Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy with Helical Tomotherapy for Brain Metastases: A Mono-Institutional Experience.

Background: The present study reports on the outcomes of our mono-institutional experience of Helical Tomotherapy (HT)-based SRT for brain metastases. The use of this linac is less frequently reported for this kind of treatment. Methods: This retrospective study displays a series of patients treated with HT-SRT. The eligibility of using SRT for brain metastases was defined by a Karnofsky performance status of >70, a life expectancy of >6 months, and controlled extra-cranial disease; no SRT was allowed in the case of a number of brain metastases larger than 10. All the cases were discussed by a multidisciplinary board. Toxicity assessments were performed based on CTCAE v5.0. Survival endpoints were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to identify any potential predictive factor for an improved outcome. Results: Sixty-four lesions in 37 patients were treated using HT-SRT with a median total dose of 30 Gy in five fractions. The median follow-up was 7 months, and the 1- and 2-year LC rates were both 92.5%. The IPFS rates were and 56.75% and 51.35%. The OS rates were 54% and 40%. The UA showed better IPFS rates significantly related to male sex (p = 0.049), a BED12 of ≥42 Gy (p = 0.006), and controlled extracranial disease (p = 0.03); in the MA, a favorable trend towards LC (p = 0.11) and higher BED (p = 0.11) schedules maintained a correlation with improved IPFS rates, although statistical significance was not reached. Conclusions: HT-based SRT for brain metastases showed safety and efficacy in our monoinstiutional experience. Higher RT doses showed statistical significance for improved outcomes of LC and OS.

BRCA1/2 variants of unknown significance in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome: Looking for the hidden meaning.

Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome is caused by germline mutations in BRCA1/2 genes. These genes are very large and their mutations are heterogeneous and scattered throughout the coding sequence. In addition to the above-mentioned mutations, variants of uncertain/unknown significance (VUSs) have been identified in BRCA genes, which make more difficult the clinical management of the patient and risk assessment. In the last decades, several laboratories have developed different databases that contain more than 2000 variants for the two genes and integrated strategies which include multifactorial prediction models based on direct and indirect genetic evidence, to classify the VUSs and attribute them a clinical significance associated with a deleterious, high/low or neutral risk. This review provides a comprehensive overview of literature studies concerning the VUSs, in order to assess their impact on the population and provide new insight useful for the appropriate patient management in clinical practice.

IOERT versus external beam electrons for boost radiotherapy in stage I/II breast cancer: 10-year results of a phase III randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons (IOERT) boost could be not inferior to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) boost in terms of local control and tissue tolerance. The aim of the study is to present the long-term follow-up results on local control, esthetic evaluation, and toxicity of a prospective study on early-stage breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving surgery with an IOERT boost of 10 Gy (experimental group) versus 5 × 2 Gy EBRT boost (standard arm). Both arms received whole-breast irradiation (WBI) with 50 Gy (2 Gy single dose). METHODS: A single-institution phase III randomized study to compare IOERT versus EBRT boost in early-stage breast cancer was conducted as a non-inferiority trial. Primary endpoints were the evaluation of in-breast true recurrences (IBTR) and out-field local recurrences (LR) as well as toxicity and cosmetic results. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and patient's grade of satisfaction with cosmetic outcomes. RESULTS: Between 1999 and 2004, 245 patients were randomized: 133 for IOERT and 112 for EBRT. The median follow-up was 12 years (range 10-16 years). The cumulative risk of IBTR at 5-10 years was 0.8% and 4.3% after IOERT, compared to 4.2% and 5.3% after EBRT boost (p = 0.709). The cumulative risk of out-field LR at 5-10 years was 4.7% and 7.9% for IOERT versus 5.2% and 10.3% for EBRT (p = 0.762). All of the IOERT arm recurrences were observed at > 100 months' follow-up, whereas the mean time to recurrence in the EBRT group was earlier (55.2 months) (p < 0.05). No late complications associated with IOERT were observed. The overall cosmetic results were scored as good or excellent in physician and patient evaluations for both IOERT and EBRT. There were significantly better scores for IOERT at all time points in physician and patient evaluations with the greatest difference at the end of EBRT (p = 0.006 objective and p = 0.0004 subjective) and most narrow difference at 12 months after the end of EBRT (p = 0.08 objective and p = 0.04 subjective analysis). CONCLUSION: A 10-Gy IOERT boost during breast-conserving surgery provides high local control rates without significant morbidity. Although not significantly superior to external beam boosts, the median time to local recurrences after IOERT is prolonged by more than 4 years.

