Vemurafenib in patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive metastatic melanoma: final overall survival results of the randomized BRIM-3 study.

BACKGROUND: The BRIM-3 trial showed improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for vemurafenib compared with dacarbazine in treatment-naive patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive metastatic melanoma. We present final OS data from BRIM-3. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive vemurafenib (960 mg twice daily) or dacarbazine (1000 mg/m2 every 3 weeks). OS and PFS were co-primary end points. OS was assessed in the intention-to-treat population, with and without censoring of data for dacarbazine patients who crossed over to vemurafenib. RESULTS: Between 4 January 2010 and 16 December 2010, a total of 675 patients were randomized to vemurafenib (n = 337) or dacarbazine (n = 338, of whom 84 crossed over to vemurafenib). At the time of database lock (14 August 2015), median OS, censored at crossover, was significantly longer for vemurafenib than for dacarbazine {13.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 12.0-15.4] versus 9.7 months [95% CI 7.9-12.8; hazard ratio (HR) 0.81 [95% CI 0.67-0.98]; P = 0.03}, as was median OS without censoring at crossover [13.6 months (95% CI 12.0-15.4) versus 10.3 months (95% CI 9.1-12.8); HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.68-0.96); P = 0.01]. Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS rates for vemurafenib versus dacarbazine were 56% versus 46%, 30% versus 24%, 21% versus 19% and 17% versus 16% at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years, respectively. Overall, 173 of the 338 patients (51%) in the dacarbazine arm and 175 of the 337 (52%) of those in the vemurafenib arm received subsequent anticancer therapies, most commonly ipilimumab. Safety data were consistent with the primary analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Vemurafenib continues to be associated with improved median OS in the BRIM-3 trial after extended follow-up. OS curves converged after ≈3 years, likely as a result of crossover from dacarbazine to vemurafenib and receipt of subsequent anticancer therapies. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01006980.

Anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with advanced melanoma and preexisting autoimmune disorders or major toxicity with ipilimumab.

Background: Anti-PD-1 antibodies (anti-PD-1) have clinical activity in a number of malignancies. All clinical trials have excluded patients with significant preexisting autoimmune disorders (ADs) and only one has included patients with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with ipilimumab. We sought to explore the safety and efficacy of anti-PD-1 in such patients. Patients and methods: Patients with advanced melanoma and preexisting ADs and/or major immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with ipilimumab (requiring systemic immunosuppression) that were treated with anti-PD-1 between 1 July 2012 and 30 September 2015 were retrospectively identified. Results: One hundred and nineteen patients from 13 academic tertiary referral centers were treated with anti-PD-1. In patients with preexisting AD (N = 52), the response rate was 33%. 20 (38%) patients had a flare of AD requiring immunosuppression, including 7/13 with rheumatoid arthritis, 3/3 with polymyalgia rheumatica, 2/2 with Sjogren's syndrome, 2/2 with immune thrombocytopaenic purpura and 3/8 with psoriasis. No patients with gastrointestinal (N = 6) or neurological disorders (N = 5) flared. Only 2 (4%) patients discontinued treatment due to flare, but 15 (29%) developed other irAEs and 4 (8%) discontinued treatment. In patients with prior ipilimumab irAEs requiring immunosuppression (N = 67) the response rate was 40%. Two (3%) patients had a recurrence of the same ipilimumab irAEs, but 23 (34%) developed new irAEs (14, 21% grade 3-4) and 8 (12%) discontinued treatment. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: In melanoma patients with preexisting ADs or major irAEs with ipilimumab, anti-PD-1 induced relatively frequent immune toxicities, but these were often mild, easily managed and did not necessitate discontinuation of therapy, and a significant proportion of patients achieved clinical responses. The results support that anti-PD-1 can be administered safely and can achieve clinical benefit in patients with preexisting ADs or prior major irAEs with ipilimumab.

Fibronectin induction abrogates the BRAF inhibitor response of BRAF V600E/PTEN-null melanoma cells.

