Intraoperative seizures during neuro-oncological supratentorial surgery: the role of prophylaxis with levetiracetam and intraoperative monitoring in a consecutive series of 353 patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this paper was to understand the role of prophylaxis with levetiracetam at skin incision in preventing convulsive intraoperative seizures (IOS) during neurosurgical procedures with and without intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM). METHODS: Authors retrospectively reviewed the Institutional database for cases of supratentorial brain tumors undergoing surgical resection performed from January 2021 to October 2022. Patients were operated on both under general anesthesia and awake, using motor-evoked potentials (MEP) and direct cortical stimulation for cortical mapping. 1000 mg ev of Levetiracetam before skin incision in case of a history of seizures was administrated. We excluded all infratentorial cases. RESULTS: Three hundred fisty three consecutive cases were retrieved. IOS occurred in 22 patients (6.2%). Prophylaxis with Levetiracetam was administered in 149 patients, and IOS occurred in 16 cases (10.7%) in this group of patients. The IOS rate in the case of no Levetiracetam prophylaxis administration (3.5%) was significantly lower (P<0.001, OR=3.38 [1.35-8.45], RR=3.12 [1.32-7.41]). The Penfield technique stimulation evoked seven of all 22 IOS reported (31.8%) (P=0.006, RR 5.4 [1.44 -20.58], OR 21 [2.3-183.9]), and the train-of-five technique stimulation caused two of all registered IOS (8.7%) (P=0.2, RR 2.3 [0.99-5.67], OR 6.5 [0.55-76.17]). Transcranial MEPs evoked no IOS. CONCLUSIONS: Under levetiracetam prophylaxis, the IOS rate was not significantly lower than in the group of patients without Levetiracetam prophylaxis, regardless of the histology of the tumor and IONM. Neither the transcranial stimulation (MEP) nor train-of-five technique stimulation increases the risk of convulsive IOS, as Penfield technique stimulation does.

Is the Patient State Index a reliable parameter as guide to anaesthesiology in cranial neurosurgery? A first intraoperative study and a literature review.

BACKGROUND: Patient State Index (PSI) and Suppression Ratio (SR) are two indices calculated by quantitative analysis of EEG used to estimate the depth of anaesthesia but their validation in neurosurgery must be done. Our aim was to investigate the congruity PSI and SR with raw EEG monitoring in neurosurgery. METHODS: We included 34 patients undergoing elective cranial neurosurgery. Each patient was monitored by a SedLine device (PSI and SR) and by raw EEG. To appraise the agreement between PSI, SR and EEG Suppr%, Bland-Altman analysis was used. We also correlated the PSI and SR recorded at different times during surgery to the degree of suppression of the raw EEG data by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. For a comparison with previous data we made an international literature review according to PRISMA protocol. RESULTS: At all recording times, we found that there is a strong agreement between PSI and raw EEG. We also found a significant correlation for both PSI and SR with the EEG suppression percentage (p < 0.05), but with a broad dispersion of the individual values within the confidence interval. CONCLUSION: The Masimo SedLine processed EEG monitoring system can be used as a guide in the anaesthetic management of patients during elective cranial neurosurgery, but the anaesthesiologist must be aware that previous correlations between PSI and SR with the suppression percentage may not always be valid in all individual patients. The use of an extended visual raw EEG evaluated by an expert electroencephalographer might help to provide better guidance.

Feasibility of Intraoperative Visual Evoked Potential Monitoring by Cortical Strip Electrodes in Patients During Brain Surgery: A Preliminary Study.

OBJECTIVE: The role of visual evoked potentials (VEPs) monitoring during neurosurgical procedure in patient remains unclear. The purpose of our study was to determine the feasibility of intraoperative VEP recording using a strip cortical electrode during surgical resection of intracranial lesions. METHODS: In this prospective, monocentric, observational study, we enrolled consecutive patients undergoing neurosurgical procedure for intracranial lesions. After dural opening, a cortical strip was positioned on the lateral occipital surface. Flash VEPs were continuously recorded using both subdermal corkscrew electrodes and strip electrodes. An electroretinogram was also recorded to guarantee delivery of adequate flash stimuli to the retina. RESULTS: We included 10 patients affected by different intracranial lesions. Flash VEPs were recorded using subdermal corkscrew electrodes in all patients except 1 in whom they were never identified during the recording. Flash VEPs were recorded using strip electrodes in all patients and showed a polyphasic morphology with a significantly larger amplitude compared with that of flash VEPs measured using subdermal corkscrew electrodes. No patient reported worsened postoperative vision and a >50% decrease in the VEPs amplitude was never registered. CONCLUSIONS: We have reported for the first time in the literature that VEP monitoring during a neurosurgical procedure is feasible via a cortical strip located on the occipital surface. The technique demonstrated greater stability and a larger amplitude compared with recordings with scalp electrodes, facilitating identification of any changes. Studies with more patients are needed to assess the clinical reliability of the technique.

Surgical Resolution of Trigeminal Neuralgia Complicating Vestibular Schwannoma Removal.