Moderate hypofractionated helical tomotherapy for localized prostate cancer: preliminary report of an observational prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To report preliminary findings of a phase II study exploring the clinical outcomes of moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy performed with helical tomotherapy (HT) using computed tomography-magnetic resonance imaging-based planning for localized prostate cancer. METHODS: The phase II prospective study received ethics approval from our institutional ethics committee. A dose of 60 Gy/20 fractions for low-intermediate risk prostate cancer by means of HT was explored. Primary endpoints of the study were acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities. Secondary endpoints were quality of life and biochemical-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients were included in this interim report. At the time of the analysis, median follow-up was 36 months (range, 13-62). Acute GI toxicity was recorded as follows: grade 1 in 34% and grade 2 in 14%; acute GU toxicity was grade 1 in 71% and grade 2 in 11%. For the entire population of the study, no acute toxicities ⩾ grade 3 occurred. A single case of late grade 3 GU toxicity was registered, whereas no late GI toxicity ⩾grade 3 was recorded. At the time of the final assessment, no biochemical failure was detected. CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary results of the present phase II trial, using HT for moderate hypofractionation in localized prostate cancer, are optimal. In fact, HT guaranteed an acceptable tolerability profile with low rates of GU and GI side effects and, more specifically, no acute severe adverse events were recorded. Long-term findings are warranted.

The vaccinaTion & Hpv Knowledge (THinK) questionnaire: a reliability and validity study on a sample of women living in Sicily (southern-Italy).

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to introduce the VaccinaTion & Hpv Knowledge (THinK) questionnaire to assess knowledge about human papillomavirus (HPV) and attitude to HPV-vaccination. Its reliability and validity was demonstrated in a sample of women living in Sicily (southern Italy). METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on a sample of 220 women at the "Paolo Giaccone" University Hospital in Palermo (Sicily), aged 18-61. Data were analyzed through Cronbach's alpha and exploratory factor analysis, followed by a structural equation model with measurement component. The two-level data structure was explicitly considered. RESULTS: Three dimensions were found: "knowledge of HPV infection (kHPV), "Attitude to be vaccinated against HPV (aHPV)" and "Knowledge about vaccines (KV)" (97% overall explained variance). Internal consistency was good for the whole questionnaire (0.82) and the first dimension (0.88) and acceptable for the second (0.78) and the third dimension (0.73). 23% of women showed no or little knowledge of HPV and 44.3% of women had no or little knowledge about HPV induced lesions. DISCUSSION: The use of a validated questionnaire may serve as a useful measure to assess general knowledge about HPV and attitude towards vaccination against HPV in the primary prevention setting.

Transitional cell carcinoma of endometrium: a case report of rare pure form.

Transitional cell carcinoma is a very rare histological subtype of endometrial cancer, with only 18 cases described in literature. Ovary represents the most common site where it accounts for 2% of all ovarian cancers. Due to the rarity of this disease, current management is controversial and includes various approaches, mostly described in the adjuvant setting, both radiotherapy and chemotherapy alone or in combination. Here, we report a case of a 65-year-old patient who underwent adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy for an endometrial transitional cell carcinoma. The patient was treated with radical total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAH-BSO), without lymph-node sampling, and adjuvant endocavitary brachytherapy delivering 30 Gy in 5 fractions in consecutive days. Treatment tolerance was excellent, with only G1 genitourinary acute toxicity and no other adverse events reported. In this experience, the choice of brachytherapy alone resulted in excellent local control outcomes. However, the patient developed a distant recurrence after 43 months and chemotherapy was applied. More research is required to determine the most effective treatment for this rare histological subtype, and in particular, the role of chemotherapy and radiotherapy combinations.

Moderate hypofractionation and simultaneous integrated boost by helical tomotherapy in prostate cancer: monoinstitutional report of acute tolerability assessment with different toxicity scales.

INTRODUCTION: Based on radiobiology evidence, hypofractionated radiotherapy has the potential of improving treatment outcome in prostate cancer patients. In this study, we evaluated the safety, in terms of acutetoxicity, of using moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy delivered with Helical Tomotherapy (HT) to treat prostate cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between December 2012 and April 2014, 42 consecutive patients were treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy using HT. All patients received 70 Gy in 28 fractions to PTV1, which included the prostate. In the intermediate risk group, 61.6 Gy were delivered to PTV2, which included the seminal vesicles. In high risk patients, the pelvic nodes were added (PTV3) and received 50.4 Gy. Acute toxicity was recorded prospectively with RTOG and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 3.0, retrospectively with CTCAE 4.0. Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) was measured at baseline and 3 months after end of treatment, to investigate health related quality of life with regards to bladder and gastrointestinal function. RESULTS: Acute toxicity was acceptable, independently from the system used to score side effects. Moderate genitourinary toxicity was more frequent than gastrointestinal toxicity. No correlation between acute side effects and patients' characteristics or physical dose parameters was registered. EPIC evaluation showed a negligible difference in urinary and bowel function post-treatment, that did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience confirms the safety of moderate hypofractionation delivered with HT in prostate cancer patients with low, intermediate and high risk.