The mechanisms by which some melanoma cells adapt to Serine/threonine-protein kinase B-Raf (BRAF) inhibitor therapy are incompletely understood. In the present study, we used mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics to determine how BRAF inhibition remodeled the signaling network of melanoma cell lines that were BRAF mutant and PTEN null. Short-term BRAF inhibition was associated with marked changes in fibronectin-based adhesion signaling that were PTEN dependent. These effects were recapitulated through BRAF siRNA knockdown and following treatment with chemotherapeutic drugs. Increased fibronectin expression was also observed in mouse xenograft models as well as specimens from melanoma patients undergoing BRAF inhibitor treatment. Analysis of a melanoma tissue microarray showed loss of PTEN expression to predict for a lower overall survival, with a trend for even lower survival being seen when loss of fibronectin was included in the analysis. Mechanistically, the induction of fibronectin limited the responses of these PTEN-null melanoma cell lines to vemurafenib, with enhanced cytotoxicity observed following the knockdown of either fibronectin or its receptor α5ß1 integrin. This in turn abrogated the cytotoxic response to BRAF inhibition via increased AKT signaling, which prevented the induction of cell death by maintaining the expression of the pro-survival protein Mcl-1. The protection conveyed by the induction of FN expression could be overcome through combined treatment with a BRAF and PI3K inhibitor.

Characteristics of pyrexia in BRAFV600E/K metastatic melanoma patients treated with combined dabrafenib and trametinib in a phase I/II clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Pyrexia is a frequent adverse event with combined dabrafenib and trametinib therapy (CombiDT), but little is known of its clinical associations, etiology, or appropriate management. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients on the BRF133220 phase I/II trial of CombiDT treated at the standard dose (150/2) were included for assessment of pyrexia (n = 201). BRAF and MEK inhibitor-naïve patients (n = 117) were included for efficacy analyses. Pyrexia was defined as temperature ≥38°C (≥100.4(°)F) or related symptoms. RESULTS: Fifty-nine percent of patients developed pyrexia during treatment, 24% of which had pyrexia symptoms without a recorded elevation in body temperature. Pyrexia was grade 2+ in 60% of pyrexia patients. Median time to onset of first pyrexia was 19 days, with a median duration of 9 days. Pyrexia patients had a median of two pyrexia events, but 21% had three or more events. Various pyrexia management approaches were conducted in this study. A trend was observed between dabrafenib and hydroxy-dabrafenib exposure and pyrexia. No baseline clinical characteristics predicted pyrexia, and pyrexia was not statistically significantly associated with treatment outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Pyrexia is a frequent and recurrent toxicity with CombiDT treatment. No baseline features predict pyrexia, and it is not associated with clinical outcome. Dabrafenib and metabolite exposure may contribute to the etiology of pyrexia. The optimal secondary prophylaxis for pyrexia is best studied in a prospective trial.

A multi-institutional phase II trial of a novel inpatient schedule of continuous interleukin-2 with interferon alpha-2b in advanced renal cell carcinoma: major durable responses in a less highly selected patient population.

BACKGROUND: A prospective multi-institutional phase II trial was undertaken to define the activity and toxicity of a unique decrescendo infusion of interleukin-2 (IL-2) in combination with interferon (IFN) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The identical regimen has shown promise in advanced melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 1997 and March 1999, 47 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, from five institutions, were treated with outpatient s.c. IFN (10 mU/m2/day) on days 1-5, followed by inpatient IL-2 via continuous i.v. decrescendo infusion [18 million International Units (MIU) (I mg)/m2/6 h, followed by 18 MIU/m2/12 h, then 18 MIU/m2/24 h and 4.5 MIU/m2/24 h for the following 3 days] on days 8-12, in a hospital ward without intensive care unit (ICU)-type monitoring. Treatment was repeated every 4 weeks. In contrast to high dose IL-2 protocols, patient eligibility did not require pulmonary function tests and allowed serum creatinine up to 2 mg/dl. RESULTS: Among 44 eligible patients, 57% (25) had their primary in place, 57% (25) had bone or visceral involvement, and only 4% (2) had lung as their only site of disease. The overall response rate in 43 response-evaluable patients was 16.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.3 to 27.3], with three complete responses and four partial responses observed. The median survival was 13 months; nine patients remain alive at >23 months. The median duration of response is 36 months (range 11.5 to 48+ months). Toxicity was modest, consisting of typical cytokine-induced systemic symptoms and rare organ dysfunction. Severe grade 4 toxicity occurred in only 13% of the 130 cycles. CONCLUSIONS: This unique, reasonably well tolerated IL-2/IFN combination induced a modest response rate with a number of durable remissions. While the optimal IL-2-based regimen for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma remains elusive, the present regimen should attract considerable interest. This is based on tumor activity very similar to high dose IL-2 in a patient population not as carefully selected for optimal organ function.