This work illustrates the case of surgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (TN), as a tardive complication after vestibular schwannoma (VS) removal (Koos III, Figure 1), in a female patient. After VS surgery, the postoperative computed tomography scan did not show any significant complication, although a thin blood clot was present in the surgical bed (Figure 2). However, 3 months later, our patient developed a TN involving the territories V2-V3. Medical therapies were ineffective. Several magnetic resonance imaging scans confirmed a left dislocation of the brainstem (Figures 3 and 4), probably due to the previous clot retraction. The anatomic-functional preservation of the left Tn was documented using the laser-evoked potentials. Fifteen months after surgery, our patient underwent a second operation aimed at exploring the Tn territory, with the use of the intraoperative monitoring and mapping the fifth and seventh cranial nerves. A neurovascular conflict, caused by scar tissue involving the superior cerebellar artery, a small vein, and the Tn, was detected and surgically solved (Figure 5). Postoperative analgesic treatment was progressively reduced and suspended. The case is illustrated and explained in the Video 1. The paucity of cases reported in the literature lead us to think that TN as complication of VS removal is underestimated because it may be responsive to medical treatment. Laser-evoked potentials may be useful to study the integrity of the Tn, ensuring that no anatomic damage has been done during surgery. On the basis of our experience, surgery can be an effective treatment option when TN is not responsive to medical therapy and the anatomic-functional integrity of the Tn has been preserved.

SSEP amplitude accurately predicts both good and poor neurological outcome early after cardiac arrest; a post-hoc analysis of the ProNeCA multicentre study.

AIM: To assess if, in comatose resuscitated patients, the amplitude of the N20 wave (N20amp) of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) can predict 6-months neurological outcome. SETTING: Multicentre study in 13 Italian intensive care units. METHODS: The N20amp in microvolts (µV) was measured at 12 h, 24 h, and 72 h from cardiac arrest, along with pupillary reflex (PLR) and a 30-min EEG classified according to the ACNS terminology. Sensitivity and false positive rate (FPR) of N20amp alone or in combination were calculated. RESULTS: 403 patients (age 69[58-68] years) were included. At 12 h, an N20amp >3 µV predicted good neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Categories [CPC] 1-2) with 61[50-72]% sensitivity and 11[6-18]% FPR. Combining it with a benign (continuous or nearly continuous) EEG increased sensitivity to 91[82-96]%. For poor outcome (CPC 3-5), an N20Amp ≤0.38 µV, ≤0.73 µV and ≤1.01 µV at 12 h, 24 h, and 72 h, respectively, had 0% FPR with sensitivity ranging from 61[51-69]% and 82[76-88]%. Sensitivity was higher than that of a bilaterally absent N20 at all time points. At 12 h and 24 h, a highly malignant (suppression or burst-suppression) EEG and bilaterally absent PLR achieved 0% FPR only when combined with SSEP. A combination of all three predictors yielded a 0[0-4]% FPR, with maximum sensitivity of 44[36-53]%. CONCLUSION: At 12 h from arrest, a high N20Amp predicts good outcome with high sensitivity, especially when combined with benign EEG. At 12 h and 24 h from arrest a low-voltage N20amp has a high sensitivity and is more specific than EEG or PLR for predicting poor outcome.

Does a combination of ≥2 abnormal tests vs. the ERC-ESICM stepwise algorithm improve prediction of poor neurological outcome after cardiac arrest? A post-hoc analysis of the ProNeCA multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Bilaterally absent pupillary light reflexes (PLR) or N20 waves of short-latency evoked potentials (SSEPs) are recommended by the 2015 ERC-ESICM guidelines as robust, first-line predictors of poor neurological outcome after cardiac arrest. However, recent evidence shows that the false positive rates (FPRs) of these tests may be higher than previously reported. We investigated if testing accuracy is improved when combining PLR/SSEPs with malignant electroencephalogram (EEG), oedema on brain computed tomography (CT), or early status myoclonus (SM). METHODS: Post-hoc analysis of ProNeCA multicentre prognostication study. We compared the prognostic accuracy of the ERC-ESICM prognostication strategy vs. that of a new strategy combining ≥2 abnormal results from any of PLR, SSEPs, EEG, CT and SM. We also investigated if using alternative classifications for abnormal SSEPs (absent-pathological vs. bilaterally-absent N20) or malignant EEG (ACNS-defined suppression or burst-suppression vs. unreactive burst-suppression or status epilepticus) improved test sensitivity. RESULTS: We assessed 210 adult comatose resuscitated patients of whom 164 (78%) had poor neurological outcome (CPC 3-5) at six months. FPRs and sensitivities of the ≥2 abnormal test strategy vs. the ERC-ESICM algorithm were 0[0-8]% vs. 7 [1-18]% and 49[41-57]% vs. 63[56-71]%, respectively (p < .0001). Using alternative SSEP/EEG definitions increased the number of patients with ≥2 concordant test results and the sensitivity of both strategies (67[59-74]% and 54[46-61]% respectively), with no loss of specificity. CONCLUSIONS: In comatose resuscitated patients, a prognostication strategy combining ≥2 among PLR, SSEPs, EEG, CT and SM was more specific than the 2015 ERC-ESICM prognostication algorithm for predicting 6-month poor neurological outcome.