays progression through mitosis, indicating an activated mitotic spindle checkpoint, which likely fails to reduce aneuploidy. Overall, this study provides insight into a mechanism that generates aneuploidy at early stages of cellular transformation, pointing to a role for miR-155 in chromosomal instability at tumor onset.

Optimal cut-offs for Down syndrome contingent screening in a population of 10,156 pregnant women.

STUDY DESIGN: A population of 10,156 pregnant women with singleton pregnancies were screened by the integrated test. Risks were retrospectively recalculated for contingent test strategies with first step intermediate risk groups defined by first trimester upper cut-offs of 1 : 10, 1 : 30, 1 : 50, and 1 : 70 and lower cut-offs 1 : 1500, 1 : 1200, 1 : 1100, and 1 : 900. The second trimester high risk group was based on a single cut-off of 1 : 250. RESULTS: In the first trimester, the detection rate (DR) ranged from 21% (6/29) to 52% (15/29) as the high risk first trimester cut-off was changed from 1 : 10 to 1 : 70. The corresponding first trimester false positive rate (FPR) increased from 0.2% to 1.4%. In the second trimester, an additional 21/29 (72%) to 12/29 (41%) affected pregnancies could be detected with an additional 1.6% to 2.7% false positives when lower first trimester cut-offs of 1 : 900 to 1 : 1500 were used. The best results were obtained with the upper first trimester cut-off of 1 : 30 and lower first trimester cut-off of 1 : 900, which yielded a rate of women requiring a second trimester test of only 12%, with overall DR and FPR of 93% and 2.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although the study population was relatively small, the results confirm the advantage of using contingent screening and suggest optimal first trimester cut-offs of 1 : 30 (lower cut-off) and 1 : 900 (upper cut-off).