High-dose interferon alfa-2b significantly prolongs relapse-free and overall survival compared with the GM2-KLH/QS-21 vaccine in patients with resected stage IIB-III melanoma: results of intergroup trial E1694/S9512/C509801.

PURPOSE: Vaccine alternatives to high-dose interferon alfa-2b therapy (HDI), the current standard adjuvant therapy for high-risk melanoma, are of interest because of toxicity associated with HDI. The GM2 ganglioside is a well-defined melanoma antigen, and anti-GM2 antibodies have been associated with improved prognosis. We conducted a prospective, randomized, intergroup trial to evaluate the efficacy of HDI for 1 year versus vaccination with GM2 conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin and administered with QS-21 (GMK) for 96 weeks (weekly x 4 then every 12 weeks x 8). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had resected stage IIB/III melanoma. Patients were stratified by sex and number of positive nodes. Primary end points were relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Eight hundred eighty patients were randomized (440 per treatment group); 774 patients were eligible for efficacy analysis. The trial was closed after interim analysis indicated inferiority of GMK compared with HDI. For eligible patients, HDI provided a statistically significant RFS benefit (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.47, P = .0015) and OS benefit (HR = 1.52, P = .009) for GMK versus HDI. Similar benefit was observed in the intent-to-treat analysis (RFS HR = 1.49; OS HR = 1.38). HDI was associated with a treatment benefit in all subsets of patients with zero to > or = four positive nodes, but the greatest benefit was observed in the node-negative subset (RFS HR = 2.07; OS HR = 2.71 [eligible population]). Antibody responses to GM2 (ie, titers > or = 1:80) at days 29, 85, 365, and 720 were associated with a trend toward improved RFS and OS (P2 = .068 at day 29). CONCLUSION: This trial demonstrated a significant treatment benefit of HDI versus GMK in terms of RFS and OS in melanoma patients at high risk of recurrence.

Pilot trial of interleukin-2 with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for the mobilization of progenitor cells in advanced breast cancer patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy: expansion of immune effectors within the stem-cell graft and post-stem-cell infusion.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether administration of interleukin-2 (IL-2) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) improves mobilization of immune effector cells into the stem-cell graft of patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autografting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a trial of stem-cell mobilization with IL-2 and G-CSF in advanced breast cancer patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin and stem cells followed by IL-2. The trial defined immune, hematologic, and clinical effects of IL-2 in this setting. RESULTS: Of 32 patients enrolled, nine received G-CSF alone for mobilization. Twenty-one of 23 patients mobilized with IL-2 plus G-CSF had stem cells collected with more mononuclear cells than those receiving G-CSF (19.3 v 10.4 x 10(8)/kg; P =.006), but fewer CD34(+) progenitor cells (6.9 v 22.0 x 10(6)/kg; P =.049). The IL-2 plus G-CSF-mobilized patients had greater numbers of activated T (CD3(+)/CD25(+)) cells (P =.009), natural killer (NK; CD56(+)) cells (P =.007), and activated NK (CD56 bright(+)) cells (P: =.039) than those patients mobilized with G-CSF. NK (P =.042) and lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) (P =.016) activity was increased in those mobilized with IL-2 + G-CSF, whereas G-CSF-mobilized patients had a decline in cytolytic activity. In the third week posttransplantation, immune reconstitution was superior in those mobilized with IL-2 plus G-CSF based on greater numbers of activated T cells (P =.003), activated NK cells (P =.04), and greater LAK activity (P =.003). The 16 of 21 IL-2 + G-CSF-mobilized patients with adequate numbers of stem cells (> 1.5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg) collected engrafted rapidly posttransplantation. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that G-CSF + IL-2 can enhance the number and function of antitumor effector cells in a mobilized autograft without impairing the hematologic engraftment, provided that CD34 cell counts are more than 1.5 x 10(6) cells/kg. Mobilization of CD34(+) stem cells does seem to be adversely affected. In those mobilized with IL-2 and G-CSF, post-stem-cell immune reconstitution of antitumor immune effector cells was enhanced.

