Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) ; 43(9): 713-20, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24268873

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare pregnancy outcomes after transabdominal chorionic villus sampling using biopsy forceps or needle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective bicentric study including all women who had a transabdominal chorionic villus sampling between 2005 and 2009 (172 using biopsy forceps and 160 using needle). The primary endpoint was the rate of fetal loss, after excluding medical abortion due to the result of the biopsy. The secondary endpoint was the rate of premature rupture of the membrane. All cases were reviewed to try to determine the responsibility of the biopsy. RESULTS: The pregnancy outcomes were not different between the two groups: 4 (4.4%) fetal losses in the biopsy forceps group and 6 (7.4%) in the needle group (P=0.52). Only one case (1.2%) of fetal loss can be attributed to the biopsy, using a needle, and none (0%) following a forceps biospy (P=0.29). The rate of premature rupture of the membrane was comparable in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The pregnancy outcomes following chorionic villus sampling using a biopsy forceps or a needle seem comparable.


Assuntos
Biópsia/instrumentação , Amostra da Vilosidade Coriônica/métodos , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Biópsia por Agulha , Amostra da Vilosidade Coriônica/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Morte Fetal , Ruptura Prematura de Membranas Fetais/epidemiologia , Ruptura Prematura de Membranas Fetais/etiologia , Humanos , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA