Outcomes of Implantable Loop Monitoring in Patients <21 Years of Age.

Rhythm-symptom correlation in pediatric patients with syncope/palpitations or at risk cohorts can be difficult, but important given potential associations with treatable or malignant arrhythmia. We sought to evaluate the use, efficacy and outcomes of implantable loop recorders (ILR) in pediatrics. We conducted a retrospective study of pediatric patients (<21 years) with implanted ILR. Patient/historical characteristics and ILR indication were obtained. Outcomes including symptom documentation, arrhythmia detection and ILR based changes in medical care were identified. Comparison of outcomes were performed based on implant indication. Additional sub-analyses were performed in syncope-indication patients comparing those with and without changes in clinical management. A total of 116 patients with ILR implant were identified (79 syncope/37 other). Symptoms were documented 58% of patients (syncope 68% vs nonsyncope 35%; p = 0.002). A total of 37% of patients had a documented clinically significant arrhythmia and 25% of patients had a resultant change in clinical management independent of implant indication. Arrhythmia type was dependent on implant indication with nonsyncope patients having more ventricular arrhythmias. Pacemaker/defibrillator implantation and mediation management were the majority of the clinical changes. In conclusion, IRL utilization in selected pediatric populations is associated with high efficacy and supports clinical management. ILR efficacy is similar regardless of indication although patients with nonsyncope indications had a higher frequency of ventricular arrhythmias as opposed to asystole and heart block in syncope indications. The majority of arrhythmic findings occurred in the first 12 months, and new technology that would allow for less invasive monitoring for 6 to 12 months may be of value.

Predictors and outcomes of heart block during surgical stage I palliation of patients with a single ventricle: A report from the NPC-QIC.

BACKGROUND: Mortality in cohorts with a single ventricle remains high with multiple associated factors. The effect of heart block during stage I palliation remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to study patient and surgical risks of heart block and its effect on 12-month transplant-free survival in patients with a single ventricle. METHODS: Patient, surgical, outcome data and heart block status (transient and permanent) were obtained from the National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative single ventricle database. Bivariate analysis was performed comparing patients with and without heart block, and multivariate modeling was used to identify variables associated with block. One-year outcomes were analyzed to identify variables associated with lower 12-month transplant-free survival. RESULTS: In total, 1423 patients were identified, of whom 28 (2%) developed heart block (second degree or complete) during their surgical admission. Associated risk factors for block included heterotaxy syndrome (odds ratio [OR] 6.4) and atrial flutter/fibrillation (OR 3.8). Patients with heart block had lower 12-month survival, though only in patients with complete heart block as opposed to second degree block. At 12 months of age, 43% (12/28) of patients with heart block died and were more likely to experience mortality at 12 months than patients without block (OR 4.9; 95% confidence interval 1.4-17.5; P = .01). CONCLUSION: Although rare, complete heart block after stage I palliation represents an additional risk of poor outcomes in this high-risk patient population. Heterotaxy syndrome was the most significant risk factor for the development of heart block after stage I palliation. The role of transient block in outcomes and potential rescue with long-term pacing remains unknown and requires additional study.

Wearable cardioverter defibrillators in schools: A guide for parents and educators.

Keeping children safe is a goal for everyone. To stay safe, some children need a wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD). WCDs protect individuals who are at risk for life-threatening arrhythmias. The LifeVest® (ZOLL, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) is a WCD that identifies, records, and treats potentially life-threatening abnormal heartbeats, or arrhythmias. The WCD will provide electrical energy to the heart with up to five high-energy shocks if a potentially dangerous cardiac arrhythmia is detected. This type of arrhythmia, if not treated within a short time period (less than 2 minutes), can result in disruption of blood flow to the brain and other vital organs (that is, a sudden cardiac arrest), and death can occur within minutes. A shock delivered by the LifeVest can terminate an arrhythmia and restore a normal heart rhythm and blood flow to the body. In December 2015, the Food and Drug Administration approved the LifeVest for patients under 18 years old. The purpose of this guide is to serve as a resource for parents and educators, to promote awareness of the LifeVest, and to answer questions about the safety of the LifeVest in schools.

Utility and safety of the SafeSept™ transseptal guidewire for electrophysiology studies with catheter ablation in pediatric and congenital heart disease.

PURPOSE: The atrial transseptal procedure is used in catheter ablation of left-sided arrhythmias. Studies in adult patients have shown the SafeSept™ transseptal guidewire (SSTG) to be effective in atrial transseptal procedures. We analyzed our 5-year experience with SSTG use in pediatric and congenital heart disease patients undergoing catheter ablation. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective analysis of patients undergoing catheter ablation from 2009 to 2014. We identified all procedures where SSTG was used for atrial transseptal or trans-baffle access. Success of transseptal access and complications were recorded and compared to the standard transseptal approach without the SSTG. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven patients underwent 132 attempted atrial transseptal or trans-baffle procedures using SSTG. Median age was 14 (1.2-38) years. Arrhythmia substrates included AV reentrant tachycardia (90.2%), atrial tachycardia (4.5%), ventricular tachycardia (2.3%), and AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (2.3%). Transseptal or trans-baffle access was successful in 96.2% of the SSTG cases compared to 98.9% in the standard transseptal group without SSTG (p = NS). The youngest patient with successful atrial transseptal procedure using SSTG was 4 years old. SSTG was used to successfully cross a surgically created atrial baffle in a patient who had undergone the Mustard procedure. There was one major complication in both groups, 0.8% in the SSTG group compared to the standard transseptal group without SSTG, 1.1% (p = NS). The major complication in the SSTG group occurred when the SSTG crossed the aorta into the coronary artery system and mimicked placement in the left atrial appendage, with subsequent placement of a transseptal sheath into the aorta, requiring sternotomy and surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: SSTG is effective for use in atrial transseptal and surgical trans-baffle access in pediatric and congenital heart disease patients. Placement of the SSTG into the pulmonary vein is necessary to avoid major complications, and if not achieved requires additional methods to determine appropriate left atrial placement.

Usefulness of combined history, physical examination, electrocardiogram, and limited echocardiogram in screening adolescent athletes for risk for sudden cardiac death.

Sudden cardiac death in the young (SCDY) is the leading cause of death in young athletes during sport. Screening young athletes for high-risk cardiac defects is controversial. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility and feasibility of a comprehensive cardiac screening protocol in an adolescent population. Adolescent athletes were recruited from local schools and/or sports teams. Each subject underwent a history and/or physical examination, an electrocardiography (ECG), and a limited echocardiography (ECHO). The primary outcome measure was identification of cardiac abnormalities associated with an elevated risk for sudden death. We secondarily identified cardiac abnormalities not typically associated with a short-term risk of sudden death. A total of 659 adolescent athletes were evaluated; 64% men. Five subjects had cardiac findings associated with an elevated risk for sudden death: prolonged QTc >500 ms (n = 2) and type I Brugada pattern (n = 1), identified with ECG; dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 1) and significant aortic root dilation; and z-score = +5.5 (n = 1). History and physical examination alone identified 76 (11.5%) subjects with any cardiac findings. ECG identified 76 (11.5%) subjects in which a follow-up ECHO or cardiology visit was recommended. Left ventricular mass was normal by ECHO in all but 1 patient with LVH on ECG. ECHO identified 34 (5.1%) subjects in whom a follow-up ECHO or cardiology visit was recommended. In conclusion, physical examination alone was ineffective in identification of subjects at elevated risk for SCDY. Screening ECHO identified patients with underlying cardiac disease not associated with immediate risk for SCDY. Cost of comprehensive cardiac screening is high.

Consequence of use of lower dose flat plate fluoroscopy in pediatric patients undergoing ablation for supraventricular tachycardia.

Traditional imaging for ablation of supraventricular tachycardia has been fluoroscopy, although 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping (3D) has been demonstrated to reduce radiation exposure. This study compares a technique for the reduction of radiation, low-dose fluoroscopy (LD), with standard-dose fluoroscopy (SD) and 3D with SD (3D-SD). This was a single institutional retrospective cohort study. All patients undergoing initial ablation for atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) or atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) from 2009 to 2012 were reviewed and divided into 3 groups: (1) SD, (2) 3D (CARTO or NavX) with SD, or (3) LD. LD uses the same equipment as SD but includes customized changes to the manufacturer's lowest settings by decreasing the requested dose to the detector. Primary outcomes were fluoroscopy time and dose area product exposure. One hundred eighty-one patients were included. The median age was 15.0 years (3.3-20.8); 59% had AVRT, 35% had AVNRT, and 6% had both AVRT and AVNRT. LD decreased the dose area product (DAP) compared with SD (637.0 vs 960.1 cGy*cm², p = 0.01) with no difference in fluoroscopy time. 3D-SD decreased fluoroscopy time compared with SD (9.9 vs 18.3 minutes, p <0.001) with DAP of 570.1.0 versus 960.1 cGy*cm² (p = 0.16). LD and 3D-SD had comparable DAP (637.0 vs 570.1 cGy*cm², p = 0.67), even though LD had significantly longer fluoroscopy time (19.9 vs 9.9 minutes, p <0.001). In conclusion, LD during catheter ablation of AVRT and AVNRT significantly reduced the DAP compared with SD and had similar radiation exposure compared with 3D with SD.