Amplification and overexpression of HER-2/neu are uncommon in advanced stage melanoma.

The HER-2/neu proto-oncogene is a useful prognostic and predictive biomarker in breast cancer. In addition, use of a humanized monoclonal antibody against HER-2/neu has recently been shown to have efficacy in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. In order to examine the potential of HER-2/neu as a biomarker and as a target for HER-2/neu monoclonal antibody treatment in melanoma, we examined the HER-2/neu status in 40 advanced stage melanomas. Using fluorescence in situ hybridization for determining the gene amplification status and immunohistochemistry for detecting protein overexpression, we found that only one out of 40 cases of melanoma had an altered HER-2/neu status. These results demonstrated that HER-2/neu amplification and overexpression are not common in advanced stage melanoma and thus, HER-2/neu would have limited value as a biomarker or as a target for immunotherapy in melanoma.

CI-980 in advanced melanoma and hormone refractory prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: CI-980 is a novel chemotherapeutic agent that inhibits polymerization of tubulin. Preclinical studies have indicated a high level activity of this agent against various tumor cell lines. METHODS: 13 malignant melanoma patients who had failed prior chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy and 13 hormone refractory prostate cancer patients, including 4 who had received prior chemotherapy, were treated in 2 separate NCI-supported clinical trials. Subjects received a recommended phase II dose of CI-980 of 4.5 mg/m2/day by continuous infusion for 72 hours every 3 weeks. RESULTS: No activity was seen in either study. Toxicity was tolerable with neutropenia being the most common, significant toxicity. Among the melanoma patients, 15% and 31% developed grade 3 and grade 4 neutropenia, while 7% and 38% of the prostate patients developed grade 3 and grade 4 neutropenia, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CI-980 at this dose and schedule is ineffective against malignant melanoma and hormone refractory prostate cancer.

Daily subcutaneous ultra-low-dose interleukin 2 with daily low-dose interferon-alpha in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

A limited institution Phase II pilot study was performed using a very low-dose combination of daily s.c. interleukin (IL)-2 with IFN-alpha-2b in patients with advanced renal cancer in an attempt to duplicate or increase the response documented with higher dose schedules without the attendant toxicity profile. We selected a dose of IL-2 with documented immunological activity and combined it with clinically active low-dose IFN. Between August 1994 and September 1996, 19 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, who had been judged incapable of tolerating high-dose i.v. IL-2, were treated with IL-2 (1 million units/m2/day) and IFN (1 million units/day), administered s.c. daily. All treatments were administered on an outpatient basis. Virtually all patients had bulky tumor burden with multiple sites of involvement, including five patients with bone metastases. No major objective responses were observed; however, one patient experienced a minor response lasting 13 months, with an associated improvement in performance status. Median survival was 6 months, and 1-year survival was 16%. Toxicity was generally mild and consisted almost entirely of constitutional symptoms. No serious grade 3 or 4 toxicity was observed, although two patients withdrew from treatment due to treatment-related fatigue. On therapy, mild eosinophilia but no lymphocytosis was noted; in fact, peripheral lymphocyte counts decreased, only to rebound after treatment was discontinued. No toxic deaths occurred. Despite the reasonable tolerability of this daily low-dose s.c. regimen, we conclude that this regimen is an ineffective treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients who are incapable of tolerating high-dose i.v. IL-2.

Phase II trial of biochemotherapy with interferon alpha, dacarbazine, cisplatin and tamoxifen in metastatic melanoma: a Southwest Oncology Group trial.

The therapeutic benefit of adding interferon alpha (IFNalpha) to established single-agent and combination chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of metastatic melanoma has not been proven. We designed the present study to estimate the response rate of IFNalpha, dacarbazine, cisplatin and tamoxifen in patients who had not been treated with systemic therapy for advanced disease. Using a schedule similar to that which had previously been shown to favor IFNalpha plus dacarbazine over dacarbazine alone, we treated patients with an "induction" regimen of IFNalpha, 15 mU m(-2) day(-1) intravenously 5 days/week for 3 weeks. Following induction, schedules of IFNalpha, 5 mU m(-2) day(-1) subcutaneously three times a week, and tamoxifen, 10 mg orally twice a day, were begun. Dacarbazine, 250 mg m(-2) day(-1) and cisplatin 33 mg m(-2) day(-1) for 3 consecutive days were repeated every 4 weeks, and subcutaneous IFNalpha and oral tamoxifen were continued until the discontinuation of chemotherapy. We treated 25 patients (18 men and 7 women, median age 52 years) and observed only 1 objective response (response rate 4%, 95% confidence interval 0.1%-20%). The toxicities of the regimen consisted of moderate myelosuppression and constitutional side-effects. On the basis of the low antitumor activity of this regimen, we do not recommend it for further study or for use as standard therapy of metastatic melanoma.

Phase II study of carmustine, dacarbazine, cisplatin, and tamoxifen in advanced melanoma: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: The combination of carmustine (BCNU), dacarbazine (DTIC), cisplatin (DDP), and tamoxifen (Tam) has been reported in small series to provide a response rate of 50%, but with significant myelosuppression and risk of thromboembolic complications. We performed this phase II study to assess the antitumor activity and important toxicities of this combination in the cooperative group setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-nine eligible patients were treated with BCNU 150 mg/m2/d, every 6 weeks, DTIC 220 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 3 every 3 weeks, DDP 25 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 3 every 3 weeks, and Tam 20 mg orally daily throughout treatment. Treatment cycles were repeated every 6 weeks in responding or stable patients for a maximum duration of 1 year. RESULTS: Twelve objective responses were achieved (response rate 15%, 95% confidence interval 8%-25%). Five responses were complete (CR) and seven were partial (PR). The median response duration was 8+ (range, 4-19+) months, (16+ [4-19+] for CR and 8+ [4-11] for PR), and the median survival of the entire group was 9 months. The toxicities were predominantly neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Four patients developed thromboembolic events. Two patients died while on protocol therapy, one with complications of neutropenia, and the other with disease progression. CONCLUSION: The activity of this regimen is in the range reported for single agents or DTIC plus DDP, and the addition of BCNU and Tam appears to increase toxicity. We do not recommend this combination for routine treatment of advanced melanoma or as the control arm in randomized studies of combination therapy.

Effects of single-dose interleukin-12 exposure on interleukin-12-associated toxicity and interferon-gamma production.

Interleukin-12 (IL-12) is a key regulator of cell-mediated immunity that has therapeutic potential in cancer and infectious disease. In a previous Phase 1 dose escalation study of a single test dose of recombinant human IL-12 (rhIL-12) followed 14 days later by cycles of five consecutive daily intravenous injections every 3 weeks, we showed that a dose level up to 500 ng/kg could be administered with acceptable levels of safety. Based on these results, a Phase 2 study was conducted. In the Phase 2 study, however, administration of rhIL-12 at this same dose level resulted in severe toxicities with some patients unable to tolerate more than two successive doses. Of the 17 patients receiving rhIL-12 in the Phase 2 study, 12 patients were hospitalized and two patients died. A thorough scientific investigation to determine the cause of this unexpected toxicity failed to identify any difference in the drug products used or the patient populations enrolled in the Phase 1 and Phase 2 studies that could have accounted for the profound difference in toxicity. The focus of the investigation therefore shifted to the schedule of rhIL-12 administration. We determined that a single injection of rhIL-12 2 weeks before consecutive dosing included in the Phase 1 study, but not in the schedule of administration in the Phase 2 study, has a profound abrogating effect on IL-12-induced interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) production and toxicity. This observation of schedule-dependent toxicity of IL-12 has been verified in mice, as well as nonhuman primates. In this regard, a single injection of IL-12 before consecutive daily dosing protected mice and cynomolgus monkeys from acute toxicity including mortality and was associated with an attenuated IFN-gamma response. Because of this unique biologic response, careful attention to the schedule of administration is required to assure safe and effective clinical development of this highly promising cytokine.

Outpatient subcutaneous interleukin-2 and interferon-alpha for metastatic renal cell cancer: five-year follow-up of the Cytokine Working Group Study.

PURPOSE: A phase II trial of outpatient subcutaneous (SC) interleukin-2 (rIL-2) plus interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha 2B) was performed in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer. A 5-year follow-up of that Cytokine Working Group study is presented. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients meeting eligibility criteria of previous Cytokine Working Group studies were treated on an outpatient basis with SC rIL-2 (Chiron, Emeryville, CA), 5 x 10(6) IU/m2/dose q 8 hr x 3, then daily, 5 days per week, and IFN-alpha 2B (Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, NJ), 5 x 10(6) IU/m2/dose three times weekly for 4 weeks. After a 2- to 4-week break, patients were scheduled to continue treatment for up to six cycles. RESULTS: There were two complete and six partial responders (17% response rate, 95% CI: 8%-31%). Median duration of response was 12 months (range 1-49+ months), with complete responses of 15 and 49+ months. Responding sites of disease included lung, nodes, soft tissue, bone, and liver. Dose and schedule were adjusted to control toxicity at grade 2/3 levels, with 50% requiring dosage alterations. Grade 2/3 toxicity included fatigue, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, anorexia, fluid overload, rash, CNS, injection site pain, chest pain/palpitations (including atrial fibrillation requiring treatment, two patients), and hypotension. Grade 4 toxicity included dehydration (seven patients), vomiting (one patient), and irreversible renal failure with crescentic glomerulonephritis requiring dialysis (one patient). CONCLUSION: SC rIL-2 plus IFN-a2B is tolerated in the outpatient setting with frequent dose adjustments. The overall response rate of this regimen is similar to that seen with high-dose rIL-2 alone; however, the response duration appears to be shorter.

Induction of human cytotoxic T lymphocytes specific for prostate-specific antigen.

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), a tissue-specific protein expressed by most adenocarcinomas of the prostate, might be a useful target for T-cell-mediated immunotherapy of prostate cancers. The current study examined whether it is possible to elicit human cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) with specificity for PSA. A synthetic nonamer peptide, corresponding to residues 146-154 of PSA and containing a canonical HLA-A2-binding motif, was shown to stabilize the expression of HLA-A2 on the T2 antigen-processing mutant cell line. Repeated in vitro stimulation of peripheral blood lymphocytes from a normal HLA-A2+ donor induced CTL with specificity for the PSA 146-154 peptide. The peptide-induced CTL expressed the CD4- CD8+ cell surface phenotype and were restricted by HLA-A2. A large portion of patients with prostate cancer express the HLA-A2 phenotype, implying that many prostate cancers might be targeted by HLA-A2-restricted CTL with specificity for the PSA 146-154 epitope.

Concurrent phase I trials of intravenous interleukin 6 in solid tumor patients: reversible dose-limiting neurological toxicity.

Interleukin 6 (IL-6) has antitumor activity comparable to IL-2 in murine models with less toxicity. Because the biological effects of intermittent and continuous infusions may differ, we conducted two concurrent Phase I trials of daily x5, 1-h, and continuous 120-h i.v. infusions to determine the toxicity, biological effects, and maximum tolerated dose of i.v. IL-6. Cohorts of six patients with advanced cancer received escalating doses (1, 3, 10, 30, 100, and 150 microgram/kg/day) of recombinant human IL-6 on days 1-5 and 8-12 of each 28-day course (1-h trial) or on days 1-5 of each 21-day course (120-h trial). Treatment was administered in regular inpatient wards and in outpatient clinics and was withheld in the event of grade 3 toxicity. Sixty-nine patients (1-h trial, n = 40; 120-h trial, n = 29) were enrolled, including 27 with renal cancer and 16 with melanoma. All were ambulatory, and 40 were asymptomatic. Fever (97%), anemia (78%), fatigue (56%), nausea or vomiting (49%), and elevated serum transaminase levels (42%) were the most frequent toxicities. Transient hypotension developed in 23 patients (33%). There were three deaths during the study due to progressive disease and/or infection. There were no objective responses. Dose-related increases in platelet counts and C-reactive protein levels were detected in most patients. Principal dose-limiting toxicities included atrial fibrillation (1 episode in the 1-h trial and 4 episodes in the 120-h trial) and neurological toxicities (3 episodes in the 1-h trial and 4 episodes in the 120-h trial). The neurological toxicities included confusion, slurred speech, blurred vision, proximal leg weakness, paraparesis, and ataxia. These effects were transient and reversed when IL-6 was discontinued. IL-6 can be given by i.v. infusion at biologically active doses with acceptable toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicities consisted mainly of a spectrum of severe but transient neurological toxicities and occasional episodes of atrial fibrillation. The maximum tolerated doses recommended for use with these i.v. schedules in Phase II trials are 100 microgram/kg/day by daily x5 1-h infusion and 30 microgram/kg/day by 120-h infusion. Phase II trials will be performed to determine the antitumor activity of IL-6 and better define its toxicity. Patients in these and other IL-6 studies should be monitored closely for neurological and cardiac effects.

A phase I trial of interleukin 3 (IL-3) pre-bone marrow harvest with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) post-stem cell infusion in patients with solid tumors receiving high-dose combination chemotherapy.

In humans, interleukin 3 (IL-3) administration increases the cellularity and cycling of bone marrow progenitor cell populations. Initially, in primates and then in humans, IL-3 in sequence with GM-CSF has been shown to stimulate multilineage hematopoiesis. Based upon these effects, we designed a phase I trial of daily IL-3 administered subcutaneously for 10 days at dose levels of 2.5, 5.0, 10.0, 12.5, and 15.0 micrograms/kg followed within 72 h by bone marrow harvest, high-dose chemotherapy, and following chemotherapy, a fixed dose (5.0 micrograms/kg/day) of GM-CSF and bone marrow rescue. The study was designed to assess the toxicity and biological effects of IL-3 administered alone prior to bone marrow harvest and to determine the safety and clinical effects of IL-3 stimulated bone marrow with GM-CSF following high-dose combination chemotherapy. A total of 19 patients with chemotherapy-sensitive non-hematologic malignancies (13 breast, five ovarian, and one testicular cancer) were enrolled. IL-3 up to 15.0 micrograms/kg/day could be administered without dose-limiting toxicities. Flu-like symptoms and headaches were common and poorly tolerated at the highest IL-3 dose. Significant increases in neutrophil counts (P = 0.018) were observed following IL-3. Overall, IL-3 administration was associated with a modest, but significant increase in CFU-GM within the bone marrow (P = 0.034). IL-3 administration had no consistent effect on CD34+ cell number within bone marrow. For the entire group, engraftment of neutrophils to greater than 0.5 x 10(9)/l occurred at a median of 21 days (range of 13-63 days) and platelet independence occurred at a median of 17 days (range 11-120 days). When IL-3 dose levels were analyzed separately, engraftment of neutrophils and platelets, blood product (platelets and packed RBCs) utilization, and discharge date were not superior in those treated with the higher dose (15.0 micrograms/kg) of IL-3. While higher doses of IL-3 were associated with more toxicity, they did not appear to enhance the stem cell pool or speed engraftment later. The effects of pre-bone marrow harvest IL-3 are modest and likely not as impressive as other approaches aimed at enhancing hematologic recovery following high-dose chemotherapy.

Evidence for eosinophil activation in cancer patients receiving recombinant interleukin-4: effects of interleukin-4 alone and following interleukin-2 administration.

Interleukin-4 (IL-4) is a T-cell-derived cytokine that may mediate murine tumor rejection through the activation of host eosinophils. In association with a Phase I clinical trial of IL-4 in cancer patients, we have examined changes in eosinophil counts and characterized systemic eosinophil degranulation. As previously reported, IL-4 administration induced a modest eosinophilia in all 17 evaluated patients. Here, we report that IL-4 therapy induced systemic eosinophil degranulation based on increases in serum major basic protein (MBP) (P = 0.018) and urine MBP (P = 0.031). The increase in serum MBP was IL-4 dose dependent (P = 0.001). Following the highest dose (600 microgram/m2/day) of IL-4 administered, mean serum MBP levels were >2000 ng/ml. Skin biopsies of rashes from patients receiving IL-4 revealed MBP deposition. Sera from eight patients receiving IL-4 at 360 and 600 microgram/m2/day exhibited eosinophil survival-enhancing activity (on days 3, 5, 7, and 9) significantly above pretreatment (on day 1) activity (P values 0. 0469, 0.0039, 0.0395, and 0.0313, respectively). This enhanced eosinophil survival could be neutralized by antibodies to IL-5, granulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor, and IL-3. The eosinophil activation demonstrated in this trial may be relevant to the clinical effects of IL-4 in cancer patients. Furthermore, an association between IL-4 and eosinophil activation should be explored in other disease states.